The Kenshin Kawakami Debate
Much has been posted about Kenshin Kawakami lately. Some people think that he should move to the bullpen when Tim Hudson comes back. Some think that Kawakami should be trade bait. Others think that he isn't worth his contract. I hope to look a little more in depth at what KK has done this season and hopefully, convince some of you of his value to the Atlanta Braves so far this season.
I'll start off by saying that I know very little about advanced metrics on pitchers. My knowledge is pretty much limited to K rates, BB rates, WHIP, and things of that nature. I know very little about WAR, or how to compute it. I know what WAR means and believe it is a valuable tool for measuring a player's worth. However, due to my ignorance of the ins and outs of it, I will not really refer to it during this post. If someone smarter than I can elaborate more on WAR in the comments below, I would appreciate it, and I think that it will enhance the discussion.
via d.yimg.com
I have made many fanposts on here, but this is my first attempt at a serious analytical look at a player...play nicely please! :)
My hypothesis is that Kawakami is not only one of our better options for a SP, but also one of the better SPs in our division. I believe that he belongs no where near the bullpen, nor does he belong on another team. I will compare some of his stats this season with other pitchers that we were rumored to be getting, our own pitchers and some of the better pitchers in our own division.
First, let's look at total innings pitched. It has been said on this website several times that Kawakami cannot pitch past the 5th inning, and that he cannot throw more than 75-ish pitches. Really? I will list below a comparisson of IPs and # of pitches per start:
| NAME | # Games | Total # IP | Innings /game | Total # Pitches | Pitches/game |
| Kenshin Kawakami | 20 | 110.33 | 5.5 | 1816 | 90.8 |
| Derek Lowe | 23 | 136.67 | 5.9 | 2238 | 97.3 |
| Javier Vazquez | 22 | 147.3 | 6.7 | 2281 | 103.7 |
| Ricky Nolasco | 20 | 117 | 5.9 | 1915 | 95.8 |
| Jake Peavy | 13 | 81.67 | 6.3 | 1302 | 100.2 |
| A.J. Burnett | 21 | 131.33 | 6.3 | 2223 | 105.9 |
| John Smoltz | 7 | 36.67 | 5.2 | 606 | 86.6 |
| John Maine | 11 | 61.67 | 5.6 | 1066 | 96.9 |
| Cole Hamels | 21 | 123 | 5.9 | 1971 | 93.9 |
Here I have compared KK with some of our own pitchers, some other pitchers in our division and some that we were rumored to be after. While KK ranks the lowest of all of these names in the specific categories measured (except for John Smoltz), I think it is still safe to say that he is not pitching as few innings as most people claim, or as few pitches. KK is pitching well into the 6th inning on average (ranking just below Derek Lowe) with over 90 pitches per game.
It has also been said that KK lacks control. While I understand that early on in the season, control was an issue for KK, has he settled down at all? Where does he rank among the above-listed pitchers in control? Let's take a look:
| NAME | # Games | BB | BB/Game | K | K/Game | K:BB |
| Kenshin Kawakami | 20 | 46 | 2.3 | 80 | 4.0 | 1.7 |
| Derek Lowe | 23 | 28 | 1.2 | 72 | 3.1 | 2.6 |
| Javier Vazquez | 22 | 30 | 1.4 | 164 | 7.5 | 5.5 |
| Ricky Nolasco | 20 | 28 | 1.4 | 118 | 5.9 | 4.2 |
| Jake Peavy | 13 | 28 | 2.2 | 92 | 7.1 | 3.3 |
| A.J. Burnett | 21 | 65 | 3.1 | 117 | 5.6 | 1.8 |
| John Smoltz | 7 | 5 | 0.7 | 30 | 4.3 | 6.0 |
| John Maine | 11 | 34 | 3.1 | 42 | 3.8 | 1.2 |
| Cole Hamels | 21 | 23 | 1.1 | 106 | 5.0 | 4.6 |
So ok, Kawakami has a lower K:BB rate than some of the best pitchers in the game. But, we all know he had control issues early on. What about now? Well, here are his stats by month:
| Games | BB | BB/Game | K | K/Game | K:BB | |
| April | 4 | 11 | 2.75 | 18 | 4.5 | 1.6 |
| May | 5 | 12 | 2.4 | 26 | 5.2 | 2.2 |
| June | 5 | 8 | 1.6 | 16 | 3.2 | 2.0 |
| July | 5 | 15 | 3 | 16 | 3.2 | 1.1 |
| August | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | INF |
He brought his BB #s way down in June, but for some reason, in July he spiked again. Maybe it has something to do with being nailed by a line drive in the Yankees game at the end of June? Even with the spike in July, he seems to have bounced back in August (with a 1-game sample size). At any rate, to average less than 3 walks per game as a SP is not too bad, IMO.
It has also been said that KK is giving up a lot of runs and that he blows leads as soon as he gets them. let's take a look at the most important factor for pitchers - runs allowed (both earned and unearned) and how KK matches up with the names already listed:
| NAME | # Games | Runs Allowed | Earned Runs | Runs/Game | Earned Runs/Game |
| Kenshin Kawakami | 20 | 60 | 54 | 3.0 | 2.7 |
| Derek Lowe | 23 | 68 | 64 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
| Javier Vazquez | 22 | 52 | 49 | 2.4 | 2.2 |
| Ricky Nolasco | 20 | 70 | 65 | 3.5 | 3.3 |
| Jake Peavy | 13 | 38 | 38 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
| A.J. Burnett | 21 | 61 | 57 | 2.9 | 2.7 |
| John Smoltz | 7 | 29 | 29 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| John Maine | 11 | 33 | 31 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
| Cole Hamels | 21 | 66 | 64 | 3.1 | 3.0 |
This is where I think KK sets himself apart and distinguishes himself. He is putting up comparable, if not better numbers than most of these guys. Some of these guys are reguarded among the best pitchers in the league. Others are #2 or #3 starters on our division rivals. KK is our #5! He is pitching like a true #3 starter and only looks to get better as he continues to adjust to the American style of baseball.
The sad part about all of this? In games in which Kawakami pitches, the Atlanta Braves are 8-12. The only other pitchers on this list with a losing record are John Smoltz (2-5 in appearances) and Jake Peavy (6-7). Is this because Kawakami has been sucking it up? I don't think so. I think it is a lack of run support. Kawakami is giving us fewer runs than most of these guys (both earned and unearned), yet has the worst record.
I think we as Atlanta Brave fans need to stop looking at wins and losses and start looking at the value that our pitchers have. I don't hear anyone complaining about Derek Lowe's numbers, yet when it all boils down, Kawakami is giving up the exact same number of runs per game as Lowe.
So, having laid the numbers out there for all to see, I ask once again, why all the bashing of Kawakami? The numbers prove that he pitches well into the 6th inning in each start. The numbers show that he is gaining command of his pitches. The numbers show that he is among the best in the division (if not the league) in terms of not giving up runs. Flat out, the numbers show that Kenshin Kawakami is an asset to this team.
I have no idea why some of you prefer to put one of the division's best pitchers in the bullpen in favor of a guy who hasn't pitched a Major League inning in over a year, who is coming off of Tommy John surgery, whom we have no idea how effectice or efficient he can/will be.
I realize that there are a few pitchers in the division that I left out (Johan Santana, Josh Johnson and now Cliff Lee are some), but I think it is safe to say that they are probably 3 of the top 5 pitchers in the division. I wanted to contrast Kawakami to people that he is connected to in some way (either as an Atlanta starter, or a comprarable pitcher on another team).
Like I said before, if anyone can shed some light on the WAR info (or VORP, I don't even really know the difference) and then contrast his value as it relates to his contract, I would appreciate it.
Let the bashing begin...
EDIT: It should be noted that the "Earned runs/game" column is not based on a 9 inning game, but rather actual games pitched. That is why it differs from a traditional ERA.
