Talking Chop: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Once A Metro covering Red Bull New York!

Braves/Angels Rumor About Javier Vazquez

I saw this rumor earlier this evening and thought very little of it, but then ESPN.com decided to repeat it and source it:

According to a reliable source, the Angels are talking to the Braves about Javier Vazquez. The Braves however want to deal Derek Lowe, obviously. The names of the players in a potential deal are not known, but it is no secret the Braves are looking for a power hitting left fielder and are said to be interested in Juan Rivera.

The ESPN rumor central piece adds this:

The Angels have actually been focused on Javier Vazquez, according to executives of two clubs that have spoken with them.

Maybe ESPN is reporting anything and everything, but they seem to have multiple sources. Kudos to AngelsWin.com, a blog, for getting this story first.

Compliments aside, both sites mention the big hang-up with Vazquez being his no-trade clause to West coast teams. I don't think a player would negotiate that level of specificity into a contract and then ignore it when it comes trade time. Vazquez has been traded enough to be picky, and he won't waive his no-trade just to because Bill Stoneman and Vazquez "keep in touch," as the AngelsWin post mentions. That's a lot of wishful thinking on their part.

Furthermore, Vazquez and his agent should know that going into a contract year there is more value in remaining in the National League where Javy had a career year last year. They should also have some idea that the Braves want to re-sign Vazquez. Atlanta's a good and stable situation for Javy, and I don't see him waiving his no-trade to leave, that's the only leverage he has.

This rumor is likely a result of the Angels asking for Vazquez instead of Lowe, but that doesn't mean the Braves are going to bite. Frank Wren's luck is not on the side of negotiating a trade and not having the player veto it. The Angels may very well have interest in Javy, but I don't think that will end up being his ultimate destination.

0 recs  |  Comment 112 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Talking Chop

John Smoltz Finds A Job

Mar 2010 by gondeee - 25 comments

Braves Quote For The Day

Mar 2010 by gondeee - 3 comments

The View From Your Seat

Mar 2010 by gondeee - 9 comments

Braves Quote For The Day

Mar 2010 by gondeee - 15 comments

Braves Set Starting Rotation

Feb 2010 by gondeee - 82 comments

Comments

Display:

Don't trade Javier Vazquez.

That is all I ask.

In Frank Wren I trust.

by mvhsbball on Dec 17, 2009 10:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Would you rather have an impact bat + Lowe or bargain bat + Javy?

Since a bat could play every day and even without Javy we have a great rotation… I think I’d… trade…. Javy…. and hate myself in the morning.

by Kelly's Big Johnson on Dec 17, 2009 11:34 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

depends who the bargain bat is

Mark DeRosa? Oh, I’d take him and Javy in a heartbeat.

Marlon Byrd? I’d rather have the “impact bat” and DLowe.

In Frank Wren I trust.

by mvhsbball on Dec 17, 2009 11:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It is the Marlon Byrd scrap heap pickup that I fear.

I seriously think we could turn Vazquez for a really good impact bat for 1st or LF.

Not gonna happen with Lowe, and if we have to eat 2-4 mil of his contract a year… Scrap heap time…

by Kelly's Big Johnson on Dec 17, 2009 11:44 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

same here on Byrd. I’d much rather have Nady if we’re gonna get a decent FA.

In Frank Wren I trust.

by mvhsbball on Dec 17, 2009 11:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Cubs are after him too. I’m really hoping they sign him quick before we have a chance to deal Lowe and give him serious thought. Uck.

by J-Freak on Dec 18, 2009 12:15 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently not.
The Cubs are “not leaning toward” any specific candidate to be their new center fielder at this time, reports Jon Paul Morosi and Ken Rosenthal of FOXSports.com.

Overheard in press box, from local reporter: 'If this Moore kid was any good, they'd be up 31-0 right now.'
--Darin Gantt, on CAR@NE

by MichaelProcton on Dec 20, 2009 2:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If it is Vaz for Rivera, count me out.

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 18, 2009 1:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

oh, and Gondeee

it should be Angels, not Angles.

