Bullpen Report: Looking at How We Use Relievers
|
Braves Bullpen: By the Numbers |
||||
|
IP |
ERA |
WHIP |
K/9 |
BB/9 |
|
206.2 (18th) |
4.05 (14th) |
1.50 (25th) |
8.14 (4th) |
4.35 (Tied- 10th) |
As something of a follow up to roy's post earlier this year, I decided to take a look at the bullpen for the Braves this year. Effective usage of the bullpen can make a huge difference in a team's success. While the Braves made major moves to improve the rotation (which is now the 6th best in the majors in ERA), we never really addressed the bullpen in the offseason. To date, the bullpen has been so-so, posting a great strikeout rate but a league average ERA.
I'm going to take a look at how the Braves have been managing their bullpen using gmLI from FanGraphs. gmLI is the measure of the Leverage Index of the situation when a relief pitcher enters the game. Tom Tango, the creator of Leverage Index, describes Leverage Index as "a measure of the fire the player faces" in any given situation. Using the inning, outs, score, and number of players on base, gmLI can show us which relievers are being put into the most critical situations. Closers, for example, have an extremely high gLI; mop-up relievers will have the lowest. Overall, I was pretty impressed with our bullpen management.
Mike Gonzalez
33 IP, 2.18 ERA (3.37 xFIP), 1.24 WHIP, 11.45 K/9, 3.83 BB/9, 1.6 gmLI
With 8 saves, Gonzalez has performed admirably in the closer's role this year. Coming off a 4.28 ERA last year, many feel that Gonzalez has shown major improvements. The difference has been in his batted ball profile; he's had a nearly nine percent increase in groundball rate and a corresponding decrease in line drive rate. However, I would guess that this is unsustainable. Additionally, Gonzalez (being a flyball pitcher) is benefiting from a 5.7% HR/FB rate. Gonzo was incredible unlucky last year, but very lucky this year; I would expect that his ERA will settle around the mark projected by xFIP.
Rafael Soriano
32.2 IP, 1.36 ERA (2.83 xFIP), 0.98 WHIP, 12.4 K/9, 3.33 BB/9, 1.52 gmLI
While Soriano already has 6 saves, his gmLI suggests that his usage is pretty normal for a set-up man. While Bobby does have a pretty good amount of confidence in him, it seems that he's not quite challenging Gonzalez as a secondary closer. This is a shame, considering he's been better in almost every possible way. I would ideally like to see Soriano become the closer, but at least he should be seeing some more high-leverage action.
Eric O'Flaherty
25.1 IP, 3.91 ERA (4.30 xFIP), 1.07 WHIP, 5.44 K/9, 1.42 BB/9, 1.16 gmLI
This is a considerable gap in confidence between spots two and three in the bullpen. Claimed off waivers last November, O'Flaherty has been a solid addition to the bullpen. O'Flaherty sports an impressive 48% ground ball rate to go along with tight control. He has, however, been the beneficiary of quite a bit of luck as far as home runs go (his 3.7% rate is unsustainable), so expect his ERA to rise a bit.
Peter Moylan
26.2 IP, 4.73 ERA (3.94 xFIP), 1.58 WHIP, 8.10 K/9, 5.74 BB/9, 1.14 gmLI
Moylan has been...well, pretty bad this year. In 2007, Moylan had a 1.80 ERA in over 90 (!) innings of work. Many metrics suggest that 2007 was something of a mirage, though, as Moylan posted a .236 BABIP and a Left on Base % of over 80%. xFIP suggests his true skill level was in more of the 3.75 ERA range, which is still largely true. This year, Moylan has been on the poor end of the luck spectrum. For one, his .328 BABIP seems inflated. However, even skill wise, Moylan seems to have lost something. Even though he is striking out almost 3 more batters per nine innings, he is walking 2.64 more. Wilder and out of control, Moylan has posted a terrible 1.58 WHIP. Moylan seems to have more trouble in the more critical roles; Moylan had a gmLI of only 0.85 in 2007. Moylan will regress a bit to the mean (and is probably better than O'Flaherty), but don't expect him ever to return to his past form.