EDIT #2: I have corrected the errors noted in the comments below. The results of plugging in the correct numbers are that KK's runs allowed went down to an even more respectable number, Lowe's K numbers look worse (and KK's better, thus supporting my hypothesis more) and that a couple of other numbers from other pitchers (Burnette) went down as well. Thanks for helping point out the errors!
EDIT #3: As someone below pointed out, it would be interesting to see what happens when you take away each pitchers 3 worst starts. KK only has 3 bad starts (as, interestingly enough, most of these guys do) and here is what happens:
| NAME | # Games | Runs Allowed | Earned Runs | Runs/Game | Earned Runs/Game |
| Kenshin Kawakami | 17 | 41 | 36 | 2.4 | 2.1 |
| Derek Lowe | 20 | 47 | 45 | 2.4 | 2.3 |
| Javier Vazquez | 19 | 36 | 33 | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| Ricky Nolasco | 17 | 47 | 42 | 2.8 | 2.5 |
| Jake Peavy | 10 | 23 | 23 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| A.J. Burnett | 18 | 41 | 37 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
| John Smoltz | 4 | 12 | 12 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| John Maine | 8 | 15 | 13 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Cole Hamels | 18 | 43 | 44 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
I think that this shows that outside of his 3 poor performances, KK has been VERY reliable this season.
7 recs |
187 comments
Comments
Great post, rec’d. I always believed that KK was better than what people said about him. Now we have the numbers to prove them otherwise. Thanks
"A Tar Heel Born and a Tar Heel bred, and when i die ill be a Tar Heel dead."
by mad_dog_maddux on Aug 6, 2009 10:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why the bashing?
Simple – the 8-12 record that the Braves are posting in Kawakami starts. The knee-jerk reaction is that it’s always KK’s fault, and right now, many people are conditioned to assume that a Kawakami start is a likely loss, and somewhere, there’s a stigma being born out of it.
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
by royhobbs on Aug 6, 2009 10:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Plus he’s Asain….
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
by cbwilk on Aug 6, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think his last start was a perfect example of why people have been frustrated
Braves got one in the first, should have been more. Gave it right back. Same in the second, but with a first pitch homer. Gives up another run in the third and we never catch up. Didn’t pitch badly, didn’t get enough support, but gave up runs at inopportune times.
"...Braves tie! ...Braves tie! ...Braves tie!"
by The Keith Lockhart Era on Aug 6, 2009 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
why does it matter when he gives up the runs? What if he gave up 2 runs first and our offense came back? Would that make a difference in the perception?
I couldn’t find the stats (I briefly looked), but I am pretty sure the perception that KK blows any lead he is given is a false one too…
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not many stats account for momentum, Joe Simpson talks about it a lot pitching more aggressive with leads, when you give up runs right after having them scored, the offense has a tendency to loose confidence
by cirela20 on Aug 8, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
if your offense doesn’t perform because your pitcher gives up a run or two, that is a problem with your offense, not your pitching.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 8, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If your offense is only scoring one or two runs...
There are very few pitchers who can reasonably hope to pitch well enough on a consistent basis to win games.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To much to read but..............
When comparing total innings pitched, your comparing them with players that are hurt. Peavy has lost a good amount of time and Smoltz is pitching his 7th game of the season. Hammels has lost some time as well at some pt this season and has thrown 12.67 more innings than “KK”. When comparing him to players that haven’t missed a start, according to your statitics KK has thrown less innings. Burnett has thrown 21 more innings, and every one else has done the same.
Yes I do agree that KK should stay in the rotation but he needs to get deeper into games. Has to throw first pitch strikes and walk less batters. Easier said then done,yes I know but he has the stuff to be dominant in this league but it seems at times he has no confiedence in his stuff. He needs to attack and stop “wiggling” around the plate, that is why is pitch count is a million by the 5th inning.
Why does Derek Lowe giving uo more ER then KK and has 11 wins? B/C DL goes deeper into games and gives himself a chance to win all the time. One thing about KK is for the most part he’s been healthy all year and has thrown some great games but lost anyways. Keep him in the rotation for now.
by AlRoBraves95 on Aug 6, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lowe doesnt really go deeper into games than KK. That is why I included the average number of innings pitched. Lowe is going 5.9 innings on average and KK is going 5.5.
Also, if you had bothered to read the post instead of saying that it was too much to read, you would know why I included guys like Peavy and Smoltz.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 7, 2009 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Come on, Justin.
Don’t underestimate all the CONFIDENCE that extra out does for the offense.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kawakami has thrown fewer innings and made less starts because he's the #5.
When other guys want to stay on schedule, he’s the one who gets skipped. That’s about Cox and Wren, not Kawakami.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Job
Especially for your first time.
My only critique would be that you shouldn’t go into a research analysis with a preconceived notion. It seems as if you had a point to prove from the start, and then you downplayed stats that didn’t agree with that point and emphasized those that did. Next time let the numbers say what the numbers say, leaving the conclusion up for debate.
All over though, I agree that KK is a better pitcher than what his numbers say, however his inconsistency is what drives me up the wall.
Also, 2.7 ER/g is great, but runs are runs, earned or not 3.8 Runs/g in only 5.5 IP leaves you with roughly 4 runs against to start the 7th inning.
Lastly, has anyone noticed that KK seems to face some of the leagues best pitchers? J. Johnson(10-2), M. Latos(3-1), Santana(11-7), R. Wells(8-4) and I can’t remember if he faced Lincecum early on, maybe not.
by rhinoskin on Aug 6, 2009 10:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
fair enough. I did have a preconceived notion when writing this. I did downplay his walks issue to a bit as well, now that I look back and re-read. Good catch.
I wonder why he has so many unearned runs though? Defense? walks?
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Think you’ve got a typo on Kawakami’s runs allowed and earned runs allowed. Should be 60 runs allowed instead of 74. Him having as many unearned runs as the rest of the pitchers combined seemed a little odd to me.
by VictorW on Aug 6, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did the math on that one several times, because it seemed odd to me as well. Apparently, I made the same mistake twice, as I came up with 74 twice…the correct number should be 60.
That makes a little more sense now.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"I wonder why he has so many unearned runs though? Defense? walks?"
As I read your post I was wondering the same thing. Aside from the walks the other thing that comes to mind is that he is very slow and deliberate on the mound which can make it more difficult for a defense to stay in the flow of the game. This could lead to slower initial reactions to balls put in play which might be a contributor to the errors and unearned runs.
by Mountngrown on Aug 6, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've heard that kind of point mentioned several times.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Confidence.
Duh.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
L . Matos is one of the best pitchers in the league? Jair Jur. has faced the best pitchers in baseball.
by AlRoBraves95 on Aug 6, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mat Latos is awesome. Hop on the bandwagon.
by bigjoe on Aug 6, 2009 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it possible for two pitchers to often face talented opponents? Yes.
Is it possible you’re being argumentative? Yes.
by rhinoskin on Aug 6, 2009 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
walks don’t produce unearned runs, so it has to be bad luck with D.
And the runs/game stat is misleading considering how KK pitches fewer innings while allowing those runs. By that method, a guy like Roy Halladay would be a good bit higher because he’s simply in the game longer.
He’s been decent, but inconsistent. To be honest, I wouldn’t mind if the big club took a Kelly Johnson like approach with him when Hudson comes back up—put him on the DL, let him go work on his control issues for a week or two and then come back up hopefully a little stronger.
by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 6, 2009 10:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I disagree. I don’t think he has been inconsistent at all. Look at his game splits. He has maybe 1 really bad game per month, while being rather steady in his other games.
He was a bit inconsistent in the month of July as compared to the rest of the season (more walks for some reason), but overall, he has been really steady with no big differences in any of his numbers – BB, H, R, K, etc.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he had a rough first month,...
and settled down, doing decent but not spectacular up until the Yankee incident. But as I looked, he had one or two bad outings, but the rest were decent.
