Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miami Wins Opener Over Boston, 93-79

OT: Something different, take the quiz!

Ok Braves fans, with the slew of rosterbation floating around on the site, I thought it might be nice to change things up a bit.  A friend and I like to quiz each other about baseball topics every now and again and one day he came across a couple of questions that stumped both of us - at least initially.  So let's see just how smart we all really are, huh?

 

Question 1:  How can a fielder to turn an unassisted triple play without ever touching the baseball?  (you must elaborate or give examples)

 

Question 2:  Let's assume a pitcher throws 9 complete innings (regardless of score or who is winning and excluding errors and walks).  How many total hits, actual base hits, could he have given up without allowing a single run (earned or otherwise)?

 

Now, I will preface this by saying the reality of either is slim to none but it is nonetheless a possibility.  These are not trick questions!  Also, please no cheating!  The fun in this exercise will be in discussing all the possible, and possibly ridiculous, scenarios everyone comes up with.

 

Post your answers and I'll let you know if they are correct.

This FanPost does not express the views or opinions of Talking Chop.

Comment 43 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The answer to question 2 would be 54.

Assuming that each runner can only advance one base on each hit, and that each hit with the bases loaded results in a runner being thrown out at home, the opposing team could theoretically have 6 hits per inning without scoring. Multiply that by 9 innings and you have 54 hits without a run scoring.

by swainzy on Nov 21, 2010 1:27 PM EST reply actions  

FWIW

I stood by 45 as my answer for the longest time until I remembered a play that happened to Scott Rolen a couple years ago. All I will say is that Scott was running 1st to 2nd on a batted ball and the ball hit him in the heel.

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Right but no enough info

The answer to question 2 is 54 but you didn’t detail how it is possible – which kinda makes me wonder if you didn’t look it up??? How can you get six hits in an inning without giving up a run?

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Correction

You gave the wrong info. Look at it like this, in your scenario you would have 3 hits before the first out. On each of the next batted balls the runner is thrown out at home it would be considered a fielders choice, not a hit. So your total hits would be 3 for an inning. Does that help?

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, that is true.

I think duxfan is right with 45.

by swainzy on Nov 21, 2010 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Nope

The answer to question 2 is 54. A pitcher can give up 6 hits in an inning without giving up a single run (earned or unearned).

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

How about if

both of the first two hits result in the runner being thrown out attempting to stretcha single into a double, and the next 3 hits load the bases. With the bases loaded, a ball is hit to the outfield, but the runner on first thinks it’s caught so he stays at third to tag up, and the runner from second passes him. The runner from second is called out, but the batter is awarded a hit, which would make 6. If that happened once each inning (which is unlikely, but possible) there would be a total of 54 hits.

by swainzy on Nov 21, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions  

The easiest way...

…is to have the first five batters do what you say (the first two can also be picked off or caught stealing), the sixth hitter hits a base runner with the batted ball, and gets credit for the hit.

by cavebird on Nov 21, 2010 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

For the first question, it would have to be on interferance. I know of one case where a fielder was awarded an unassisted double play without touching the ball (on interference).
For the second, assuming no errors were made, it would probably be 45 (5 per inning). Outs would be made on runners taking extra bases on hits, but it is not likely that a runner out on a bases-loaded single w/o being ruled a fc. However, it could happen, and in this rare case, the answer would be 54.

"I always thought that record would stand until it was broken." -Yogi Berra

by iamthesgt on Nov 21, 2010 1:44 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Clarify interference with an example. It would help me understand your point a little better.

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

clarification

A shortstop (Alvin Dark, if I’m not mistaken) was getting ready to field a ball when a runner on second ran into him. The umpire ruled the batter would have been out an of course the baserunner was out. So interference resulted in two outs.

"I always thought that record would stand until it was broken." -Yogi Berra

by iamthesgt on Nov 21, 2010 5:07 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Cool

That’s pretty close to my scenario but it doesn’t involve a runner interfering with a fielder.

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Also – your answer on number 2 is very close. There are a couple of scenarios that could get you to 5 hits (CS, out taking extra bases, pick-offs) but there is only one type of out that can get you to 6 hits. Can you think of it?

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Bingo!

Yes, the 6th batter in the inning is credited with a hit if his batted ball hits a player in fair territory but none of the runners are allowed to advance (hence no runs scored).

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Answer to question #1

Runners on 2nd and 3rd no outs, pop fly (very fast runners and very high fly ball) the ball is going to land between 1st and second base and the second baseman is camped under the ball, the runner who hit the pop fly runs into the second baseman causing him to drop the ball, the other two runners have already crossed home plate and started to the dugout, unassisted triple play awarded to 2nd baseman and he never touches the ball

by Webby18 on Nov 21, 2010 2:10 PM EST reply actions  

That's interesting

Though I have to admit I’m not sure what would come of the two runners who crossed the plate. I’ll dig into this one a little later.