Angles are those things I wish I could understand in geometry

In Frank Wren I trust.

by mvhsbball on Dec 17, 2009 10:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Wow

Just… wow. Sometimes. I’ve corrected.

by gondeee on Dec 18, 2009 8:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gondeee, one more thing

I believe you may mean “compLIMent,” not “compLEMent.” The former is an expression of praise, the latter is something that makes another perfect or whole. Just looking out for you =)

Tigers love pepper; they hate cinnamon.

by Jareth Cutestory on Dec 18, 2009 8:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

I’ve got to slow down. I’ve been making too many avoidable grammatical mistakes lately. I’ve just been too busy.

by gondeee on Dec 18, 2009 8:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, there is also “Vazuez” but I wasn’t going to say anything about it….

lol.

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 18, 2009 8:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

-1

"SIGN PUJOLS OR FIRE WREN" ~ Swo12bv

by Smoltz's Beard on Dec 18, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

gibe thee gui a braek...

Speling miztakes…no big deal

by Trek on Dec 20, 2009 1:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I know what you mean!

Trying to pull these 8th graders from the brink of failure when they couldn’t seem to care less has been a chore and half. Pray for the future! These ruffians will be on the loose soon!

Tigers love pepper; they hate cinnamon.

by Jareth Cutestory on Dec 18, 2009 9:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not for Rivera! I’d ask for Morales and Reckling. Braves may have to include a mid prospect. This would still allow the Braves to make a big offer for RH LF.

by waysouth on Dec 17, 2009 11:06 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

1 year of Javy — Who’s not going to LAA anyways — for Morales?

Why are so many people convinced the Angels would trade Morales? He’s not going anywhere unless its for a young, cheap, impact starter.

In Frank Wren I trust.

by mvhsbball on Dec 17, 2009 11:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Would you do JJ for Morales?

by Kelly's Big Johnson on Dec 17, 2009 11:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm…I’d want another B-level prospect or two, but probably. Only concern about Morales is that he’s only done it for one season. There’s no reason to believe he won’t be as good — if not better — in 2010 and beyond.

In Frank Wren I trust.

by mvhsbball on Dec 17, 2009 11:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Finished in the top five in MVP voting in his first full year, with switch-hitting .300 AVG 30+ HR power. Even at risk of mild regression, I’d put my money on that in a heartbeat.

by J-Freak on Dec 18, 2009 12:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i think it’d have to be vazquez and freeman for morales…i’d do that in a heartbeat and the angels may consider that IMO

"Im a fullonrapist, I do men, women, autistic kids, children, the elderly." -Charlie Kelly

by Hcgadawgs on Dec 18, 2009 12:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think they’d consider it because Vazquez would likely be gone by the time Freeman was ready. They want to have the pitching and their hitting cornerstone. Morales is a beast in the majors now, we are just hoping that Freeman can reach the upside of being major league ready in a couple years, let alone being all star caliber by that time. So, needless to say, I agree with the Angels fan who says they wouldn’t trade us Morales for all of those guys.

by Sir Stealth on Dec 18, 2009 12:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

IF we trade Vazquez and pick up Rivera for him that’s one of the worst trades i’ve ever seen

The Spanish Kid

by Kobe:The Legend on Dec 17, 2009 11:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This

Rivera=Nady

by bbxxj on Dec 17, 2009 11:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

...except not as good, and less hurt.

Overheard in press box, from local reporter: 'If this Moore kid was any good, they'd be up 31-0 right now.'
--Darin Gantt, on CAR@NE

by MichaelProcton on Dec 20, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well done. gondee...

…we have disagreed on many things, most notably Cameron, but this is a load of horse crap. Vazquez has the no-trade to the west in his contract because he wants to be closer to his family. His family hasn’t moved and he likes being in Atlanta. Since he won’t waive the no-trade clause, this is completely moot. I am sure the Angels or even the Angles want him, but it won’t happen. Vazquez can prevent it and he will prevent it unless Puerto Rico moves closer to Los Angeles, which I am pretty sure it won’t.

by cavebird on Dec 17, 2009 11:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Of course the Angels are interested in Javier Vazquez

Just like the Braves are interested in acquiring Prince Fielder, but that’s not happening either.

