Analyzing Dan Uggla's Defense (Part 1: Traditional Stats)
Everyone has flaws--even the wise and wonderful readers of Talking Chop (shocking, I know). Whatever our flaws are, we are fortunate in that they are mostly restricted to this corner of the internet and not widely dissected by millions of fans, experts, and pseudo-experts across seven types of media.
Baseball players aren't so lucky (in this one regard... they are, generally speaking, quite fortunate human beings). I'm sure Dan Uggla has long since gotten sick of these discussions, since he has one particularly glaring flaw: his defense at second base.
Pretty much everyone (and every metric) agrees that Uggla's defense is somewhere between "below average" and "awful." That's a pretty wide gap, however, especially when extended over five seasons (which is both how long Uggla has played in the majors and how long he's under contract for).
In this series of posts, I'll look at several different ways of measuring defense to try to get closer to the full picture of Uggla's defense, both his strengths and yes, his weaknesses. I'll pay particular attention to a question that has been much discussed around these parts: Did Uggla's home ballpark the past 5 years, Dolphins Stadium (etc.), hurt his fielding in some way? (I'm skeptical.) I've also got lots of interesting graphs lined up, for those of you who like such things.
After the jump, I look at how Uggla rates using traditional fielding metrics like errors, assists, and fielding percentage. These do not give us a great picture of Uggla's overall defensive ability, but they do tell us some surprising things about his individual skills.
There's no getting around it: Dan Uggla has made a lot of errors. In fact, over the past five seasons, he's made 73, which is more than any other second baseman. Like with any "bad" counting stat, however, there's an upside. One of the biggest reasons Uggla has made so many errors is simply because he's been in the lineup day in and day out. Uggla is both very durable and a good enough hitter that his managers have been reluctant to take his bat out of the lineup. Those are good things.
For comparison, let's look at the top 5 in errors by a second baseman during Uggla's career. For each player, I list his errors per 150 games (or 1350 defensive innings):
- Dan Uggla: 14.6 errors/150 games (73 errors, 6754 innings)
- Ian Kinsler: 17.8 errors/150 games (71 errors, 5396 innings)
- Rickie Weeks: 21.2 errors/150 games (71 errors, 4527 innings)
- Chase Utley: 13.7 errors/150 games (64 errors, 6294 innings)
- Jose Lopez: 13.7 errors/150 games (51 errors, 5017 innings)
Making 15 errors per year isn't anything you'd brag about, but as you can see, it could be worse. If you believe in errors as a measure of a player's defense, then Uggla should rate only slightly below Utley or Lopez and well ahead of Kinsler or Weeks.
A slightly different measure is fielding percentage. Uggla's .980 mark rates 36th out of 45 second basemen in this metric (with at least 1350 defensive innings since 2006). The league average over this period has been .984, so Uggla has been a bit below average, but not drastically so. That works out to about 3 more errors per year.
The more interesting question, however, is: What causes all those errors? Does Uggla just have bad hands, leading to a lot of botched grounders? Is his throwing arm inaccurate? Has he been done in by poor first basemen or a substandard playing surface? Let's try to answer these questions.
From what I've heard, the scouting report on Uggla is that he is generally mediocre at all the aspects of fielding, but that his particular weakness is that he boots a lot of ground balls. The Fans Scouting Report, voted on by fans at TangoTiger.net (and available on FanGraphs) gives Uggla below average ratings across the board, with the worst rating in the "Hands" category. This fits with the general perception about Uggla, but what does the data say?
Below, I've broken down Uggla's errors and compared them to the number of errors the average MLB second baseman would make in the same number of chances. Notice anything?
Contrary to perception, Uggla's fielding error total is quite average. It could be that people look at Uggla's stocky, muscular build and just assume that he's a clumsy fielder. Based on error totals, anyway, that does not seem to be the case. In actuality, the entire error gap between Uggla and an average second baseman can be explained by a higher number of throwing errors. To reiterate, this is not a huge flaw--equal to about 3 extra throwing errors per year--but arm accuracy definitely does seem to be an issue for Uggla.
There's also the possibility that the first basemen he's played with have been particularly poor at "saving" Uggla's bad throws from becoming throwing errors; this would make sense, since Marlins first basemen rank tied for last in UZR/150 and dead last in DRS since 2006 (thank you, Mike Jacobs). It will be interesting to see if Uggla's throwing errors decline now that he'll be throwing mostly to Freddie Freeman, who has a very good defensive reputation.
