Troy Glaus: Atlanta Braves 2010 Player Preview
This player preview was written by Christopher Mears, who posts here as scstrato.
After having endured the 2009 debacle that was Garrett Anderson, Braves fans entered the off-season with one goal in mind. Find a big, right-handed bat for the middle of the order.
Enter, Troy Glaus. Even if, like Anderson, he's an ex-Angels player.
On January 5th, 2010, after freeing up salary in the Javier Vazquez deal, Frank Wren pulled off what could turn out to be a masterful free agent signing by inking Troy Glaus to a one year $1.75 million contract with incentives. Here are the specifics: 1 year/$1.75M (2010); $0.25M roster bonus for 100 days on active 25-man roster; performance bonuses: $0.35M each for 400, 450, 500 PAs; $0.4M for 550 PAs; $0.55M for 600 PAs.
Glaus will easily be worth his contract unless he fails to get at least 200 PA's. In other words, if he is not producing at least league average offense then he doesn't make more than the $1.75 mil guaranteed. I do not see the Braves giving him more than 300 or 400 plate appearances unless he is providing above league average offense. In this case he will be worth more than the $3.75 mil maximum value of his contract. The only way the Braves lose in this deal is if he suffers another major injury and misses more than 65% of the season. Given that Glaus and his agent were shopping his medical records as proof of health, AND the fact that he passed not one but two physicals, I tend to believe this money is WELL spent.
Let's look at it from another angle. Obviously this deal wreaks of the "re-establishing value" variety, but in this case is that a bad thing? Let's consider the "recommended" alternatives, Jason Bay and Matt Holliday. The Braves get a first basemen who is capable of producing similar offensive numbers at just under 3% of the total cost of the cheapest alternative which is Bay's 4yr $60 mil deal. Not to mention how nicely Glaus fits when you consider he is not blocking ANY of our prospects. This is the prototypical high risk/high reward signing that the Braves are known for and have played to near perfection.
Now let's take a look at the "keys to success" for Glaus and the Braves.
The first key, and the most obvious, is health. Glaus missed practically the entire season after having arthroscopic surgery on his right shoulder in January of 2009. This was the same shoulder he originally hurt while diving for a bunt by Julio Lugo in July of 2003 and would eventually have surgery on in May of 2004. The good news is all indications point to a healthy shoulder that is ready for battle and, as many others have suggested, the move to first could help by eliminating the constant throwing across the diamond he would have endured while playing third.
However, even with the shoulder woes behind him, there are still concerns that could derail his 2010 performance. Not unlike Chipper, Glaus has suffered a litany of injuries in the past. Whether it is his balky back, foot ailments or oblique strains, Bobby will need to find a way to get him regular rest which brings me to my next key: regular rest! As everyone knows, this is Bobby's last year at the helm. Given that, there will be a strong temptation to over-play some guys especially if the Braves do not get off to a hot start. He will need to do a much better job managing playing time this year especially with regards to Glaus but also with Chipper, Saito and Wagner to name just a few. I would like to see the team find a way to squeeze in some days off coupled with an off-day for our two big guns. In other words, maybe give Glaus a game off before an off day with Chipper getting a game off on the day after, or vice versa, thus giving each player 2 days rest. Obviously this can't happen every week but utilizing this strategy as much as possible could go a long way towards keeping our guys fresh and healthy come October!
The next issue to consider is how Glaus will do in making the transition from third to first. Our new found friend pacgnosis provided a fantastic study, which you can read here, that covers how other players fared when making the switch. Though it doesn't really tell us how Glaus specifically will perform, it does give us a good guideline with which to judge his performance. For me, this is a good news/bad news topic. On the one hand Glaus has never been considered a good defender, most believe he has been slightly below average at the hot corner for his career, while on the other hand he presents a very large target to throw to and he doesn't necessarily have "hands of stone". Another negative is that he has only played 6 games or 38 innings at first base for his career, but the good news is those came in 2008 and 2009 so at least the experience is recent. My simple expectation is that he focus almost exclusively on fundamentals during spring training: footwork, positioning, holding runners, etc. If he can get the fundamentals down then I would agree with the community assessment that Glaus will end up in the 0 to -4 UZR range.