I can’t fathom a package that would make me happy about sending them Vazquez. I know it’s a one-year rental, but the Angels don’t have anyone close to a 6 WAR player. Maybe if some deal included Brandon Wood-but they wouldn’t send him for a one year rental, so this deal doesn’t even launch.

by Bronn on Dec 17, 2009 11:11 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Just curious...

would you play Wood at first? He’s done it professionally before.

Overheard in press box, from local reporter: 'If this Moore kid was any good, they'd be up 31-0 right now.'
--Darin Gantt, on CAR@NE

by MichaelProcton on Dec 20, 2009 2:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OK. My friend is bugging. He's saying that LAA wud turn this down

Javy
Lowe
Freeman

FOR

Morales

MATT DIAZ IS THE F**K*NG MAN.
They made me change my signature...

by nick9314 on Dec 17, 2009 11:22 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Well

From the Angel’s perspective, I can actually see them refusing this.

Sure, next year they’d have a good rotation anchored by Vazquez, Lowe and Weaver (Kazmir is pretty good too), but how would they score runs? Morales is the only decent hitter in that line-up. Without him, their offense is anchored by Torii Hunter and Bobby Abreu. After that, they’d probably lose JV on the open market.

Now, Freeman might end up being almost as good as Morales, but that’s at least a couple of seasons away. In the meantime, they’re stuck with a team that has a tough time competing, and is sidled with the Lowe contract. I’m just not seeing them remaining competitive unless they can find another stick. Their defense has already taken a shot without Chone Figgins.

I don’t think they can afford to be non-competitive in the AL West. Someone would get fired.

by Bronn on Dec 18, 2009 12:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Angels would definitely turn that down. What good us supplementing their pitching now if they’re giving up their hitting cornerstone? We are just hoping that Freeman can approach Morales a couple years down the line.

by Sir Stealth on Dec 18, 2009 12:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have seen some on the Halo’s side rationalize saying that a contract extention would help lure Vaz away. I think staying longer in an an area of the country he OBVIOUSLY doesn’t want to be would a negative and not a positive.

Vazquez may be traded (though I hope not and I don’t think he will) he won’t be traded to the A’s.

by bbxxj on Dec 17, 2009 11:29 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I mean Angels.

by bbxxj on Dec 17, 2009 11:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The ONLY possible way he'd agree to waive the no-trade...

would be a big money extension prior to the deal.

If Vasquez, what do we ask for? Wood? Wood and a IF prospect?

by Mr. Sanchez on Dec 18, 2009 12:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

An extension to a team on the west coast where he doesn’t want to go anyway… think again.

by gondeee on Dec 18, 2009 8:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

For enough money,...

he’d possibly go. Just saying gondee, he can’t even be dealt without waiving his no trade, and the chance may go from none to slim with the chance of an extension.

by Mr. Sanchez on Dec 18, 2009 9:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

or he could just stay in ATL where he is very comfortable and IF he has a very good season like he did this season he can name his price and play where he WANTS to play.

braves#1

by rockybull on Dec 18, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Facts

If I am the Angels I would tell FW it was Vazquez or nothing.

I think having to move a piece in this instance works much more against us than for us.

I hope he has more than one team to leverage these guys against… Otherwise we are screwed.

by Kelly's Big Johnson on Dec 17, 2009 11:29 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Well then they get nothing becasue Vaz aint waivin his NTC. Of all the West teams I could maybe see Texas because it is far enough East and South but not LA. No way. Anyways, why the hell would Vaz agree to go back to the AL in a contract year, like Gondeee said?

by bbxxj on Dec 17, 2009 11:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sign and trade. If I’m the Angels I’d rather pay Javy 15 mil than Lowe.

A big raise and a 4-5 year contract extension might change his mind. Just sayin’.