Next, let's look at Uggla's home/road splits. One of the hypotheses we're testing in these posts is whether Uggla's home field has caused his fielding to look worse than it is. If Uggla's error total is much higher at home than on the road, it would be consistent with that theory. Below, I've graphed all of the Reaches on Errors (ROEs) that batters had due to Uggla errors (it was hard to get a home/road breakdown for all errors, but this is basically the same idea):
Uggla had slightly more of all types of errors at home, but the really noticeable difference is in fielding errors. He had twice as many fielding ROEs at home than he did on the road. This certainly supports the theory that the poorly maintained playing surface at Dolphins Stadium has contributed to Uggla's fielding woes. Of course, this could also easily be just a fluke. Even if his former home field caused him to make a few more errors, that explains only a small portion of his poor defensive numbers and reputation.
Combining the two charts, we can infer that it is possible that Uggla actually has very sure hands in most ballparks (his road ROE rate is well below average). We can also tell that Uggla's throwing problems are likely not due to any home/road differences. If these inferences are accurate (and I'm not sure they are), we would expect Uggla's fielding error totals to go down now that he's in Atlanta, but that his throwing errors would continue to be alarmingly frequent.
Alright, let's move on to some other traditional fielding stats: putouts and assists. These are the closest thing to a measure of range in traditional statistics. So, even though they are a very approximate measure (and no doubt highly influenced by factors beyond Uggla's control), it is useful to look at how Uggla compares to other second basemen in these areas.
First up is putouts. Overall, Dan Uggla has had 1511 putouts in his career (3rd-most in MLB behind only Utley and Brandon Phillips). Don't get excited by that figure, though. In the same number of innings that Uggla has played in the field, the average second baseman would have recorded nearly the same number: 1504. The playing time sword cuts both ways.
There are three types of putouts: catches (of batted balls in the air), tags, and forceouts. Let's break down Uggla's putouts into these three groups to see if he has any particular strengths:
As you can see, Uggla is slightly above average at catching fly balls and tagging runners, but slightly below average at recording forceouts. And I do mean "slightly": that works out to about 6 more catches, 2 more tags, and 7 fewer forces per year. Each of those is about a 5% difference from the league average, so I doubt you'd even notice from watching him play that Uggla was a bit better or worse in these areas.
Next, let's look at assists very quickly. Uggla has recorded 2056 assists in his career, which is second to only Robinson Cano in that time frame. Of course, the league-average second baseman would have recorded 2161 assists in the same playing time (Uggla has been very durable). That's a difference of about 21 fewer assists per year, or again about 5% below average. This would seem to indicate that Uggla has slightly less range than most second basemen, though again, assists are not the most reliable statistic.
Finally, let's look at Uggla's ability to turn double plays. He's been involved with 484 double plays, which again is second in MLB behind Cano. The league-average 2B, however, would have had 514 double plays given the same number of innings. So Uggla is involved in about 6 fewer double plays per year compared to the average 2B. Again, this is not a huge difference--about 6% less than average--but it might be meaningful.
Here's a breakdown of Uggla's double plays. As you can see, he is a bit below average in each category:
Per year, Uggla starts about 2.5 fewer double plays and turns about 2.5 fewer.
Alright, so let's put this all together. Based on the simple statistics that we have, Uggla seems to be average or a bit above average in the following areas:
- Catching pop flies
- Avoiding fielding errors (especially on the road)
- Tagging runners out
He also seems to be below average in these areas:
- Making throwing errors (though this could be partly his first basemen's fault)
- Recording assists and forceouts
- Starting and turning double plays
I wouldn't put too much emphasis on any of these conclusions because I don't have that much confidence in the predictive value of these statistics. However, I do find it interesting that so far, the evidence points toward the possibility that factors like his home ballpark and his poor first basemen may have influenced the subpar statistics and negative perceptions regarding Uggla's defense.
Actually, the most important thing I learned from writing this post is that Uggla is the degree of his durability. Did you know that he's been the Marlins second baseman for 94% of their innings since 2006? That kind of day-in-day-out consistency is a huge plus.
In the next post, we'll look at some of the non-traditional (or "advanced") fielding stats, like Total Zone, Defensive Runs Saved, and Ultimate Zone Rating. Those should give us a better idea of Uggla's overall defensive skills.
