Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

Disproving a Kawakami myth...

our old friend justincredible said the other day that Kenshin Kawakami would be a #3 or 4 starter for most teams.

While I'm not Kenny hater, and think the man pitched well enough to be treated a lot better than he was down the stretch when he was collecting splinters, but the old myth that he's good enough to be a #3 or 4 for most teams is flat wrong.  He's good enough to start for some, mostly bottom feeders.  But he's no more than a 4 or 5 on the vast majority of teams when their primary starters are healthy.

For reference's sake, I'll post the starters, in order of # of starts this year, for the other teams and if people feel like he'd start above any of them, they can say so in the comments (I'll put a * next to the teams I feel he'd start on).  But let this fan post prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, that justincredible is flat out incorrect on the issue.

This FanPost does not express the views or opinions of Talking Chop.

Comment 292 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

Tuesday's Frosty Mug

Nov 2010 from Brew Crew Ball - 30 comments

Monday's Frosty Mug

Dec 2010 from Brew Crew Ball - 172 comments

Tuesday's Frosty Mug

Dec 2010 from Brew Crew Ball - 173 comments

Comments

Display:

So the list is...

Astros
Blue Jays
Brewers
Diamondbacks
Dodgers
Indians
Mariners
Marlins
Mets
Nationals
Orioles
Padres
Phillies
Pirates
Rockies
Royals
Tigers
Yankees

Only two playoffs teams (who had horrible problems at the back end of their rotations), with some of the others questionable at best, mostly composed of the worst teams in baseball, and some where he’d slot 4th but mostly 5th.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 20, 2010 6:05 PM EDT reply actions  

he would start on the Cardinals

by Braves24 on Oct 20, 2010 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

Better than Suppan, Lohse and Westbrook.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 20, 2010 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, he's not...

definitely not better than Westbrook. That leaves Lohse, Suppan, and Penny as their 5th starter. Only Lohse had an ERA above 4 in that group, so no, he would not start over Suppan, Penny, or Westbrook. Add in Garcia, Wainwright, and Carpenter, and that leaves KK at best 7th in the pecking order, and no one has a 7 man rotation.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

ERA??

C’mon, man.

You’re right about Westbrook, although it’s incredibly close. 4.22 FIP v. 4.35. Less strikeouts, less walks. His time in St. Louis saved him, as he was considerably worse in Cleveland.

Suppan is considerably worse. 4.89 FIP. Lohse was a 4.42. Worse peripherals on those two, as well.

Brad Penny was Brad Penny, meaning he was already done for the season by May. That’s two of the last three years he’s been shelved now, and the fourth time in his career he’s missed considerable time due to injury. I don’t believe in a “when healthy” argument when the pitcher is well-known to rarely be healthy…

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Silly me for thinking a pitcher's job is to not allow runs...

yeah ERA. And I know Westbrook was strong in St Louis, that’s kind of the point. He was great for them, and the AL is much harder (so KK would have been worse there).

You found their FIP, how about xFIP, or SIERRA, pitching metrics aren’t all they are cracked up to be. Point is, he’s 5th starter there at best, and even that’s suspect. You think he’d slot above some of those guys, but I obviously don’t.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

The difference is...

I actually looked at the metrics before making that decision.

Oh, but I forgot. You looked at ERA, which we all know is the most superior statistic available.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I never said it was...

I just listed ERA in one part, I never said that was all I looked at. But nice try.

Unlike you apparently, I don’t consider any single stat as the true and only accurate measure of a pitcher’s worth.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

"I never said it was"

meaning I never said ERA to be “the most superior statistic”.

As said above, I do not consider any single stat as an all encompassing measure of a pitcher’s worth.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Throughout my analysis

I’ve compared several stats. K/9, BB/9, HR/9, FIP, xFIP, ERA. Most times, they’re fairly comparable, so there’s no reason to mention them.

When there has been significant difference, I’ve mentioned it, i.e. “Worse peripherals on those two, as well,” in the case of Suppan and Lohse.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's funny.

I thought Suppan’s ERA was 5.06. You can’t just exclude the part of a season he played for another team and say he was really as good as the 70 IP sample size you are using. Especially when his WHIP was almost 1.5 in the 70 IP sample size showing he was just getting lucky.

by cavebird on Oct 21, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

We haven't had a classic Sanchez vs. Justin battle in quite a while...

This is looking promising.

'Terrible preview...pretty weak, didn't learn anything new. pretty sad." - mastermike

by Scott Coleman on Oct 20, 2010 7:01 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Calling the man out!

Cage match or steel chairs?

Write your own recap!.....mvhsbball

by bighop on Oct 20, 2010 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hell in a cell

and the spectators get to bring the weapons!!

The birth of Jason Heyward was God’s punishment for the sins of the people in New York and Philly.

by TonyAlmeyda on Oct 20, 2010 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have no idea why this pic cracked me up as much as it did.

"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"

"You look like you should be married to one of the San Diego Padres."

by Doghnut on Oct 20, 2010 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Have I told you lately I like you NY?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think so. But this just confirms it

Carpe Diaz

by GoBravesNY on Oct 21, 2010 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

This isn’t a promising one, as he did not disprove anything. All he did was create and eye-sore of a fanpost with a bunch of names.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

So much for not promising

Carpe Diaz

by GoBravesNY on Oct 21, 2010 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Didn’t pacgnosis (maybe it was someone else) do a post like this (but with numbers) last season determining which teams Kenshin would start on?

"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"

"You look like you should be married to one of the San Diego Padres."

by Doghnut on Oct 20, 2010 8:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Found it

http://www.talkingchop.com/2010/5/13/1470550/how-many-teams-would-kenshin

pacgnosis should update it. I’m sure he has nothing else to do…

"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"

"You look like you should be married to one of the San Diego Padres."

by Doghnut on Oct 20, 2010 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

this

that was an excellent post

by Braves24 on Oct 20, 2010 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Both the others' rotations...

and Kenshin’s production has changed since that time. Several of those rotations got better as the year went along, and KK as we saw got much worse than he was last year.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Which is why I said he should update it :)

"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"

"You look like you should be married to one of the San Diego Padres."

by Doghnut on Oct 21, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed, ...

if folks want it with numbers and charts and researched well, he should update it.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, this fanpost made me change my mind!

This post certainly contains a lot of statistical information to back up the thesis.

"Jason Heyward was a Greek philosopher reincarnated as a baseball player." - Don Sutton

by UMDBHIK on Oct 20, 2010 9:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah really. I want a green milkshake.

I like people until I meet them.

by scorby911 on Oct 20, 2010 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you want stats, go find them yourself...

don’t like my post, then make your own jackass.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

To make his own jackass...

…he would need a jack and jenny and some knowledge about how to get equines to breed. That’s a little unfair to expect from someone on an internet message board.

by cavebird on Oct 21, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

you win for being the msot literal person on the thread….congratulations you made me chuckle

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 21, 2010 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

"How to get equines to breed"

Cards, flowers, a gift basket of tasty vegetables at the right time?

by Salty on Oct 22, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nah...

…it probably just involves holding the female down, lol.

by cavebird on Oct 22, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not the one who stated:

“But let this fan post prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, that justincredible is flat out incorrect on the issue”
 
Yet, you offer no proof. If you can’t take the criticism, stop posting crap.

"Jason Heyward was a Greek philosopher reincarnated as a baseball player." - Don Sutton

by UMDBHIK on Oct 21, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't like it, don't read it...

you want more, feel free to spend your time doing so.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also,that was a bit of bluster...

it took long enough to get the names down, I really didn’t feel like going through stat after stat after stat too to put in there.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

In order to disprove something, as you claim to be doing, typically one would need something more substantial than a bunch of names.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t have to say – numbers show it.

If I were to just list names, that would be an opinion, which we all know does not disprove anything…

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

You've brought no numbers

and numbers can be misleading

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

What have you brought of substance by the way?

not a damn thing.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, you know, stats, numbers, metrics, that sort of thing.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

where?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

To quote someone else “look them up yourself.”