I know he wants to stay local, but it might be enough to persuade him to waive it.

by Kelly's Big Johnson on Dec 17, 2009 11:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree that he would waive his NTC anyway, but who do you think we could get in return for Vazquez that would actually be fair value? Sure, who wouldn’t prefer to have Vazquez for the same salary at this point, but that doesn’t mean we should offer them a bad deal for us just to get rid of an extra pitcher. Vazquez’s contract is a good one and does not need to be unloaded like Lowe’s. If they really do agree with you in wanting no part of Lowe, then we need to just walk away unless they give us something substantial.

by Sir Stealth on Dec 17, 2009 11:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We could get something very substantial
for Javy right now. Much more than we gave for him, I think.

I wouldn’t be surprised at Rivera and a couple of really good prospects, but I think we could match up better with a different team…

by Kelly's Big Johnson on Dec 18, 2009 12:01 AM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

We can only get anything for Vazquez...

…if we trade him to a non-AL or NL West team. If we try to trade him out west, he vetos the trade and nothing happens. This is definitely a case of rumors just because everything is slow right now.

by cavebird on Dec 18, 2009 8:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed ESPN is a joke

ESPN is so behind every rumor they put on-line and on their many TV networks. Vasquez is not going to the Angels b/c he doesn’t want to be on the West Coast and I would be shocked if he waved his no trade clause to go to the angels really shocked.
 
Just trade Lowe to the Angels and get some prospects from the deep farm system and acquire a 1B/Spot OF and be done with it.

Lowe for Swisher str8 up would be okay but I just don’t like the idea of making the Yankees stronger and still not that crazy about Swisher but we did inquire about him last offseason I believe trying to get him from the Whitesox and of course Nady wants to be a Brave and has let us know that through his agent, friends etc… Nady I would sign but Swisher is a better opition.

Lowe needs to go NOT VASQUEZ .

Come on Frank Wren lets get rid of Lowe already.

by Holty_Panthers_Fan on Dec 17, 2009 11:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Please use periods.

by Kelly's Big Johnson on Dec 17, 2009 11:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

ahem...

i do many things during the day i walked my dog down to the store because my dog likes to walk to the store but then we had to leave cause my puppydog was humping an old guys leg and took a shit on his lawn so then we walked to the park and played ball with a tennis ball since my favorite color is yellow and then we walked to the ice cream truck and got a popsicle because theyre good and colorful but then i spilled on my shirt and had to go home to wash my shirt cause i dont want it to stain and my mom will be mad at me and when my mom is mad at me she gets the paddle out and teaches me how to be a good boy because she doesnt like messes!!!

In Frank Wren I trust.

by mvhsbball on Dec 17, 2009 11:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You think he’ll ever get it?

by Kelly's Big Johnson on Dec 17, 2009 11:53 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

hope so

I know it’s not an English class on here, but it’s nice to be able to read what people write without having to re-read sentences multiple times.

In Frank Wren I trust.

by mvhsbball on Dec 17, 2009 11:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Save yourself some trouble...

I always check to see who wrote something long before I even start to read it, and when I see his name it’s a no-go.

"It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall alone." A. Bartlett Giamatti

by sddbaker on Dec 18, 2009 10:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

why would you need periods...

When you can just use lots of exclamation points !! !!!! ! ! !!

Overheard in press box, from local reporter: 'If this Moore kid was any good, they'd be up 31-0 right now.'
--Darin Gantt, on CAR@NE

by MichaelProcton on Dec 20, 2009 2:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, let's not make the Yankees stronger.

That’s definitely mission #1 for the Atlanta Braves organization.

Overheard in press box, from local reporter: 'If this Moore kid was any good, they'd be up 31-0 right now.'
--Darin Gantt, on CAR@NE

by MichaelProcton on Dec 20, 2009 2:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t think this is anything to get to worked up over – obviously the Angels would prefer Vazquez, but it’s sort of a nonstarter with the NTC anyway. I don’t think that we could really get fair value for Javy anyway, considering he was one of the top pitchers in the game last year, so I’m glad that the NTC to the west coast exists.