Most fielding stats in this article can be found at the marvelous baseball-reference.com. Here's a link to Uggla's defensive statistics page on B-Ref. I also consulted FanGraphs for the Fans Scouting Report, DRS, and UZR numbers. Here's Uggla's FG page if you want to do research of your own.
83 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
These defensive stats
are so sensitive that because they are relative…4-5 extra errors and 6 fewer double plays PER YEAR moves someone from average to below average…or as some posters have declared…“awful”.
Of course, advanced metrics don’t favor or add weight to critical baseball situations…such as when game-tying or -winning runs are on base.
by TBuzz on Feb 24, 2011 10:12 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Very true.
It’s a fine line in defense, since you’re supposed to make the great majority of the plays. Just a few botches here and there can really sink your defensive numbers… even the advanced ones.
That’s a good point about situational fielding, too. Maybe I’ll look that up for a later post. I doubt there’ll be any huge differences, but you never know.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 12:10 AM EST up reply actions
Come to think about it...
Do advanced hitting metrics take situational hitting into account?
Case in point. Runner or 2nd base, 1 out. What matters more…BA or OBP?
by TBuzz on Feb 25, 2011 12:19 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
That’s exactly why the first thing I look at when we aquire a player is BAw/RISP. I think that’s one of the most interesting and underrated stats available.
by king of games on Feb 25, 2011 10:05 AM EST up reply actions
Well,
WPA certainly does. The big ones like wOBA, WAR, and so forth don’t because they’re designed to be context neutral. But WPA is all about context… and I’m sure a hit is worth a lot more than a walk in that scenario, by WPA.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 11:52 AM EST up reply actions
I wish there was a statistic that took into account not only how many total bases you take as a player…but also how many total bases you impact for runners on base. This way, a sacrifice bunt or weak grounder towards first that gets a runner from 2nd to 3rd would get you credit for a base. A bases-clearing double, for example, would be good for 8 total bases (2 for you, 6 for the runners on base)
The idea being how did you impact total bases which is more closely reflected in runs scored.
by TBuzz on Feb 25, 2011 12:07 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
That's an interesting idea, actually.
wOBA does factor in the value of other baserunners moving up, but it’s all based on averages and not the actual baserunners… and of course it doesn’t count productive outs or anything like that. There are stats that track productive outs, they just haven’t been combined with the other stats to my knowledge.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 4:59 PM EST up reply actions
My thoughts as well
First off, nice work on the stats. I like to have as much defense (pun intended) in my back pocket when my neighbors and I debate the Braves and Phillies. Good stuff.
As for the home-road error splits, the data are weakly powered, with n=20 (home) and n=10 (road). Yes, Uggla had twice as many errors at home than on the road. But, it is tough to attribute his poor defense to his home field. And by attribute, I mean make a strong statistical case. I’m no statistician, but I am curious to know if there is a way to assess this difference relative to the total number of fielding opportunities Uggla had at home and on the road. Would this indirectly raise the power of the “study” to permit proper statistical analysis?
by aaaaandTheBravesWin on Feb 25, 2011 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
Funny you should ask.
Stay tuned for later parts of the series. I examine this issue in much more detail.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
Very nice. I look forward to it.
by aaaaandTheBravesWin on Feb 25, 2011 1:49 PM EST up reply actions
The Marlins picked up Uggla in the Rule 5 draft if I’m not mistaken. His reputation in the Minors was that his defense was suspect, I assume that’s why he was left unprotected. Having looked at and posted his UZR, home/road splits and this excellent breakdown of information, I feel pretty confident that he will be a very good addition to the Braves. His defensive issues do not seem to come close to negating what he brings to the offense.
When Bobby retired, I said Wren would let the new manager have a shiny new toy, a signing or a trade for the player that manager felt would shore up the Braves. Gonzalez wanted Uggla. The Braves have wanted him for a while. Gonzalez watched him every day for 3 and a half years. Surely he knows a decent 2B from a hack.
"It's like winning a war...you need arms and money." Fredi G
I agree that Gonzalez surely knows what he's getting in Uggla,
and is clearly pleased with him as a player. That’s a strong endorsement, certainly.
To be clear, I don’t think this evidence by itself means much of anything regarding Uggla’s overall defensive contributions, or what they’re likely to be with the Braves.