I think his problem is the control problems makes it feel like he’s doing a lot of more work than is neccessary to get through an inning and also the lack of anything really to stand out. I can’t recall but maybe one start where you’d walk away thinking, “Damn, that was a helluva night by the P”. On the Nationals, that might look good. But when you follow Hanson, Vasquez, Jurrjens who drop jaws and amaze the fans, following that up with a ho-hum, nice but unimpressive is going to lead to fans feeling unimpressed. Part of why fans come across so anti-KK is because the rest of the staff is so amazing. To be honest, he’s as good as Lowe, but KK is steady around 6 with 3 runs and Lowe feels different because while his bad games are worse than KK his good ones are much better (8 or so innings allowing only 1 or 2).
by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 6, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
to make a long rambling point short...
looking at his game by game numbers, there is only one really impressive outing to me (May vs. Toronto). Consistent mediocrity will lead to grumbling from the fans. Some fans gripe even after greatness, so consistent mediocrity (especially when surrounded by greatness like JJ, Hanson, Vasquez) is going to lead to a lot more griping and that’s what we see. Plus, he has no in town backing as described by both the lack of marketing by the Braves and the lack of a significant Asian community as Seattle and other areas have.
by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 6, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To be honest...
Kawakami has typically been a good bit better than mediocrity. I think you’re complaining about the difference between good and great. Also, Atlanta actually does have a pretty good-sized Asian community. It was one of the reasons he cited for signing with us.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
You weren’t impressed by his game against Halladay? He was obviously on his way to a great game against a very good hitting Yankees lineup, and his most recent start (7 IP, 0 runs against LA) was nice, too. Also, I think his adjustment to MLB rotation rest and strike zones are another eason he doesn’t often get late into games.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
how foolish of me,...
how could I not be impressed by a start that was made AFTER I made the post. Goodness gracious.
I agree, we’re talking about probably the best “5th starter” in the bigs, but compared to his compatriots—Vasquez, Hanson, Jurrjens-I don’t find his starts all that impressive. I’ll say again, he’s a good pitcher, but when surrounded by outstanding, “good” doesn’t look all that impressive.
by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 14, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair...didn't know when that start had actually happened.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 15, 2009 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Acually
He beat Halladay months ago. That start was made before the post.
by Andy Braves Fan on Aug 18, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
should be under justincredubil
oops.
by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 6, 2009 10:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Justin
Great post. As I have said before, I agree that KK has been under-rated by fans.
Something else that you didn’t mention but should be mentioned is how important KK is to the Braves international scouting and their ability to draw from the Japanese market. While the effects of that haven’t been, and perhaps can’t be analyzed, I think KK was a good start from which the Braves can continyue to draw talent out of Japan.
by Andy Braves Fan on Aug 6, 2009 11:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd argue this notion
The Atlanta Braves have done, well, shit, when it comes to the capitalization of the Japanese/Asian market. No billboards, no emails, no mailers, no marketing. Not a single sign showing Japanese/Kanji characters at Turner Field, and not a single effort on braves.com to try and grab a Japanese viewer. Not even close to a fraction of the tune that Seattle did for Ichiro, or Boston did for Matsuzaka. Hell, I’d be happy to see Kawakami getting exposure that rivaled Iwamura down in Tampa; at least they bothered to put a questionably politically incorrect comic drawing of him on the walls of the Trop.
The notion that the Braves are “attuned” to the Japanese market because of the acquisition of Kenshin Kawakami is an overrated (and invalid, IMO) one. It all depends on how a club treats their Japanese players that creates the pipeline to Japan. I can’t really see any Japanese players wanting to come play for the Braves any time soon, when even Atlanta’s Japanese newspapers still highlight Ichiro and Dice-K on their sports sections’ covers.
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
by royhobbs on Aug 6, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do you think any of that stems from the Francouer overmarketing mistake, in that, they don’t wanna put too much pressure on him early on? Perhaps they want him to get settled in and establish himself as a successful MLB pitcher before they put him on billboards. Hey, they did make a Japanese schedule with him on it, that counts, right?
"Ohhhh Shit."-Bobby Cox, 3/28/09
by 10-4 on Aug 6, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Possibly
But in this case, I think the circumstances are slightly different. I hate to keep making the comparisons to Boston and Seattle, but neither of those teams/cities wasted any time at pushing Matsuzaka and Ichiro into the spotlight. Ichiro might have had a wildly successful “rookie” campaign, but depending on whom you ask, despite the title, lots of people felt that Matsuzaka had a fairly mediocre rookie season. That still didn’t stop Boston from pushing the daylights out of him.
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
by royhobbs on Aug 6, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then again...
When you consider the circumstances of those players’ signings, it makes more sense that they would become marketing focal points. Ichiro was the first ever Japanese position player to be signed as an everyday guy, and his $14 million contract was probably at least as expensive/big back in ‘01 as Kawakami’s was this past offseason. In the case of Daisuke, the hype was to some degree necessary for the Sox to justify his nine-figure cost. (Seriously, more than $100 million to bring in a guy who had never thrown a major-league pitch!) In the case of Kawakami, the expectations were kept low. While he was a big target in this market, he wasn’t a young star being taken from Japan at the peak of his career. He’s an established vet who has probably already seen his best years and is mostly going to be a stable/consistent option, rather than an All-Star type one.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is the exact reason why I did not even touch this issue. The Braves have not shown in any way that this will be a capitalization of the Japanese/Asian player market. While it may prove to be accurate down the road, it has no bearing on the team right now.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree a little bit
I’m willing to bet that there was a substantial chunk of change that wasn’t made, by not putting a little bit of investment into marketing Kawakami. Target the areas of Metro Atlanta with notable Japanese populations, advertise some shirts/jerseys (even the chintzy Japanese character ones), and try to sell some extra season ticket packages. There was some easy money that could’ve been made, but was not capitalized upon, and now many have their own opinions of Kawakami and might not bite late.
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
by royhobbs on Aug 6, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not living in Atlanta
I don’t get to see the marketing campaigns as closely. If it is as weak as you say, I would argue that the Braves are missing a huge opportunity.
by Andy Braves Fan on Aug 6, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That said
None of us know what the Braves organization is doing in Japan itself, and if there is some sort of marketing going on there (which would make sense to attract Japanese viewers/players). The fact is that Atlanta has a small Japanese population.
by Andy Braves Fan on Aug 6, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Relatively (for an East Coast city), that's not true...
It was one of the reasons he signed here.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never heard that
and according to the last US census, there were a grand total 408 people who reported themselves as Japanese, a 0.1%. Only about 8,000 Asians in total, or just under 2%. Am I missing something?
by Andy Braves Fan on Aug 14, 2009 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No
You’d have to live here to see how low the Asian community here is. Georgia Tech, Gwinnett county and Doraville is pretty much the entire Asian population in Metro Atlanta. You should see the annual JapanFest the city holds; it’s basically 200 of those 408 Japanese people who show up and about 500 non-Japanese exhibitors that work for companies with Japanese origin.
If I’m the Atlanta Braves, I send Kawakami out there next time to try and sell season tickets.
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
by royhobbs on Aug 14, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In Atlanta, it’s about 0.12%. For the the Northeast, it’s about 0.14% and the South is less than Atlanta’s so I guess Atlanta is average for the East. For the US, the Japanese population is about 0.28%.
Baseball:Sabermetrics::Luddites:Technology
by VictorW on Aug 14, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh and that census is about 400k people so you can estimate the Japanese population of Metro Atlanta at about 5,100 or so.
Baseball:Sabermetrics::Luddites:Technology
by VictorW on Aug 14, 2009 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A little bit from a good article about it
To get Kawakami, the Braves knew they would have to convince the 33-year-old pitcher that Atlanta would be a comfortable place for him to live and work. The Japanese consulate told the Braves that Georgia is home to 8,000 Japanese nationals and, said Takuji Hanatani, the Japanese consul general in Atlanta, there are many Japanese restaurants, bookshops and food stores. More than 350 Japanese companies are located in Georgia, employing 35,000 people, according to Hanatani.