So what kind of offense should we expect from him in 2010? Realistically, trying to project what Glaus will do this season is difficult at best, but my personal favorite is the CHONE projection, click the link for details. Keep in mind that the one big limitation most projection systems have is projecting rookies with limited service time and players returning from extended injuries. So I have to believe this is a "safe" 50/60 percentile type projection and I believe he has a very good chance at out-performing it. If all things fall into place, as I hope and believe they will (call it blind faith), then there isn't any reason Glaus cannot duplicate his 2006 or 2008 season totals. This would put him in the 4 to 5 WAR range though I have to admit this is probably his best case scenario. Still, I believe that no matter where his numbers end up he will have been well worth his contract!
Nice preview by Chris.
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
really?
you been smoking the Bill James’ Grass?
I’m thinking more around 400 PA, .255 Average, .320 OBS and 25 HR. I think that he’ll do better in the RBI department than most are thinking (around 75-80). This will entice us to keep him around another year. NEXT year, however, I think he could explode.
by apoxonbothyourhouses on Feb 26, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions
If you are pessimistic about his health, I get that...
But c’mon, he’ll way outpace that .320 on-base. His career on-base is over 100 points above his career batting average, and walking skills don’t deteriorate with age or injury. So if you think .255 average, you should be thinking .350 OBP, at least.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 26, 2010 11:41 AM EST up reply actions
Truthspeak.
"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."
by justincredubil02 on Feb 26, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
um
.320 OBP? I think you need to research his stats
by drumzalicious on Feb 27, 2010 2:13 AM EST up reply actions
One quick edit
This was my first real attempt at projecting WAR for a player and after a couple of tries, and considering the position switch to 1B, I feel more comfortable changing that second to last sentence to read:
This would put him in the 3 to 4 WAR range though I have to admit this is probably his best case scenario.
Sorry Gondeee, I should have made that change before I sent it to you!
"I think the Tigers really overpaided here" ... 2/21/2010 by Holty_Panthers_Fan on Johnny Damon signing for $8 Million
The biggest problem for the position switch...
will be that 3rd basemen develop a penchant for always going after every ball they can reach – often ‘poaching’ the shortstop. The reason for this is pretty clear: they’re already moving in the direction of first base and thus momentum and direction are both on their side.
But in moving across the diamond, there’s another problem all together: finding out where the ‘stop sign’ is located and having the discipline to know exactly how far to go before counting on your 2nd sacker to handle the play. That line changes with the speed of the grounder, the range and speed of all the players involved, etc. That can only be learned by repetitive training and game experience.
All that said — Glaus can’t possibly be worse than Adam Dunn, and probably will be at least as good as Ryan Howard (the latter’s recent improvements notwithstanding), since he’s already reasonably skilled at catching the grounders. It’s kinda funny about Dunn, actually — Nat fans seem to be relieved that he’s no longer in LF, but they have another problem now that he’s at 1B… their second basemen better move well to their left!
This is why Omar Infante is so important to our team
Omar can play a lot spelling Chipper and Glaus, and he needs to play a lot because these two are old, and they can use the rest to grind through a 162 game season. Last July when we went on a long losing streak I think one of the main reasons was we were missing Omar. Playing Infante will be a key to keeping our older starters healthy and staying solid through August and September.
And Hinske, or Prado, or Melky...
we’ve got a bench if everyone stays healthy (knocking on wood), if Bobby uses it. And I think he will, again if everyone is healthy. The main quarter of Ross, Infante, Hinske, and Cabrera are all productive enough to allow for Bobby to use them without much drop off from the regular lineup.
by Mr. Sanchez on Feb 26, 2010 10:07 AM EST up reply actions
Don’t hold your breath waiting for Bobby to give his regulars more rest. That hasn’t happened in his long career thus far (not even for players like Francoeur who weren’t even productive) and there’s no reason to think he’ll suddenly start doing it in his final year.
I am hoping for a change there.
You’re right about the history, of course, but Bobby also has a history of favoring the experience of career guys. IMHO, this is shaping up to be the best bench he’s ever had, and that was probably due to the design ideas of both Frank and Bobby. They’ve also seen the results of a tired Chipper, and heard his comments about that last year. So if there isn’t a change in bench use this year (I know: old dog/new tricks syndrome), I’ll be surprised, for it certainly seems to me that the Braves off-season was geared to have productive depth available. They oughta take advantage of that.
Maybe it's the Simpson in me, but I think he'll be the best signing of this season's free agents...
Healthy, and Glaus can really mash, fitting perfectly between Chipper, McCann and Esco. His power is 30-40+ HR (when he gets enough plate appearances), and has a solid obp. He really has the potential to be as productive as anyone signed, including Bay and Holliday, at a very discount price.
