Looking back at the offseason
The 2009 offseason was long and complicated. We made a few moves to make us a better team, but also lost on some moves. Let's take a look at what could have been. There were quite a few players we almost signed or traded for, but missed out on.
Also, I am not much of one for all of the advanced statistics, so I am just going to be going over some basic ones. But please, feel free to discuss any other stats you wish.
Let's start off with the one we were closest to obtaining. After verbally agreeing to a deal, he suddenly backed out to re-sign with the Dodgers, mainly because he wanted to remain a shortstop, not move to second base. He would have given us the lead off hitter we have needed since he first left for the Dodgers in 2006. But he has been underperforming this year, hitting only .256 with a .331 OBP. Add a SLG of only .350, and you have a .682 OPS. But a double play combo of Escobar and Furcal would certainly be one of the best in the league.
While Furcal has not been doing too hot this year, the player we have been putting on second instead has been worse. Hitting only .214 with an OBP of .286 and a SLG of .359, Kelly Johnson has certainly been the worse of the two players. But the extra 5 million we would have to paid Furcal was probably not worth a mediocre improvement. Now with Prado at second, we seem to have the position covered.
I would take him over: no one. N other acqusition this offseason would have taken so much money for an average performance.
Peavy was another one we had in our hands, but the Padres backed out at the last minute. This year, Peavy has an ERA of 3.97 with 92 strikeouts and a 1.19 WHIP. While he might be performing better if he was with us, it was probably not worth the cost of Escobar. Add in the fact that we already have one of the best starting staffs in baseball, and the Peavy trade looks like it would have been a bad trade for us, considering we would most likely be without a good everyday shortstop.
I would take him over: no one. The Vazquez trade has given us a better pitcher for alot less, in terms of players cost.
Burnett seemed like another sure sign, but backed away from us to the Yanks. Burnett has a 3.77 ERA with 101 strikeouts, but 53 walks, the most in the AL. At the time, it looked like we would absolutely have to get Burnett to have a decent starting staff. Once he got away, it was looking bad. But the Vazquez trade and Lowe signing have given us a great staff.
I would take him over: no one. Lowe has cost us less money, and performed about the same. He has struggled recently, but if he gets back to the form he was in at the beginning of the year, we definitely got the better one of the two.
While we never actually decided to pursue Andruw, it was talked about. Jones is definitely one of the candidates for comeback player of the year, with 14 home runs and a .869 OPS. This is in limited action, as he has only played in 50 games this year. His defense is not what it used to be, and that is the reason he is a DH for the Rangers. But he could still be an above average corner outfielder. His .231 average is low, but his OBP is .101 points higher, at .332.
I would take him over: Garret Anderson. Andruw would most likely provide better defense as well as more pop, which this team desperately needs. GA gets on base more, but they are usually just singles and he often does not come around to score.
If there is anyone else I might have left out, please, let me know.
0 recs |
17 comments
Comments
Well...
The reason why Andruw will win this poll is because he’s the only cheap option in the bunch. I was never a fan of Peavy’s total cost, Burnett’s contract or Furcal’s eventual place on our team. The durability concerns for those three were always worrisome to boot. That said, I’m happy with what we got instead.
"A player who conjugates a verb in the first person singular cannot be part of the squad, he has to conjugate the verb in the first person plural. We. We want to conquer. We are going to conquer. Using the word 'I' when you're in a group makes things complicated." ~ Wanderley Luxemburgo, 1999
by ejruiz on Jul 14, 2009 11:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Furcal may get better statistically because Manny’s back. I saw a few games of his this year with Manny in the line-up and he was red hot.
by Walker Wallace on Jul 15, 2009 12:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What About Him?
Sure, he’s been worth almost three wins with his bat, but he’s cost the Nats over two wins with the glove. He’s essentially been as valuable to them as Omar Infante has been to us…
"A player who conjugates a verb in the first person singular cannot be part of the squad, he has to conjugate the verb in the first person plural. We. We want to conquer. We are going to conquer. Using the word 'I' when you're in a group makes things complicated." ~ Wanderley Luxemburgo, 1999
by ejruiz on Jul 15, 2009 1:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Surely he doesn't hurt us that much
If he was at 1b right? Pardon, my statistical ignorance or I’d be able to qualify that assumption. Would keeping Tex for the draft picks and signing Dunn to play 1st have been a good decision?
by Cracker! on Jul 15, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=319&position=OF
Sample size is way too small, but he’s pretty bad there too. How you cost your team 3 runs in just 68 innings at 1B (in 2009) is pretty mind-boggling.
by SeeingStars on Jul 15, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought about him
but the FO never considered him an option, no matter how much we wanted them to.
by scottyboy10 on Jul 15, 2009 1:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just go look at Dye’s #’s this year. I know we were rumored to be going after this guy and his age and other things killed the rumor fast. But his .942 ops would look fabulous in right field right now. Wren should have asked for him in that Javy deal I wondered if the sox would have wanted to get rid of that much salary, and take Frenchy for us. The Braves didnt have it but Dye is mashing this year and he gets on base. Would have been really nice. O well the would of and should of dont work in Baseball.
Baseball is my life
by That a boy on Jul 15, 2009 2:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
O, I thought the White Sox wanted to get rid of Dye’s salary but if they wanted Hanson I see why it was a no go.
Baseball is my life
by That a boy on Jul 15, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Andruw
Is in platoon with the Rangers and is benefiting from Jamarillo/Arlington. He is just as valuable as Matt Diaz.. Not that I would complain, but I would venture a guess that Andruw’s performance had he signed here would not be what it has been in Texas.
by Andy Braves Fan on Jul 15, 2009 12:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
this is true
but I still believe it would be better than it was the last 2 years. Plus the defense would still probably be better than GA.
by scottyboy10 on Jul 15, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How could it have been worse than the last two years?
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jul 16, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice post
I’d like to look back at some of the moves we actually did make- and see which worked out (Vasquez!!!), and which haven’t worked out as well (GA, Lowe). I think all in all Frank Wren had an excellent off season, continuing a trend of nice moves he’s made since taking over.
by krsracker on Jul 15, 2009 2:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Lowe hasn't worked out?
We’re paying $15 mil for a guy who’s currently on pace to earn $16.6 mil based on WAR. I’d say that worked out OK.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jul 16, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 