Armed with that information, Braves General Manager Frank Wren made his pitch to Kawakami and Kawakami’s agent, Dan Evans.
"The agent said at the winter meetings that the presentation Frank and his staff made was very crucial," said Braves President John Schuerholz. "There were several teams interested. The Braves were the team they wanted to go to."
—http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/2009/02/16/story3.html
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 15, 2009 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
While I wouldn’t be suprised if he ended up on the DL when Huddy comes back, I would still like to keep him in the rotation and have Hudson’s ground ball tendancies coming out of the pen. That might take some of the workload off of Moylan.
by Bmacbandwagon on Aug 6, 2009 11:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why do people hate KK again? As of right now, he looks like a very average starter with upside who can pitch something like 170+ innings a year. There’s value in that. It’s pretty nice when your worst starting pitcher is simply average. I count 31 pitchers who have pitched 80+ innings with ERAs of 5 or more.
The thing bugs me about Kawakami is that he’s never shown the control he’s capable of. His K/BB ratio in Japan over the last 5 years was right at 5 and he can’t even be league average here? I really think the larger balls here (that sounded awkward) are playing a part there.
On the topic of Lowe, holy crap some of his peripherals are ugly. Lowest GB% of his career (54%) and the only time it’s been under 60%. K/9 under 5?! But he’s barely giving up any HRs, his FIP is at 3.79, and he has a chance to hit 200 innings this season so you’ve got to like that.
VORP is based on a pitcher’s runs allowed and innings pitched compared to replacement level based on the league replacement level runs allowed for starters and relievers. They used to use the actual stat runs allowed so I hope they’ve at least upgraded from that. The replacement level varies depending on league average. Their methodology for replacement level is a little funky so the starter/reliever replacement level isn’t as far apart as it should be. VORP, for this season, is something like 5.72 for starters and 5.65 for relievers. VORP was nice when it was new and the only thing around, but the methodology is a bit outdated and their replacement level is a little screwy.
WAR on Fangraphs is based on FIP and innings with some leverage bonuses compared to replacement level. Their replacement level is usually something like 4.5 for relievers and 5.5 for starters, but it varies a bit depending on the run environment. WAR on Statcorner is based on tRA and innings pitched compared to replacement level. tRA, however, comes from linear weights.
by VictorW on Aug 6, 2009 11:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good points
My other concern about KK is his below-average FB. I’m still feeling my way around the pitch values over at Fangraphs, but his FB grades out quite poorly. Kind of tough to have a lot of confidence in a guy whose primary pitch actually costs his team runs.
by Yakker on Aug 6, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah that’s pretty ugly. Fifth worst among qualified starters. At least he throws it less than the average pitcher. The movement and velocity on the pitch is good enough. Very average so he’s not locating it well at all.
by VictorW on Aug 7, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so he’s not locating it well at all.
Perhaps. I haven’t seen as many starts as others, but what also could be happening is that his failure to command his breaking stuff means guys can just sit on his fastball.
by Yakker on Aug 7, 2009 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think part of what happens with the Japanese pitchers...
Is that they get encouraged to develop a “versatile” pitch repertoire that at times prevents them from developing their primary pitches as well as they should. I mean, honestly, what’s the sense in having a bad forkball as your 7th pitch at the expense of control of a basic four-seamer?
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When you talk about his BB rate...
It’s important to note that it has been improving. Kawakami not only had to adjust to a newly defined/umpired strike zone, but a whole new baseball (the MLB is made of cow hide, rather than the horse hide of Japan.) Many say it’s slicker and more difficult to control.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's great Justin
But you have some errors.
1) Derek Lowe doesn’t have over 200 Ks this year…not even close. He’s got 72.
2) AJ Burnett doesn’t have 189 Ks. He’s got 117.
3) KK has only given up 60 runs, not 74.
4) Derek Lowe has allowed 64 ERs, not 62.
by Bronn on Aug 6, 2009 11:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I hate simple math…lol
I was fat-fingering on the calculator, but didn’t realize that I did it that much!
Thanks for the corrections.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some reasons i suspect people don’t like KK:
1. He came here as an unknown signed to a high dollar (for an unknown) multi year deal
2. He seems quiet, and i believe the language barrier is a hindrance. See people’s dislike of Garrett Anderson and Kotchman simply becuase they aren’t lively, perky, and vocal.
3. Yes, the win-loss record screams out to the naked eye evaluating fan.
4. Some fans are never happy, and are always seeking out someone to serve as the weak link who needs to be replaced.
"Ohhhh Shit."-Bobby Cox, 3/28/09
by 10-4 on Aug 6, 2009 11:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i dislike Kotchman because i disliked Rico Brogna :/
- I miss Spooneybarger :(
by Mighty Healthy on Aug 6, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+100
"...Braves tie! ...Braves tie! ...Braves tie!"
by The Keith Lockhart Era on Aug 6, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
2 is important.
And I think that’s also something that hinders potential marketing efforts. The guy has some great quotes (the “I pitch with all of my soul” comment comes to mind, as well as when he totally owned up to the Josh Johnson HR), but he doesn’t seem like he’s going to talk unless he’s asked.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve never been a KK hater. I’ve liked this guy from the start. Not sure why he’s been struggling with control, but I’m sure it has to do with the inconsistency from one ump to the other and he’s still making adjustments.
I do think KK just needs some rest. When Huddy gets back place him on the DL to rest and work on mechanics.
by Sparhawk on Aug 6, 2009 12:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
More likely
the control problems are a continued struggle with the US baseball which is larger and more slippery than the balls used in Japan. Of course, umpires are also a key difference.
by Andy Braves Fan on Aug 6, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Mr. Kawakami is going to have a big year next season. He’s had to make a few adjustments, as noted by others above, and it makes sense that he will improve given time. For now, I’m quite happy with the guy, but I imagine he will only get better if we give him a chance.
"When life gives you lemons, just say 'F*ck the lemons,' and bail."
by Bravely going forward on Aug 6, 2009 12:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It doesn't take much...
All he has to do is throw next April the way he’s been over the last few months. And with the added experience, I can’t imagine he should struggle with that.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like KK but damn a 1.7 SO/BB? It would also be helpful to include the average for all of these stats
by acie4mvp on Aug 6, 2009 12:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Like KK, but...
Like rhinoskin said, you came in with a preconceived notion. That being said, I really like KK and think having pitched on this team with the likes of Javy, JJ, Hanson, and Lowe (sorta), Braves fans see him as a “weak” link, when in fact his numbers are more middle of the pack, which for a “weak” link is good. You also have to take into consideration that he’s coming over from a different league with less work on the pitcher and different balls (teehee). KK is used to Horse-hide, which allows for a better grip and more control of pitches but less velocity and now he’s using cow-hide, which may help explain his control-issues.
Also…I like how your used John Maine, Jake Peavy (the two are down with injuries), John Smoltz (missed a huge chunk of the beginning of the season recovering from an injury), Ricky Nolasco (sent down because of his own issues and has struggled compared to last year), and Cole Hamels (bad year for him…especially coming off a WS).
It has been said on this website several times that Kawakami cannot pitch past the 5th inning, and that he cannot throw more than 75-ish pitches
I’ve only been on the website a few months, but that seems to be a bit of a strawman, even for TC.
I can remember earlier in the season when Elias or something mentioned that KK had the worst run support of any SP. May not be true anymore (too lazy to look up), but he still has really bad run support (the story of this season). Still…he’s had some incredible games against Aces (Halladay, Santana, Lincecum, etc.) and I think (and hope) he’ll continue to improve while he adjusts to the league (not only the balls (teehee) and differences between the two leagues, but the fact that he’s facing completely new hitters, which tends to lend itself to the hitters). My only issue with KK is that he seems to be laboring in recent games, which could be the 5-man rotation catching up to him…but otherwise, for our #5 starter…he’s a solid pitcher.
by award6 on Aug 6, 2009 12:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
award, you may not have seen it...