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

you didn't mention any of the numbers, stats, metrics...

you went “off the top of your head”. And you didn’t even know what you were talking about when you went “off the top of your head”

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I listed teams that he would be the #3 or #4 starter on, and you have yet to prove me wrong. You just have your list of names.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

As do you...

and most of those names would start above KK. He ain’t a 3 except on the worst rotations in baseball, and a 4 on just a handful more. For most teams, he’s a 5 unless injuries hit.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Your list of names proves this. the stats posted in this thread and others in the past fail in comparisson to your list of names.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again...

since you are having trouble understanding what has been said numerous times now, including in the original statements above. The names are for reference sake.

The numbers those names put up, for the most part, show Kawakami is rarely a 3 except on the worst rotations, and closer to a 4/5 than a 3/4.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

You say “the numbers” like you have posted some or something.

As I read through the thread, the only numbers that have been posted support my side of the theory, not yours. You have not posted any numbers or stats that back your claims up. That’s all we are asking for.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kawakami's

WAR, 0.8, good for the bottom of this list.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=sta&lg=all&qual=y&type=6&season=2010&month=0

His xFIP (over 4.5), again would be on the bottom of this list.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=sta&lg=all&qual=y&type=1&season=2010&month=0

Same with his FIP. He’s a bottom of the rotation pitcher, a 4/5. He’s not a 3 by any stretch of the imagination, unless your 3rd starter is Bruce Chen.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

We all know he was not very good this year. But what about when you look at the big picture and not the 17 or so starts he made this season?

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

So you agree with me...

he was a bottom of the rotation guy at best this year.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve never said otherwise.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Glad to see...

that you’re finally seeing the light and coming to my side.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, you say “would be” but I ask “what is?”

that list only has 91 names – last time I checked there were more starting pitchers in baseball.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd guess somewhere between

200 and 300 start on a given year. 5 per team, times 30 teams means 150 slots. Plus injuries and poor performance replacements, get you near 300. But again, if healthy, the list is 150 names long. And KK is not a top 100 starter imo. Probably in the 100-200 range, hence a 4/5.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Woohooo! I love internet fights!

"Tony Gwynn made sacrifices. Cal Ripken made sacrifices. I'm not sure Derek Jeter made sacrifices given the ungodly deep pockets the Yankees have." - Chipper Jones

by MBL1 on Oct 21, 2010 5:13 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

The key phrase here is “IMO”.

In your opinion, he is not. According to the stats, he is.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 4:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Actually...

the stats I’ve found have him in the low 100s, so you are wrong again.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

With at least 80 innings pitched...

Kawkamai is 110 in FIP, and 119 in xFIP. So according to the stat you consider the all encompassing measure of a pitcher, he is.

My opinion and the stats seem to align just fine.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

80 IP

you’re comparing him to relievers

by kbertling353 on Oct 22, 2010 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

AT LEAST 80 innings...

learn to read. There would be very few relievers with an innings count that high.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

And that is strictly from this season – which was not a good one for him due to several issues, not the least of which is his being mishandled.

What happens when you expand your perameters to include his full body of work?

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also not a good one because he ....

got rocked on several occassions, BEFORE he was mishandled. But nice spin.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Spin?

What part of “was not a good one for him due to several issues” did you fail to comprehend?

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

because you focus on the mishandling...

when his poor play began before the splinter treatment, and in large part lead to that “mishandling” of which you speak. Blaming his poor play on mishandling is like blaming a car accident on a broken leg sustained in the accident.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hmmm…so, I ask again:

What part of "was not a good one for him due to several issues" did you fail to comprehend?

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

What about one of those issues...

being his incompetence did you fail to comprehend?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

You got me.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think he had an ERA around 3.15 in his last eight starts.

by Braves24 on Oct 22, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

WAR

is cumulative.

Not pitching half a season dropped his WAR value by half, assuming he puts up identical statistics throughout the rest of the year.

Additionally, his sparse use late in the season brought down the value because he obviously wasn’t sharp during those outings.

If you discount those performances after June (and there were only three in three months), his WAR increases by 0.1, and the Fangraph’s salary calculation based upon WAR goes up to about $3.6M for the half season of work (as background info for those who aren’t aware, 1 WAR was worth $4.1M this season).

Extrapolate for the other half-season, and you’re looking at a 1.6-1.8 WAR and a $6.6-$7.4M salary.

Comparing his FIP and xFIP figures to pitchers that threw an entire season, and you’ll find those are fairly accurate extrapolations, assuming he continues to pitch at the same ability he did during April-June.

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can't assume that

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

On the same token

You can’t dismiss the possibility, either.

You can’t simply say, “Oh, he’s a 0.8 WAR player, because that’s what Fangraphs says.” Because no one can account for what might have happened had he pitched the other half of the season.

Given that there’s very minor amounts of variation between the vast majority of his individual statistics (Krate, BBrate, FIP, xFIP, with HR/9 being the only meaningful deviation) compared to his history, it would be misguided to suggest he wouldn’t pitch at or near the same level for the rest of the season, given a reasonable amount of fluctuation for both positive and negative.

So, you have to do what’s reasonable. What IS reasonable, in this case, is that the percentages hold. Let other people perceive the data as they wish, and make appropriate projections.

So let’s do that.

Let’s say he pitches poorly, and slice his WAR by half for that half-season. Now he’s a 1.2 WAR player, which comes to $4.9M dollars.

But, as I stated, you have to adjust for both. good and bad. He could improve during that last half a season. So, let’s add a half on, and now he’s at 2.0 WAR for the season, worth $8.2M.

So now we’ve covered the good possibilities, and the bad possibilities. Let’s average them!! You come up with 1.6 WAR, $6.56M, and we’re basically right back where we started, without having accounted for his three post-June performances.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

No mention of h/9?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd use WHIP...

If I were to go that route. At least you can be rationally assured that a walk is usually the pitcher’s fault.

Hits can be incredibly fluky, as we all know. A nubber off the end of the bat, a dribbler, a mis-scored error, etc. all constitute hits, but aren’t necessarily worthy of receiving that designation.

Fact is, there’s really no good way to tell statistically whether a hit is a hit, or a stroke of luck. You can look at FB, GB, LD, IFFB, IFH percentages and what-not, but it’s hard to decipher any clear-cut parameters as to what constitutes good or bad.

In the case of KK, LD% being up this season is probably bad.

FB% was down, HR% up, IFFB% up, so that’s a head-scratcher…inducing infield fly balls is good, more HR bad, so there’s no way to really distinguish whether the FB% as a whole going down is good or bad, because the results of the fly ball are mixed.

IFH% was up, gb% is down. What to make of that?? In general, ground balls to the infield should be a good thing, but with infield hits being up, it’s hurting him when it shouldn’t.

In short, there’s no good way to calculate whether a hit is deserved or not without actually having seen it. Individual basis.

If I were a professional statistician working the MLB, which I’m not, I’d like to see the development of a pitcher ISO to determine how powerful the hits against a pitcher are.

Find the opp. SLUG% and subtract the singles to see the pitcher’s propensity to give up powerful hits…that would be a better determinant, I think, but I’ve never run into it.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

So because you can't distinguish ...

the difference between one hit and another, you throw them all out?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure how you can criticize since you didn’t mention any stats in this post.

by Braves24 on Oct 21, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

He doesn’t need stats. He has a list of names.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 4:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

But, it’s ok for you to assume worse performance in the AL?

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 4:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Again, DH vs. P

it’s not an assumption

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

If there are examples of pitchers who pitcher better in the AL than in the NL, then you cannot dogmatically say that KK’s numbers would be worse in the AL.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

You've brought Zito, who could have been any number of reasons...

there are countless, countless examples who pitch better in the NL when coming from the AL, or worse in the AL. Are you really trying to say pitching against lineups with a DH is the same as ones without?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m trying to say that you cannot dogmatically say that KK would do worse in the AL. Hell, in the AL he would actually have some run support bumping up his win total.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hey, you are the W-L guy here. I’m just trying to help you by putting this in your terms.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Where did I mention W-L, ever? You are grasping at straws with that one.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

You have been known to argue that pitcher wins are a valuable stat. I can go pull up some quotes if you’d like, but I’d rather not.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Feel free, because I know what I've said...

