Braves Quote For The Day ... Robinson Lopez
The Braves traded away three prospects yesterday to get Derrek Lee, but really the Braves traded away one good prospect and two warm bodies. Robinson Lopez is head and shoulders above Tyrelle Harris and Jeffrey Lorick as a prospect, but what did the Braves really give up in Lopez? Mike Newman from the prospect site Scouting The Sally, has the best quote I've seen from any of the scouts out there about Lopez:
He’s the type of high ceiling arm ANY organization would covet. It just so happens the Braves find them better than anybody else and Lopez was a project in an organization needing to win now.
Very well put. There are a bunch of Braves fans who are upset at the loss of a good young pitcher like Lopez, and even Mike admits truthfully that Lopez could come back to haunt the Braves, but in the grand scheme of our organizational pitching Lopez will not be a factor for three or four years. The Braves are trying to win now, and they had a glaring hole that needed to be filled, and they may have found the best player available to plug it in Derrek Lee. That's worth mortgaging the possibility that Lopez will develop into something special for Atlanta.
Read more about the trade and the prospects at Scouting The Sally.
Jonathan Mayo at MLB.com has some info on the three Braves players sent to Chicago.
Baseball Prospectus has an extensive look at the trade from both sides.
Ken Rosenthal has a great behind-the-scenes look at the trade.
ESPN's Keith Law thinks the Braves paid a surprising cost.
And Baseball America has their usual solid review of the trade.
156 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
our needs were a bit different
it may have behooved us to wait
"Infield hits are sexy, because they require technique."
-Ichiro
by VivaLosBravos on Aug 19, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Or we may have found a CF better than Ankiel...
just pondering with no real point or answer to the quetion
by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 19, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Doubt it would have been a whole lot more
Lopez is a solid enough prospect, but he’s not the sort of guy that’s going to net a great return. There were also the payroll limitations, which were more limiting at that point. Maybe a similar player that could actually be offered arbitration as a type B free agent.
Er one question. I need to catch up on my prospects so I was wondering if Freddie Freeman is a power hitter like Brian McCann and will we draft a pitcher or bat next year in the draft?
Wouldn't use Mcann
as the determining whether one is a “power hitter”, although he has pop, I would suggest Adam Dunn as a prototypical power hitter. And Freeman’s game is very well rounded IMO
Bat, we have amazing depth pitching-wise… Teheran, Delgado, Vizcaino, Minor, Kimbrel, Venters, etc
GSO
ehhh… I’ll ask Gondee what the chances are of Wren taking a power-hitter next year we seem thin with the bats which is never a good thing when you’re gonna play the AL in the World Series. I think this team can win the pennant but once we face the Rays or Yanks were done for sure
Teams have so many draft picks that Wren will take all of the above.
Jason Heyward wins at baseball.
by bbxxj on Aug 19, 2010 12:18 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
you also dont usually draft for needs
Baseball players take a while to get to the majors. You don’t (usually) draft needs, but best available…
"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"
"You look like you should be married to one of the San Diego Padres."
when you talk about individual picks, you’re right. In the overall scheme of the draft though, you target organizational needs more. This year, we drafted a lot of infield bats and a lot of college guys because the high minors had absolutely no hitting. I see the organization targeting outfielders next year, and probably some high school pitching to keep the low minors stocked.
By the way, freeman probably profiles to hit 25-30 homers, so take that for what you will.
MASN Announcer: "Ususally they have what they call here 'the privilege,' and that's what bobby cox calls it when he let's the veteran guys swing away on 3-0. This is not such a hitter."
Jason Heyward: Single up the middle, ballgame.
Compare Freeman's power as he's moved up with Chipper's...
both long, large frames.
by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 19, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
THIS...
with 50 or so picks, we will draft pitchers (both with high upside and more “polished” without the upside), infielders, outfielders, catchers, position players with speed and the potential to lead off, position players with size and power and the potential to hit in the heart of an order, you take a lot and generally at each spot take the “best available” according to your board (best available including cost consideration in the analysis).
by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 19, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
let me start by sying great move by wren and company. But i stll believe frank wren is a dumbass with dumb luck. My point may seem random but they are all tied together. starting with tex to laa he could have gotten a much better return but demanded a ml ready first baseman he didnt look a few short months into the future and see the glaring holes approaching in the off season. such as 3 people missing from the rotation no proven cfer, auto dp escobar if he was up and a man on 1st, jeff (swing at everything and try to pull it) francour, a streaky second baseman whos overall numbers looked respectable at the end of the year but that was because of an amazing streak in sept. where you could see he was playing over his head. no real power itn the upcoming lineup. So what does he do overspends for lowe and kk but makes a great deal for jv. i thought that was a smart move who would have thought he would have had such an astonishing year. i was expecting the norms of 3.90 to 4.10 era 200+ ip and 200+ ks but his monster year made wren look smarter than he is. his power rh bat was an over the hill lh with NO POWER. but he blew all the funds for a good starter in lowe but not great like he is paid. and a japanes pitcher that a past history indicates dont pitch nowhere near as well here but paid him like he pitched there. he overlooked the fact that huddy was coming back and hanson was ready or real close at the time. and an outfield that wouldnt intimitade low a ball 5th starters. his cfr couldnt cut it his rh power bat fuga was awful at the plate and in the field,and fyf was still trying to pull everything that was 3 feet out of the zone or in the dirt. all of those things brought on the trade for mcclouth who even at his best in atl wasnt very good.
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 11:53 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
so there you have 27 mil in payroll for three guys. 2 of which could havee been gotten from within for leauge minimum (kk & mcclouth = blanco & jojo) and the third he could have gotten the same production for aroun 6 mil. so that would have been 6.8 ( which is either kk or mcclouths salary) which would have left 20 for a bat or two
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 12:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
you think kk and jojo are the same?
"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"
"You look like you should be married to one of the San Diego Padres."
Are you insane?
Kawakami, who was a league-average or better pitcher, is the same as Reyes, who has been awful nearly every time he’s taken the mound?
