No Hall Of Fame Momentum For Dale Murphy
Making the Hall of Fame should be a rare thing, but for guys that are on the bubble the arguments for and against induction go on and on. The line between what constitutes a Hall of Famer, and someone who isn't becomes a matter for heated debate. This is the case with Atlanta Braves fans and Dale Murphy. Many fans think he's a Hall of Famer, but as of yet not enough writers have agreed with them.
This year (2012) will mark the second to last year that Dale Murphy can be considered for the writer's ballot. Nearing the end of a ballot run has propelled many players towards election to the Hall. This was the case most recently with Bert Blyleven. He began his "ballot career" a year before Murphy, and with less first year support. Blyleven only received 17.5% support in 1998, while in Murphy's first year of 1999 he received 19.3% support. In fact, the first two years Murphy was on the ballot he garnered a higher voting percentage than Blyleven did.
Murphy also received more votes in his second year than Jack Morris received in his first year on the ballot in 2000. Morris is currently being talked up as a serious Hall candidate this year, as he has only two more years of eligibility left after this year's results are released. That momentum is propelling Morris in the same direction that it propelled Blyleven -- each passing Murphy on their way to induction.
On the graph below I traced the Hall of Fame voting percentages of these three players as well as that of Dave Parker:
Murphy also started out with a higher percentage than Dave Parker, but somewhere in the early 2000's Parker slid ahead of Murph. Last year was Parker's last on the ballot, and as you can see he never gained any momentum as his ballot career came to a close. Murphy similarly is not gaining any momentum in the waning years of his ballot career.
So why the positive change in attitude about the careers of Blyleven and Morris, but loss of excitement and eventual flat-lining about the careers of Murphy and Parker? The first explanation that jumps to my mind is what was happening in baseball in the early 2000's. It was the era of abundant home run power; the steroids assisted ascent of offense that made the accomplishments of guys like Murphy and Parker, who played in a more pitching dominated era, seem less impressive to voters, while the pitching accomplishments of Blyleven and Morris began to look better against the backdrop of an era with few dominant and durable pitchers.
I would have thought that there might be some type of post-steroids revelation backlash in the late 2000's that would have caused Murphy and Parker and their numbers to get more consideration, but that clearly didn't happen. Perhaps the arrival on the ballot of more deserving hitters throughout these years drew votes away from them, while fewer deserving pitchers landed on the ballot.
There hasn't been a first ballot Hall of Fame pitcher since Dennis Eckersley in 2004; notice the uptick in votes for both the pitchers above after that year. Since then there have been five first ballot hitters. It seems that the hitters who came along -- and there were a lot more of them -- impressed voters more, while no pitchers came along during that time, and so voters turned to previous candidates to apportion their votes.
Blyleven barely made the Hall in his second to last year. By the above logic Morris' time could be running out if more attractive candidates enter the ballot next year when Roger Clemens and Curt Schilling become eligible for the first time. It gets even tougher in Morris' final year in 2014 when Greg Maddux and Tom Glavine appear on the ballot.
For Dale Murphy, the voting momentum for his induction is just not there. Anything short of an unprecedented last minute surge in 2013, and Murphy will have to wait for the Veterans Committee many years from now. That last minute swell of support likely won't happen, and Braves fans, and fans of number-3 will be left with their memories of a really good baseball player, but not a Hall of Famer.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Why momentum for Blyleven but not for Murphy?
Easy: Blyleven was a far more valuable player over the course of his career, something that most people didn’t realize until he’d been on the ballot for a while. As people saw the compelling evidence, they came around gradually.
The Morris thing is much more inexplicable. Dale was better than him, and Dale isn’t really a Hall of Famer unless you cut him a lot of slack for his short peak. I think it’s just the mythos that Morris acquired thanks to game 7 and whatnot. That, plus old-school writers who vote for him because they resent the way that people’s perception of value has changed in the last 20 years.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
I also blog about weird statistics at JunkStats.
Follow @junkstats
Murph
My user name says it all.
Despite the last few years of his career, no player was more steady, more feared, or more respected than Murph.
He will always be a Hall-of-Fame member in my mind….
by Dale Murphy for HOF on Jan 3, 2012 5:40 PM EST reply actions
I'm a huge Murph fan...
…but I don’t think he makes the cut for the MLB HOF. Peak was too short, average too low, strikeouts too high, and couldn’t get to 400 HRs even in Colorado. He wouldn’t be the worst player inducted if he did get in, but he’d be in the bottom 10% or so. He’ll have to settle for the Braves’ HOF and his well-deserved reputation of actually being worthy of the term “role model”.
question
Is there another player that was the 2nd best player in their league for a decade that is not in the Hall of Fame?
I would only put Murphy behind Mike Schmidt in the national league for the 1980’s. Does that mean he should get in? Maybe not, but he certainly deserves a lot more respect from the voters than he is getting.
Yes there is.
Tim Raines, who was actually the second-best NL player during the 80s sabermetrically (and you could certainly make the case with traditional stats as well), is also not in the Hall.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
BUT MURPHY HIT DINGERZZZ???
In a more traditional stats and awards age…Murphy gets in at some point with his 398 HRs, 2 NL MVPs, and AS appearances. He’s an unfortunate casualty to science…
"Reach down in there...TURN THAT DAMN THING UP!" - Coach Paul Johnson
Dale Murphy:
Better than Jim Rice.
For some good campaigning for The Murph, Google him along with Joe Posnanski.
"It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall alone." A. Bartlett Giamatti
Really wish the murph would wake it, but it looks like the odds are a against him. Even if he doesn’t get in he is still a hall of fame person to me. We need more guys in baseball like him, actually we need more guys like this in life in general.
by chrisdaugherty on Jan 5, 2012 11:07 AM EST via mobile reply actions

by 