But there have been many who have complained about Kawakami’s ability to pitch into games, and more than once, people have suggested that he can’t make it past 5.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like him
It’s clear that he gets into trouble when he tries to get fancy around the corners. When he goes right after hitters he can be deadly.
He’s too expensive to place in the bullpen, personally. Though, while I like him, I’d rather have a rotation of Lowe, Vazquez, JJ, Hudson, and Hanson.
by kalesi on Aug 6, 2009 1:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think cost can be a consideration.
We’re paying him the same either way. I think he’s best left as a starter (his multitude of pitches without a single dominant one leads me to feel that way), but if the team feels otherwise, they shouldn’t let salary be the determining factor to his role.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice job. Few comments.
- Pitches per game are pretty meaningless so I’m not sure why you included them. I don’t care how many pitches Kawakami can throw, just as long as he goes deep into games on an innings basis. Thus, Innings per game is what matters, which puts him at the bottom end of you list.
- KK’s K:B rate of 1.7 is not very good. If you are going to give up walks, you had better be able to miss bats and strike people out. This is what makes AJ Burnett successful – high walks but balanced out by high strike outs. Kawakami gets in trouble by walking people since he doens’t miss enough bats.
- Finally, I echo what others have said. Earned runs per game means nothing. You need to factor in how many innings they pitch.
- I’m not a huge Kawakami lover and I don’t think there is a trade market for him unfortunately. We overpaid for him based on what he’s provided thus far so I think we’re stuck with him.
by Dandrews on Aug 6, 2009 2:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Commenting on my own post (I'm a loser)......
Just to be clear, I don’t think KK sucks, I just think KK has provided #4 or #5 starter results thus far. I don’t think that warrants a 3-year $21MM contract. I think we were hoping for results similar to a #3 starter when we signed him – I think Wren said this, could be wrong. We probably could have gotten similar to slightly worse results from Charlie Morton this year, for only around $350K per year. However, we do get the intangible off-field benefits of signing a Japanese player.
by Dandrews on Aug 6, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Intersesting that you mention Charlie Morton though. I plugged his numbers into the spreadsheet that I created for all of this, and guess what…he has REALLy good numbers (over a 9 game sample size).
In fact, I would say, for the money, he would be the best pitcher on this list.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hard to have said we could have counted on Morton.
He was, at best, inconsistent last year. And, again, this is Kawakami’s first year in the league. There is plenty of room for improvement over the next two.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pitches per game were included, beacause, as I stated earlier, that has been one of the knocks against him – he can’t pitch more than 75 pitches a game.
I disagree that a pitcher needs Ks to balance out BBs. All I care about is outs, whether they come from a GB, FB or a K. As long as he can get more outs than he allows runs/hits/walks, I am good with it. It doesn’t have to be sexy, just efficient.
Runs per game mean everything. If you have a guy who can consistently go out and give you a good start, 3 or less runs in 5 or more innings, you can rely on your BP the rest of the way. ERA is meaningless, and here is why: When was the last time a pitcher threw 9 innings for the Braves? How many times has it happened this year? I prefer runs per game (an admitted made up stat) because I think that it gives you a better idea of what to expect.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the problem with runs per game is its not a baseline comparison amongst all the pitchers on your list. KK comes out looking good becuase he has a low nbr of runs per game… but that partially because he is only goign 5.5 inning per start. the reason ERA is better is it is the same for everyone… its the runs based on nine innings. You are testing two variable at a time with runs per game… first runs and second innings pitched.
I understand what you are trying to do… its just not practical for comparisons
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
by Swo12bv on Aug 6, 2009 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Good stuff Justin. I like KK and I’m glad you’re defending him. Plus, he was cool as hell to me in ST. Still waiting to find that video of me on Japanese TV with his baseball card.
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
by cbwilk on Aug 6, 2009 2:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks! If you ever find that, you DEFINATELY have to post it! I haven’t heard that story yet…care to share or link?
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
*Definitely…not definately (I always mispell that word.)
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I may have mentioned it in whatever I posted about ST, but who knows. Yeah, 2 of the 3 days I was around the Braves complex I got KK’s autograph. The first time he was leaving for the day and for some reason he went through the minor league area. Well, me and my buddy spotted him quick and he had no problem signing a card for each of us.
The next time, a few days later, we caught him going from the back practice field back to the main field. There were 15-20 other fans and he made sure to sign for all of them. There was a Japanes TV crew following him around all day and they were getting a lot of shots of him signing. The producer was really excited to see that I had one of KK’s Japanese baseball cards, so he had me hold up the signed card while they panned out from it to me giving the thumbs up.
I asked the guy if they had a website or if he had an email, but right about this time his English evaporated and he went away quick. I’ve been searching a little for KK videos in Japanese to see if maybe I can find it, but, you know, I don’t speak Japanese.
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
by cbwilk on Aug 6, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
1) Okay, don’t understand why people would think that.
2) Strike-outs are a better type of out because there is a 0% chance the hitter can reach base (excluding strike 3 calls in the dirt). Any ball put in play by the hitter has a roughly 30% chance of becoming a hit (based on historical BABIP averages). Thus, strike-outs eliminate any luck or poor defense that might contribute to a runner reaching base.
3) I don’t follow your logic on ERA. The purpose of ERA is make an apples-to-apples comparison of how many earned runs a pitcher gives up over a hypothetical 9 inning game. If Roy Hallady gives up 3 runs in 8 innings (3.38 ERA) and KK gives up 2 runs in 5 innings (3.6 ERA), would you say that KK is the better pitcher?
by Dandrews on Aug 6, 2009 2:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would say that KK has done an effective job, and your offense only has to overcome 2 runs scored vs. 3. I like consistancy. If I can get a consistently good (not even great, but just good) start out of my SP, I will be happy. I will rely on my BP a little bit more in games in which KK starts, but as long as we either have a lead or are only trailing by 1 or 2 runs, I am fine with that.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
KK has done a great job. I think people figured he was going to be the #3 guy and he hasn’t turned out to be, but he’s been more than you would expect of the #4 or #5 guy. Not all of his losses have been because he’s pitched badly. The other night he had a quality start and threw 60 strikes and 24 balls; he lost because the Braves couldn’t score a third run. He’s adjusting to a more rigorous schedule where he is expected to pitch every fifth day instead of every sixth. I realize that doesn’t sound like much of a challenge, but I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on this one.
by John Holton on Aug 6, 2009 3:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I looked at other pitchers in KK's price range (7-9 million)
He is actually pretty average:
Kawakami: $8.3 million
4.38 ERA/80k’s/1.39 whip
Ryan Dempster: 9 million
4.09 ERA/96 k’s/1.38 whip
Rich Harden: 7 million
4.41 ERA/ 124k/ 1.35 whip
Doug Davis: 8.75 million
3.67 ERA/ 108 k/ 1.46 whip
Kyle Lohse: 7.43 million
4.56 ERA/ 51k/ 1.35 whip
Joel Pinero: 7.5 million
3.18 ERA/ 61k/ 1.11 whip
He hasn’t been great, but for the most part he has been middle of the road (Pinero being the big big outlier there).
by Andy Braves Fan on Aug 6, 2009 3:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I look at this list (thanks for looking that up btw, I was too lazy to go that far in this post), I see one #1, one #2, two #3 and one #4 (Pinero, who coincidentally has the best numbers of all of these guys).
I’d say that we are getting MORE than adequate numbers out of our #5 pitcher. Our #5 is pitching and getting paid like a #3…that is always a good thing!