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 19, 2010 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I didn’t understand any of that
"Tony Gwynn made sacrifices. Cal Ripken made sacrifices. I'm not sure Derek Jeter made sacrifices given the ungodly deep pockets the Yankees have." - Chipper Jones
by MBL1 on Aug 19, 2010 12:14 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
That's because
It’s a bunch of jibberish.
He lost his credibility well before comparing KK to JoJo Reyes, but that’s the most glaring, “Are you fucking serious??” kind of comment he made. Comparing McLouth to Blanco makes sense in hindsight, but there’s no possible way that the comparison is anywhere near valid at the time the trade was made. McLouth has had an all-star season, and Blanco will never be an all-star.
Whining and griping about Lowe and KK’s salary shows a complete lack of context, imo. Tons of people do it now, but completely disregard the state of the Braves rotation at the time the deal was done. Hudson was hurt, Hanson was in the minors, and Vazquez was coming off a pretty lackluster season in Chicago.
Our rotation was looking something like Jurrjens, Jorge Campillo, Charlie Morton, JoJo Reyes, and Chuck James if FW hadn’t done the Vazquez trade and the FA signings. Glavine was rehabbing, Smoltz was coming off a serious injury, Mike Hampton was a FA and Hudson was thought to be lost for the entire season.
If you look at the FA options of that season, they weren’t exactly stellar. Ryan Dempster and Pettitte remained with their teams, the Yankees took both Sabathia and Burnett (dodged a bullet??). That leaves Carl Pavano and Jon Garland as pitchers who have seen success since that time.
Here’s a list of pitchers we could have had instead of Lowe or Kawakami: Rich Harden, Kris Benson, Paul Byrd, Brad Penny, Mark Mulder, Pedro Martinez, Oliver Perez (LOLMets), Mark Prior, Ben Sheets and Randy Wolf.
THANK GOD we signed Lowe and Kawakami.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
by cthabeerman on Aug 19, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
and kept the same offense minus tex and kotsay.that lead to the seventh worst record in baseball. my point was and still is there were other needs at the time it was all spent on 3 players 2 of which was overpaid for to long limiting financial flexibility for the rest of this year and next and still have holes but at leas they have depth
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 2:20 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
mcclouths numbers wasnt very good at the time of the trade. And the pitchers they picked up wasnt going to shut offenses down every outing. With that said you cant win if you cant score runs. Adding two average pithchers who eat innings and an unproven 31 year old japanese who had not completed more than130 innings over the past 5 seasons. that is not a championship caliber that he claimed it was
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 2:41 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
If you think...
The offense, which included Chipper, McCann, KJ, and Yunel was a greater need than a rotation that included JoJo Reyes and Charlie Morton, there’s not much I can do for you because you’re a moron.
The Braves needed a No. 1 guy. Jurrjens was entering his second season, for Pete’s sake. Vazquez had just finished a mediocre season at best with the White Sox. Then you have Reyes, Morton and a hodge podge of possibilities including Campillo (who was a FA), Chuck James, Jeff Bennett or James Parr. Yeah, no significant need there.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
And Glavine, Kawakami, Medlen, Hanson,...
and then there were also other free agents besides just Lowe. So please explain the “significant need” to ad a P in his mid 30s to a high dollar, long term deal.
Also, please explain how Derek Lowe = “a No. 1 guy”.
Neither Hanson or Medlen had pitched at AAA prior to the 2009 season. Glavine signed with the Braves but was coming off a shoulder injury, which is why he didn’t start the year with the team. The Braves signed him after Lowe, hoping he could rehab and come back.
As for calling Lowe a No. 1, he averaged 15 wins/season during his seven years as a starter. What else would you call him?? I bet if you found a list of pitchers that averaged 15 wins as a starter during their career, you’d probably be fairly safe in calling them all No. 1s.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
Glavine was rehabbing an injury. Total question mark.
Kawakami was a new import who hadn’t even been really great in Japan for a few years. #4/5 upside at best.
And Medlen and Hanson hadn’t even shown success above AA yet. So counting on them from Opening Day would have been pretty retarded. As for Lowe as a #1 guy, he’s a great postseason pitcher, he had pitched very, very well for the Dodgers coming down the stretch of a playoff race, and he will come out and throw 200+ innings of solid baseball every year.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 20, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions
how can your bitch ass call me a moron the fact is that same offense plus tex for most of the season until they fell completly out of contention had the 7th worst record in mlb. They didnt have a replacement centerfielder with enough experience to merit him as a real option. Chipper as good as he is still didnt have much pop and was only able to play no more than 120 games. Kj was inconsistant to say the least and McCann cant do it all by himself let alone the fact that he is a catcher so he needs a little more rest than the rest of them. Kotch hit for average but no pop.Fuga poor d no stick. Frenchy enough said and at the time Escobar was considered an automatic dp even if he was leading off.
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 3:40 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
How is it, exactly...
that Chipper, who hasn’t played fewer than 120 games since ’06 should have been considered a lock to play “no more than 120?”
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 20, 2010 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I never said they didnt need starting pitching.I was saying there were other cheaper options that wouldnt have crippled the financial status like he has. Just because you have a need and 30 mil doesnt mean you have to spend it all on one need especially when you have other needs as well. Also they had jv jj kk huddy and hanson for this year anyway so a 1 year rental would have been the fix til huddy came back.
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 3:53 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Hudson coming back like he did was no guarantee. Hanson hadn’t thrown a pitch above AA, and only pitched there for about 2/3 of a season. Vazquez was no sure thing, either. Jurrjens was in his second season. There were at least logical questions marks at literally every spot in the rotation.
Am I arguing that we didn’t need help offensively?? No. But if you think for one second that our needs there were even remotely as significant as our rotation needs, you’re deluded.
Also, you used KK as an example of spending too much on a player (and compared him to JoJo Reyes, ffs), and then later cited him as an example of why we didn’t need to spend money. Nice contradiction.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
by cthabeerman on Aug 19, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Which pitcher in baseball shuts down offenses EVERY outing?
