Braves 2010 Season in Review: Omar Infante
Coincidentally enough, the Omar Infante review was set to post today, which happens to be the first day he is not an Atlanta Brave since December 4, 2007 when he and Will Ohman were traded for right-handed reliever Jose Ascanio. In his final season with the Braves he put together the best season of his career. He was controversially selected to the All-Star game as the league's top utility man and almost won himself a batting title. Infante started at every position aside from first base, catcher, pitcher, and center field, providing the team with much needed flexibility as they battled through injuries in the outfield and infield all season.
Due to the trade, the SBN stats widget is not working for Infante, but I'll post his stats here. He batted .321 with a .359 OBP, 8 home runs, 7 steals, 15 doubles, and 3 triples in 506 plate appearances.
Infante really got going after his selection to the All-Star team. On July 5 the All-Star teams were announced, and after that date Infante hit .331/.373/.444 with seven of his eight home runs. Of course, he got significantly more playing time after that date due to the injuries to Martin Prado and Chipper Jones. Infante was far from a wizard defensively, but playing adequate defense at a number of positions made him one of the most important defenders on the Braves roster.
The biggest slight against Infante last season was his inability to draw a walk. His walk percentage of 5.7% was lower than both Jeff Francoeur's and Juan Pierre's, two players known around the world as free swingers. Most of Infante's success was tied into his BABIP, which sat at .355, which is .042 points higher than his career BABIP of .313. This says that he is likely to suffer a drop down in numbers next season, which is why it is hard to understand why the Marlins valued him so much.
Infante played so well that he became a centerpiece of a deal for one of the top power hitting second basemen in baseball. He put together a career year and Frank Wren sold him at his peak value. While an extremely useful player on a team with playoff aspirations, Infante was expendable. One can only wonder how high Infante's value would have been, and if he could have netted an even better return, if he actually did win the batting title. It will be sad to see Infante playing against the Braves with the Marlins, but I imagine it will be even sadder for Marlins fans to watch Dan Uggla torture them as he tortured the Braves over the past five seasons.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I do miss Omar. He will certainly be missed. You could plug him in at any time and he was always ready. You have to love a guy like that on your team.
On the other side of that, it’s certainly nice to have a legit 4th hitter in the lineup.
I don’t get this. Please, don’t get me wrong. I love having Omar on the team. He was an asset due to his versatility and ability to put the ball in play.
However, saying something like “You could plug him in at any time and he was always ready. You have to love a guy like that on your team” is just ridiculous to me. The guy was a career sub. Of course he was going to be ready to go when Bobby told him he was in. This is nothing unique to Omar or something rare in MLB. All MLB bench warmers would love to play whenever and wherever the coach told them to.
This is like everyone saying the Prado is good because he tries so much harder than any other player. Really? No. Let’s just be honest with ourselves and call it like it is.
This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Nov 17, 2010 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
to be fair… most MLB “bench warmers” aren’t going to challenge for a battle title when given extended duty. I’m not crying over Omar leaving, but he was a bit better than your run-of-the-mill bench guy.
He was the best of them, no doubt. But at the end of the day, he was and is just a backup who had to depend on guys better than him getting hurt or needing a day off to get any regular playing time outside of a routine pinch-hit appearance.
This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Nov 17, 2010 1:02 PM EST up reply actions
He had the Mark DeRosa Effect. Could be plugged into second or any corner position without showing an iron glove, and provided better-than-replacement-level production. There are very few true super utility guys in that mold, and the ones that can do it are undervalued. Losing Omar is certainly not going to cripple this team, but unless Matt Young can show up next year and do the same thing, I think we’ll be sorely missing him come June or July.
ATTENTION CITIZENS: DAN UGGLA IS NOT A THIRD BASEMAN. That is all.
But not everyday.
Look at what he did from September on. He wore down something awful when he had to start on a regular basis.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Nov 18, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think anyone is thinking that Omar is a huge loss. I was giving the man some props. He did extremely well in his time here. My gawd, is that wrong?
He didn’t do extremely well. He did well, but not extremely. Now, if you look at the context, I guess he did extremely well – performed adequately enough for a guy off the bench, but let’s not kid ourselves into thinking he actually deserved an All Star spot, or that he would be a starter on this team when everyone was healthy.
This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Nov 18, 2010 1:53 AM EST up reply actions
Exactly my point.
Would you rather have Lockhart out there? Or any number of other benchers that never seem to do much. At least Omar performed well enough to the point where we could trade him for Uggla.
No, I would not rather have Lockhart out there. I would prefer Omar, because Omar is a better bench player…but he is still a bench player.
This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Nov 18, 2010 1:54 AM EST up reply actions
Long live...
IMHOTEP!
"That guy mvhsbball is really an insufferable schmuck." - FuquaManuel
by Scott Coleman on Nov 17, 2010 12:18 PM EST via mobile reply actions
The Venezuelan Connection
The VC took a hard hit yesterday, Omar was mighty helpful to the Braves. Auto-Single will be missed. Maybe Wren will bring him back someday, I’ve got a feeling he’d be welcome.