Jeff Bennett
32.2 IP, 3.03 ERA (4.58 xFIP), 1.84 WHIP, 6.06 K/9, 5.09 BB/9, 1.11 gmLI
The fact that Bennett is being used quite similarly to Moylan and O'Flaherty worries me, because he's considerably worse than both of them. Bennett's ERA is deceptively low; he's bad in almost every possible way. 4.58 may be a harsh indicator of talent, but it is much more accurate than his actual ERA.
Not included (not enough appearances this year): Blaine Boyer, Jorge Campillo, Manny Acosta, Buddy Carlyle.
7 recs |
27 comments
Comments
BOBBY
I’ve always thought that pulling pitchers at the right time and using our bullpen was one of Cox’s worst attributes of coaching…..
Roll Tide Roll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Sabanholic on Jun 24, 2009 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-two
This sums it up. It’s basically calculating ERA from the most basic components of a pitcher’s skill: Home Runs, Walks, and Strikeouts. xFIP is the same idea, however it takes into account the luck involved with home runs (that is, home run per flyball rates which fluctuate pretty randomly).
by kasas on Jun 23, 2009 2:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Fielding Independent Pitching
FIP is a stat used to measure the success of pitchers. It is similar to ERA, but is more focused on the individual performance of the pitcher and takes away the variables outside of the pitcher’s control (i.e. the fielding of the other defenders). A pitcher’s ERA will be manipulated based on how well the team’s overrall defensive play is. A pitcher’s FIP would not be manipulated based on the defense. I don’t know the exact calculation, but it only has stats like BB, HR, and Ks. FIP also has a league factor that is a constant in the equation, but enables it to look more like an ERA.
So…if a guy has a high ERA but a low FIP, that probably means his teammate’s suck at fielding.
I probably should of let one of the 11 define this…
A man walks into a meat shoppe and goes to the counter. The cashier asks, "Thinking about buying some meat?". The man replied, "No, I'm going to buy meat, I was thinking about punanny."
by bwellnjonesco on Jun 23, 2009 2:39 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Good explanation!
BTW Who are the “11” I keep reading about?
by HEYJUDE on Jun 24, 2009 3:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The 11 are a magical group of alien bloggers sent here to save Earth from everything. Specifically, they eliminate threats (people) that ignore OBPs, think RBIs are soo great, and post nonrelevent Fanposts. They rosterbate almost every waking hour, and never get tired of it.
No one knows the identity of all 11, but if you watch closely you can sometimes see a few of them (they go to alot of games and take alot of pictures too)…
Your lucky JUDE, they have a weakness for women…
A man walks into a meat shoppe and goes to the counter. The cashier asks, "Thinking about buying some meat?". The man replied, "No, I'm going to buy meat, I was thinking about punanny."
by bwellnjonesco on Jun 24, 2009 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Definitely a very interesting read
Rec’d
"...Braves tie! ...Braves tie! ...Braves tie!"
by The Keith Lockhart Era on Jun 23, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, Boyer is no longer with us....
And I love the fact that Meds isn’t even mentioned (seriously). I guess he got hit by a bus or something. Bennett is NOT the freaking answer. He’s too inconsistent.
"The future is no place to place your better days." - Dave Matthews ~ RIP Roi
(self-appointed President of Yunel's Cartel~~~)
by Chief Noc-A-Homa on Jun 23, 2009 3:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Manny has been pitching well
by Heyward is the next crime dog on Jun 23, 2009 3:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So is the gmLI cutoff for the newer guys you own (i.e. could they still be calculated)?
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 23, 2009 5:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If I understand you correctly here...
gmLI is an average, so it would still apply
by kasas on Jun 24, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK...
