2011 Atlanta Braves Player Review: Tim Hudson and Derek Lowe
This week, we take a look at the starting rotation and we begin with two pitchers who contrasted as much as anyone this season: Derek Lowe and Tim Hudson. Hudson was consistently good while Lowe was consistently bad, so bad that he could give Freddy Krueger nightmares (this is Halloween, after all). They both smacked home runs, but that's where the similarities end. Hudson was Atlanta's most reliable starter in 2011, leading the team in wins and innings pitched while finishing second among starters in ERA (Jurrjens).
Lowe, on the other hand, was the first Braves pitcher since 1988 (Glavine) to lose 17 games in a season. The 17 losses were tied for the most in all of MLB and set a new personal record for futility. He had the worst ERA among the starting rotation and, for the most part, did not pitch like he was worth $60 million. His nine wins are his fewest since becoming a full-time starter in 2002.
Lowe may have been the opening day starter, but it was Hudson who proved to be the better pitcher. Hudson's 158 strikeouts are the most he's recorded with the Braves and it's the fourth-highest total of his career. His 2.82 K/BB ratio is the highest he's ever recorded. His GB% (56.7) was the lowest since 2002, yet it was good enough for fourth in all of MLB; the same goes for his GB/FB ratio (2.29). He tossed Atlanta's first of two complete game shutouts during the season, an 8-0 1-hitter over Milwaukee on May 4. He earned his 1,600th career strikeout in his June 20 start vs. Toronto and won the 10,000th game in Braves franchise history July 15.
On the downside, Hudson plunked 15 batters in 2011, topping all of MLB and his 10 wild pitches were second on the team; no one behind him had more than five.
As for Derek Lowe, to say he struggled this year would be an understatement. To put it simply, he flat out stunk. He showed glimpses of what he was supposed to be, but they were few in number; his May 6 start against the Phillies, for example: he took a no-hitter through six innings before getting dinged for a couple of hits. Including that start, for the month of May, the Braves were 5-1 in his starts despite his 4.86 ERA. Lowe's best month was April when he posted a 3.21 ERA; after that, everything went south starting with his DUI arrest April 28 and culminating with a miserable September that saw Lowe lose all five starts with an 8.75 ERA; a stark difference from September 2010 when he was the NL Pitcher of the Month. Lowe walked 70 batters for the first time since 2004 with Boston. According to Fangraphs, Lowe's WPA of -3.11 was worse than Scott Proctor.
Quality starts may be a useless stat to some, but in this case, they're effective in showing just how much better Hudson was than Lowe. I've also included other numbers for comparison.
| Tim Hudson | Derek Lowe | |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Starts (6+ IP, ≤ 3 ER) | 23 of 33 | 14 of 34 |
| ERA in quality starts | 1.81 | 3.09 |
| 6+ inning starts | 28 | 19 |
| 7+ inning starts | 16 | 3 |
| ≤ 5 IP starts | 4 | 11 |
| Starts with 4+ ER allowed | 7 | 15 |
| BABIP | .276 | .332 |
| Opponent's batting avg. | .236 | .285 |
If there is a glimmer of anything positive in Lowe's 2011 season, he was second in MLB in GB% (59.0) and GB/FB ratio (2.62). In addition, his FIP of 3.70 was his lowest as a Braves pitcher. He also had four starts in which he didn't allow a run (each at least 5 IP).
He also had a .173 batting avg. as a hitter, besting Hudson's .116, but they hit the only two home runs hit by Braves pitchers in 2011.
June 20: Hudson's homer
August 31: Lowe's homer
IN CONCLUSION
Hudson proved he deserves to be Atlanta's Opening Day starter in 2012. He's a free agent following the end of next season with an option for 2013. Lowe has no such option and certainly didn't help his cause this year to be retained beyond 2012, if he's kept next year at all. If he is, it could (and should) be out of the bullpen. The Braves have much better, younger options for the rotation.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
KK would have done a better job than Lowe this year.
-Yellow Jackets, Braves, Falcons, Hawks, and Thrashers fan!
by ChrisK562 on Oct 31, 2011 10:40 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
KK did worse against AA hitters
so I assume you’re joking.
http://sportsandgrits.com/
by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 31, 2011 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Normally in a case like Lowe's,
with a pitcher coming off a a subpar season but with a relatively good FIP, I’d say that he’d be due for a bounceback year. But Lowe is going to turn 39 next season. When a 38-year-old has a down year, there is rarely much up after that. Given 30 starts, he could be better in 2012, but his upside is very limited. The Braves have at least 7 better options.
The question is: do you try to find some team that will take a $3-5 million of his contract, or do you stick him in the bullpen, where his reduced stamina will make less difference? He’d be a high-priced middle reliever, but you have to ignore the first $10 million or so of his deal, which is basically a sunk cost now. I’d be inclined to trade him if possible, but either choice is fine as long as he’s not in the rotation.
As for Hudson, the only choice has to do with that 2013 option: Will he pitch well enough next year to justify the Braves picking it up? It seems pretty likely at this point, and honestly, I would not be surprised if the Braves signed him to a new deal after next season (presumably for less $$/year) so that Huddy could potentially end his career in a Braves uniform.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
I now twitter as @junkstats and blog about made-up stats and general baseball stuff at JunkStats.
by Jacob Peterson on Oct 31, 2011 11:44 AM EDT reply actions
You trade him if you can find someone willing to take 1/4-1/3+ of his remaining salary
we don’t need relief arms, so he’d be just as clogging there as he would be in the rotation. Plus any money saved can be better served addressing the actual needs of the team, which both starting and relief aren’t, i.e. SS, depth and LF (depending on Prado plans).
http://sportsandgrits.com/
by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 31, 2011 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I would move Lowe as quickly as we could...
I’d hate for the Front Office to sit on the hope of a better deal (like with KK) and then watch that player self-destruct. Lowe has some value, especially if the infield guys behind him can pick it. For an AL team, Lowe could be a hoss and surpass 200 IP since he wouldn’t be in the position of having to be pinch-hit for in the bottom of the 5th after he’s gone 5 IP with 95 pitches thrown. I think there are several teams out there that would be interested in a 1-year Lowe deal…probably a team that loses a SP to injury (Boston) or a team on the verge of moving pieces in 2013 because of salary (sort of like the 2012 Brewers) if the team isn’t in contention. Getting a team to take on $5MM would be great.
Huddy’s the Man. That is all. I’m not sure what the 2013 option is for, but the guy’s a gamer.
"Reach down in there...TURN THAT DAMN THING UP!" - Coach Paul Johnson
Lowe's numbers really aren't that bad.
Of course he’s not worth the money he makes, and he’s not really a fit for this team any longer, but really there are quite a few teams that should be happy with a guy that eats 190 innings as their fifth starter. And with his peripherals showing he was pretty unlucky this year, a smart GM would pounce on Lowe if they could get him for $5-7mil.
If we can land [Stephen Drew], I will give FW a bj.
~justincredubil02
LOWE to INDIANS
Probably a separate story on that momentarily.
"Forget Roy Halladay or Clayton Kershaw or Cliff Lee, the NL Cy Young Award should go to O’Ventrel." - David Schoenfield, ESPN.com, 8/19/11






