I’ve said it’s not a worthless stat and there is some value in it. There are dozens of others with more value, especially in comparing pitchers.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

That might be the biggest load of BS you've ever posted here...

and you’ve posted a Biff Tanner’s worth load of manure.

Not once, ever, have you seen me evaluate pitcher’s using that statistic.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

not in this thread...

not in the other thread, and not in any thread there’s ever been.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are really going to make me do it…

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

i remember what he was saying…Sanchez is of the beleif and I concur…that all stats are valauble…if you really want to evaluate a pitcher you need to look at everythign and Ws are a aprt of that…if you are only gonna look at 5 stats or even 10 stats…Ws probably shouldnt be one of them….Ws dotell you something…it tells you how good a pitcher is at keeping his team in teh game…we have no evidence to show that that is not a skill….there is something to be said for a DLW (IMHO)…its clealry not as important as FIP, of xFIP, or ERA even, or k/bb or a ton of other stats but it is indeed useful to an extent.

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 22, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you Swo

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

you and justin, collectively, are just a trip.

by fandave on Oct 24, 2010 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

FIP and xFIP

have at least 100 starters better than Kawakami, not including those that had their seasons cut short by injury such as Strasburg.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m sorry but there’s no way KK starts for the Yanks

by eaheckman10 on Oct 20, 2010 10:00 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't think he would either to be honest...

I think he’d be destroyed up there and have a severe drop in productivity ala Vazquez. But I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt on several of the teams. Plus, the end of their rotation was decimated by injuries and poor play. After Sabathia, no one was consistently good. Pettitte was injured a lot, Burnett struggled, Javy struggled, Hughes was solid. So I figured he might slot some in the 5 spot until he pitched his way out of it, ahead of Mosley or Nova.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Angels.

KK had similar or better year than both Kazmir and Santana. Santana averaged one more strikeout per nine. Trevor Bell started all of 7 games, so I don’t know why his name’s even there. He did okay against horrible teams, but got bombed in his only two starts against teams with records better than .500.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 20, 2010 10:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Look at things other than K/9...

Santana had a much better year than KK.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Much better??

4.28 FIP, 4.45 xFIP. That’s a difference of .07 and .11, respectively. Slightly higher HR/9 than KK.

Very similar seasons, other than the previously-mentioned strikeout rate…

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Transitioning to the AL doesn’t make a pitcher worse.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

See Zito, Barry.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

See Vazquez, Javier

two can play that game. If you think facing NL lineups is no different than AL, then that’s a stopping point.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I never said it was or wasn’t different. I said that switching leagues does not automatically create a change in pitching performance. Therefore, saying that KK would be a worse pitcher in the AL is nothing factual and is everything speculative – unless we are going to start debating what may have happened. In that case, I surrender as I can not possibly refute something that may have happened.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Facing a lineup with a DH wouldn't help Kawakami

and would almost certainly lead to a decrease in his numbers.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

So, we are going to debate what may or may not happen? I’ve already said, I can’t do that.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oakland.

Sheets is comparable, Mazzaro is worse, and Duchsherer is worse in all of his five starts.

I know you said “when healthy,” but Duchsherer’s been a healthy starter for only one season of his 10-year career and Sheets will likely never return to his “healthy” form.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 20, 2010 10:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Go look at Mazzaro's numbers...

they weren’t great, but solid. And you’d assume KK would pitch worse against an AL lineup with the DH.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

His numbers are much worse.

Lower K rate, higher BB rate, FIP of 5.13 and an xFIP of 4.72. Horrendous HR rate, despite the fact that he plays in one of the best pitcher’s parks in the league for HRs (38th) and in general (20th). The HR splits aren’t all that egregious considering that fact, 8 at home v. 11 away.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

And at this point...

We’ve reached 20 of the 30 teams in the league that he could reasonably start for. 2/3 of the league goes a little beyond “bottom feeders,” and I imagine there’s more teams that he could actually pitch for than the list provided. I just checked the first two “no” teams on your list and called it after they both proved to be “yes.”

So far, the only thing that this post has settled beyond a shadow of a doubt is that KK is definitely a viable starting option, filling a #3-#5 slot, depending on the depth of the team’s rotation.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 20, 2010 10:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Exactly what?...

he’s a below average starter, and other teams with below average starters might start him, but he’s not demonstrably better than any of the options they’d already have (except for the Royals, Pirates, and a couple others). That was more the point. Not to say KK sucks, but this idea that he’d be a #3 or 4 for half the league is just wrong. A 5th, at best for most, otherwise they have significant problems in the back end of their rotation. That was the point, and I don’t see any evidence having been presented that says otherwise.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

He can't be below average

if he could start for 2/3 of all baseball teams. Thus far he has had about 1 good season and 1 bad season. In his good season he posted a WAR that was comparable to Bronson Arroyo’s THIS season. In other words, a 3-4 on a playoff team.

This season he was clearly mis-handled, and his mis-handling skews his numbers quite a bit.

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 21, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why does his mishandling automatically skew his numbers?...

He pitched really poorly at the end, even before the mishandling. Perhaps the wheels fell off, and Bobby saw that he could not be effective at this level the rest of the way. Maybe, maybe not, but we’ll never know one way or the other.

And your math is horrible on your opening sentence. "he can’t be below average if he could start for 2/3 of all baseball teams). Teams use 5 starters, if the 3 spot is average (1 and 2 above, 4 and 5 below), and KK wouldn’t even start for a greater number of teams than he’d be a #3 for, that automatically makes him “below the average”.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's funny, because it's completely false.

His June numbers (the last month he pitched before being tossed aside) are better than April or May’s statistics. Both traditional and advanced statistics support this conclusively.

April: 5.48 ERA, 4.22 K/9, 3.38 BB/9, 0.42 HR/9, 3.88 FIP, 4.82 xFIP.

May: 4.15 ERA, 5.71 K/9, 1.82 BB/9, 1.82 HR/9, 5.13 FIP, 4.87 xFIP.

June: 4.10 ERA, 8.54 K/9, 4.44 BB/9, 0.34 HR/9, 3.15 FIP, 4.31 xFIP.

There was a rise in walks, but overall, he was much better.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

unlike you...

I do not feel like K, BB, and HR are the only thing a pitcher can control.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

So start showing me some stats

That show he was worse later in the season.

You can start with BABIP, which I’ll shoot down in turn because his HR rate was so high (HR do not count against BABIP, although they do show up in opp. AVG, so maybe you still have a little something there). Tell me how his LD% was significantly greater in June, which means batters were hitting the ball harder against him.

You keep saying, “I feel this, or I don’t feel that…” but you never actually follow it up with anything to support your argument.

Show me where you’re coming from, and perhaps I can then glean HOW you came to your conclusions. I may not agree with them, but at least I can respect where you’re coming from.

Right now, your arguments aren’t any better than the ones that end as a precursor to “My dad can beat up your dad.”

Pretend it’s math class and show your work, if you want someone to have any reason at all to believe your opinions have been created using logical means.

I feel like I’ve given you plenty of hints on how to properly form your arguments, using statistical analysis, but the rest is up to you.

If you’re not prepared to offer statistical evidence for your opinions, why did you bother making a Fanpost?? Why did you bother wasting our time and your reputation on beliefs that are rooted in casual observation and personal biases rather than of statistical analysis of actual performance??

As far as I’m concerned, until you offer any sort of rational support for your argument, your opinion is no more valid than several others here that I routinely write off as soon as I see the name associated with it.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Do your own research to prove my point!