In the later posts, I’ll give out some more meaningful numbers.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 12:08 AM EST up reply actions
I've seen enough of Uggla
To say that I find him far from “awful”. I would say he’s quite competent. He’s actually very athletic for his build, and has fairly good range to his sides. He also turns a double play as smoothly as anyone.
It seems that his ugly errors in the ASG a few years ago combined with preconceived notions about someone with a muscular stocky build have led many people to falsely assume he is much worse than he is.
He will naturally make some “What was that?!?” throws throughout the year, but he will also turn some heads with some of his highlight plays.
How do I feel? Like f**king success - Jordan Schafer
well there is the fact that his UZR is always negative
but yeah, i imagine most people’s minds naturally drift toward that ASG on the subject of Dan Uggla’s defense
by kbertling353 on Feb 25, 2011 1:24 AM EST up reply actions
Is a player’s UZR also a function of the neighboring defenders? Hanley got to a ton of balls, and I’m sure Marlins 1B had good range (even if they had bad hands)
Did Andruw lower the UZR’s of the Bravers LF and RF when he was around?
Trying to figure out if there’s another reason for the UZR always being negative.
There is some evidence
that a truly great fielder can lower the UZRs of the neighboring players slightly.
However, Hanley also typically has terrible defensive ratings (-9 UZR/150 career), as do the Marlins’ first basemen (as mentioned in the article). So that is certainly not the case here. From the evidence, all the Marlins’ infielders have poor range—Uggla might even be the best of them.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
So...
defensively he’s been about as reliable as Utley, and even that’s skewed negative by playing with terrible-fielding 1st baseman on a total sandlot?
Sounds like a good deal for mid-30’s home run pop at second base.
But I’m just a simple racist, homophobic redneck who lives in his truck. Oh and Im 7.
"IN THE AIR LEFT FIELD- THAT'LL DO IT!... AND IT KEEPS ON GOING; THAT IS A HOMERUN!"
Talking Chop: where you get "final warnings" for calling out blog authors who quit on the team in a pennant race
utley is crazy good defensively. even when you give uggla the benefit of the doubt, he’s still at best slightly below average. the difference between the two is probably around 15 runs per year defensively.
by kbertling353 on Feb 25, 2011 1:25 AM EST up reply actions
I’m perfectly comfortable with “slightly below average” for what he brings to the offense. It’s easy to forget that Prado was also slightly below average last year. Bottom line is, 6 errors are highly unlikey to have an extreme impact on the overall season, and with our pitching, those extra runners will likely be stranded anyway.
by king of games on Feb 25, 2011 10:10 AM EST up reply actions
Uh oh...
6 errors are highly unlikey to have an extreme impact on the overall season
/bracing for the inevitable beating of an obliterated horse
he did say
overall season, not postseason. (couldn’t resist)
there are only two seasons: baseball and winter. -bill vreek
Yeah, I probably should have been a bit more clear considering who’s reading the post. But yeah, 6 errors over the course of an entire season is not the same as 6 in 2-3 games.
by king of games on Feb 25, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions
Wow. Awesome analysis. It’s probably elementary for the more sabermetrically-inclined here, but I can’t thank you enough for laying out the evidence point-by-point. I was able to grasp the concept clearly because you walked us through the numbers and explained how they work together to create a coherent conclusion. I learned baseball stuff!
LIVE EST
Tape-delayed for the West Coast
Glad you learned something... and baseball stuff, no less.
I’m not always coherent when explaining these things. Hopefully the info on sabermetric stats will come through as clearly.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 12:13 AM EST up reply actions
yep. did you see that MLG’s (UZR guy) discussion on uggla’s home/road splits? he doesn’t put much stock into the theory…
by kbertling353 on Feb 25, 2011 1:26 AM EST up reply actions
aaaaaaaand by MLG I actually meant MGL
MLG = major league gaming
by kbertling353 on Feb 25, 2011 3:40 AM EST up reply actions
In stating that, he also basically condemned UZR as completely unreliable. I personally hate UZR as a defensive metric, it’s always way too far behind the game.
by king of games on Feb 25, 2011 10:13 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I did.