This strikes me as being part of the the bigger haggling over Lowe, who in my opinion is not really getting his due for the quality pitcher that he has been and is hardly a “worthless mule.” He may be in decline, but he did not stink up the joint overall last season by any means.

Despite this, I’m becoming less optimistic that we’ll be able to get anything for Lowe besides unloading his salary. I hope that Wren holds firm, especially if he’s not serious about using all that extra cash to go out and sign or trade for a serious cleanup hitter. If we’re going to go bargain basement anyway, then we might as well plan to roll with all 6 guys, move KK to the pen until someone gets hurt, and wait for someone to get desperate. It’s not a good contract, but we still shouldn’t just get rid of Lowe for no reason if we’re not going to use the money for something else useful.

by Sir Stealth on Dec 17, 2009 11:43 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I totally agree with you. I’d hold onto Lowe unless we can get a legitimate cleanup hitter like a Bay or Holliday or someone of that nature via trade. If we are just dumping him just to be able to pickup a few bargain basement types that have been mentioned here (Nady, Derosa, Dye, Glaus, etc) then we are gonna be screwed. We’ll find A) our strength which was our pitching staff is not nearly as deep as we expected and B) our offense is still not good enough to overtake the Phillies.

by chopc on Dec 18, 2009 1:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Completely disagree.

You’re suggesting that holding onto Lowe is a better idea if we can’t get a hitter like Bay or Holliday. That is crazy.

The Braves would be much better off filling our two holes of 1B and the OF with two good, but not great, hitters. If we don’t get a “legitimate” cleanup hitter like you suggest and hold onto Lowe, then who fills those spots? Callups?

You have no chance of winning with 6 starting pitchers and no hitting. It is a way better idea to dump Lowe for practically nothing and use the money to do something like resign LaRoche and get a guy like Nady. With two guys like that, you’re looking at 40-50 home runs and solid offensive production. That’s even better than Holliday hitting 30 homers for us.

"Sometimes I wonder what'd it be like to be outside and not hear the birds chirping...I think it'd be kind of nice."

by alligatorimpersonator on Dec 20, 2009 4:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Lowe certainly stunk up the joint for long stretches of last season.

Overheard in press box, from local reporter: 'If this Moore kid was any good, they'd be up 31-0 right now.'
--Darin Gantt, on CAR@NE

by MichaelProcton on Dec 20, 2009 2:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Javy's family is in Puerto Rico. He's staying with Atlanta.

Somebody around here is more anal than the mom on 7th heaven. Freakin' A. lol
(self-appointed President of Yunel's Cartel~~~)

by Chief Noc-A-Homa on Dec 17, 2009 11:46 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Yep. If anybody’s gonna sign him to an extension right now, it’s gonna be us. The idea that the Angels could offer him an extension would not be a reason for him to give up his NTC.

by Sir Stealth on Dec 17, 2009 11:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If they pay him enough...

Couldn’t he just move his family?

Overheard in press box, from local reporter: 'If this Moore kid was any good, they'd be up 31-0 right now.'
--Darin Gantt, on CAR@NE

by MichaelProcton on Dec 20, 2009 2:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

His family is in Puerto Rico for a reason. That’s where he wants them to be, they’re not going anywhere.

I wrote a novel, it's about baseball, you should buy it: https://www.createspace.com/3407939
www.dropoutproductions.com

by cbwilk on Dec 20, 2009 8:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The reason is probably...

…that they are Puerto Rican, lol.

by cavebird on Dec 20, 2009 9:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

JJ for Morales and Rivera?

by Brandonba on Dec 17, 2009 11:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I’d do it.

Morales is an animal and Rivera would be solid for us in LF.

Only problem is DLowe already shit his pants yesterday over the rumored trades and might not wanna stay.