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 20, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions
JOsh Johnson?
Adam Wainwright?
i guess not every outing…but like 95% is darn good (guessing on the percentage)
"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."
Dwight Schrute
But none actually do...
And they sure as shit don’t hit the FA market at a lower price than we spent on D-Lowe.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 20, 2010 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Got one
Pedro Martinez
in 1999 and 2000 he had one (total) bad outing in 1999 he gave up 6 runs…in 2000 he gave up more than 3 runs in a game twice
BWAHAHAHAHA
"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."
Dwight Schrute
Also Scott Olsen and Josh Willingham was on the block. Washington got both in a deal and didnt give up anything useful. That filled 2 needs a startng pitcher that could have been non tendered at the end of the year and a rh power bat. But wren wouldnt throw his hat in the ring because of Willinghams defense and then this year tried to get him from washington
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 3:01 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Did he?
Did he tell you so?
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 20, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Hudson didn’t come back until August/September last year. And I agree with MLB1…that was hard to understand.
Let us know what deals FW passed up when he traded Tex to LAA…
by dunnytwogloves on Aug 19, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
whats hard to understand about one demand he made for a trade for tex he said he HAD to have a ml ready first baseman and yeah huddy but they knew he was coming back and hanson would be ready soon. now do the math lowe 15 mil kk 6 mil jv 11 mil now jvs can be justified but the other 2 and for so long knowing they had jj hanson and huddy wanted an extension with another year of jv that is six ml starters and 2 overpaid and with tex they could have gotten more than kotchman but he made it clear that he HAD to get a ml firstbaseman in return to fill the void that would be left with tex leaving
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 12:29 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
The things that's hard to understand...
is what you are actually saying. Punctuation and capitalization are big helps. You may have some great points in there somewhere, but it’s way too much trouble to try to figure out what you are saying.
"It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall alone." A. Bartlett Giamatti
this entire paragraph has 1 period. when I read this, my mind interprets it as you being one of those hyperactive kids they need to give medication to.
MASN Announcer: "Ususally they have what they call here 'the privilege,' and that's what bobby cox calls it when he let's the veteran guys swing away on 3-0. This is not such a hitter."
Jason Heyward: Single up the middle, ballgame.
He didn't know Hudson was coming back as a quality pitcher any more than he knew what the weather would be a month in the future.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 19, 2010 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Meaning what?...
as a Georgia boy, I can give you a pretty solid prediction on the weather just about every June, July, and August—90+, high humidity, scattered thunderstorms generally localized and short lived. Probably god for about 60-75 days in those 3 months alone.
Haha.
Right. So you can give a pretty solid guess. But it’s no sure thing, and certainly isn’t the kind of thing you’d want to bet, say, an $85 million investment on.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 19, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I’ll answer the Tex trade question. He passed up on getting 2 draft picks and keeping Tex for the year if there wasn’t a better package than Kotchman and Marek out there. By the way, the Angels selected Mike Trout with the pick they got from the Yanks for signing Tex. I’m sure you know Trout is one of the highest rated CF prospects in the minors.
And yet...
Everyone’s calling the Washington Nationals idiots for not trading Dunn and getting more than those two draft picks. Teixeira > Dunn.
So…it’s a bad deal for us because the draft pick the Angels got turned out to be good instead of bad?? Seems to me the jury’s still out on this type of thing, generally speaking.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
by cthabeerman on Aug 19, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
It all depends on how you valued Kotchman and Marek at the time of the deal. I would have preferred to have the 2 draft picks at the time. In addition, Dunn may only be a Type B free agent and just net a supplemental pick for the Nats. There was no doubt that Tex was a Type A.
If Dunn doesn't make an A...
The Elias system is retarded. I know it’s horribly flawed as is (the most recent update has Brad Hawpe ahead of Dunn), but c’mon…
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
+1
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 19, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Unfortunately th Braves scouts were not high on Kendry Morales at the time...
That would have been nice, but given Morales’s performance up until last season, there were a lot of reasons to prefer Kotchman when the trade was made.
Proof?...
I’d read we liked Morales and they said no way. But then, no one has or can get definitive proof of that possibility.
I thought I remembered reading the opposite.
That they offered us Morales before Kotchman because they would rather have kept Casey, but the Braves weren’t too enamored with Morales either. Maybe I got it backward, wouldn’t surprise me.
big block of text
"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"
"You look like you should be married to one of the San Diego Padres."
sorry about the errors but i am on my phone at work and i work at a lumber yard and work with my hands constantly so i dont have much time to check or proofread
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 12:32 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Perhaps there's a better time to be posting, then?
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 19, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah, wren is terrible. That’s why we have the 2nd best record in the NL.
MASN Announcer: "Ususally they have what they call here 'the privilege,' and that's what bobby cox calls it when he let's the veteran guys swing away on 3-0. This is not such a hitter."
Jason Heyward: Single up the middle, ballgame.
and he gets the credit. he didnt draft heward mccann prado hanson or pull off the trade for jj aside from one and a half stellar months from glaus none of his additons really played a big part in this teams success. melky has had some clutch hits and great putouts from the outfield but he gets credit for their record. Did he tell bobby to bat prado 1st and heyward second? That was the initial move that offense.
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 12:55 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
and why is the other 2 eating 13 mil in salary to suck in aaa
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 12:57 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
let me guess he made examples of them like it dont matter what you make either produce or go to aaa we dont care we dont have the money to replace you
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 1:00 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He pulled off a number of signings and trades without giving up any of those guys. Where schuerholz traded guys like wainwright for rentals, wren has made a point to amass and keep high level prospects. That’s the reason that we have jurrjens, hanson, medlen, and heyward contributing substantially to this club and 3 or 4 of the best pitching prospects in baseball and our first baseman of the future waiting in the wings.