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Glad you like it
I didn’t have the time to put any advanced metrics up on these guys or anything, but just the basic information tells a lot of the story…
by Andy Braves Fan on Aug 6, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Take a look at his NDs and losses. (BB/K)
6 IP, 8 H, 3 ER, 0/4 Loss
5 IP, 4 H, 1 ER, 3/1 ND
6.2 IP, 5 H, 2 ER, 4/3 ND
5 IP, 7 H, 2 ER, 3/3 ND
6 IP, 4 H, 3 ER, 1/5 ND
7 IP, 7 H, 3 ER, 1/2 ND
5 IP, 5 H, 3 ER, 1/4 Loss
5 IP, 8 H, 2 ER, 3/7 Loss
5 IP, 7 H, 2 ER, 3/2 Loss
Thats 9 games he gave this team a chance to win besides his actual 5 wins. I he could have gottern support and wins in half of those games he would be something closer to 12-7 or so and the discussion would be “What a bargin.” He’s actually only had three bad outings and several mediocre. 18 of his 54 ERs were given up in three starts. Take away those three of his twenty starts and he has an ERA of 3.33. Again, not bad.
by braves99 on Aug 6, 2009 4:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That was something that I wanted to do as well – take away the 3 worst starts for all of these guys, and then compare them…but, I forgot about it while writing the post. I will do this now, though:
(See Edit #3 in Post)
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
FML!!!
I just was on Baseball-reference.com (where I got all my info from), and read where I could simply click on any given stat and BR.com would total them for me…I spent several hours adding up every stat for every single player I referenced above…FML.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 4:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
haha
speaking of Baseball-reference.com… I would be curious to see who they list as most comparable pitchers at the end of the season. That may give us a better framework to work with when evaluating his performance as it relates to his contract at least.
by Andy Braves Fan on Aug 6, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
TY Justin, somebody needed to do this post
I have always been rooting for KK and do get sick of the bashing he gets (more so on the AJC blogs than this site i must say). I think he has already proven he has the stuff & resilience, and will only get better with experience and some better play from the team (who has been reluctant to back him not only with runs but good D).
Outside of the numbers, of course you have to remember he is not only adjusting to MLB but to america as well and it’s not like ATL (or the south in general) is LA where there is a huge Japanese population. Hell i remember going to see Nomo pitch at Dodger stadium back in the day and there where vendors going up and down the aisles with sushi to cater to all the Japanese in attendance.
by Slee on Aug 6, 2009 4:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Atlanta, however...
Has as many Asian residents as most anywhere in the South.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 13, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but compared to the rest of the country
Northeast and West Coast cities have huge Asian populations, especially compared to Atlanta.
by Andy Braves Fan on Aug 14, 2009 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Focusing on the low total of walks, while he’s not striking anyone out, is a really bad idea. I don’t exactly get excited about a pitcher walking 8 in a month when he’s only striking out 16. Thats absolutely horrible for 4-5 starts.
by bigjoe on Aug 6, 2009 4:46 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Serious question here
Does it really make a difference when given that the K:BB ratio is equivalent to Burnett’s?
I only mention A.J. because he was referred to in another comment above. Sure A.J. is striking out a ton more hitters than KK, but he is also walking a ton more, resulting in a similar ratio.
I completely understand and agree that 16Ks in an entire month is pretty pathetic, but there are plenty of good pitchers out there who are not a big K threat. KK wasn’t advertised as a big K threat (from what I recall) but rather, he was advertised as a good control, efficient pitcher.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no he was supposed to strike people out… as mentioned above he had a K/BB of around 5 in Japan
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
by Swo12bv on Aug 6, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When you’re striking out that few batters, you need to REALLY limit the walks. See: Cliff Lee, Jason Hammel, Chris Carpenter
Kawakami’s main issue is the long ball, which you neglected to mention. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too high.
by bigjoe on Aug 6, 2009 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bad Signing !!
I believe this KK signing was a bad one from the beginning; for starters ATL pressed so hard to improve their starting pitching that they went over seas to acquire a mid 30’s rookie MLB style ball. I have heard every excuse for this guy from language barrier to the different types of balls we use. HIS RECORD SUCKS !!! HE WALKS TO MANY PEOPLE !!!
HE IS NOT A MLB CALIBER STARTER !!! PERIOD !!!
Now you all can argue !!!
by Holty_Panthers_Fan on Aug 6, 2009 4:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you being sarcastic? Sadly, I cannot tell anymore. People around here say some crazy things and are absolutely serious about it…
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oops...almost forgot...
!!!
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I find, to express my point, it is sometimes helpful to throw a 1 in with my !!!'s
as in "OMG, brah
That way it looks extra emphatic, like I was in a super hurry to get it out. Bam
"...Braves tie! ...Braves tie! ...Braves tie!"
by The Keith Lockhart Era on Aug 6, 2009 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t forget the ALL CAPS!!1
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 6, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or the irony of ending the one-word sentence "Period" with three exclamation points...
"...Braves tie! ...Braves tie! ...Braves tie!"
by The Keith Lockhart Era on Aug 6, 2009 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol…indeed.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 7, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
great observation
Pete Rose was actually banned from baseball for teaching Jeff Francoeur how to play. He made up the gambling stuff to hide his shame.
by VivaLosBravos on Aug 9, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we wont argue… we’ll all agree u don’t know what you are talking about
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
by Swo12bv on Aug 6, 2009 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I WILL USE CAPS TO MAKE MY POINT !!!! AND EXCLAMATION MARKS !!!!!! AND I WILL PUT SPACES BEFORE MY PUNCTUATION !!!!!!!! ALSO, I’M GETTING DANGEROUSLY CLOSE TO SOUNDING LIKE A BIGOT !!!!!!
by bigjoe on Aug 6, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Touche, Joe.
"...Braves tie! ...Braves tie! ...Braves tie!"
by The Keith Lockhart Era on Aug 8, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know anyone can look thi up but no one posted it yet… so i figured i would… we are exactly 2/3 of the way done on the season… Kawakami has produced 3.7M worth of value to us… that means at the end of the year he will be at around 5.5 (assuming he continues at his current pace, which is certainly debatable considering he will be approaching a limit of inning he has never pitched before).
He is making 7.667M this season, so the investment wasnt exactly perfect… but there are lots of players that don’t outproduce their salary (the market isnt perfect). That certainly doesn’t make it ok, but it at least partially justifies it… so we may have overpaid, but we don’t know what the other offers were and he might well outproduce his salary over the next two years (when his salary will be 6.667M)
I’ve been pretty happy with KK this year… but Hudson has definately shown that he is the superior pitcher if healthy. Im not worried about his elbow he has shown some positive results so far in rehab and am confident he will outproduce KK (which is more of a glowing review of Timmy then a slight against KK).
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
by Swo12bv on Aug 6, 2009 5:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Then again...
History (and Hudson’s inconsistency in his rehab results) shows that we’re a lot less likely to be able to rely on Hudson to do what he was doing than for Kawakami to keep doing what he is doing.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 15, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay in no way am I a Kawakami basher, I’ve supported the signing and defended his W-L record multiple times throughout the season. However, we are a mid market team with a payroll set around 90 million for next year. Fact of the matter is we can’t afford our six starters and put together a competent bullpen/offense. Nobody is trading for Lowe and trading either Hanson or Jurrjens is out of the question. That leaves Kawakami, Hudson, and Vazquez. You can argue the merits of Kawakami all you want but the fact remains he is the worst of that trio.
Career K/BB ratio- Huddy: 2.22 Javy: 3.44 KK: 1.74
Career WHIP- Javy + Huddy: 1.25 KK: 1.39
Career FIP- Javy: 3.85 Huddy: 3.79 KK: 4.65
Average WAR- Huddy: 4.2 Javy: 4.5 KK: ~1.5
by McCann's the Man on Aug 6, 2009 6:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You’re looking at one hell of a small sample size for Kawakami in comparison to the other two, chief.
by bigjoe on Aug 6, 2009 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s much to his advantage. Look at most Japanese pitchers who’ve come over to the US, almost every single one pitched better in the first part of their stay and then declined. I’m not saying it’s a guarantee that it happens to Kawakami but as the book on him gets bigger i think he’s not going to improve but go in the opposite direction. Hudson and Vazquez, you know what you’re getting and they have higher potential (weird to use the word describing three guys in their 30’s).
by McCann's the Man on Aug 6, 2009 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What would these numbers look like if you only used the first 20 games for each of those guys (like we have to do with KK?)