In Frank Wren I trust.

by mvhsbball on Dec 17, 2009 11:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was one of the guys that actually thought signing him was a good idea last offseason, until we paid too much for him and he fell apart halfway through the year. That is, I kinda had his back against the critics when we got him. But when you collapse like that, and become the 6th best starter in a 5 man rotation, take your fucking medicine like a man. DLowe is a baby, and I say good riddance. The sooner the better.

by J-Freak on Dec 18, 2009 12:23 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I don’t think they would give up Morales for anyone short of Hanson or Heyward. This is why Vazquez wouldn’t really seem tradeable to me even if he didn’t have the NTC. A team that is in contention does not want to give up a bat that is on the level with the way Javy pitched last year, which was at the top of the league. I think that if we end up getting rid of Vazquez it will mean we probably got screwed, even if there is a chance of him regressing from his career year.

by Sir Stealth on Dec 17, 2009 11:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Morales is their untouchable

Just like we’re not moving Heyward for anything, they’re hanging up the phone if someone asks for him.

by Bronn on Dec 18, 2009 12:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re right, I would actually revise my post to remove Hanson and Heyward. They wouldn’t trade him for any one person in our organization.

by Sir Stealth on Dec 18, 2009 12:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is funny...

He isn’t going to L.A. because of he no-trade clause, I understand why they would ask for him but it just isn’t happening, no reason to even be worried in my opinion. They’ll either get Lowe or nobody but I don’t think we are getting Rivera for Lowe unless we eat some of Lowe’s contract, I hope I’m wrong though I don’t think I’d care if it were only a couple mil and they could still sign someone to play first.

What’s also funny is that I read the article and some of these Angels fans are delusional, one said Vazquez would be there fifth starter in there current rotation and another said that Vazquez isn’t worth Rivera, all I could do was laugh.

by Magoo12218 on Dec 18, 2009 2:18 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

angels fans are nuts

Both Weaver and Kazmir wouldnt be more than a 3rd starter or 4th starter for Atlanta . Someone said Gary Matthews jr for Lowe those fans need to quick sniffing the pollution in LA . If we didnt sign Huddy Lowe would still be in our top 3 pitchers . I’d still take Lowe over most teams 1 and 2’s starters .

by ~~banditwolf~~ on Dec 18, 2009 4:30 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

"I’d still take Lowe over most teams 1 and 2’s starters."

Matt Cain?

i think not.

I bring this up because, while I like Lowe, for the $ we’re paying him I’m pretty sure we could have Grienke and $ left over to give to an impact bat.

let’s not fool ourselves into thinking that Lowe is anything other than what he is: a decent, innings eating #3 starter in the NL and a #4 in the AL.

by apoxonbothyourhouses on Dec 18, 2009 8:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Come on now, he is better than that!

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 18, 2009 8:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Every GM in MLB will want Vazquez over Lowe.
Unless Wren consistently and firmly takes the position that Vazquez is not available and simply will not be discussed, he will never be able to dump Lowe.

by fandave on Dec 18, 2009 6:00 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

yes he will

it all depends on how much $ we kick in. we kick in a lot, we expect a lot in return. if we pick up none, we expect next to nothing in return.

by apoxonbothyourhouses on Dec 18, 2009 8:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In my mind, the primary option and thus the primary objective is to dump the $45M owed over the next three years (or as much of it as possible), hopefully for a prospect or two, and thus have the flexibility to make some other deals.

The secondary option of receiving back an established bat (Riveria or Swisher, for instance) and that player’s contract, more or less straight up, is much less feasible IMO and – most likely – would not be possible without paying a big chunk of Lowe’s contract (like, $5-7M/year), in addition to taking on the other player’s contract, which likely makes that option pretty much financially unworkable because we would have very little, if any, flexibility to fill our other needs.

by fandave on Dec 18, 2009 8:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Lackey got 16.5 per over 5 years
Wolf got 10 per over 3 years

I think it would be fair to think that Lowe’s value is better than 3/30 but perhaps as high as 3/45. So I guess we are looking at eating somewhere between 0-5M per year which isn’t too bad and it makes him certainly movable.

by bbxxj on Dec 18, 2009 8:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed.