As for his trades, you win some and you lose some. In the vazuez trade, he gave up flowers and some riff raff and got back a staff ace. In the mclouth trade, he gave up nothing and got a somewhat productive half season in CF. In the 2nd vazquez trade, he got an elite pitching prospect for a guy with 1 year left on his deal. Say what you will about the players that he’s acquired, but it’s not like he’s giving up our very best for them. Wren has put together a team that’s got more solid contributors than any in baseball. There’s not one guy on the roster that isn’t capable of starting for someone (except maybe hicks).
MASN Announcer: "Ususally they have what they call here 'the privilege,' and that's what bobby cox calls it when he let's the veteran guys swing away on 3-0. This is not such a hitter."
Jason Heyward: Single up the middle, ballgame.
the jj trade was in 07 while js was still gm
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 1:05 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It was after the '07 season though.
JS retired at the end of the season. All the moves made that offseason were by Wren.
And the Jurrjens trade wasn't even the most lopsided one the Braves made that offseason.
We got Omar Infante for something called a “Jose Ascanio”.
Infante and Will Ohman, who was outstanding for the Braves.
I wrote a novel, it's about baseball, you should buy it:
http://www.amazon.com/Four-C-B-Wilkins/dp/1449578454/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257720610&sr=1-1
www.dropoutproductions.com
I was a fan of Ascanio though...
and thought he could be a good reliever. But Ohman was better, let alone Ohman + Infante.
Good god.
First, what was the “much better return” anybody offered for Teixiera? Further, who’s to say that Vazquez wasn’t due to outperform his typical numbers (although likely not as much as he did) just because he was back in the NL. To have assumed Hudson was coming back at even the level he performed at before would have been foolish.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 19, 2010 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions
The point is that wren is one lucky guy and people are calling him a genius for this move (and i believe it is a great addition) anone in baseball could see this as a no brainer. It may be a bust but from a baseball standpoint right now is a great deal. I was pointing to the fact that one great deal doesnt make him a genius. If you look at his other deals you can see he is not the man people want him to be. As for Huddy nobody saw him doing what he is doing but he still had this year on his contract so we would have found out anyway. Besides he was still an above average pitcher with whom they knew would give them a discount they couldnt pass up. Now imagine where the team could be without the 16 million dollar man and the 2 6 million AAA guys .
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 1:21 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It's 15 million dollars...
And would you rather the deal have been from anywhere from $4M to $12M (most on the middle-to-high side of that range) for guys like: Rich Harden, Kris Benson, Paul Byrd, Brad Penny, Mark Mulder, Pedro Martinez, Oliver Perez, Mark Prior, Ben Sheets and Randy Wolf??
Those were the other “average to above-average” pitchers available in FA that year. Say what you want about his price tag, but we couldn’t have signed Lowe for less money. We would have ended up with one of the above instead.
Again, it’s easy to look back and say, “Too much money.” But, at the time, he was the best option available, that’s what he cost, and we needed him. If you look at the other pitchers available and their own individual situations at the time, it’s pretty clear that Wren signed the right guys at the time. And, while expensive, their performances have been far better than any of the above listed pitchers.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
As much as people like to hate on Lowe
He gives us at least average performance and he eats innings. He has a lot of value. In the neighborhood of 12 million a year thus far. Sure we paid a little more than that, but I won’t consider the contract a major overpay if he stays around his current level for the next 2 years, especially since his presence helped get us an extra year of Hanson.
Disagree...
but then at his age, I didn’t think Lowe was worth the money, and also felt we could get by fine with Vazquez at the top, followed by Jurrjens, KK (not sure if he or Lowe were signed first, but I assume we knew he’d likely be coming or had already agreed at the time Lowe signed), and let the rookies battle with Hanson, Jojo, and others on the cusp (like Medlen. In that scenario, I’d have been fine with a one year deal for Wolf, Harden, Penny, among others that were available (like Pavano and Garland), if not two of that group. I think that’d be a wiser use of the money than Lowe’s deal considering the risk of a pitcher in his mid 30s and a long term, high dollar deal.
But that’s me, and I’m not in a good position to make those decisions, plus what’s done is done
So you'd have been fine with a rotation...
With two pitchers that had proven themselves to be major-league caliber.
I rest my case.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
Just cause they're "unproven" doesn't make them worthless...
giving KK the amount we did “proves” he’s major league caliber, as did his performance on the hill, so I’d have been fine with him in the 3 or 4 slot. In the least the money proves the front office thought he was major league caliber. Plus you still have math problems, because in case you stopped reading, I also mention offering a one year deal to a veteran or two of the liks of Wolf, Harden, Penny, Garland, Pavano, etc instead of 4/60 to Lowe. Add the veteran or two to sure up the 3 and 4 spot, and I’d have been fine with adding KK, Glavine (he was around and considered a likely option at the time, so let’s not forget him), and Jojo, Hanson, Medlen, among other rookies competing for the 4th and 5th starters spot.
Now compare the results you’d have gotten from a one year deal for any of those names, PLUS the flexibility of having it only being a one year deal allowing the team to keep Vazquez or pursue other free agents with the freed up cash both then and now, to what we’ve gotten from Lowe.
Now I’ll rest my case, at least until you come up with some other bs argument or reading comprehension failure response.
Valid points
On the whole, although there’s not as much flexibility short-term in taking any of those guys as you’d thought.
The cheapest of the options listed, Pavano, made only $1.5M because he didn’t hit any of his $5.3M in incentives. Otherwise, you’re looking at a minimum $5M apiece (Wolf and Penny). If they signed Harden or Garland, you’ve got $7M+ with options and buyouts for a second year. At that rate, you’ve got two pitchers instead of one but no significant flexibility (< $2M) until 2011.
You’ve also got a handful of pitchers with known significant injuries in their past, other than Garland’s clean bill of health.
Or you could take the known commodity, whose never had an injury and has been worth more than 3 WAR an average during his previous four seasons in the NL, who might cost you 3-4 million more than the other options (save Garland), who have considerable downside attached to them.
Obviously, you can go either way. But Lowe, even at the time, was a much safer yet slightly more expensive option. It’s easy to say you’d go the non-Lowe route now, but without knowing that Vazquez was going to do as well as he did, you’d be taking a much bigger risk by not signing Lowe.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
by cthabeerman on Aug 19, 2010 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
"slightly more expensive"...
because 1 year for under $10m is only “slighlty” less than 4 years for $60m.