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

This wasn't a research based post...

you kept claiming off the top of my head. Well, there’s every teams’ rotations. Now don’t use the top of your head, say who he’d start for and start over.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

He shoudl start over every guy who has a worse FIP than he does.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

FIP is not an absolute measure of a pitcher’s ability.
For the Braves starters this year…
Beachy 2.48
Hanson 3.31
Minor 3.77
Medlen 3.78
Lowe 3.89
Hudson 4.09
Jurrjens 4.19
Kawakami 4.35

So if you think this is the ultimate measure, that means Hudson was our 6th most effective starting pitcher, and Kawakami was 8th.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

And yet, it is the only stat that you use (and from 2010 only, btw) to justify him not being a “top 100” pitcher.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

What other season would you like...

to determine how people did in 2010? 2009, 2008, and the rest don’t exactly do a good job of explaining performance this year.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, I didn’t know the “Myth” that you were disproving was that KK would be a 3 or 4 on any other team THIS year. I thought it was in general. I mean, you are taking what I said and making a fp about it, so I just naturally assumed you would use the context that I made the statement in correctly.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m fully aware that is what you think…and it is wrong.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

And who do I have him behind

that I shouldn’t? You have failed, continuously, to answer that question.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because I do more than list names when I make an argument.

You are literally, and I use the word literally, the ONLY person here who has agreed with what you posted.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then you are reading imparied.

A couple have posted that I listed too many teams that he’d start for. And one explicitly said “I basicly agree with Mr Sanchez”.

In the post below listing who he’d be a 3 for, a 4 for, and then the rest as 5s or not at all. Please, list whatever teams you disagree with that he’d be a 3 or 4 for that I did not list.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interestingly enough, the post that says “i basically agree with Mr Sanchez” then goes on to disagree with you.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 23, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

His game log...

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.cgi?n1=kawakke01&t=p&year=2010

He had two good starts in June, and was destroyed in the other 3. The KC start in particular stands out as pitching extremely poorly.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, he was slightly worse than the league average pitcher this season in most pitching categories, and slightly better than the league average pitcher in most picthing categories last season.

In other words, his two seasons average out to make hiim league average, which, according to your own words, is a #3 pitcher.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I should say that better...

hge’s a bottom half of the rotation pitcher. By being in the “bottom half” there are more starters above you than below you, hence “below average”.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not all rotations are created equal

Jonathan Sanchez is a 3 starter on the Giants. He might be a 2 starter or even an ace on some other teams. In reality, the entire moniker “3 starter”, “4 starter” is a crude way of evaluating.

However, even if we just took an average, as done in the study:
http://reconditebaseball.blogspot.com/2008/02/revisiting-rotation-spots.html
Kawakami matches just fine with the leagues 3/4 starters. So yes, my analysis was crude, but the example and study are crude.

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 21, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

When comparing team to team, yes...

but your example of Sanchez is misguided. When all healthy, Hudson, Hanson, Lowe, and Jurrjens all slot above Kawakami here. While Jurrjens or Lowe or Hanson might slot a lot higher on other teams, such as Sanchez, that speaks differently than Kawakami. We have all said he wouldn’t be better than a 3 for anyone. By saying that, unlike a Sanchez or Jurrjens where their 3rd or 4th spot is misleading and would be better for others, Kawakami would be at best a 3rd. So every team in baseball has at least 2 starters better than him, making him, again at best, their “average” starter (as 2 starters above, and 2 below). Now some have 3, 4, 5, even 6 better options to start (such as Atlanta, Tampa, etc). So now he’s not even in as many rotations as he’d be 3rd for. That gives you quite a lot of starters better than him. Going off what I list above, I count at least 110 I’d rather have. Split everyone evenly amongst all 30 teams, that’d put Kawakami at best on the bottom end of 4s, or more likely a 5. I consider a team’s 5th starter below average. (and this is also my underlying theme he’s not a 3 like most say, he’s a 5 at best).

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Look at the data on the website

he matches just fine in the 3 spot of an average rotation statistically both in ERA and FIP. That takes all rotations into account. The “Myth” you state is that he matches well as a 3/4 starter in most rotations. The fact is that he does. You are the one who brought in matching team to team into this. That method by definition creates a lot of difficulties. Take an average to standardize as done in the study and the numers for KK match favorably, making the “myth” look more like fact.

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 21, 2010 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

How is it difficult?...

the rotations are above. If people want to do indepth research on their numbers, they can. But every team has at least 2, and most have 4 starters who would start over Kawakami if forced to choose.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

As CThaberman said, that’s not true. About 2/3 of the teams would have him in the 3/4 spot. Which disproves the “Myth”. That is going team by team.

Meanwhile, a better way of doing this analysis is to create an average level of performance for all of baseball based on the performance of they 3-5 starters. The above site did that over a period of a few years which makes it that much more compelling. Doing so, Kawakami stacks up as a 3/4 starter.

Two different ways of trying to analyze, and the myth hasn’t really been busted. He could be a 3/4 starter on any given team. Now, some teams will have better rotations (Braves, Giants) and he would slot lower. Other teams might slot him as a high 3 (Pirates).

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 21, 2010 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

2/3?

maybe that’s a disagreement, because I don’t think he’d be a 3 for all but a small handful of teams. If you’re an ‘average" 3 starter, you’d be the 3 for more than just the Royals and Pirates.

He’s a 3, at best, on the worst rotations. More often than not, he’d be around the 5.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok

one form of analysis he comes up anywhere from the 3-5 spot, in another more sophisticated form of analysis he comes up as a standard 3, good 4 starter. Either way, saying that his ranking in a rotation as a 3/4 is a myth is way too strong and there is plenty of empirical evidence to support the contrary opinion.

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 21, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

you have to take into consideration that the site you listed is using data that is almost 3 years old….i would like to see updated data…i posit all the numebrs would be at least .25 less and some even .5 less…which moves KK from a 3/4 to a middle of the road 4.

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 22, 2010 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

.25-.5 would be a large swing

Even though this was “the year of the pitcher”, I would be shocked if it swung that much. That’s a pretty faulty thing to posit, that 10 years of data would make such a swing over 3 years of stats. It isn’t like offense has plummeted in the past 3 years.

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 23, 2010 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

there was only 3 years of data as far as I saw…and it wasthe height of offensive production….i would be interested to see what the actual nbrs are…if you can find them for 2010 and 2009…just what the league avg is would appropriate…i looked and couldn’t find it, although i didnt try that hard.

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 24, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

5 years

but still, that would be a large swing. Don’t know why I said 10.

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 24, 2010 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

cause you are a liar

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 24, 2010 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

indeed

And for my next reveal… I AM KENSHIN KAWAKAMI!

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 24, 2010 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hi, my name is Mr. sanchez and I am going to prove something. I am going to list names. This list of names proves that KK is not a good pitcher.

If you want anything with statistical analysis or numbers, do it yourself. My list of names disproves all. I am not here to use fancy numbers and high-falutin’ stats. I have my list of names.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

The names don't prove it,...

they are who they are. But Kenshin did not pitch better than several of them.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hi, I'm justin...

I’m an argumentative arse who thinks he can go off the top of his head and know everything he needs to know.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, I just don’t make fanposts supposedly disproving something and then tell everyone else to back up my argument by looking up their own stats.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

And if by argumentative arse, you mean someone who takes a discussion and makes a fanpost about it and calls out the other person by name in an effort to somehow take away internet points from theim, I think you got the wrong guy.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

That thread was going off the board...

so I started a new one to continue the discussion.

The list of names was a starting point, for reference sake if you will, and some of the comments were meant as bluster.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

and the stats that have been posted?

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

When you call the other guy...

…an argumentative arse, and then state that some of your comments were meant as bluster, there appears to be a fundamental disconnect somewhere.

by cavebird on Oct 21, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

you sayin he isn't?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nope, just saying it is a pot calling the kettle black situation...

….when you call someone argumentative while admitting that you made comments that were bluster, and, therefore, argumentative.

