Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys Roster: Who'll Be This Year's Surprise Cut?

2011 Atlanta Braves Player Review: Eric Hinske and Brooks Conrad

Photo

In 2011, no one was used more in a pinch than Eric Hinske and Brooks Conrad. Both were brought back following the 2010 season to provide reliable off-the-bench offense once again.

This year, neither of them had as good a season as they did in 2010. Hinske hit under .200 off the bench, having much of his success this season as a starter. Conrad hit only .210 despite a .319 OBP as a pinch-hitter.

Star-divide

G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K SB CS AVG OBP SLG
2011 - Eric Hinske 117 236 24 55 10 0 10 28 26 71 0 1 .233 .311 .403


Hinske posted pinch-hit numbers of .161/.254/.268 in 2011, a stark contrast to .298/.389/.596 the year before. His six RBI are down from the 12 he drove in last year off the bench:

  • PH 2-run HR April 19 at Dodgers ahead 2-1 in 9th inning, Braves win 10-1
  • PH 2-run HR May 8 at Phillies ahead 3-1 in 8th inning, Braves win 5-2
  • PH 2-run single July 3 vs. Orioles behind 3-2 in 6th inning, Braves lose 5-4

Hinske hit .308 in May, easily his best month, starting 18 games and hitting four of his 10 home runs. April (.269) and July (.282) were also good months, but he disappeared the last two months of the season with a combined 5-for-41 and three RBI. His two PH home runs were the only extra-base hits Hinske had off the bench.

Hinske started 50 games, hitting .246 with seven home runs, 19 RBI and a .321 OBP, but much his overall production came in low leverage situations. He only hit .183 from the seventh inning onward, but with 13 of his 28 RBI. He was, however, very reliable with two outs, hitting .297 with 13 RBI and .310 with two outs and RISP.

His .233 avg. was the second-lowest of his career, having hit .204 in 84 games with Boston in 2007; his OBP was the lowest of his career and his slugging third-lowest. His ISO (.169) and BB% (9.8) were the lowest since 2005 and his K% (26.9) was the highest of his career.

G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K SB CS AVG OBP SLG
2011 - Brooks Conrad 92 103 11 23 5 0 4 13 15 41 2 0 .223 .325 .388


Brooks Conrad wasn't much better as a pinch-hitter than Hinske, but he was certainly more productive. He started the season 1-for-12 in April, but his walk-off single May 1 against the Cardinals showed he was still able to get the big hit. All three pinch hits during May were crucial, one of them his first home run of the season:

  • PH walk-off single May 1 vs. Cardinals tied in 9th inning, Braves win 6-5
  • PH game-tying RBI double May 18 at Diamondbacks down 2-1 in 7th inning, Braves lose 4-3
  • PH 2-run HR May 25 at Pirates tied in 11th inning, Braves win 4-2

Conrad's five RBI in May were his most for any month, but June was his best month of the season. In 14 games, he hit .421 (8-for-19) with a pair of home runs, the first of which was a ninth-inning blast to tie the game June 16, hit off Francisco Rodriguez in Atlanta's "balk-off" win over the Mets. 10 of Conrad's 13 RBI came in high leverage situations.

His other big hits:

  • July 21: game-tying home run in the seventh inning against the Rockies, his only home run as a starter
  • August 16: 11th-inning PH single that leads to him scoring the game-winning run against the Giants
  • September 4: game-tying PH two-run single in seventh inning against the Dodgers

Conrad hit just .196 after the Break, .091 in September with two RBI. The RBI hit against the Dodgers was his only hit of the month; he was 1-for-11. Conrad only started 12 games, but hit .263 with a .326 OBP. He walked more as a pinch-hitter (10 compared to just three in 2010), but also struck out nine more times than last year. Conrad's .210 avg. off the bench was down from 2010 when he hit .224, but his OBP was an improvement over the .262 mark he posted last year. His slugging, however, dropped from .448 to .419. His overall ISO from 2010 (.237) fell off dramatically (.165). In 2010, he hit .378 with RISP (9 XBH); this year, .148 (0 XBH).

In Conclusion

All told, Conrad didn't quite have as much late-inning magic in his bat this year as in 2010, but he'll be relied upon again in 2012 to provide a solid pinch-hitting presence. As for Hinske, he's a better hitter than what he showed in 2011 and with him returning next year, the Braves seem to be confident he'll prove this year was an anomaly.

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I’m a Hinske fan, but just not a fan of Conrad.

I think both are fine off the bench. I just cringe when Conrad is in the field.