What part of short-term did you miss??
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
even if it is cheaper short term you still have the spend teh extra 50M so it doesnt matter what is cheaper short term.
15 a year for Lowe isnt horrible the 4 years and 15M a year is what makes it a problem
2-3 years at 15M isnt that big of a deal….
I would have happily paid wolf or Harden 12M for a single year
"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."
Dwight Schrute
You could certainly go that route, and I wouldn’t say there’s an issue with it.
However, in so doing, you lose any sense of continuity in the rotation. Two years here, a year there, just form a patchwork rotation until you can get your prospects developed. Which is fine, if you’re confident that your starters in the farm system can come in and perform at a high level consistently for years to come.
Take a quick look at how our young starters up until that point had done in past years. As previously mentioned, you have Morton, Reyes & Co. not exactly lighting it up in the major leagues.
There’s certainly something to be said for signing a guy long-term that can come in and fill one of those spots without a hitch.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
i dont wanna patchwork rotation, but you wait until you get a guy who makes snese to sign to a 4-5 year deal for FA money…DLowe isnt that type of guy IMHO.
I don’t think it was a terrible signing, he will pretty much perform pretty close to the value of his contract as long as he is healthy. but we’ll see.
"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."
Dwight Schrute
The fact that you even mention Medlen as a potential starter in 2009 shows that you’re doing your fair share of revisionist history.
2008 was Medlen’s first year in the minors as a starter. He then moved up to start at Gwinnett for part of the year, and was promoted to the majors…as a reliever.
It’s pretty obvious that the Braves had absolutely no intentions of using him as a starter at the major league level at that time. The fact that he came into 2010 as a reliever further strengthens that point.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
by cthabeerman on Aug 19, 2010 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Meds hit the bigs before Hanson last year and he came in for a couple spot starts. Actually he was outperforming Hanson in AAA is the reason he got the call.At the end of spring training Bobby was real high on Meds liked what he saw in his spot starts and kept him around in the bullpen. He was a younger more talented version of Jorge Sosa. Spot starter and long reliever which is what he was til jj went down. With that being said i dont think he would be nearly as good without the time in the bullpen to get him acclimated to major league hitters. I think thats what made the difference IMO.He had a pretty rocky first start filling in JV. I do not think he was ready at the beginning of the season last year.
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 5:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
No.
The reason he got the call was that they didn’t see him burning them as a super two player, because they didn’t think he’d be as good as Hanson long term.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 20, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions
You are wrong...
completely and totally wrong. Medlen was promoted to the majors … as a STARTER. Go back and check for yourself if you’d like, but he came in and started several games before giving way to Hanson and sliding to the bullpen. It is posts like this that makes it seem as though you are talking straight out of your rectum, because it is completely and absolutely false.
“revisionist history” = you, not me.
Uhh...
They had no idea what Hudson was going to do with regards to a potential contract extension, and that’s to completely ignore the fact that they didn’t know ho he’d pitch.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 20, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Periods. Capitalization at the start of sentences. Basically all the stuff you learn in grade school would make this possible to read. As it is, it’s gibberish and I can’t read it.
I wrote a novel, it's about baseball, you should buy it:
http://www.amazon.com/Four-C-B-Wilkins/dp/1449578454/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257720610&sr=1-1
www.dropoutproductions.com
I learned it better than most. I may not be an english major but I am not ignorant by any means. If you want to try and belittle someone, fine go right ahead, but atleast try to understand the circumstances first. By the way shouldnt Gondee be capitalized?
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 5:43 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
don't worry about it
grammar policing is apparently the cool thing to do
by kbertling353 on Aug 19, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions
You should have put a comma after dumb. And i appoligized for my grammatical errors, I as typing and then I would have to sit my phone down and lost track.
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 6:24 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I am not the biggest fan of Wren...but
I am sure that the Tex deal still had Shurhotzes fingers in it…..I think you got it right on his “knee Jerk” aquitition of Lowe and KK but at the time we didn’t have the money to go after Sab (I love de penstripes) itha and so maybe trying to emulate his former mentor thought it was better to overspend on pitching after the horrible disentigration or blowup of our pitching stable!
So this year with the Tight budget he gambled…and at least a few are coming in to help…though one is going to need a little down time to find his “Clarence Carter” (stroke) owed to the fact that maybe someone was not keeping his legs in shape while his shoulder was on the mend?
It is ok to air it out on Wren and I can only hope that his latest venture will be a turning point in his leadership when a win now approach has a time and a place…do I need to state the obvious?
it just felt right and the chance to go to the postseason is hard to pass up. I’ve always respected their orginization… and Bobby…I’m excited. I’m looking forward to it...Derrek Lee (at press conference sayiing he had been traded to the Braves)
Two points
I hate giving up Lopez as much as the next guy but there a two things that I came to realize about Lopez before the trade that help to ease the pain.
1) While his ultimate ceiling remains very high, his physical projection is probably closer to maxed out than most people would assume with a 19-year-old. The following report from Scouting the Sally is a great example of why minor league height/weight listings shouldn’t be trusted.
http://scoutingthesally.com/2010/08/scouting-report-robinson-lopez-p-atlanta-braves/
2) It has become evident throughout the year that Lopez is in fact several years away despite his great raw stuff. He seems to have hit a wall after a terrific start and will need quite a bit of minor league seasoning to adjust to full season ball and gain more consistency.
Now none of these revelations are atypical for young pitchers like Lopez but it’s become obvious he’s not going to be on the fast-track like Teheran and therefore it makes me feel better about putting him in a deal like this.
When you are barely breaking the top five pitching prospects on a team with a stacked for years major league rotation, you become very expendable in filling a big need on a team that can win now.