And I’m not as concerned about him defensively as others. I was under the impression he was a solid glove man at 3rd, enough that he has a decent amount of experience at SS (70 innings isn’t a lot, but his numbers aren’t abysmal there). Again, maybe it’s just the homer in me, but I’m not concerned about him at 1B in the slightest, especially if he’s put in a lot of time there over the off season and spring.
amen
im not worried about his defense i think he will be fine at first, im worried about whether he can be dominant with the bat again
by carolinabrave89 on Feb 28, 2010 12:48 AM EST up reply actions
Money well spent
If he doesn’t get caught in no-man’s land repeatedly or dive for too many bunts, I think Glaus is exactly the guy we needed. Freeing up Chipper and BMac and providing power himself, Glaus can influence the middle of our order in a very positive way.
Anyone know...
If Glaus’ numbers with the Angels reflect him being protected in the order? I don’t remember who hit behind him in Anaheim. If he didn’t see a ton of decent pitches, his numbers might actually go up with B-Mac hitting behind him. Pitchers are afraid of B-Mac too. It wouldn’t be too farfetched to see a .300+ season for him. Now wouldn’t that be nice!
by I Saw Buzz Beaned on Feb 26, 2010 6:19 PM EST up reply actions
glaus
Glaus and Heyward are the reasons i watch the countdown ticker to opening day. Im very excited about our these two of our uncertainties(i say that very very loosely….we all know they are studs) I think Glaus will return to form and possibly better.
If Heyward starts to mash and shows himself to be a middle of the order bat at some point this year…what will our lineup look like…will we just leave him int he 6th/7th spot or do we move McCann down, or what?
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
Slide him into the 6th spot? That is what I would do, I think. Move Yunel down to 7 (or up to 2?).
"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."
by justincredubil02 on Feb 26, 2010 11:00 AM EST up reply actions
I’m thinking he starts in the 7 spot, keeping the l,r,l,r thing going, and not 8th losing the protection of batting nefore the pitcher. Following Glaus, McCann, Escobar, Heyward will have tons of RBI chances. I think he stays there for the year. Eventually he should be our 3 or 4 spot hitter, but who knows when. Chipper usually does the right thing for the team, if it’s time, maybe he gives up the 3 spot next year. And with Bobby gone, maybe the new Manager just makes the change.
I think by the end of the year our lineup could look something like…
McLouth
Escobar
Chipper
Glaus
McCann
Heyward
Diaz
Prado
by eaheckman10 on Feb 26, 2010 11:03 AM EST up reply actions
I like this…
McLouth
Prado
Chipper
Glaus
McCann
Escobar
Heyward
Diaz
Diaz has a decent OBP late in the order a should set up some decent sacrafice situations so pitchers aren’t automatic unproductive outs
HansonManCrush
by HansonManCrush on Feb 26, 2010 11:21 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I like that, but I'd tweak one thing
Flip-flop Prado and McLouth at the top. McLouth never really seems comfortable in the #1 spot, plus he’s got more power and a lower OBP than Prado. We could also try Diaz in the #2 spot against LHPs and move McLouth down to 6 or 7 on those days.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 26, 2010 11:32 AM EST up reply actions
I hate sacrifices.
"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."
by justincredubil02 on Feb 26, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions
Unless it's from Javy Vazquez...
he was pretty good at them. On that note, I differentiate sacrifices from position players and those from pitchers such as the worst hitting player in baseball, Tommy Hanson.
by Mr. Sanchez on Feb 26, 2010 12:04 PM EST up reply actions
hahaha. I’ll give you Hanson…most other pitchers have a near 20% success rate swinging the bat though. A 20% chance of not making an out is better than a 0% chance (or .0000001% if you want to factor in fielding errors) of not making an out.
"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."
by justincredubil02 on Feb 26, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions
And how do you balance that "chance of making an out"...
with the “chance of advancing the runner into more likely position to score”? Where is that statistics report the poster did on bunting? That was a great piece, although I still will understand bunting with pitchers who aren’t Micah Owings, Carlos Zambrano, Mike Hampton, Greg Maddux, etc, meaning better than the normal ‘lucky if they can get the ball out of the IF’ type of pitcher at the plate.
by Mr. Sanchez on Feb 26, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
It’s good baseball. And yes, I’ve seen the stats, still, it’s good baseball.
I wrote a novel, it's about baseball, you should buy it: https://www.createspace.com/3407939
www.dropoutproductions.com
Embrace the change, my friend.