(And yes, me stating this is probably the frying pan calling out the pot and kettle, lol.)

by cavebird on Oct 21, 2010 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

mmmm, kettle corn

"Tony Gwynn made sacrifices. Cal Ripken made sacrifices. I'm not sure Derek Jeter made sacrifices given the ungodly deep pockets the Yankees have." - Chipper Jones

by MBL1 on Oct 21, 2010 5:18 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

That means...

…you are still pot. Go have fun with Lincecum!

by cavebird on Oct 21, 2010 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Common sense FTW!

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Off the top of my head FTW!

Name a single pitcher on the staff of the Angels or White Sox he’d start over, you can’t, but keep claiming he would “off the top of your head”. Those are the starters for each team, Kawakami would not be a #3 except on the worst, and would be an arguable 5 for most.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I said “off the top of my head” in our last discussion about this, because I am in freakin Afghanistan and don’t have time to do the research required to compare the stats and numbers, so i went off of “the top of my head” – which, btw I never claimed to prove anything, unlike your list of names which apparently disproves all.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

IMO...

if it’s tight enough you’d need to go to the advanced stats for a decision, it’s within their margin for error, and that’s why I starred more teams than I truly felt he’d start on.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

KK would start on the YANKEES? Huh?

"Tony Gwynn made sacrifices. Cal Ripken made sacrifices. I'm not sure Derek Jeter made sacrifices given the ungodly deep pockets the Yankees have." - Chipper Jones

by MBL1 on Oct 20, 2010 10:47 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I disagree mightily on your list

I think he could start with:
Pirates
Mets
Astros
Brewers
Orioles
Indians
Royals
Mariners

Blue jays, Rockies, dbacks, yanks, fish all have better staffs’, not that they are good staffs’

by murph35 on Oct 20, 2010 11:38 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

He could get on the Tigers too

None of my list is based on numbers though. Honestly, really looking at it from a fantasy baseball point of view. KK was abysmal, other teams had serviceable guys, and some quality young arms.

by murph35 on Oct 20, 2010 11:42 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

The problem is #3-#5 is not a spot you spend $7 mil on.

I’d be willing to trade him for a $5-$6mil OF that is better then Ankiel/McLouth/Melky, or as part of a Vernon Wells Package along with McLouth.

by Broccoman on Oct 21, 2010 7:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Unless you have a stable of cost-controlled pitchers...

Yes it is, many times.

The Giants will have an 18.5M fifth-starter next season. Brad Penny cost the Cardinals 7.5M. Vincente Padilla is 5M. Aaron Harang was left off the Reds postseason roster and made 12.5M. Carlos Zambrano spent half the year in therapy, worked in the bullpen, and made 18M. Jason Marquis was 7.5M for the Nats. Kazmir and Joel Piniero make 8M apiece. Javier Vazquez made 11.5M for the Yankees.

Starting pitchers make a lot of effin’ money, unless they’re still under team control. The only veteran starting pitchers not making 5M per year are retreads.

Now, you might be saying, “Hey, those guys you listed weren’t 5th starters when they signed their contracts.” And that’s true. Neither was KK. He was tabbed as the #4, which puts his salary right in line (or slightly lower, in many cases) with what a fourth starter on a team with average pitching depth would receive. At the time of his signing, the Braves had below-average depth in the rotation.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think Atlanta is spending $7M on him.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wasnt it a 3 yr/$21 mil contract?

I think I’m missing your point.

"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"

"You look like you should be married to one of the San Diego Padres."

by Doghnut on Oct 21, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not a huge difference, really.

"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"

"You look like you should be married to one of the San Diego Padres."

by Doghnut on Oct 21, 2010 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

its actually 6.67M so really we can pertty much all agree its 7M if we are rounding…or we can say its 6.67

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 22, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cot's (depends if you average it all + bonus, or not)....

Kenshin Kawakami rhp
3 years/$23M (2009-11)
3 years/$23M (2009-11)
signed by Atlanta as a free agent 1/13/09
$2M signing bonus (paid between 2/09 and 5/09)
09:$7.667M, 10:$6.667M, 11:$6.667M
Kawakami may become a free agent if he and the club do agree to new contract by 10/15/11 or one day after final game of 2011 World Series
award bonuses: $25,000 for LCS MVP; $50,000 each for Gold Glove, WS MVP, Rolaids award, All Star; $0.1M for Cy Young, $0.1M for Rookie of Year ($50,000 for 2nd place, $25,000 for 3rd)
perks: interpreter, $25,000 moving expenses, housing and SUV during Spring Training, access to massage therapist, 8 round-trip business- or first-class airline tickets between Tokyo and Atlanta

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

While I guess he could start for these teams, I agree that none of them are going to pay him what he makes. There are more than enough guys out there that would put up similar numbers for 1-3 million a year. To trade him, its going to have to be to a team with a similar bad contract

by wcubmac on Oct 21, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

1-3 million

is barely bullpen money.

The only starting pitchers making that little are cost-controlled or retreads. If you want to sign Justin Duchscherer for $2M, it’s your own fault when he’s done for the season before May begins.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 21, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

How was that any different that what we got from KK this year? Essentially his season ended in June. :)

by dunnytwogloves on Oct 21, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dammit, Bobby.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

OH YES.

It has returned.

'Terrible preview...pretty weak, didn't learn anything new. pretty sad." - mastermike

by Scott Coleman on Oct 21, 2010 4:35 PM EDT reply actions  

give the people what they want

I always say

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Except stats.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 21, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

The people don't want stats.

We want other teams to trade us cheap good players for rubbish.

by cavebird on Oct 21, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

THIS

every rosterbation post proves that.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 21, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't use the term rubbish

I prefer “rummage sale items.” Insert a lot of comments about potential and how said player could be an upgrade here or there ignoring the team’s farm system, et cetera.

by Salty on Oct 22, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

you mean thats not gonna happen?…i firmly believe we are acquiring Colby Rasmus a top 25 prospect no more than 2 years ago, who is now producing in the MLB for a LOOGY and a middling pitching prospect.

that doesnt seem crazy at all

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 22, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I bet ya we can get for just Randy Gress...

I’ve heard he’s a monster prospect, and they need IF. If Mozliak wants to be a jerk about it, we’ll throw in another MI in Michael Noboa.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

KK is a slightly above average (or average, if you want to argue that) starting pitcher.

The Braves mismanaged the situation so badly it’s comical.

Because overusing Venters, pitching a tired Minor, and using Jesse Fucking Chavez in tied extra inning games is a great idea. So long, Cox.

by kbertling353 on Oct 21, 2010 5:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Jesse Chavez is a star!

Well, ok, the answer to a trivia question. The guy sure is putting on the frequent flyer miles.

by Salty on Oct 22, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

My two cents and play by play

I basicly agree with Mr Sanchez…..KK would have made it as a Starter (though maybe only as an injury replacement for the Yanks) for the teams you mentioned. After watching most of these pitchers this year I can see him easliy being the 3 or 4 starter on a lot of teams.

Ok, When to Stat and When not to Stat.
Justing would be right if the comparison numbers were a “One to one” argument but in a general argument involving sooooo many players a single stat may have been helpfull…like Whip….but not needed

it just felt right and the chance to go to the postseason is hard to pass up. I’ve always respected their orginization… and Bobby…I’m excited. I’m looking forward to it...Derrek Lee (at press conference sayiing he had been traded to the Braves)

by bravestatoo on Oct 21, 2010 9:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Staffs he could be on...

a 1 or 2, none.
A 3 – Diamondbacks, Indians, Royals, maybe Orioles
A 4 – Rockies, Tigers, Astros, Brewers, Mariners, Mets, Pirates, and maybe Padres.

On the rest, he’d be either a 5 or not starting. That’s more than half the league on which he wouldn’t start or be a 5th starter when everyone’s healthy. To me, that screams a 4/5, not a possible 3 (unless your rotation is abysmal). Last year doesn’t change that opinion. He’s a decent starter, and fits in the back end of a rotation nicely. But to claim he’s a possible 3, except on the worst of rotations, is ignoring the staffs around the league, and how he’s pitched.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 11:35 AM EDT reply actions  

Using 1 season of stats, non-cumulative

The methodology is sloppy. This is why I preferred the above method which standardized these things and places KK firmly in 3/4 slot position.