Jason Heyward wins at baseball.
by bbxxj on Aug 19, 2010 12:20 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I agree but
it is not a guarantee that our pitching prospects will pan out. Actually, the percent of them panning out is very small, therefore you can never have too much pitching. I agree with you but we really don’t know
by Braves24 on Aug 19, 2010 4:30 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
As an admittedly ignorant Braves fan...
With respect to their prospects (aside from what I read on this site and the obvious top-level talent). That said, I just don’t see what the problem is.
No matter what prospect you send in a trade, there is always the possibility that said prospect could turn into a solid pro or even a star. If there was a 100% guarantee that a prospect would never pan out, why would the other team trade a quality player for the prospect????
It baffles me at the number of people who feel that they can simply compile a list of garbage to send to another team, not necessarily in this deal, but in deals past. You can’t get something without giving up something. Period.
I suppose that a team could never trade prospects for fear of potentially trading away the next Wainwright, but how many trades go by where none of the prospects amout to anything? Plenty.
In that light, I could care less about Lopez leaving (once again…I’m ignorant). I wish him the best. The Braves did what they had to do without paying too much money and without giving up their top talent…Who cares where Lopez now ranks in the Cubbies’ system? In our system, he was down on the totem pole and years away.
I’m sure in 2018, Lopez will be an All Star and some TCer will be lamenting the Derrek Lee trade, but hopefully we can respond with: But we won the WS that year!
"You can't print what I said, but they have to catch us." - Chipper Jones
by Jman781 on Aug 19, 2010 12:23 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
This. All this.
Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960
by Darin H on Aug 19, 2010 12:35 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
You can dump worthless prospects on a team if they are looking to simply dump salary in return.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t look like the Braves could afford to take on all of Lee’s remaining salary, or the Cubs weren’t that desperate to avoid paying the remainder…probably some combination of both as the deal would indicate.
Give them some credit – they got three average young pitching prospects – a good return for a 40 game rental for an injured, aging player in the final year of his contract. They knew we had budget concerns, a hole at first base and a farm system that was very rich in talented young arms, and that we were in “win now” mode. They made a good trade and we can certainly justify our end by pointing to the fact that we are in a tight pennant race in Cox’s final season.
Great Read
Ken Rosenthal column about the trade !!! A must read !@!
Law says we gave up way too much
Put it this way:
The Dunn/Melky/Vizcaino package wasn’t all that much better at the time than the package we just gave up. Vizcaino and Lopez are 19 yr old high upside arms and Melky and Dunn are decent pieces. It’s a better package, but not extraordinarily so.
However, Vazquez (+2 Type A picks) is far far far superior to half a year of a hurt .750 OPS Derek Lee.
At least one of the two trades has to be considered bad for such a large discrepancy in return. IMO, both were net losses.
Yankees would have to offer arbitration to Vazquez in order to get anything for him. Do you think they want to risk paying him even more money for another year like this one??
This season with the Yankees has been statistically worse than his last one in New York. K/BB ratio is the worst of his career, HR/9 is tied for worst.
Meanwhile, if they get to consider the prospect of getting two compensation picks for Vazquez, we should get the same out of Lee…he’s just two spots below an A ranking, so if he performs moderately well, he should get an A ranking by season’s end (his four HRs last week occurred after the latest unofficial rankings update, so he may be a Type A as we speak).
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
no shit, i know what kind of year vazquez is having
but the yankees paid a similar price for a 2.5 FIP pitcher as we did for a .750 OPS first baseman with all his injury and age concerns for half a year.
evaluating the trades based on the value at the time shows we gave up too much or didn’t get enough for vazquez (both, IMO)
by kbertling353 on Aug 19, 2010 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions
If you’re evaluating Lee on a half-year, why are you using his full season OPS?? His OPS since the All-Star break is .939.
Seems to me like Law is picking and choosing his arguments to fit his conclusion rather than choosing one way to evaluate and sticking without throughout the evaluation in order to come to a conclusion.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
Also...
Unless Pettitte retires, Vazquez’s spot in the rotation would be needed for their attempt at Cliff Lee.
Just another thing to consider when determining the likelihood of the Yankees offering arbitration.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
the fact that the Yankees have roster concerns has nothing to do with the value the player would have
That’s like saying KK was a terrible deal because he was in the bullpen then the minors. In a vacuum, the deal wouldn’t be bad at all. Our mismanagement doesn’t determine how much he’s worth.
by kbertling353 on Aug 19, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions
the point still stands that Vazquez
was a 2.5 FIP 2 draft pick player
yankees fuck ups and NYC pressures aside
by kbertling353 on Aug 19, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Does anyone know if Vizzy is still on the shelf from his injury i havnt heard anything about him in awhile?
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 6:02 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He’s still out. I think when it happened they said it would be about 6 weeks, which would be sometime in the next week or so that he’d be ready to come back. But, there was also speculation that since that would be so close to the end of the season that it wouldn’t be worth trying to get him back up to speed and just shutting him down and letting him rest his arm would be the better plan.
I wrote a novel, it's about baseball, you should buy it:
http://www.amazon.com/Four-C-B-Wilkins/dp/1449578454/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257720610&sr=1-1
www.dropoutproductions.com
Thanks for the info
Wow it seems like he has been out longer than 6 weeks. I may be wrong but i thought he went down early to mid May.
by bmac#3 on Aug 20, 2010 9:31 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Here's the word from Jim Powell:
Arodys Vizcaino is throwing and is ramping up toward pitching in a game in Sept. How that goes will determine if he can avoid Tommy John.
The hope is that he continues to feel good and is one of the few who can rehab a partial tear and avoid the surgery.Could go to Instruct Lg.
(from yesterday)
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 20, 2010 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions
and there's no way we offer arbitration to DLee
though the two picks are enticing
by kbertling353 on Aug 19, 2010 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Exactly
And the Yankees aren’t offering Vazquez. The mention of two picks is completely irrelevant to the trade evaluation.
-C
It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?
No way...
in your opinion. Be specific, because you don’t know that one way or the other.