Just seeing if he had chosen not to use it rather than there being some sort of qualifying figure.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 24, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
bennett is garbage…end of discussion.
by HawksBaseball2 on Jun 23, 2009 11:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, bud, but "garbage" players don't put up solid numbers three years in a row.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 24, 2009 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bennett needs a new role
I agree that we are not using Bennett correctly. The fact that he was in during the bottom of the 9th in the Boston game he lost baffled me. I know Cox wanted to save Soriano for the possibility of extra innings, but Bennett seems to crumble under pressure situations this year. Sure, there have been some games when he’s pitched a solid three innings for us, but most of those games were already washes, which is why he was in the game for so long. He has 4 losses this year. If you’re ERA is hovering around 3 and you have 4 losses and you’re not a closer then it should be pretty obvious that he can’t pitch in close ball games. Moylan seems to be coming around of late, hopefully his recent success is an indicator and not just an abboration. I think Bennet though needs to become somebody who pitches in mop up games, games that we are winning big, or in games that are going 17 innings and he’s our last available arm. The guy simply doesn’t seem to be able to handle the pressure involved with pitching in tie or 1 run games.
by michaelcooksey on Jun 24, 2009 12:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
FanGraphs records a curious stat called “clutch” which compares WPA in high leverage situations to that of neutral situations. Clutch suggests that Bennett does poorly under pressure, but in fact Moylan and O’Flaherty do even worse. You can play around with various other WPA and leverage based stats if you want; they’re all pretty interesting.
(http://www.fangraphs.com/winss.aspx?team=Braves&pos=all&stats=pit&qual=0&type=3&season=2009&month=0)
by kasas on Jun 24, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
...So what of the two wins?
Must have been some of that “mop-up” duty where the offense promptly proceeded to score like eight runs in the next inning.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 24, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, well, if we want to add some facts into the arguement, Win # 1 came in a 12 inning game against the Mets in which he pitched 2 scoreless innings, the bottom of the 10th and the bottom of the 11th. It was a game in which the bullpen was taxed because JoJo Reyes could only go 3 innings. Carlyle, Soriano, Parr, O’Flaherty and Moylan had all been used. A good outing from Bennett, like I said, most of those outings. In the 2nd win Bennett pitched to one batter to finish the top of the 7th in a 2-2 game against Toronto. The Braves then went on to score 7 runs in the bottom of the 7th. This was a game that Jurrjens pitched and only surrended 2 runs in 6 innings pitched. Now, if you want to look at losses, Loss number 1 came in a game against the Mets in which he gave up a walk off hit in the bottom of the 10th. Loss number 2 came in a game against the Diamondbacks where he gave up a walk off hit in the 11th. Loss number 3 he gave up the go ahead run in the top of the 11th against the Cubs and his most recent loss, number 4 he threw one pitch to Nick Green in the bottom of the 9th. So, out of his 2 wins only 1 was truly worked for. Of his 4 losses we have 3 extra innings losses and 1 in the bottom of the 9th. And of his 4 losses the most he pitched was 1.1 innings. So in none of them had he been in the game long and labored. There are a few stats for you, facts if you will.
by michaelcooksey on Jun 24, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You were the one who said he couldn't handle pressure situations...
Strikes me the 10th and the 11th of a tied game are pretty high pressure. But maybe I’m worng.
Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.
by MichaelProcton on Jun 24, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do me a favor and go a step further finding out who, other than Bennett, was available to come in during his losses…taking into account guys that might have pitched the night before. Chances are that Bennett simply is the last option. Perhaps guys like Acosta and Medlen, but would you really prefer them in extra innings with a tie score? Tough to say.
by Smoltz's Beard on Jun 25, 2009 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Splits
Until Gonzalez solves his BB problem against RHBs, he’s better as a LOOGY and not as the closer.
by Yakker on Jun 24, 2009 8:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We gotta stop this
Despite how much I enjoyed this fanpost, much like when I wrote something to give the relievers some credit (read: why Bennett isn’t so bad), the following night, Bennett’s always thrust into a terrible situation, and comes out on the short end of it. Small sample size, sure, but 2/2 is enough superstition for me now.
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
by royhobbs on Jun 25, 2009 9:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