Free Matt Young!
Deciphering this trade
First, let me say that Infante remains an undervalued player despite his all star appearance, and I will miss him.
Secondly, I commend Frank Wren for moving quickly and decisively to fill an obvious need in the Braves’ batting order.
Finally, the initial reaction from most Braves fans seems to be that Wren “stole” Dan Uggla from the Marlins. Let me explain the obvious elements behind this “larceny”. (1) Uggla is under contractual control only for the 2011 season, and has already said no to a 4 year, $48 million contract extension proposal by the Marlins. (2) Net, the Marlins dumped $4 million of 2011 salary in the trade. (3) Uggla is on the wrong side of 30. (4) Uggla is basically a one-position player and a below-average defensive player.
Don’t misunderstand what I am saying here. Uggla fits the Braves’ current offensive needs better than Infante, and I view Dunn as a marginal loss. This trade has the potential to solve a key problem and work out nicely for the Braves. But unless Wren can sign Uggla to a reasonable contract extension, then I for one doubt this will go down in history as a turning point for the franchise.
In the end, Wren is exactly right when he says that the club must hold onto its top minor league prospects and continue to retool their major league roster from within the organization. I would just add that Freddie Freeman appears to be the last projectable major league-quality offensive prospect on the horizon for the next couple of seasons.
by Messenger on Nov 17, 2010 12:57 PM EST via mobile reply actions
This trade doesn’t need to be a turning point in the franchise. It just has to get us through 2011.
Infante is also under contractual control for only the 2011 season. Uggla’s “wrong side of 30” is still in a peak year.
This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Nov 17, 2010 1:01 PM EST up reply actions
Lawn Gnome also broke into the league at an older age, so it’s not like he’s been on the grind of a 162-game season for all that long.
"That guy mvhsbball is really an insufferable schmuck." - FuquaManuel
by Scott Coleman on Nov 17, 2010 1:30 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
To a certain extent, I agree
Your point is well-taken, but here’s the problem with it.
The same points have been made before. The Braves have a dreadful history of attempting one-year solutions to fix holes in their lineup.
Now, it’s certainly true that no major prospects were coughed up in this particular trade, and that Infante will also be a FA after 2011. But that isn’t what I am talking about. This discussion needs to be about solutions that create productive continuity in the organization. That’s why re-signing Uggla is the key to this trade.
And, fortunately, Uggla is already signaling that he will be more receptive to a contract extension in Atlanta than he was to the Fish.
Bottom line, no medium-budget organization in the major leagues succeeds with a revolving door methodology. The Yankees or the Red Sox can get away with that approach, but the Braves can’t. We have heard arguments to the contrary for years, but the track record speaks for itself. The Braves need consequential complimentary players who will stick around while Heyward and Freeman mature.
I’m 57 years old, and I want to see the Braves win another WC. To do that, they will need to continue developing their lineup over a period or several years, while young pitchers like Hanson, Jurrjens, Minor, Teheran, Venters, and Kimbrel are maturing into major league impact players. Obviously, having Uggla in Atlanta for one year would only help if the Braves get to the WS in 2011. But having Uggla in Atlanta for 4 years would carry the lineup through Chipper’s retirement and the development of Heyward and Freeman into stars. I’m very glad to hear Uggla apparently wants an extension in Atlanta.
So, based on that logic, the Braves should never sign/trade for 1 year players?
This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Nov 18, 2010 1:54 AM EST up reply actions
And you don't believe the potential first-round picks we would gain in losing Uggla would provide complimentary players?
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Nov 18, 2010 12:20 PM EST up reply actions
Undervalued by whom?
He was a main piece to getting us a 30-HR All-Star. And a legitimate All-Star at that.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Nov 18, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions
Couple Points
Uggla was silly to forego the 4yr/$48MM extension…at his age.
Florida wanted to parlay some of the savings into the C from Toronto, John Buck. They are obviously still interested in turning a profit from all their revenue sharing proceeds.
I don’t think we are planning on keeping him past 2011 if he wants $12MM or more for multiple years. We’d just wind up substituting his salary for Chips. Not the worst thing in the world, but still a little older than I’d like to skew with those kind of $$.
I am stoked for what the guy can bring us this year, and we got rid of some redundancy in LHers in our pen…we already have Vents and O’Flat….this cost us nothing in the short term, and Wren should be applauded for getting out in front of everyone.
I would like to keep Prads at 2nd though. He is better at 2nd, and also filling in for Chipper will be an easier transition from 2nd than from a LF mentality. Better to stick Uggla in LF and get him used to it, his legs will keep him from playing 2nd for many more years anyhow.
Now let’s go get Upton.
Pretty much this.
I can’t for the life of me fathom why we’re moving Prado to play Betty at second. Betty’s going to lay an egg no matter where you play him, so stick him in left field. That’s typically an easier defensive egg to absorb than one at second.