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 18, 2009 8:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that he should in theory be moveable.
However, there are a small pool of teams that are willing to pay that type of money for an older pitcher with a big three year commitment. And all such teams obviously know we are, at minimum, highly motivated to move a pitcher so we can fill our offensive holes and although Lowe is our 1st choice, Vazquez – who is younger, better and in every other way more desirable – could also be on the table. So, we have very little negotiating leverage.
In the meanwhile, good offensive options are being signed by other teams, which puts increasing pressure on Wren to do something as soon as possible.

by fandave on Dec 18, 2009 9:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Lowe better than Wolf is fair, but its certainly debatable.

by Salty on Dec 18, 2009 12:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How is that even debatable?

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 18, 2009 12:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wolf is 3 years younger. He’s also clearly not as good at baseball.

/debate ends.

If Albert played in the AFL, they’d have to rename it the AZ/NM Fall League, based on where his homers landed.

by Yakker on Dec 18, 2009 12:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This should help:
A source close to Javier Vazquez tells MLB.com’s Mark Bowman that it’s highly unlikely the pitcher would approve a trade to a west coast team like the Angels. The Braves are still interested in trading Derek Lowe.

— MLBTR

by carpengui on Dec 18, 2009 2:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Vazquez may not be Halladay or even Lee but for the most recent season, he was. He should be less expensive to sign going forward. Seems to me the starting point to ask for would start with the Phillies Jays trade…prospects #1, #2 and #7 plus cash or equivalent. They should settle for nothing less than the Phillies Mariners trade value.

by waysouth on Dec 18, 2009 8:43 AM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Your absolutely right!!!!!

I think we would ask for MLB guys instead but Vazquez’s value is extremely high right now. Aren’t the yankees looking for a pitcher? Both lowe and Vazquez could be moved to the Yankees quite easily.

It all depends on who the yankees are targeting via FA Holliday/Nick Johnson/Nady/etc…… Swisher seems like a luxury if they sign Nick Johnson/Bay/Holliday/Nady?etc…….

FW would be wise to make the Angels fully aware that the Yankees, Nationals, and Mets are interested in Vazquez and Lowe. Whether they are or not doesn’t matter. He needs to put the pressure on the Angels without showing his cards.

by Charmin519 on Dec 18, 2009 9:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Is Wren near retirement? Its a dangerous strategy to completely BS other FOs to try and trick them.

Asking for a 1, 2 and 7th rated prospect will result in nothing.

by Salty on Dec 18, 2009 12:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Yankees won't trade for Vazquez.

Javy’s previous stint with the Yankees did not go well. I think that bridge is burnt.

by cavebird on Dec 19, 2009 7:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Braves are not trading both Lowe and Vazquez. It is one or the other.

by fandave on Dec 18, 2009 10:10 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

reply fail – Charmin519

by fandave on Dec 18, 2009 10:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the angels have nothing i'd want in return for javier

the only thing they have i’d want in return for lowe is salary relief. vazquez wont go to the west coast any damn ways. this is bullshit.

by GORILLATUX on Dec 18, 2009 10:24 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

They will be resigned to take Lowe for a prospect, and eat the salary… Braves will sign Javy to an extension… And why haven’t i heard any rumors involving the Braves and Adrian Gonzalez… I say ship them Freeman, Schafer, B. Jones level player/pitcher.. sign Gonzo to an extension paying him more than the 10 mm over the next 2 years, giving us the bat we need, and can do it in the confines of our payroll… and by the time his salary really increases we will have chipper, huddy and a few others off the books.

The Spanish Kid

by Kobe:The Legend on Dec 18, 2009 12:10 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Dude, let’s go get some chicks!

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 18, 2009 12:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What isle do you store your chicks?

-Yellow Jackets, Braves, Falcons, Hawks, and Thrashers fan!

by ChrisK562 on Dec 18, 2009 1:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 18, 2009 3:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What if

What if Tommy Hanson comes out of the gate struggling in 2010? It could happen, and it has happened with talented players in the past, the dreaded sophmore slump. It would probably be wise to hold on to an extra pitcher until the year starts anyway. I don’t see anybody wanting to blow us away with an offer anyway. Good defense seems to always trump good offense anyway. We should just hold firm and wait until closer till the deadline next year, and the teams will be filling Wrens voicemail trying to cut in line. Hold your ground F W, we can almost compete now if all the cards fall right for us.