And it's now my sig
by Bronn on May 17, 2011 4:56 PM EDT

by Sparhawk on Nov 17, 2011 10:44 AM EST reply actions  

Why so confident conrad will be relied upon in 2012?

With 5 bench spots and Hinske, Diaz, and Ross taking up three, I expect the other two to be occupied by someone who can backup center field and someone who can back up shortstop. Unless the Braves acquire a corner outfielder who can backup center, I don’t see Conrad on the 25-man next year.

by epatl on Nov 17, 2011 11:28 AM EST reply actions  

This looks vaguely similar to something I read after last year, about Conrad not coming back. Besides, I don’t think the Braves will start the season with seven relievers.

Twitter: @TAlmeyda

by TonyAlmeyda on Nov 17, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Unless they re-acquire Brent Lillibridge, or someone similar, that can play SS and CF. Not necessarily well, but you get my drift.

"If it's F'd up then it's F'd up" --- Gregg Marshall

by jwrocks on Nov 17, 2011 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree. I hope that the team doesn’t bring Conrad back next year. The Braves need to improve on what was a really weak bench last year. Conrad can’t play any defensive positions and now he can’t hit either. A good team wouldn’t have a guy like that on the roster.

by FourScore199 on Nov 17, 2011 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Constanza

may back up the OF next year, at least to begin with. And then we will need a back SS…maybe Conrad does not make the bench unless we trade or release Diaz. Losing either would be sad though….

All while Fredi is surrounded by a bunch of orangutans, trying to teach them how to bunt the rocks and coconuts that angry 300 lb gorillas are throwing at them,

by royhobbs on Jul 29, 2011 11:20 AM PDT

Strong Side / Weak Side: Chipper Jones

http://www.onionsportsnetwork.com/articles/chipper-jones,8431/

by Santaklose11 on Nov 18, 2011 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

At least we still have options left for Conrad

I think.

Although I wouldn’t be surprised to see Diaz cut come spring.

http://sportsandgrits.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Nov 18, 2011 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Me either

I love caveman, but I am afraid he may be finished. He looked nothing like the Matty-D of old this season…

All while Fredi is surrounded by a bunch of orangutans, trying to teach them how to bunt the rocks and coconuts that angry 300 lb gorillas are throwing at them,

by royhobbs on Jul 29, 2011 11:20 AM PDT

Strong Side / Weak Side: Chipper Jones

http://www.onionsportsnetwork.com/articles/chipper-jones,8431/

by Santaklose11 on Nov 18, 2011 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

There are both fairly attractive in my book. However, Hinske ranks lower than Conrad. I’m not a tats guy. Therefore, Conrad had a better season than Hinske. That’s my analysis.

I’m here to kick ass and drink sweet tea, and dammit, I’m all out of sweet tea.

by TheLetter2 on Nov 17, 2011 11:45 AM EST reply actions  

Only way Conrad makes team is if Braves aquire SS/CF

maybe the likes of Wilson Valdez or as poster above said, a Brent Lillibridge type. The bench next year:

C David Ross
1B/ OF Eric Hinske
OF Matt Diaz
Utility IF- capable of playing SS
OF- capable of playing CF if something happens to Bourn

Conrad does not fit either of the last 2 bench spots. Unless Diaz is let go or they aquire someone that can play SS and CF, I don’t see Conrad making the team.

by bbaker68 on Nov 17, 2011 2:42 PM EST reply actions  

We don’t necessarily need to carry a backup SS to start the season if we get a decent starter. If an injury occurs, Prado could fill in for a few innings until we called someone up. It’s not that unusual for a team to not have a legit backup at every position on the bench.

If we can land [Stephen Drew], I will give FW a bj.
~justincredubil02

by king of games on Nov 17, 2011 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

True...

didn’t think of it that way…this becomes mute if Prado is traded though….wait a sec, I just found a way to get David Ross’ bat into the lineup! Brilliant!

"If it's F'd up then it's F'd up" --- Gregg Marshall

by jwrocks on Nov 17, 2011 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I always hate that teams waste roster spots on guys just because they can play a position at an acceptable level. If you have your starters set, you should fill your bench with the best players you can find regardless of position. Having a stronger, but less versatile, bench is more likely to win you games than keeping Julio Lugo just because he can play SS in the unlikely event of an injury. Catcher is the obvious exception.

If we can land [Stephen Drew], I will give FW a bj.
~justincredubil02

by king of games on Nov 17, 2011 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Except if you have a bench full of outfielder’s or first basemen….but yeah, I agree with what your saying.