And I don’t really put much stock into them either, though we’ll get more into that in the next post. At the very least, I’d say his UZR splits don’t tell the whole story. You can’t put much stock into the “Uggla will be better now that he’s not at Dolphins Stadium” theory based only on the UZR splits.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 12:00 PM EST up reply actions
So a 5 yr sample size, for multiple players in the same infield...
and it’s bunk? If so, then the stat as a whole is as well imo. You can’t ignore a sample that large, for that money, for so many, and not completely discredit the stat as a whole.
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
Actually, I thought your explanations were very clear.
And I applaud the effort. In looking at these numbers, the most glaring differential is that fielding error differential between home and road games. A 2:1 margin is statistically huge – particularly over a 5 year period… that’s not a trend – it’s statistical money in the bank.
Going a little further, I would expect that on average, an infielder would tend to have more fielding errors in road games than at home: he gets 81 games on familiar turf and 81 at widely different fields that you only see 2-4 games at a time. So those numbers you dug up are a big indictment against Miami’s football field.
I suppose that it would solidify the argument if the other Marlins’ infielders have had similar splits over the past five years… but all I can find quickly is that none of the infielders (with significant innings) have a decent UZR rating.
Sandy Alderson: "There's 'no market' for Luis Castillo or Oliver Perez, even if we wanted to trade them." (All you need to know about the Mets).
A 2:1 margin is huge,
but as another poster mentioned, the overall # of errors we’re dealing with is rather small.
I certainly don’t see the error differential as “money in the bank”… I’d call it more “an interesting finding that requires further study”.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 12:02 PM EST up reply actions
You’re right – I’m speaking strictly of the fielding errors home vs. away. The overall error counts are high-ish, but I certainly believe you’ve already found numbers that make an argument to expect better fielding (certainly no worse) in Atlanta. That would get him in an area in which I would think we could forget about phrases like “defensive liability”… though I do look forward to Part Deux.
Sandy Alderson: "There's 'no market' for Luis Castillo or Oliver Perez, even if we wanted to trade them." (All you need to know about the Mets).
Today I learned
that Dan Uggla’s middle name is “Cooley.”
Awesome.
by YakuzaFro on Feb 24, 2011 10:57 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
Oh good God...
some intellectual humor…the UGA kryptonite
by TBuzz on Feb 25, 2011 12:15 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
That's a good one.
Did you know Jair’s middle name is “Francoise”? We’ve got some good middle names on this team.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 12:01 AM EST up reply actions
do we think those double play numbers will go up
with two big double play pitchers on the staff ahead of him? Could they have been kept down because there werent as many grounders from the marlins staff? anyone have those figures?
Good question.
The Marlins rank 26th over the last 5 years in GB%, and the Braves rank 1st… so yeah, assuming Lowe doesn’t get traded, he’ll see a lot more double plays.
Actually, this is one of the big problems with using the traditional stats. So much depends on the pitchers and batters, and they aren’t adjusted at all. I bet that’s the main reason that Uggla ranks highly in the “catches” area but lowly on all the ground ball-based areas (assists, forceouts, double plays).
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 12:05 AM EST up reply actions
This is exactly what I was thinking. The Marlins tend to prefer fireballing strikeout pitchers, which doesn’t usually tend to yield a lot of ground balls.
by king of games on Feb 25, 2011 10:15 AM EST up reply actions
Awesome work!! It makes me even more pumped up for Opening Day.
by dunnytwogloves on Feb 24, 2011 11:09 PM EST reply actions
It’s probably worth noting, if you’re looking at counting stats, that the Fish pitchers have been bottom 1/3 of MLB in GB% over the last 5 seasons (Braves pitchers have been first), so he’s been getting fewer opportunities than the average 2B would.
Q: If not us, who? If not now, when? A: The Batman. And "when you least expect it."
Just stay tuned for the later posts.
I’ll be trying to neutralize pitcher effects, among other things.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
I have to wonder..
If the Uggla’s less than stellar fielding numbers in Florida really do have to do with the condition of the field, then you’d expect every Marlins infielder to have a higher error rate at home, not just Uggla. If the other Marlins are consistent across the home and road, then you probably have to throw out that theory…
i remember someone posting something about this
comparing Ugglas home and away splits with Hanleys, and both were skewed away vs home
I think
Someone pointed out that his UZR/150 is like average on the road and like -25 at home.
"The WAR folks like yunel apparently. i know this, bobby cox hated going to war with this guy." - Jon Heyman
Beyond the Box Score / Capitol Avenue Club / shwitter: @CapitolAvenue
make that
+1.4 on the road, -10.5 at home.