But either way, your analysis concludes that he would slot into the 3-4 slot for more than 1/3 of all major league baseball teams. That is a significant percentage.

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 22, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

But, he isn’t a top 100 pitcher…

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's not,...

care to show anything that says otherwise? I’d give you a list of 100 names he’s worse than, but then you don’t like lists.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not true....

I’m not going off a single season of stats (although KK doesn’t have much more than a full season’s worth to begin with).

I’m looking at rotations around the league, and seeing where he’d slot (mostly 4th or 5th), and it’s not 3rd. Saying he’s a 3/4 is misleading when he’s only a 3 for the worst of the worst. Otherwise, he’s a 4 or 5.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's correct

but he is a 3 or 4 on 1/3 of baseball teams according to your analysis, no? And according to a more comprehensive analysis that standardizes over a longer period of time he slots well as a 3 or 4, no? Put this together, and your argument that a “myth” has been disproven can’t be so because there is empirical evidence to the contrary, and thus the issue is debatable. It can’t be a “myth”. You aren’t arguing about the existence of the Easter Bunny.

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 22, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Easter Bunny...

…being a rabbit, should at least be easier to breed than the equines!

by cavebird on Oct 22, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

hence the phrase “F*cking like rabbit”

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 22, 2010 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

You throw in 3 like that's a primary part...

he’s a 3 for fewer teams than he wouldn’t start for. He’s about 2/3 a 4 or 5, and I’d say 2/3 > 1/3, wouldn’t you? Significantly greater. You can split the other 1/3 between a 3 and not at all, with the greater portion of that being not at all and slanting the 4/5 closer to 5 than 4.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

you can spin your numbers however you want

the fact remains, 1/3 of teams he would fit in the 3-4 spot. Bottom line.

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 23, 2010 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

and the fact that we are still debating this

means that you have failed to disprove the “’myth”. simply By virtue of the fact that there is such strong debate on the matter.

by Andy Braves Fan on Oct 23, 2010 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kenshin's ranks in MLB Amongst SP (Min 80 IPs)

2009:
ERA – 52 (3.97)
FIP – (4.21)
xFIP – (4.61)
K:BB – 94 (1.85)
K/9 – 87 (6.18)
WHIP – 66 (1.35)
DIPS – 67 (4.31)

2010
ERA – 123 (4.85)
FIP – (4.35)
xFIP – (4.56)
K:BB – 109 (1.84)
K/9 – 96 (6.22)
WHIP – 124 (1.45)
DIPS – 65 (3.96)

As you can see, KK at his worst is still right around the top 100. Doing the simple math:

30 teams X 5 pitchers = 150 pitchers
#3/4 pitchers would find themselves sitting in the 60-120 range.

KK clearly falls within that range. Granted, some teams’ #3s could be #1s on other teams and vice versa, but using a peanut butter spread,based on the league average KK falls right in line with 3/4 pitchers. And I have used stats to show this, not just a list of names.

Re: His WAR

Sanchez mentioned that KK was only worth .8 WAR this season – what he failed to mention was that WAR is a cumulative stat, and KK only pitched about half of this season. When this was pointed out, he said that we can’t assume that KK’s production would have continued. Is this true?

Well, in 2009, KK pitched 156.1 innings, posting a 3.86 ERA, 4.21 FIP and a 4.61 xFIP. His total WAR for 2009 was 1.7.

In 2010, KK pitched 87.1 innings, posting a 5.15 ERA, 4.35 FIP and a 4.45 xFIP. His total WAR value for 2010 was .8.

Seeing as how he pitched nearly exactly half of what he did the season before with minimal change in his stats (except a spike in ERA, which is countered by a drop in xFIP) and that he produced at nearly the exact value as in 2009, I’d say it is safe to assume that KK would have duplicated his 2009 with a slightly higher ERA – probably finishing somewhere in the 4.50 range. Also, something else to remember is that KK lost a LOT of value in the few innings he had out of the bullpen this season – after not pitching in a game for over a month.

In other words, the stats show that KK is a 3/4 caliber MLB pitcher. And no, I don not have a list of names of pitchers that I think KK is better than. I just have stats and rankings that show that he is, at worst, a league-average pitcher.

*FIP rankings are not included, because the only place I can find them is Fangraphs, and that page isn’t working over here. If someone could post his FIP ranking amongst starting pitchers with 80 IPs minimum, I would appreciate it.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 4:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks to SWO

My boy hooked me up.

KK’s FIP in 2010 ranked 110 and his xFIP ranked 119
KK’s FIP in 2009 ranked 75 and his xFIP ranked 111

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 22, 2010 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

And those 100+ numbers...

slot him as a 4, not a 3. Considering his age, the lack of a “book”, etc, it’s reasonable to assume the league has adjusted to him, and he’s getting hit much harder as they learn him. He’s getting worse, and even by your numbers is more of a 4 than a 3,

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/k/kawakke01-pitch.shtml
His H/9, WHIP, ERA+, ERA, HR/9, RAR, WAR, BA against, OBP against, SLG against all got worse. He got a lesser % of DPs. His fielding also got much worse (3 errors to 1, in fewer chances, lower range factor and all other defensive measure on B-R.

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=9225&position=P
His LOB%, GB%, LD%, tERA, WPA, and many more also got worse.

So you are extremely incorrect in saying “nothing got worse but H/9”.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 23, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

you don't think things like WHIP, OBP against, and ERA

are affected by H/9? Basically, you just listed the same stat over and over.

Nice try, but as far as base stats (H/9, BB/9, K/9), only the H/9 got worse.

But thanks for letting everyone know that his batting average against also got worse along with his H/9.

by kbertling353 on Oct 24, 2010 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

And LD%, GB%,tERA...

as well as his D, and several other things. But keep glossing over that, as well as the fact he also got smacked around considerably worse.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 24, 2010 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Which makes him a #3 or #4 starter in the league – the very statement that your post tries to disprove.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 23, 2010 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

You aren't good at math are you....

30 teams, x 3 starters = 90. If he’s not in the top 90, which only one of your numbers shows, then he’s not a 3. He’s closer to 120 in 3 of the 4, which would mean he’s on the lower end of the 4s.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 23, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

So, you admit that he is at least a 4, at his worst…my job here is done.

And I love how you are only looking at 2010 data for your assumption while completely ignoring his 2009.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 24, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, he is a 4, at BEST

at his worst, he’s not on a rotation, as he wouldn’t be here, for the White Sox, Angels, Rays, Giants, and a handful of others.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 24, 2010 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

2010 was his worst, and using 2010 numbers, you have admitted that he is a #4. To say he can get worse is simply speculation and not a valid argument.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 25, 2010 7:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Have you even tried...

to present an argument to back up your theory that he’s capable of pitching at the level of a 3? Because I haven’t seen it. You just bash me, and post numbers that don’t support your idea that he’s that caliber of starting pitcher, and consider that a “valid argument”.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 25, 2010 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

You are right. All I do is bash your “proof” that consists of a list of names, while I post numbers.

The humanity!

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 26, 2010 8:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

You are also reading impaired if...

you truly believe that second sentence.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 26, 2010 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

And again, you fail to name anyone...

you’ve done that repeatedly claiming “numbers vs names” while never saying any teams where the “numbers” would put KK above where I say.

By failing to respond directly to questions asked, or name a single team that was incorrectly omitted by me or anyone else here who claims he would start for fewer teams than I say, I’ll consider you bested. cthaberman on the other hand, at least he put up a respectable side of the argument, though we disagree on Kawakami vs. some of the pitchers similar in productivity.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 26, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I didn’t fail to name anyone. I have named teams before, and I named them again. But, not only did I name teams, I gave stats.

You just listed names.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 26, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

One more thing: his numbers from 09 are clearly numbers of a #3. His numbers from ‘10 are clearly from a #4…so I don’t see how your list of names somehow disproves the theory that he is a 3 or a 4 pitcher on most teams.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 23, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Except they do…

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 24, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s funny.