"If it's F'd up then it's F'd up" --- Gregg Marshall

by jwrocks on Nov 17, 2011 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

If any of them, or one of the starting OFers, are athletic enough to take up space at SS for less than one game I’m fine with that bench. I figure even if that player loses you that one game, having the better bench will likely win you enough to more than compensate for it.

If we can land [Stephen Drew], I will give FW a bj.
~justincredubil02

by king of games on Nov 17, 2011 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

It's not just about injury, though.

The less defensive flexibility you have on the bench, the less flexibility you have to double-switch or pinch hit if you need to.

Most people use statistics the way a drunk would use a lamppost—for support, and not for illumination.
www.duwanis.com

by duwanis on Nov 17, 2011 8:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Then what do you do if your starting SS needs, say, a series off due to a minor injury? Are you going to run Prado (or heaven forbid Conrad) out there at SS for 3-5 games? Are you doing to DL your SS when he doesn’t need that much time to get better? Are you going to start shuffling your bench down to AAA and deal with Options and the rules about how long it takes before you can call a player back up after sending them down?

Q: If not us, who? If not now, when? A: The Batman. And "when you least expect it."

by Lennox on Nov 18, 2011 4:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, we do the same thing with the bullpen.

If we can land [Stephen Drew], I will give FW a bj.
~justincredubil02

by king of games on Nov 18, 2011 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Just a tad bit bored with Conrad

Seemed like every time he struck out it was on 3 pitches. I know the OBP isn’t bad and though it’s a small sample size, the guy hit .148 with RISP last year. He did have a .351 OBP in those situations, but walks don’t really drive in runs.

I like his power and his ability to take a walk, don’t get me wrong. I just want someone out there who can make more contact and not looked lost 80% of the time. Braves regulars strike out enough as it is(Uggla, Bourn, Freeman, Heyward, Gonzalez*).

*Doubt Gonzalez will be back, and I expect Freeman to improve his contact rate. My point is that I just want to see more contact off the bench.

by Undocorkscrew on Nov 17, 2011 3:12 PM EST reply actions  

Conrad actually had longer at-bats on average last year than he had at any other point in his career.

Most people use statistics the way a drunk would use a lamppost—for support, and not for illumination.
www.duwanis.com

by duwanis on Nov 17, 2011 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

sigh

"It looks like The Hound of the Baskervilles out there." - Steve Stone
"...I'm reminded of Wuthering Heights." - Harry Caray
~
Gaby Sanchez - 1, Nyjer Morgan - 0

by Chief Noc-A-Homa on Nov 17, 2011 6:04 PM EST reply actions  

I stand corrected

on Conrad. He’s a serviceable 25th guy…but not much else.

My dad taught me how to make meat for sloppy joes and my mom let me turn over hot dogs on the grill.

by ChopMaster on Jun 25, 2011 7:25 PM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Nov 17, 2011 7:40 PM EST reply actions  

please no more conrad this year

You won't always agree with me...Because sometimes you're wrong.

by JonnyBravesFan on Nov 18, 2011 2:42 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

We really need to upgrade the bench.
If Diaz can be the Diaz of old, then fine. Otherwise, he has got to been gone.
I don’t see Conrad contributing enough to make the team.
I’m marginally ok with Constanza getting a solid shot at the back-up OF/ PR role, but believe we should be trying to upgrade there as well.

by fandave on Nov 18, 2011 6:44 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Atlanta Braves.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chipper1_small
Thunderdome Thread
Thankschipper_small
Memorial Day Weekend - Off Topic
Today_sbn_icon_small
TheLetter2's Top Braves, 2012 Edition
Small
Closing out May Rosterbation

Recent FanPosts

Ck_small
Time to bench Heyward or move him down the lineup?
Small
What to do with a Piece of The Great American Cracker Box?
Img_0564_small
Is Pastornicky an historically bad defensive SS?
Miami-thrice-reut_small
McCann as LF/1B?
Icon2_small
Rev Wins!!!!!!!
Small
Speed in the 7 hole?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Gondeee_small gondeee

Editors

Heis3_small Scott Coleman

Sid_small SCrebel10

Authors

Dsc01731_small royhobbs

Mccann__brian_small cbwilk

N528829858_2098004_4206_small Zeus12888

Chris_and_harrison_at_braves_game_small Atlanta_Chris

Avatar_small TonyAlmeyda

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Ffw_small Fauxfrankwren

Moderators

My_hair_is_a_bird-257x300_small yondaime4

7sw6xo_chop_crop_small HEYJUDE