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Without looking at anyone else's posts...

…the answer to the second question is 54 hits. Each hit can result in an out if necessary, and the pitcher can face 6 batters (all hits) every inning without giving up a run.

by cavebird on Nov 21, 2010 2:46 PM EST reply actions  

Yes

It is 54 but I don’t understand your point of how each hit can result in an out. Here’s my point, if there are two outs and bases loaded (which is the only way you can have 5 hits to that point and no runs scored) how is it that the final out can be off a hit without the run scoring?

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Oops.

I missed Willinn’s response above. The answer is the final AB has to result in hitting a runner with a batted ball.

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes.

Willinn got it first. I posted the same thing above his post later without reading his post. The hitting a baserunner is the obvious sneaky hit.

by cavebird on Nov 21, 2010 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

without looking at above answers...

I’ll be surprised if #1 is possible.

#2-36 (1 single, 1 double play, 3 more singles to load the bases, 1 out = 4 hits x 9 innings, or 36 hits)

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Nov 21, 2010 3:34 PM EST reply actions  

Status so far

So we have Question 2 answered. It is possible, though not likely, that a pitcher can give up 54 hits in a 9 inning game without surrendering a single run. An example: Single, caught stealing, single, pick-off, single, single, single. The sixth batter then hits a base-runner in fair territory resulting in the final out BUT getting credit for a hit.

Some pretty close guesses for Question 1 and I’ll go so far as to say this one is probably the least likely to occur. Any more guesses?

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 5:19 PM EST reply actions  

Couldn't resist looking it up,

So I won’t answer it. Real close though. Someone just has to put one more situation into what we’ve got.

by SnipeShot on Nov 21, 2010 5:44 PM EST reply actions  

question 1

eric bruntlett did it in 09. he caught the ball with his glove, stepped on the base, then tagged the runner from first coming towards him. The ball never touched him, it touched his glove.

by JohnRocker4CyYoung on Nov 21, 2010 6:03 PM EST reply actions  

Nope

“Without ever touching the baseball” implies that it was not caught in his glove, sock, hat, shoe or otherwise.

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Question # 1

How about this, runners on first and second no outs. Batter hits infield fly so he is out, the runner on first passes the runner on second so he is out and the ball hits the runner on second so he is out, the question is who gets credit for the triple play?

by Webby18 on Nov 21, 2010 7:20 PM EST reply actions  

this is what I was thinking...

or some sort of strange scenario where a batted ball hits all three runners…not very likely either way. I think the pitcher would get credit though because he was the last player to touch the ball.

by MWhitexx on Nov 21, 2010 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

That's it

and my guess is the official scorer would credit the fielder closest to the play, SS vs 2B.

by scstrato on Nov 21, 2010 7:32 PM EST up reply actions  

So, it would never happen?

Why would the runner on first pass the runner on second?

"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"

"You look like you should be married to one of the San Diego Padres."

by Doghnut on Nov 23, 2010 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

This reminds me of a game I saw where the Cubs were playing.

The bases were loaded and someone got a hit, but it hit a runner…so it was ruled a base hit, but no runs scored and I remarked to my friend that only the Cubs could manage a base hit without getting a run.

by soup du jour on Nov 21, 2010 11:14 PM EST reply actions  

The rarest play in baseball

Runners on first and second, no out. A fly ball is hit to the short stop, the infield fly rule is called and the batter is out. The runner on first advances to second, passes the lead runner, and is called out. When the fly ball comes down, it hits the runner who was on second base, but is now standing off base.

It has never happened in professional baseball, and, probably never will.

by BrandonG on Nov 22, 2010 4:14 AM EST reply actions  

Probably?

Only chance of that happening is if we decide to let monkeys play. lol

by Sparhawk on Nov 22, 2010 9:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Atlanta Braves.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Thankschipper_small
Memorial Day Weekend - Off Topic
Today_sbn_icon_small
TheLetter2's Top Braves, 2012 Edition
Small
Closing out May Rosterbation

Recent FanPosts

Chipper1_small
Thunderdome Thread
Ck_small
Time to bench Heyward or move him down the lineup?
Small
What to do with a Piece of The Great American Cracker Box?
Img_0564_small
Is Pastornicky an historically bad defensive SS?
Miami-thrice-reut_small
McCann as LF/1B?
Icon2_small
Rev Wins!!!!!!!
Small
Speed in the 7 hole?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Gondeee_small gondeee

Editors

Heis3_small Scott Coleman

Sid_small SCrebel10

Authors

Dsc01731_small royhobbs

Mccann__brian_small cbwilk

N528829858_2098004_4206_small Zeus12888

Chris_and_harrison_at_braves_game_small Atlanta_Chris

Avatar_small TonyAlmeyda

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Ffw_small Fauxfrankwren

Moderators

My_hair_is_a_bird-257x300_small yondaime4

7sw6xo_chop_crop_small HEYJUDE