30 teams, x 3 starters = 90. If he’s not in the top 90, which only one of your numbers shows, then he’s not a 3. He’s closer to 120 in 3 of the 4, which would mean he’s on the lower end of the 4s
2009:
ERA – 52 (3.97)
FIP – (4.21)
xFIP – (4.61)
K:BB – 94 (1.85)
K/9 – 87 (6.18)
WHIP – 66 (1.35)
DIPS – 67 (4.31)

2010
ERA – 123 (4.85)
FIP – (4.35)
xFIP – (4.56)
K:BB – 109 (1.84)
K/9 – 96 (6.22)
WHIP – 124 (1.45)
DIPS – 65 (3.96)

Let’s see who can and can’t count:

Top 90:
2009 – ERA, FIP, K/9, WHIP, DIPS
2010 – DIPs

1+1+1+1+1+1 = 6 categories of top 90 ranking

On the other hand, I only see 2 categories in 2 years in which he was at the 120 mark.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 25, 2010 7:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

If he's a 3...

why don’t you finally name the rotations he’d be a 3 on? You haven’t done that because you can’t. The rotations are there above, the players he’d need to start over are right there for you to see. Don’t go off the top of your head. You’ve got the rotations, which ones would he be a 3 for? You’ve still not answered this question after being asked countless times. Why not?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 25, 2010 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I did in the thread where this discussion originated.

But again, here you go:

Pirates, Brewers, Cubs, Mets, Astros, D-Backs, White Sox, Tigers, Nationals, Orioles, Indians, Mariners

He’s close to the 3 and definitely the 4 on the Reds, Twins, Rockies

He’s the 4/5 on just about all of the other teams except those with amazing rotations like the Braves, Giants, etc.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 26, 2010 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

You're nuts....

He doesn’t slot above Peavy, Buerhle, Danks or Floyd on the White Sox (nor Garcia imo), so he’s a 5 at best there.

A healthy Nats have Stras, Zimmerman, Lannan, Livan, Marquis, Maya, among others as good or better than KK.

How is he a 3 for the Mets with Santana and Niese are definites, Pelfrey has done better outside of a bad year, and then there’s Dickey if he’s solidified his knuckler, and I’d think Dillon Gee slots above KK similar to Beachy or Minor for us.

The Cubs have Zambrano, Dempster and Wells who would all be above KK. You are undervaluing the stuff of those on the Reds and Twins. You are delusional with those names, and the numbers do not support them in your argument.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 26, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

White-Sox – his numbers are right in line pretty much with Danks and Floyd. Call it a push.

Nats – Livan, Marquis, etc are not better than KK.

Mets – How is he a 3 when they have 2 pitchers better? Ummm….

Cubs – Zambrano – is that the guy that they sent to the bullpen because he was sucking?

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 26, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Zambrano also came back and looked like his old, dominant self...

and the Mets had two clearly better, there are another 3 who could easily start above KK making him off the rotation.

And you are delusional about Danks and Floyd. Floyd has been easily superior in FIP and xFIP the last two seasons, and Danks has been better as well, in addition to being one of those guys who consistently produce better than their FIP/xFIP.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 26, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Someone’s not looking at the staaaaats.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 26, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, you. Perhaps you need to reread that last paragraph?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 26, 2010 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Delusional?

Thinking Freddy Garcia is any good is delusional.

by kbertling353 on Oct 26, 2010 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

You mean the guy with...

a career FIP of 4.24, xFIP of 4.17, career ERA of 4.13? Yeah, he’s no good. I’m also pretty sure he’s an in law relation of their manager, but Kenshin would start over him, right.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 26, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's been in the league for 10+ years and severely injured recently

Why would anything matter but the last few seasons with a guy like that?

Do you really think his days in Seattle are indicative of his true talent level now?

He hasn’t had a WAR over 1.6 since 2006 (pre-injury).

Nice try, but this shit’s getting really old.

Point is, the difference between a 3,4, and 5 starter is arbitrary. And if we all agree KK would be a starter at one of those slots on most teams (except extremes like the Pirates, Giants, etc.), then why bitch about it constantly? KK’s a useful pitcher. Refusing to pitch him last year isn’t a reflection of his talent, rather a stubborn manager hurting his teams’ chances of winning by using worse pitchers (Chavez, Farns, Martinez).

Stop.

by kbertling353 on Oct 27, 2010 8:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm sure Cox left him unused in the pen...

so he could put guys he thought was worse on the mound trying to lose games in his final season as his team made a playoff push? That makes a lot of sense.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 27, 2010 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

well, it happened.

managers do stupid shit all of the time because they are either unintelligent or stubborn. take your pick for cox.

by kbertling353 on Oct 27, 2010 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

He intentionally...

put pitchers on the mound he felt gave him less of a chance to win? Do you even understand the stupidity in what you are saying?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 27, 2010 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

managers do stupid shit all of the time because they are either unintelligent or stubborn. take your pick for cox.

by kbertling353 on Oct 27, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, and last word:

Did you notice at any point of this massive fanpost that pretty much no one agreed with you?

by kbertling353 on Oct 27, 2010 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

No, I didn't...

because I can actually read. Multiple people thought he would start on even less teams than I do.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 27, 2010 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Since you are all about listing names, why don’t you list these multiple peoples?

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 27, 2010 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Are you illiterate?

or just intentionally ignoring them?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 27, 2010 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m just curious…reading through here, I think you would struggle to fine 3 people who have posted so far that agree with you.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 27, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then read better...

eaheckman, MLB1, chicagobullies, and murph35 all felt KK would start for fewer teams than I originally said.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 27, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

that’s 4…out of how many?

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 28, 2010 2:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Those against appear to be

Andy, you, kbert, and haberman. The rest just commented about you and me bickering again.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 28, 2010 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

I forgot Edwin Jackson on the White Sox now...

so no, he’s not starting there either, let alone be a 3 as you claim.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 27, 2010 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ah, yes. Who could forget about the mighty Edwin Jackson…

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 27, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is certainly a more talented pitcher...

and in higher demand than Kenshin.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 27, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

First of all, we have no idea what the demand for Jackson or Kenshin is.

Second, we don’t have any idea what the demand for Jackson is.

All we know is that their numbers are very similar.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 28, 2010 2:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ok, so I just realized that my “first of all” contains my “second”…lol

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 28, 2010 3:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

And they are both wrong...

Edwin Jackson was available and dealt. KK wasn’t, so clearly the demand is either higher for him, or opposing teams are at least willing to pay the asking price for him (and we both know KK would not have a high price tag for a deal).

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 28, 2010 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Or more accurately...

Kenshin is rumored to have takers, but from Japan, and with us paying a large portion of his salary. Jackson was sent to a MLB team, to start, without paying his salary and sending a quality package of players in return.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 28, 2010 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

OK fine…. I’ll give my expert advice on this topic so it can be over with…I know you were waiting for that.

Sanchez recently we have been agreeing a lot and generally we see eye to eye on things…you are very rational and usually think shit through….however this post was lazily put together and that is a shame, because had you put the work into it I think people would have seen you are right. I did the get the rankings for Justin (as his afghani internet blows ass). And despite the fact that he has the number he refuses to acknowledge their significance.

What the numbers show, by and large, is first that KK was no worse a pitcher in 2010, then he was in 2009. some number are different, but I would posit most of the differences are mostly just flucations due to luck and random variation. The numbers also show that he is a 4th stasrter. Justin thinks he could be a 3 on some teams, and he could…but those teams aren’t really good teams…as Sanchez mentions in the comments, they are all horrible teams who wont compete for a while. KK would probably be the 5th starter on every team in basbeall, notwithstanding 5 or so (off the top of my head, he probably wouldnt make the Red Sox, Rays, Giants, rotations… he might not make the White Sox rotation..or the twins).