"The WAR folks like yunel apparently. i know this, bobby cox hated going to war with this guy." - Jon Heyman
Beyond the Box Score / Capitol Avenue Club / shwitter: @CapitolAvenue
Yeah.
Both Uggla and Hanley have that effect, which is evidence in favor of the theory…
But of course there’s other evidence (which we’ll get to later).
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 12:04 PM EST up reply actions
It’ll be interesting to see how the new Marlins’ 2B does compared to Uggla at whatever Florida’s field is called these days…whoever that might be…
Morton hit Heyward with an offspeed pitch. Early indication is that the baseball survived the impact.
We know the guy who will be the Marlins 2B very well.
The Marlins 2B this year will be our old pal Omar Infante; who we traded for Uggla.
OT
I used the phrase “Nutmeg State” in an opening billbaord for All Things Considered not long ago, and thought of you.
LIVE EST
Tape-delayed for the West Coast
Awesome
Great work Pac.
"The WAR folks like yunel apparently. i know this, bobby cox hated going to war with this guy." - Jon Heyman
Beyond the Box Score / Capitol Avenue Club / shwitter: @CapitolAvenue
Thanks, Peter.
And thanks to everyone else for the compliments. I appreciate you guys reading my posts.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 12:04 PM EST up reply actions
We signed Uggla to hit 30+ bombs and balance our line-up. As long as he’s at least decent at 2B I’m fine with that.
Fantastic post
Uggla gets a worse-than-deserved rap for his defense, just because haters hate him for being so awesome.
"I wasn’t thinking about it. That’s the worst celebration of all time. I didn’t know what to do. I got lost in the moment." - Brian McCann
by HansonManCrush on Feb 25, 2011 9:52 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Haters wanna hate, Lovers wanna love…
by TBuzz on Feb 25, 2011 10:00 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
SOCIALMEDIA:"FACEBOOK" DOWN, MUST FIND NEW WAYS TO DEEPSTALK AREA FEMALES FOR HUMAN GANT RON TO SEX AKA DONG AFTER BRAVES ATL LOSSES --CyborgHanson48
What you did there
Made me sing that song, and then I felt a little dirty.. Still hilarious.
by murph35 on Feb 25, 2011 3:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Very nice job...
easy to understand. Reason number 352 I vist TC everyday.
Go Braves, Canes, Tarheels and Panthers. That is all.
Great work, and Sorry for my ignorance, but a ?
I haven’t really kept up with new stats for a few years, but what’s the difference between an error defined as “Catch” and one defined as “Field”? It isn’t an error unless there is a physical malfunction (sorry, but I can’t remember the exact terminology in the rulebook), so it couldn’t be an error unless he actually got his glove on the ball. So is it “Field” if he didn’t catch it cleanly, then “Catch” if he didn’t transfer before the throw? Just curious…
Yup.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
by Jacob Peterson on Feb 25, 2011 5:01 PM EST up reply actions
Awesome article
I’m not nearly as terrified we’ll have a Conrad-esqe fielder out there all season now
VERY NICE (in my best Borat voice)
His power, his grit, his durability, and his attitude to WIN (ex. Calling out HanRam, that’s +100 in my book) make this guy a great addition. This write-up about his defense just makes me feel even better about this guy.
by murph35 on Feb 25, 2011 3:47 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Great stuff as always Jacob.
And just as everyone else has said, as long as Uggla is at least decent-ish in the field, I don’t think anyone is going to care too much when he slugs 30+ HRs and has an OPS of .800-.900.
"That guy mvhsbball is really an insufferable schmuck." - FuquaManuel
by Scott Coleman on Feb 25, 2011 6:31 PM EST via mobile reply actions
No problem
What Uggla with bring with the Bat which is a huge positive (+) simply means that I have to live with his negatives which are simply one (defense). Basically it is simple Uggla will see alot of late inning clutch game time defensively on the bench and Diory will be taking his spot at 2b or Prado moving back to 2b and Mather going out of the LF.
Uggla is a beast damn can we get to opening day PLEASE !
GO BRAVES I am so excited to get this year going I cannot take it anymore.
by Holty_Panthers_Fan on Feb 25, 2011 9:34 PM EST reply actions

by 
