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 7, 2009 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You guys just don’t get it. Comparing 20 something year old Hudson and Vazquez to 33 year old Kawakami is not fair to Hudson and Vazquez. Japanese veterans almost always pitch better in their first year in MLB so actually using KK’s first year stats are much to his advantage. Kawakami has learned to pitch and has had many years of experience unlike rookie huddy or rookie javy. Not to mention he’s already past his prime, he’s not going to get better. Fact remains that if you’re going to compare Kawakami’s numbers to anyone it should be Hudson and Vazquez, his competition for a place in the starting rotation.
by McCann's the Man on Aug 7, 2009 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the only thing i would say is the KK is learning to pitch in the MLB and will most likely improve upon his first year… but thats mostly just speculation
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
by Swo12bv on Aug 7, 2009 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t buy the he’s learning to pitch in the MLB argument. He knows how to pitch and get hitters out, he’s not going to get better like Jurrjens and Hanson inevitably will. Hitters will also get a bigger scouting report on him so once again it’s not going to get much better than this
by McCann's the Man on Aug 7, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he is adapting to a new league with new hitters and a new baseball (which is made of a different material and is a different size)… to discredit that is ignorant
i dont think he will improve at the same level as Jurjjens or Hanson, but he should improve
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
by Swo12bv on Aug 7, 2009 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the league is adapting to him, i’ll give him the benefit of doubt and say he slightly improves over the next two season. He’s still only going to make it to about 1.5 WAR this season, so let’s say he posts win values of 2 in the next two seasons. Hudson has averaged 4.2 WAR per season in his career and Vazquez has averaged 4.5, they are both roughly 2.5 wins better than KK. Even if you factor in some regression for Hudson due to the surgery, he’ll carry more value than Kawakami. When you’re a mid market team like the braves, you can’t overpay for wins and that’s what you’re doing with KK. Vazquez and Hudson are much better values even though they cost more
by McCann's the Man on Aug 7, 2009 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
im not debating that Hudson is hte better pitcher.. i just feel you are underestimating KK’s ability.
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
by Swo12bv on Aug 8, 2009 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually like Kawakami, i just think some people get irrational in their defense of him
by McCann's the Man on Aug 8, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whether Hudson "carrys more value" than Kawakami isn't important.
Whether he has the capacity at this point in his career to carry twice as much (that’s the salary difference) is what is.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 15, 2009 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the history of Japanese pitchers in MLB
shows otherwise. Most are at the best initially and slowly get worse over time.
by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 8, 2009 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly what i’ve been saying, and at age 33 already it’s unlikely that Kawakami bucks the trend
by McCann's the Man on Aug 8, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Japanese veterans almost always pitch better in their first year in MLB
There must be something in the water…
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 8, 2009 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant to add this before I posted the above reply:
I guess Japanese people inherently pitch better their first season and Cuban people have a worst attitude.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 8, 2009 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One could argue...
That Japanese pitchers are among the most (if not the most) protected in the world. That changes a bit when they come over here.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 15, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even if you want to give him the benefit of improving a little each year, he’s still going to fall well short of both Javy and Tim, you’re being blind to the facts if you think differently
by McCann's the Man on Aug 7, 2009 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it all depends on the Tim Hudson that shows up. I still don’t get why people are all about Hudson – Atlanta version. Hudson was one of the best pitchers in the game in Oakland. In Atlanta, he has been average. He was actually pretty bad his first year or so here. He was pretty good in his last full season, but nothing spectacular. If you want to compare Hudson to KK, use Huddys last 3 years as your basis, and then factor in some sort of injury regression.
Although, this whole Hudson vs KK debate may be pointless anyway if Huddy can’t get himself back to a healthy status.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 8, 2009 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
First Hudson has all winter to get healthy, he’ll be perfectly fine for next season. I disagree with the people saying Huddy should start over Kawakami the rest of this season, but even the Atlanta version of Tim has been better than Kawakami. He’s been average two years in Atlanta with 1.5 years of excellence. His poor start to his Atlanta days can be explained by a lack of control, he was walking batters at a rate he hadn’t before. Then he regained his control in 07 and became an “ace lite” again. Also his HR/FB rate was a statistical anamoly those two years almost 5% higher than any time else in his career. He’s still on average, a 3.1 WAR pitcher in his days with the Braves (dragged down by a pitiful first season) which is well higher than Kawakami will reach
by McCann's the Man on Aug 8, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hudson does not have all winter to get perfectly healthy before mid-august…
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 8, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you read what I said you would see I’m saying tim should take kenshin’s spot next year not this year. And the winter allows him to build up stamina and velocity so yes he has all winter to prepare himself for the starting rotation. To pitch in the pen, I don’t think he’ll have to be 100%
by McCann's the Man on Aug 8, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Next season is a fair enough assesment, but I am concerned about this season…also, factor in that Tim will be making quite a bit more money than KK.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 8, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s why I said I wouldn’t have Hudson start this year, just stick with the same 5. He’s making 12 million but if you clear Kawakami’s salary then you have plenty of money to make other improvements (ie bringing back soriano, adding to the pen, 1B). I’d rather pay 12 million to Hudson than 7.3 to Kawakami
by McCann's the Man on Aug 8, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
how can we clear his salary? His trade value is an unknown. I was speaking more along the lines of what is the difference in the WAR of Hudson and Kawakami in terms of what they are actually getting paid?
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 8, 2009 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
1 WAR is worth about 4.4 to 4.6M on the FA market. Since every win will be important to the braves next year seeing as they’ll be in the playoff race, i’ll count it as 4.6M. If Kawakami hits 1.5 WAR which is a very fair estimate, he’ll be worth 6.9 million. If you put Hudson at 2.8 WAR (a very conservative estimate) then he’s worth about 12.9 million. Hudson’s excess value is .9M and Kawakami’s is .2M, winner Hudson
by McCann's the Man on Aug 8, 2009 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
KK is making 6.667M next year according to COt’s unless there is a bump up clause and i didnt see
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
by Swo12bv on Aug 8, 2009 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah that’s right, i was off
by McCann's the Man on Aug 8, 2009 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
on the other chart, the 13 payroll obligations he’s listed as 7.334M. That’s salary and prorated bonus however
by McCann's the Man on Aug 8, 2009 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok fair enough… like i said i was just going by what Cot says his contract is
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
by Swo12bv on Aug 8, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hudson will cost $12 mil next season.
Kawakami will cost $6-7 mil. Is there that much difference?
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 15, 2009 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, just look at the WAR post I made a few above this one
by McCann's the Man on Aug 15, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hudson will cost twice as much as Kawakami next year.
Those numbers don’t suggest he’s worth that to me. Further, there’s no proof whatsoever that a guy at his age coming off TJ will be able to pitch like he once could.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 15, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hudson will not cost twice as much, if you include Kawakami’s prorated bonus he’ll be making 7.3M. If not it’s still 6.7, not half of 12. And the decision to pick up Hudson’s option will be based on how he throws this next month and a half as well as over the winter, so yes we will have proof that he will or will not be able to pitch like he used to
by McCann's the Man on Aug 15, 2009 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh gosh, that is splitting hairs. We all know that 6.7 is not half of 12. It is pretty damn close enough though.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 16, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When he’s on, he’s on, and when he’s off, he’s off. It’s either he’s bff with the strikezone, or he hates the strikezone.
But if I were he, I would definitely pitch for a W in my next start. Huddy could be back before September.
