What's more impressive
Winning the Triple Crown
Home Run Champion
RBI Champion
AVG Champion
or
Home Run Champion (39)
RBI Champion (126)
Runs Champion (115)
To be a runs champion means you have to have a combination of on base percentage and speed - Normally opposite Home Run Hitters. It's reflective of the fact that he was second in the league with 40 steals.
I am leaving the fact that he had a phenomenal average (324-3rd) and on base percentage (399-4th), phenomenal steal total (40-2nd), Games (161-2nd), Hits (195-2nd), because I want the question to just compare the three titles.
Anyway, obviously he should be MVP - And Obviously the Braves should consider whether or not it would be worth it to part with the package it would require to get him.
He could be a generational player, and this might be one of those rare times when one is available, and we happen to have the best bargaining chips in baseball--so many that we could offer them whatever it took and still have a plenty.
This FanPost does not express the views or opinions of Talking Chop.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Oh and...
He is pretty much the only guy leading these categories coming from SS/CF/C
It depends on what totals you have to achieve to be the leader in each category...
some years the category leader isn’t really a very impressive number like Terry Pendleton in 1991 winning the batting title with a .319 or the AL four way tie for first in homers 1981 with 22. Conceivably one could win the triple crown with a very good but less than historic line. Same goes for any stat category or group of them.
The Braves might could have gotten Kemp last season when he was coming off as an underachieving malcontent, but now he is an MVP quality team leader that it would take a kings ransom to acquire if the boys in blue would even consider it. The price it would that it would that to get him just really outweighs the benefit of actually having him.
http://tarpslides-r-us.blogspot.com/
I think the Braves could get Kemp but the package would be HUGE.. Its not worth the risk of having him for a season and then him splitting town when the Braves can’t pay him what he wants when free agency comes knocking.
In baseball, you're supposed to sit on your ass, spit tobacco, and nod at stupid things. Perfect life might I add.
by HeywardFTW! on Oct 29, 2011 11:30 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Agree
Then we would have to watch a bunch of our guys playing in the World Series for the Rangers, I mean the Dodgers.
"First!"...Who gives a damn if you are first
Hahaha very true! Imagine our bullpen Kimbrel,Venters,EOF and Feliz… Thats filthy! But better not kick those tires.
In baseball, you're supposed to sit on your ass, spit tobacco, and nod at stupid things. Perfect life might I add.
by HeywardFTW! on Oct 29, 2011 11:55 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
The Braves ...
can’t pay him what he’s getting now. Good luck trading for him.
Did you have fun...
Did it rock fap-fap-fappin’ off to the thought of Matt Kemp in a Braves uniform next year, willlin?
Good. Because a trade for Kemp is about as likely as you having anal sex with Mila Kunis. But if you wanted to go for the two-fer tonight, that gives you another fantasy to fap to. };0)
I see great things in baseball. It's our game - the American game. It will take our people out-of-doors, fill them with oxygen, give them a larger physical stoicism. Tend to relieve us from being a nervous, dyspeptic set. Repair these losses, and be a blessing to us. ~Walt Whitman
Because a trade for Kemp is about as likely as you having anal sex with Mila Kunis
that’s both funny and titillating.
if we gave up Hanson and Teheran with a piece like Salcedo, MLB would think it’s fair value (and Kershaw, Teheran and Hanson for the next 5 years is scary to think about). However, we don’t have the $$$ to afford an extension for Kemp that would be, on average, around 19 million a year.
by JoelGuzman'sScout on Oct 30, 2011 2:45 AM EDT up reply actions
We will have the money in 2013......
And we should wait til then. No sense in giving up the farm for a guy that can walk away. Wait til he hits free agency and make a run at him.
This is possibly the best comment on TC that I have ever read.
wayyy tooo funny…Props to you sir.
And yes even though she has and bites for boobs, Mila Kunis is a freakin GODDESS!
Plus One, for the woman you chose to properly explain your statement.
Sometimes I wake up grumpy; other times I let her sleep.
by chicagobullies on Oct 31, 2011 1:39 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Umm...
In either case, I would pretty much do what was necessary.
Personal attacks are the weapon of the ignorant.
Panthers '011: This is what we've been waiting for...we get to overpay the core of a 2-14 team!
by MichaelProcton on Nov 2, 2011 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'ed
Like Mila’s chili ring in my dreams…
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
Which naturally leads to the question, why exactly DID you click the thread? /eyebrow raise

by !Vive la Francoeur! on Oct 31, 2011 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions

I see great things in baseball. It's our game - the American game. It will take our people out-of-doors, fill them with oxygen, give them a larger physical stoicism. Tend to relieve us from being a nervous, dyspeptic set. Repair these losses, and be a blessing to us. ~Walt Whitman
Excellent banter. Simply excellent.
"If you were going to make a Mount Rushmore of managers, Bobby's one of them."
-Mike Scioscia
by The Keith Lockhart Era on Nov 6, 2011 8:24 PM EST up reply actions
I would say that the original triple crown is more impressive...
…if only because it is rarer. The triple crown you suggested has now been accomplished in the National League for two consecutive year—-Kemp in 2011 and Pujols in 2010. Either way, either one is very impressive. That being said, leading the league in runs has far less to do with stolen bases and speed than it does with being on base a lot, having a lot of extra base hits, having a lot of home runs, and playing for a good team. From 1998-2002, the NL run champion was either Sammy Sosa or Jeff Bagwell, and that certainly had nothing to do with speed. More often than not, it is a slugger, not a speedster who leads the league in runs—-hell, Teixeira led the AL in runs in 2010, that sure as hell had absolutely nothing to do with his speed.
AVG is more impressive than R
It’s less team-dependent.
If you’re going to change something about the triple crown, get rid of RBI.
Most people use statistics the way a drunk would use a lamppost—for support, and not for illumination.
www.duwanis.com

by 