"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."
by justincredubil02 on Feb 26, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions
It’s not change if it’s only happening on websites and in books about stats. The real baseball folks still bunt when you’re supposed to bunt.
I wrote a novel, it's about baseball, you should buy it: https://www.createspace.com/3407939
www.dropoutproductions.com
Stats guys
Still think pitchers bunting is a decent strategy. It’s actual hitters bunting that makes them scratch heads.
Kind of like Boog telling Chipper ...
he gets more first pitch balls than anyone else on the roster. Numbers be damned man.
by Mr. Sanchez on Feb 26, 2010 12:26 PM EST up reply actions
our lineup is a gauntlet any way you look at it
It feels like a while since we have done the lineup thing on this site, at least long enough for it to feel fresh, and it feels good…
serriously, I think every player in this lineup is awesome..there is no relief for the opposing pitcher..and I love the idea of Diaz’s high OBP ahead of the pitcher.
Also, I am a fan of prado batting second and escobar 6th as long as escobar hits well with RISP and until Prado starts showing the power we hear he has. I also like Prado’s doubles and contact hitting batting second—especially behind Mclouth who can steal second and score on a single, or score from first on a double. Either way we are looking at a lot of guys in scoring position for the middle of the lineup and Chipper, Glaus, McCann, Escobar, Heyward sound’s terrifying (yea I just took the middle of the lineup all the way to Heyward), and Diaz offers no relief! esp. against lefties…
Thanks for the shout out (did I just use the phrase "shout out"? ugh.)
Nice preview. I agree that the Glaus should be a great signing. If he’s healthy enough for 500 or so ABs, he’ll hit 30 HRs with a .260/.350/.500 line or thereabouts. Which is darn nice for less than $4M. As for his defense, anything from a 6 to a +6 UZR wouldn’t surprise me at all, but I’m guessing it’ll be perfectly average-right at 0.
I would guess 3-4 WAR total, but he’d be worth his contract if he only puts up half that. Great signing.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 26, 2010 11:37 AM EST reply actions
Man, what the heck?
That’s supposed to be a -6 and no strike-through. Stupid auto-format
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 26, 2010 11:39 AM EST up reply actions
I hate to say it...
but all the pics that I see of Glaus so far look like a guy who USED to be on HgH and isn’t any longer.
He just looks nothing like the guy who suited up for the Angels.
That scares me.
He might not be using PEDs anymore, but he’s still 6’6" with a big frame. He’ll still hit a lot of homers if his shoulder is as healthy as we think it is.
Everything I’ve found lists him at 6’5". Still, he does have that big frame. As for the PED usage, if he was on it, I’d be willing to bet it was 2000-2001. His power numbers those two years are far above those of any other years in his career. Or, he might’ve just had a couple good years. Who knows?
by EricGreggWasPaidOff on Feb 26, 2010 9:52 PM EST up reply actions
This is a bit old (2002-2004), and admittedly comes from a small sample size (five series), but Troy Glaus has put up monster post season numbers in his career, including a 1.214 OPS.
I just thought I’d throw that out there as something to hope for if the Braves end up back in the playoffs this year.
by EricGreggWasPaidOff on Feb 26, 2010 9:44 PM EST reply actions
We need 450 of the usual ABs from Glaus...
I’ll take 22 to 25 HRs there….with a .260 avg…..and .350 OBP….. RBIs 75 to 90….
And then I’ll call it the steal of the off-season and wave bye bye and welcome one young Frederick Freeman…
I trust there will be several moments of hair pulling on the defensive side, but we’ll only have to endure this for one year.
Bitch of it is, he could probably play some 3rd again after a bit and what if we need him for Chipper later or into next year? Then his raise in the off-season will off-set some of the saves under the cap we have lined up.
When Chip falls off the cap, we will need that money for Esco and Jair’s raises…can’t extend Glaus if it dips into that.
Here's a little rosterbation....
Something I like…
Prado
Esco
Chip
Glaus
Heyward
McCann (flip him with Heyward when it’s a righty)
Diaz
McLouth (to turn it over) and have speed on 2nd after the P bunt…
What do you guys think?
The thing I love about the way I have this lineup...
Is that the true base cloggers (Chip and Glaus) come in front of two great gap hitters who both have great concepts of the strike zone.
This gives us speed at the top and bottom…and if we are lucky to lead off an inning with McLouth that gives 3 decent speedy guys before the power.
I'd like to see Diaz get some playing time at 1st base
I think he’d be a good sub for Glaus when he needs a rest.

by 




