Offer him arb, and you can get the picks or risk paying him a sizeable sum. Don’t offer, and you gave up all that for a few months. And if he accepts arb that isn’t the worst thing in the world. It makes for a high salary, and we are needing to lose salary already (KK, Lowe, McLouth, etc). But there are also the benefits in that when he’s healthy, Lee is more than worth the money, and he’d allow the team to delay Freeman’s service clock and give him additional time in AAA to fine tune his game. There are possible negatives to offering arb, but possible positives too, and it’s all up to the front office to make that call. I’d assume no Cox and the family issues that were mentioned in him declining the Angels trade play big roles in his thinking on whether he’d accept or not.
All of "what?"
Again, three average pitchers. Worth it to improve our lineup, perhaps singnificantly.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 20, 2010 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Not quite
I think there is actually a pretty big difference in those packages. Yes, Vizcaino and Lopez were are/were both low minors, high ceiling arms. Vizcaino was more highly rated but that’s not the main difference.
Dunn and Cabrera both had MLB experience and were already useful parts. Dunn not a lot of experience but was at least in the high minors. Harris and Lorick have pitched mostly in the low minors this year. Harris has fringe stuff and Lorick has the ceiling of a decent LOOGY but screams of a guy who will get exploited at higher levels. Certainly interesting guys but not anything near the pieces that Dunn/Cabrera were.
by ajones2522 on Aug 19, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
oh i know there's a difference
but the value that Dunn/Cabrera provide is pretty insignificant. melky is a light hitting corner outfielder, while Dunn is a decent relieving option. the real value is Vizzy/Lopez.
essentially, the difference between Vazquez and DLee is much greater than the value of Melky/Dunn.
by kbertling353 on Aug 19, 2010 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions
err..
Melky/Dunn/(Vizzy surplus value over Lopez)
by kbertling353 on Aug 19, 2010 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions
A proven major league contributor...
and reliever who has excelled at AAA, at about the same age as Harris in his first full year, so Dunn clearly > than Lorick as far as lefty relief prospects. And Melky is at least an average position player, which is already considered more valuable than a middle releiver, let alone a middle relief guy in AA who may or may not ever make it. Yeah, I’d side the difference between Melky/Dunn and Lorick/Harris is a bit more than “pretty insignificant”.
by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 20, 2010 8:58 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
You're kidding, right?
You’re equating two major-league caliber players and the value they provide to a couple guys who will likely never make it out of the minors?
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 20, 2010 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions
That is idiotic.
Vizcaino is a top 100 (if not top 50) arm. Melky is a 25-man roster MLB player on any team. Nobody we gave up comes even CLOSE to the value of either of those two players.
Advance apologies if the contents of this sports-based post offended you. I'm just aiming to educate the masses. My law professor says they're asses.
Panthers '010: Save the Richardson family coffers! We'll take the winning if we stumble into it.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 20, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I wonder...
If there is any deal that can be legitimately made that would have 100% of Braves fans happy…Probably not.
There’s likely a contingent out there convinced that this team would have been better off not trading Edgar Renteria…
"You can't print what I said, but they have to catch us." - Chipper Jones
Everyone values players differently thats part of the game. But the truth with low level prospects is that most dont make it. That is why people stockpile them, especially pitchers. If you have 10 you may have 3 that make it and there is not many that actually reach the level they were projected.
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 6:08 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
The hard pill to swallow about a trade, when you are filling a need, is they know what ypou need and can inflate the price. Combine that with a waiver deal and they know the options are less. In turn that drives the price even higher. To say they gave too much for D Lee may be true, but under the circumstances he was a bargain especially considering the cash. And uncertainty with prospects. Lopez was a high ceiling arm with no command of the strikezone. Sounds like someone we have in center doesnt it.
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 6:16 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Roy Clark
We’re not gonna miss that guy at all. He was a freaking bum, especially in regards to finding pitching.
by Thrashy Thrashy on Aug 19, 2010 6:11 PM EDT reply actions
one thing we can all agree on
braves scouting has been great over the last 15 years
by kbertling353 on Aug 19, 2010 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions
More like the last 25 years that is when the scouting department took off. And the great thing about the scouting is because they are so good. Alot of times players are over rated and overvalued. And they get unloaded on someone else for something of value.
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 6:36 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
What are you talking about? He ran the draft from 97 to 08, so as far as pitchers you’re talking about Matt Belisle, John Foster, Adam Wainwright, Blaine Boyer, Zach Miner, Macay McBride, Kyle Davies, Anthony Lerew, Charlie Morton, Chuck James, Luis Atilano, Jo Jo Reyes, Matt Harrison, Sean White, Joey Devine, Tommy Hanson, Kris Medlen, and Craig Kimbrel.
He also drafted some lesser known guys who still made it to the Majors, including John Ennis, Tim Spooneybarger, Andrew Brown, Ben Kozlowski, Chris Waters, Trey Hodges, Willie Collazo, Kevin Barry, and James Parr.
And as far as hitters, he selected Nick Green, Garrett Jones, Scott Thorman, Kelly Johnson, Chuck Thomas, Adam LaRoche, Jeff Francoeur, Brian McCann, Jarrod Saltalamacchia, Brandon Jones, Clint Sammons, Tyler Flowers, Yunel Escobar, Jordan Schafer, Jason Heyward, and Freddie Freeman.
There were even some decent names of guys he picked but couldn’t sign, including Dallas McPherson, Delwyn Young, Tony Gwynn Jr., JP Howell, Tyler Greene, and Andrew Cashner.
So who would you have preferred as a scouting director? And when you’re throwing a name out there, make sure you’re picking someone who’s had success picking lower in the draft, not somebody who’s selecting in the top 5 every year.
I wrote a novel, it's about baseball, you should buy it:
http://www.amazon.com/Four-C-B-Wilkins/dp/1449578454/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257720610&sr=1-1
www.dropoutproductions.com
Yup...