I disagree with extending him also. He has the old-school Mo Vaughn/Mark McGwire/etc. type skill set. Those guys tend to hit a wall at 33 or 34 and their decline to the bottom is much more rapid than that of guys who are better all-around hitters. When the bat speed goes, the power goes, and when pitchers start figuring out the power has gone, they stop working around the guy and his walks plummet also. He’s a great piece for this year, and maybe another couple or three, but I don’t want us to be the guys on the hook for a forth or fifth year where he’s a pale shadow of his former self sucking up a big piece of the payroll. Let a big-market club bet against the market and take a chance on him outlasting the conventional wisdom; with Liberty being payroll Nazis we don’t have the funds to take that chance.
ATTENTION CITIZENS: DAN UGGLA IS NOT A THIRD BASEMAN. That is all.
If he hits a wall at 34, that means we get 3 years of 30+ HR production…sign me up!
This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Nov 18, 2010 1:55 AM EST up reply actions
If he’ll take a 3-year deal, count me on board, but I don’t want to see him get the 5 years he’s seeking. The back half of that contract is far too risky for our payroll.
ATTENTION CITIZENS: DAN UGGLA IS NOT A THIRD BASEMAN. That is all.
So, 3 years of league-leading production and 2 years of league average production.
Again, sign me up.
This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Nov 18, 2010 2:24 AM EST up reply actions
it wouldn’t be two years of league average production. It would likely be a half-season at league average, a half-season below average, then a god-awful season that would see rumors of a release surface in June and July. He just profiles as the type that is overly reliant on power and little else, and when those guys decline, it happens very quickly.
ATTENTION CITIZENS: DAN UGGLA IS NOT A THIRD BASEMAN. That is all.
He does have a good OBP to go along with his power. He is more than just a bombz hitter.
This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Nov 18, 2010 3:25 AM EST up reply actions
Allow me to revisit my original thesis- his OBP is aided by his power; pitchers work around him trying to avoid the long bomb. When the power goes, everything rapidly snowballs. Not only do he suffer the loss of raw power, but as pitchers figure that out they stop working around him and it becomes difficult to maintain a decent OBP anymore either. It’s referred to by some as the “Mo Vaughn Effect.” It even happened to McGwire, but he was able to delay it a couple years by being on the juice. Lance Berkman is showing some moderate signs of a similar decline in spite of being a more well-rounded hitter than those types.
We’re living in the post-steroid age now. Guys being on their way out at 34-35 is going to be the norm again, and sluggers in particular you have to be wary of past 34. They’re liable to drop off a cliff.
ATTENTION CITIZENS: DAN UGGLA IS NOT A THIRD BASEMAN. That is all.
KJ isn’t close to 34 or 35.
Based on your most recent posts, is it safe to say that you don’t like power hitters because one day their power will be gone?
You are hating on Uggla, because in 3 or 4 years, he won’t have any power, therefore he loses all of his offensive value, and now you are saying the same thing about KJ.
This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Nov 18, 2010 3:58 AM EST up reply actions
I’m not hating on Uggla and I don’t have anything against power hitters. I have something against signing power hitters for contracts that are too long so that we have to watch their power decline while they eat up top dollar and prevent us from fielding the best team. I’ve said in mutliple places Uggla is a good piece for this year and I wouldn’t be against a three year extension. It’s when you start asking him to stick around even longer that I get antsy.
Kindly point out for me where I hated on KJ? Go ahead, I’ll make a sandwich and come back. Take a look. For the record, I was one of the guys that stood behind you and said we never should have let KJ go, so I honestly have no idea where this attack is coming from; I never mentioned KJ, and wouldn’t, because he’s not the sort of slugger to which I was referring.
ATTENTION CITIZENS: DAN UGGLA IS NOT A THIRD BASEMAN. That is all.
Also, how do we know the reverse isn’t true? How do we know that due to his patience, he is able sit and turn on a pitch he likes? It isn’t like he’s got 30-40 HR potential here. He’s a low-to-mid 20s HR hitter. Pitchers don’t necessarily pitch around guys like that.
This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Nov 18, 2010 4:21 AM EST up reply actions
Why is it the "Mo Vaughn Effect?"
Since Mo Vaughn’s career BB% was 11.3%, and in his lowest ISO years, his BB% was..
1999 – 9.1%
2000 – 11.1%
2001 – 10.6%
2002 – 14.6% (only 96 PAs)
Not really sure how you can say the same happened to McGwire, either. In his last season he posted an insane .300+ ISO. Unless you’re trying to say that his 15.4% BB% in that year (in only about 300 PAs) is some indication that pitchers didn’t “fear him” as much (despite “fearing him” about twice as much as an average hitter).
Most of BB% isn’t about being pitched around. If it were, Chipper Jones wouldn’t have posted 16%+ BB%s the last two seasons. Most of BB% is about recognizing pitches as in and out of the zone, and having the discipline and/or following a strategy to lay off of them.

by 

