(self-appointed President of Yunel's Cartel~~~)
"The future is no place to place your better days." - Dave Matthews ~ RIP Roi
by Chief Noc-A-Homa on Aug 6, 2009 6:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The numbers indicate that he has been pitching for wins in every start, but has been let down a bit by his defense/offense.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 7, 2009 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My only complaint about KK...
…is his inconsistency. One game, he’ll give up 4 runs and throw 100 pitches in 5 innings before he gets yanked, then he goes out and duels Roy Halladay by throwing an 8 inning, 3-hit shutout in 106 pitches. I’d be happy with something in the middle every time he goes out, but I’m forced to wonder if we’re getting heads or tails.
by FineHamAbounds on Aug 6, 2009 6:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Way to follow the advice
The post was good, but the pic just made it sexy.
Pete Rose was actually banned from baseball for teaching Jeff Francoeur how to play. He made up the gambling stuff to hide his shame.
by VivaLosBravos on Aug 6, 2009 11:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I can only thank you for that.
:)
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 7, 2009 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It has to be tough to have 15 or whatever years experience throwing off a different mound into a different strike zone and then flip a switch. Those are often subtle muscle-memory adjustments.
Just another point for consideration.
by godawgs on Aug 7, 2009 8:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Kawakami
7 innings, 4 hits, 0 runs tonight.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 9, 2009 1:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Whew, I can't believe I got through the whole thing (comments and all).
I’ve been meaning to read this justin, but knew I’d have to be alert first and this week’s road trip has kicked my east coast butt. So, this morning with coffee in my Braves victory cup in hand, I finally opened this thread to read.
Good post and one with stats/facts I can actually understand..imagine that! You certainly gave all of us something to ponder over.
As far as KK – I believe his adjustments to the MLB are continuing and I believe he could make us a great pitcher. Last night’s performance was awesome and his gutting it up to get out of a shaky situation late in the game was more than great to see. You could tell he was pumped up on his way to the dugout.
I’m gonna comment less statistically if I may….
His run support his year has been atrocious – and he always seems to be pitching in close ball games because of it – so how much do you think it’s affected his ability to mentally adjust on the mound if he makes a mistake and/or a fluke play in defense gives up a run or two?
I’ve wondered about what it must be like for him to be in the game and feel like he has no room for error. He must feel quite alone at times and if he gives up a dinger or has a rough inning, and Brian visits the mound, how much real communication can occur out there? He’s on his own to find a way to relax and regain his control.
We’ve not given him much reason so far this year to feel our offense will be able to come back and help him out. Hell, as a fan watching the games this year even I’ve even felt at times that if we give up 2 runs, our chances of winning have been slim – I can only imagine how he’s had to feel. Maybe if we continue to do better for the rest of the season he’ll only improve as well and next year he’ll feel more a part of the “team”.
If he had been given more runs to pitch with, his W/L record would be better and thus the “casual fan” perception of him would be totally different and a need for a post like this wouldn’t exist.
by NCChopper on Aug 9, 2009 12:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Vazquez outside of his first 5-6 starts or so has also been plagued by poor run support. They’ve scored some runs for him lately but there was a large stretch where they scored 1.9 runs per game in Javy’s starts. It’s not like Kawakami is the only pitcher getting ****ed by our offense this year. I also think you need to base your arguments off something tangible rather than what you think is going on his mind. If anything it’s seemed like he locks in more in tight games (a la the Halladay and Kershaw matchups) but that can’t be proved. And for good measure remember that Hudson lost about 5-8 wins over the last two years (2007 and 08) because our bullpen was determined to screw him over. There are legit excuses for all 3. Kawakami is obviously better than his w-l record, which is the most antiquated method of judging a pitcher, but I still haven’t seen one post that makes me even wonder if he should stay over Hudson or Vazquez
by McCann's the Man on Aug 9, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually wasn’t putting out an argument per se one way or another.
My inquiry was more along the lines of wondering if folks here think the adjustments to a new country, a new league, all new batters, a huge anguage barrier and poor run support … could … be affecting him on the mound.
If he falls behind in a game, what goes on in his mind is tangible if it means he then struggles to pitch.
I’m not out to crucify the guy, excuse his struggles or cheerlead – I was just tossing out a bit of what could be the emotional side of his performance this year thus far.
by NCChopper on Aug 9, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s fair, i was just pointing out that the same can be said for most pitchers on this team (obviously not the language and new country thing). Good points though, I just think the fact that no hitter had ever seen him before cancels out the new league, new batters argument.
by McCann's the Man on Aug 9, 2009 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The new pitcher argument goes both ways.
It’s not like there aren’t very good American pitchers who come up and get shelled initially.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 15, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
since a young 20 year old is the same as a 33 year old Japanese veteran? He has an advanced idea of what he’s doing and fully developed secondary pitches unlike the kids that come up and get rocked, he’s at no disadvantage in the US imo. Culture adjustment is really the only thing that I think he’s at a disadvantage with
by McCann's the Man on Aug 15, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You don't think that the fact that the strike zone is enforced differently and the ball is totally different matters?
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 16, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there hasnt been one post…except for that little point about Hudson coming off of TJ surgery and KK getting only better as the season progresses…but yeah.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 9, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except Hudson has looked good in rehab, low walk totals and keeping the pitch count down and those are the two things combined with velocity you look for when a player comes back from TJ. And don’t forget he has until next April to be ready to start, TJ surgery isn’t all that risky anymore as long as he doesn’t suffer a major setback i wouldn’t put too much stock into it
by McCann's the Man on Aug 9, 2009 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i keep getting confused and forgetting that you are speaking mainly about next season and not in a couple of weeks.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 9, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah that’s where my stance is: Kawakami is better than Hudson for the rest of the season, but 2010 and beyond I’ll take Hudson
by McCann's the Man on Aug 9, 2009 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can buy that…depending of course, on how KK continues to progress and Hudson’s rehab.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 10, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
lowes starts have been rain shortened twice
by Heyward is the next crime dog on Aug 12, 2009 2:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
18 new comments, 17 by MichaelProcton. I’m finally not surprised. Upset that i clicked on it, yes. But surprised, no.
"Ohhhh Shit."-Bobby Cox, 3/28/09
by 10-4 on Aug 13, 2009 3:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
lol
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 13, 2009 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ya… not that its a bad thing… but he comes in like a whirlwind and drops like 15 comments on a thread all at once… usually after the thread has died out
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
by Swo12bv on Aug 13, 2009 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
your game has died out.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 13, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ur face has died out!
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
by Swo12bv on Aug 13, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
burn!
wait, what?
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 13, 2009 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unique way to get your viewpoint(s) posted and thus read last with no debate.
Hmmm.
by NCChopper on Aug 14, 2009 8:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i feel like it should have a name, something like: “This post has been Proctonbombed”.
"Ohhhh Shit."-Bobby Cox, 3/28/09
by 10-4 on Aug 14, 2009 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Proctobombed…nice!
I like it when he joins a game-thread 2 hours later and goes back an replies to questions like “Why isn’t McLouth in the lineup?” that were posted at the very beginning.
lol
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 14, 2009 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hm
Isn’t that what they said in New York whenever Scott Proctor blew a hold chance?
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
by royhobbs on Aug 14, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol. I don’t remember.
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 14, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I frankly don't often look at timestamps...
If there’s a question that’s been asked without an answer, I don’t see how it hurts anybody to do so.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 15, 2009 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course, this methodology only works if the thread is run it’s course and you’re the last to chime in.
by NCChopper on Aug 14, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha...
I’m just catching up from being out of town/away from the computer.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 15, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And we just got procto-bombed again.
:)
"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
by justincredubil02 on Aug 15, 2009 5:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Procto-bombed sounds like a visit to the proctologist gone wrong.
Baseball:Sabermetrics::Luddites:Technology
by VictorW on Aug 15, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For him more than you...
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Aug 15, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 