I happen to think the Braves are not going to be as good at scouting without Roy Clark. It would be a natural thing, right? Besides, Frank Wren is not John Schuerholz yet. Odds are that he’ll never be close, so thank your lucky stars that John Schuerholz had enough sense to assemble a scouting staff that kept the team stocked into the Wren years.
by Thrashy Thrashy on Aug 19, 2010 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I guess I don’t get the sarcasm, since Harris and Lorrick were drafted in 09, after Clark left, and Lopez was an international signing, meaning Johnny Almaraz was the guy in charge, not Clark.
I wrote a novel, it's about baseball, you should buy it:
http://www.amazon.com/Four-C-B-Wilkins/dp/1449578454/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257720610&sr=1-1
www.dropoutproductions.com
CB, Please...
Please tell me that you looked that up. If you just happened to know that list of guys, you are amazing and I fail in any sort of comparison. Haha.
no offense as I dont know you personally..but most likely you fail in any sort of comparison.
the kid (what i have decided I shall be calling CB) is a stud…if there was a list of most useless knowledge regarding current and former braves prospects, CB would be nbr 1
"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."
Dwight Schrute
The Kid. I dig it. Seriously though, my well of useless information overflows.
I wrote a novel, it's about baseball, you should buy it:
http://www.amazon.com/Four-C-B-Wilkins/dp/1449578454/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257720610&sr=1-1
www.dropoutproductions.com
i think its nice because you are older than me and I call you the Kid…its ironical
"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."
Dwight Schrute
I did look it up, only to make sure that I had the names right. I probably could have produced most of that off the top of my head, but with so much readily available information it’s worth making sure I’m right.
I wrote a novel, it's about baseball, you should buy it:
http://www.amazon.com/Four-C-B-Wilkins/dp/1449578454/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257720610&sr=1-1
www.dropoutproductions.com
Too bad the Tigers didnt have a better option ( and yes Cabrerra is better but way too much and too long blocks Freddy F) we seem to get the best of them every time we swap with them. But have had a pretty good track record with the Cubs too.
by bmac#3 on Aug 19, 2010 6:50 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
well if we had Cabrera I could give a flying F*** about Freddie Freeman…becuase we would have one of the best hitters in abseball at 1B…Freeman would then be traded for someone, like immediately…probably to Det for Cabrera
it wont happen but still, if FW wouldnt do a deal for Cabrera bc he doesnt want to block Freeman, thats ridiculous. You don’t trade for Cabrera becuase the prospects it would cost is too much and his price tag is high
not railing on you or anything. BTW You took a beating and took it well, and thats always appreciated…eveyrone here is a Braves fan, but it is important to realize that reading a wall of text with no punctuation and no grammar, or at least a post that isn’t into sentence form, is difficult to read. Don’t take it too personally, just keep trucking as they say, but at the same time remember the advice.
"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."
Dwight Schrute
You are right Cabrera is one of the top 5 hitters in the game. But that is not my point.My point is. He is owed 20 mil a year for the next 5 years. The next 2 years has Lowe for 15 each. Huddy has 10 for 3 ( i may be wrong so correct me if i am). Chipper for 13 for maybe the next 2. No way to dump McClouth so ther is 7 mil. McCann for 8 mil the next 2 years. I dont think KK is coming back. But as of now there is 6 more. JJ, Prado arb eligible. The money just isnt there for him. Thats why cheap controllable talent is important. The FF comment, he is projected to have Adam Laroche type numbers so in about 3 years he and Miggy are gonna meet close to the middle in production. For alot less money.
by bmac#3 on Aug 20, 2010 10:18 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Laroche is nowhere near as good as Miggy.. like i said Miggy is probably the 2nd or 3rd best hitter in baseball
Laroche is like the 8th best 1B (not a knock on him)
we don;t pay chipper’s contract if he retires I believe, but I could be wrong. And there definately a way to dump McLouth, but we won’t becuase he is our best option at CF going forward if he can get his shit back together.
It’s not a big difference, but Hudson has 9M a year for 2 years and a 9M club option for 2013.
"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."
Dwight Schrute
They was gonna figure a settlement to give Chipper some of what is owed if he retires. Chipper and Wren announced that after his last retirement comment. But he has been saying it for almost 3 years so i doubt he is going to hang it up. Miggy is in his prime right now. But is he goona be worth it in 3 to 5 years, that is alot to gamble with, especially the way he comes into spring every year gettin bigger and bigger much like Andruw did.It is a wait and see what Miggy does but i see an A Jones effect coming on. And i would take a .280/35/90 guy and upgrade somewhere else. Or lock up Hanson or JJ with the money saved. And as much as i dont want to see it JJ may be the one leaving this offseason though.
by bmac#3 on Aug 20, 2010 12:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
like i said there are other reasons not to trade for Miggy, but blocking freeman isnt a concern in my opinion…
"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."
Dwight Schrute
You are right Cabrera is one of the top 5 hitters in the game. But that is not my point.My point is. He is owed 20 mil a year for the next 5 years. The next 2 years has Lowe for 15 each. Huddy has 10 for 3 ( i may be wrong so correct me if i am). Chipper for 13 for maybe the next 2. No way to dump McClouth so ther is 7 mil. McCann for 8 mil the next 2 years. I dont think KK is coming back. But as of now there is 6 more. JJ, Prado arb eligible. The money just isnt there for him. Thats why cheap controllable talent is important. The FF comment, he is projected to have Adam Laroche type numbers so in about 3 years he and Miggy are gonna meet close to the middle in production. For alot less money.
by bmac#3 on Aug 20, 2010 10:18 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I would much rather wait til the offseason and sign Pujols. Same money, better defense, and better hitter.
by bmac#3 on Aug 20, 2010 12:14 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
The Derek Lee trade
to me is a great gamble. Sure, the prospects might turn into the next John Smoltz but odds are slim and, most importantly, we’re pretty set at SP and even RP for a while. Hopefully, Lee is healthy and able to be a difference maker. I’m excited to see him as a Braves although the day games in the next couple of days mean that I won’t get the chance to watch the game.
by LEastCoastBears on Aug 19, 2010 8:42 PM EDT reply actions

by 


