Every agrees he is probably a 4th starter, and there are some teams he could start for as the 3 and some he wouldnt make the rotation…so why get all in a tiffy about whether he is a 3/4 or a 4/5…its very insignificant…the fact is he is a good pitcher that has value in MLB, thats all that is important…

lets just hug it out bitch and call it a day…and agree Tommy Hanson is better than KK

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 22, 2010 4:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Is random variation the reason...

or a league adjusting, learning what he throws, and knocking him around? That could be just as easily the answer as random variation causing his poorer production. I think he’d be a 5 on more teams than he’d be a 3 on (and as said above, given health he’d be off more rotations than he’d be a 3 on).

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 22, 2010 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

the random vairation is no negligible that i would think its random… but it could be regression based on a number of factors…we really don’t know the answer..its all just conjection what is attributed to the variation

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 22, 2010 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Does the fact he has no market for his services...

and the closest thing to takers we are getting is from Japan not debunk that theory? If he was a 3 or 4 caliber starter, you wouldn’t think all of MLB would pass on the guy, after parts of two seasons showing what he could do, and let him go back to where he came from. IMO, that supports the idea that it’s not regression as much as the league finally figuring him out and his failure to adjust.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 23, 2010 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

there isn’t enough time to say he’s hasnt adjusted….not to mention his overall numbers still point to him being a 4 or a 5….which is pretty darn useful….as has been mentioned and I think you would agree he would start on approximately 20-25 teams, most of the time as a 5th starter, but thats not relevant.

as for why no one wants him, i havent got a clue…Jermaine Dye didnt get a job last year and I dont know why, he would have been a very good DH, esp for the White Sox or a handful of other teams…how come two years ago the only team that seriously bid on Dunn was the Nationals…doesnt every team in baseball need Adam Dunn, to varying degrees.

I have absolutely no idea why GMs do things they do, they are probably smarter than me, but i don’t see it. There are tons of players who werent given the chanceto play or were given a limited opportunity…I don’t think that means that the league has adjusted to him. This is especially true considering how well he pitched down “the stretch” (that portion before the Braves decided it was a good idea to completely ignore KK and waste a half season of his)

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 23, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

My point all along has been 4 or 5...

not 3. And no, I would not agree that he’d start on 20-25 teams. With health issues into account, he’d probably start for that many or more, but if completely healthy, I think the number would be closer to 15.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 23, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

you think there are 15 teams whose nbr 5 are better than KK…that I cannot agree with

"No. Lonely people mixing with one another? Breeding? Creating an even lonelier generation? You're not even allowing natural selection do its work. Pssh. You're like the guy who invented the seat belt."

Dwight Schrute

by Swo12bv on Oct 23, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

If fully healthy...

there are about 5 he wouldn’t even be considered, and another 7-10 which it’d be debateable with others who are similar in production.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 23, 2010 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

This.

If KK is released, I guarantee he is picked up within a week.

This guy wants to suck all the cubs dick can he not have an unbias some what partition reguards
by RWH2 on Apr 5, 2010 10:20 AM CDT

by justincredubil02 on Oct 23, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

And the chances he went through waivers...

with us willing to let him and his contract walk should there be a taker last August?

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 25, 2010 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Last August...

Not all 30 teams still had a good shot at making the playoffs.

Almost 2/3 of the season has been played at that point. It makes no sense for, say, the Astros to pick him up at that point. They’re out of it. This season, maybe they can use him as a 4th or 5th guy.

The Astros are just an example, not suggesting that’s where he’s going or that they want him. The Mariners, A’s, et al., also work there.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 25, 2010 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

As you say though...

those teams could use him this season. You pick up the full contract on a waiver wire deal unless they are cut; see Alex Rios last year. So any team that would claim Kawakami last August would have likely done so thinking of this coming season as well as the end of last one, and probably without having to give up a thing to get him.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 26, 2010 8:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

At $2+M??

For the rest of 2010?? Even if the deal is done on Aug. 31, they’re picking up about an extra $1.1M.

Now you’ve turned him into a $8-9M pitcher for one or two unnecessary months and a season of baseball.

Not likely.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 26, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Assuming we wouldn't have chipped in a few million...

for a Michael Noboa like prospect. Hell, maybe KK will be the PTBNL in that deal, as Arizona is among those teams he’d almost certainly start for.

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 26, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

To my knowledge...

PTBNL cannot be a 40-man roster guy, because they would have had to pass through waivers at the time of the trade. Then again, perhaps he was past by then, perhaps he wasn’t.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 26, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also,

Alex Rios was under contract until 2015. The White Sox found a contract they liked for a player that could help them for years to come.

Taking on $2M for a player that is guaranteed to be under control until 2015 is one thing. It’s a small part of the overall investment of about $61M dollars. Taking on the same amount for a player only going to be around for a single year is another matter entirely, especially considering it’s an extra 15% of the contract, at a minimum.

-C

It’s rough to sit through these games and not have someone that can’t hit a Ball?

by cthabeerman on Oct 26, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

not in a tiffy...

but it’s the offseason, and what else is there to talk about.

It’s a mistake to put 3/4, instead of 4/5, because the 3 is misleading. What’s the point of using words if you use them incorrectly. He’d be off as many rotations as he’d be a 3 on, so you may as well say he’s a 4/nothing as a 3/4 since nothing is more frequent for the league than 3. He’d be a 5 as much, if not more, than a 4, so the two most common spots he’d be in a rotation is the 4 and 5.

Justin, Andy, cthab, and the rest are incorrect in stating he’s a 3/4. As the primary paragraph above says, which many of the detractors seem to have completely missed before posting is again….
“While I’m not Kenny hater, and think the man pitched well enough to be treated a lot better than he was down the stretch when he was collecting splinters, but the old myth that he’s good enough to be a #3 or 4 for most teams is flat wrong. He’s good enough to start for some, mostly bottom feeders. But he’s no more than a 4 or 5 on the vast majority of teams when their primary starters are healthy.”

http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Oct 23, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I believe this list is quite generous, actually, I would prolly say this list that follows would be more realistic, and then even this list gets narrowed down based on minor leaguers who teams will bring up and start, and narrowed even further from his obviously lovely contract. But say, take the following list as a guideline, for possible teams where he could start, if this was true, I believe, the Braves could prolly trade him alot easier then it has been, but then again, who is to say they really forced the issue and made seriously hard attempts to trade him last year. Although, now, they know their total pitching depth they will have made available to them. I’m all in favor of a bag of baseballs and half the contract eaten. 3.5 mil, throughout the first half, helped us reach the playoffs.

Astros
Blue Jays
Brewers
Diamondbacks
Dodgers
Indians
Mariners
Marlins
Mets
Nationals
Orioles
Padres
Phillies
Pirates
Rockies
Royals
Tigers
Yankees

by chicagobullies on Oct 25, 2010 4:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Is this a list of potential trade partners?

by Salty on Oct 26, 2010 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Atlanta Braves.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Thankschipper_small
Memorial Day Weekend - Off Topic
Today_sbn_icon_small
TheLetter2's Top Braves, 2012 Edition
Small
Closing out May Rosterbation

Recent FanPosts

Chipper1_small
Thunderdome Thread
Ck_small
Time to bench Heyward or move him down the lineup?
Small
What to do with a Piece of The Great American Cracker Box?
Img_0564_small
Is Pastornicky an historically bad defensive SS?
Miami-thrice-reut_small
McCann as LF/1B?
Icon2_small
Rev Wins!!!!!!!
Small
Speed in the 7 hole?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Gondeee_small gondeee

Editors

Heis3_small Scott Coleman

Sid_small SCrebel10

Authors

Dsc01731_small royhobbs

Mccann__brian_small cbwilk

N528829858_2098004_4206_small Zeus12888

Chris_and_harrison_at_braves_game_small Atlanta_Chris

Avatar_small TonyAlmeyda

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Ffw_small Fauxfrankwren

Moderators

My_hair_is_a_bird-257x300_small yondaime4

7sw6xo_chop_crop_small HEYJUDE