Proof that when posting while high or intoxicated can lead to some really funny posts

by bravesrbaseball on Dec 18, 2009 12:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

If Tommy falls off for some reason, we always have Medlen.

People seem to be forgetting that we don’t have 6 starting pitchers – we have 7.

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 18, 2009 12:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

8 with Jo-Jo Reyes!!!!

LOL

-Yellow Jackets, Braves, Falcons, Hawks, and Thrashers fan!

by ChrisK562 on Dec 18, 2009 1:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

if tommy "falls off" aka isn't injured..

you think he leaves the starting rotation? And falling off for him is what, a season like Lowe last year with a handful of bad outings at the end and an ERA around 4.5 overall?

by Mr. Sanchez on Dec 18, 2009 1:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think he leaves the rotation at all. I was merely responding to the OP with other options that we have at SP that indicate that we do not need to keep Lowe as insurance for Tommy.

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 18, 2009 3:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I know we honestly shouldnt expect Morales for Javy however thats the only player i would take in exchange for him.

by drumzalicious on Dec 18, 2009 4:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Vazquez

a play-off team requires 3 consistent starters. this becomes even
more critical in the off-season.
Hudson may fill 1 of those spots yet we really do not know for certain.
Hanson, Vaz, JJ meet the criteria.
Regardless of picking up a ‘possible’ big bat, you don’t win series after
series without 3 solid starters.
hitters are likely to become available to the patient buyer as GM’s move to
an into ST and gain a more realistic view of their needs.
seems a lot of folks want to see a trade happen fast….them should avoid the
securities markets.

by sealift67 on Dec 18, 2009 8:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

i would argue

that you actually need four so that your pitchers arent going out there on short rest wearing themselves down

by drumzalicious on Dec 19, 2009 3:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The problem with waiting is...

…we move Lowe late and there aren’t any hitters left to spend the money we saved from Lowe on.

by cavebird on Dec 19, 2009 7:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There aren’t really any hitters worth spending that kind of money on out there anyway…

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 20, 2009 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

post-season

post season is what I meant, apologies.

by sealift67 on Dec 18, 2009 8:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Atlanta Braves.
Start posting about the Braves »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Raymug2_small
Smoltz isn't similar to Eckerlsey. He's better. Much better.
12475953_small
2010 NL East Fan Projections: RPs
Heywardaaa_small
Like College Basketball? Join March Madness at Talking Chop!
12475953_small
2010 NL East Fan Projections: OFs

Recent FanPosts

Small
March Madness Open Thread
Seal_small
Mlb.tv for out of area fans?
Small
Heywardisms
Small
I know it's "only spring training," but is it time to be concerned about McLouth?
Zoidberg-why_small
WTF happened to the Braves on 30 in 30?
Small
When should Heyward play -- Analysis
Heywardaaa_small
Predicting the Braves' 2010 Lineup: #2 Hitter

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

New York Mets starting pitchers Mike Pelfrey, left, Johan Santana, center, and Oliver Perez watch as teammates take part in drills during spring training baseball Saturday, Feb. 27, 2010, in Port St. Lucie, Fla. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson)

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: New York Mets, The High Cost Of Low Expectations

Washington Nationals pitcher Stephen Strasburg throws during the second inning of  a spring training baseball game against the Detroit Tigers Tuesday, March 9, 2010 in Viera, Fla. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)

Nationals Send Stephen Strasburg To Double-A Despite Impressive Spring

Seattle Mariners pitcher Cliff Lee speaks during a baseball news conference at Safeco Field in Seattle on Friday, Jan. 22, 2010. Lee was acquired by the Mariners in a trade with the Philadelphia Phillies last December. (AP Photo/John Froschauer) link

Cliff Lee Out With Right Abdominal Strain

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Gondeee_small gondeee

Authors

My_hair_is_a_bird-257x300_small yondaime4

Dsc01731_small royhobbs

Tc_small cbwilk