Talking Chop: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Game 65 Recap: Braves 7, Reds 0 (a win?... a shutout?)

Atlanta Braves pitcher Tommy Hanson throws against the Cincinnati Reds during the first inning of a baseball game, Thursday , June 18, 2009, in Cincinnati.

More photos » by Tony Tribble - AP

Atlanta Braves pitcher Tommy Hanson throws against the Cincinnati Reds during the first inning of a baseball game, Thursday , June 18, 2009, in Cincinnati.

Is it too early to say that our ace, Tommy Hanson, stepped up and got this team out of its 4-game losing streak? Yes, it probably is too early to call him our ace, but Tommy Hanson certainly is getting better at pitching in the major leagues. He led the charge Thursday afternoon as the Braves avoided the sweep and shutout the Reds.

Hanson struggled early, loading the bases in the second inning, but got the Reds leadoff hitter to strikeout to end the scoring threat. That was only one of two strikeouts on the day for Hanson, who is still struggling with his control as he issued 4 walks, while holding the Reds to just 2 hits through 6 innings. The bullpen finishers -- Peter Moylan, Mike Gonzalez, and Rafael Soriano -- pitched the last three innings for the ultra-safety non-save.

The offense got going early with a run on a Casey Kotchman sac fly in the second inning, and homeruns from Matt Diaz and Nate McLouth in the fourth and fifth. Tommy Hanson got the scoring started in the 3-run sixth with a two-out bases-loaded single for his first major league hit and RBI. McLouth followed with a two-run double to put the Braves up by 7 runs.

For as much as the last two games were all about mistakes and missed opportunities, the Braves took advantage of most every opportunity in this game. It helps when the ball leaves the park, as it did twice, and the Braves pitchers pitched around trouble and held the Reds 0-for-10 with runners in scoring position.

A good win to build some confidence heading into this weekend's series in Boston.


Final - 6.18.2009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
Atlanta Braves 0 1 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 7 8 0
Cincinnati Reds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
WP: Tommy Hanson (2 - 0)
LP: Matt Maloney (0 - 2)

Complete Coverage >


0 recs  |  Comment 86 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Talking Chop

The Atlanta Braves Weekly Wrap

Nov 2009 by gondeee - 19 comments

Comments

Display:

Was anybody else

highly confused when the intentionally walked failcoeur to get to kotchman?

by Don Draper on Jun 18, 2009 5:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No, because it was Dusty Baker

No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.

by royhobbs on Jun 18, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't agree with it, but it's not ridiculous

Francoeur has been hitting well lately, drove a couple of balls off Maloney earlier in the game, and has hit a couple of hard outs over the past couple days along with his hits. I understand bashing Francoeur for his season of work but let’s give credit where it’s due, he’s been looking good at the plate over the last week or so and pitching to him with a soft-tossing lefty isn’t the best matchup, especially with a lefty up next.

by was385 on Jun 18, 2009 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Woo-wee...

Gotta love that .039 ISOP this week. Or, in other words, almost exactly what Jair Jurrjens has put up this year in as many at bats.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 18, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isolated Power: SLG-BA

Or…how far does he hit it when he does? League leaders are usually around .300. The Braves leader this year is actually Nate McLouth with a .202, with Chipper right behind at .198.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 18, 2009 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So because he has not hit the ball far he is terrible? Is that your argument? If so that’s pathetic

You dont always have to hit the ball out of the park or deep to the outfield to score a run a little short liner in a gap works just as good a lot of the times.

It just seems like you guys will find whatever stat you can on FYF to point at something lacking in his game instead of just giving the guy credit for doing better over the last week or two.

by drumzalicious on Jun 18, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

..."or two?"

Yes, he’s hit singles (and a single double) at a lovely 8-26 clip this week, but he was 2-18 in the seven days before that.

And a liner in the gap would get the guy a double. He’s hitting bloops and grounders through the infield, and if he was a slap-hitter with speed on the basepaths who had some other offensive ability, that’d be fine. But he’s not. All he’s doing (and all he’s done for the past year and a half plus) is getting few hits with little power, with nothing else to boost his offense.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 18, 2009 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

we're not talking about the week before that

We’re talking about his hot hitting of late. And again, he’s been hitting line drives, maybe not gap shots all the time, but solid hits into the outfield and you’re reducing it to “He’s hitting bloops and grounders through the infield”. You’re going after me for saying that you hate Francoeur, but then you come out with this blatantly untrue stuff. I understand if you hate the guy, his performance has been painful to watch and he hasn’t exactly been the most humble in interviews, but if you’re going to bash him when he does poorly, at least give some credit when credit is due.

by was385 on Jun 18, 2009 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ummmm, ok?

The guy gave a rough estimate of how long it has been (that’s what the “or” is for). I’m sorry that not everyone takes the time to go back and do in depth research on the subject for a comment on a blog.

by was385 on Jun 19, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Doubling the time span sure makes that estimate rough...

But you’re right…God knows there aren’t many of us who can spare five seconds in our day.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't care about his ISOP

the guy has been hitting line drives left and right over the past week. Anyone else and you’d be saying wow, theyre really locked in, but just go ahead, don’t let anything sway your hatred of him (btw, he’s just missed a homer recently).

by was385 on Jun 18, 2009 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And my uncle just missed being my aunt...

by the span of about 4-8 inches.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 18, 2009 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok, that doesn't really work

If a player puts a charge into a ball in his first two at-bats and just misses homers, on that third at-bat, the pitcher isn’t going to say well he’s 0-2, an easy out, he’s gonna say oh shit I’ve been lucky to avoid giving up a couple homers to this guy, I’d better pitch to him carefully (or in this case, I’d rather take my chances with someone else.)

by was385 on Jun 18, 2009 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You seem to like assuming what other people think, huh?

There was my ‘hatred’ of Francoeur, or my supposed commentary about another player hitting as he has over the span of a week, and now you’re projecting your thoughts to Micah Owings.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 18, 2009 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's called logic

Do you hate Francoeur (have you ever used FYF?), would you complain if someone like BMac or Chipper were hitting like he was this past week, and the last is just plain logic. MLB ball is a game where pitchers use in-depth advanced scouting reports and watch tons of film of the hitters they are going to face, do you think it is an unreasonable leap to think that Owings remembered that Francoeur had smoked a ball off him that he was lucky didn’t go out?

by was385 on Jun 18, 2009 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

1. I can say “Fuck you” to anybody I please…doesn’t mean I “hate” them.
2. If McCann or Jones were hitting like he has in the last week, yeah, I’d be suprised and perhaps a bit disappointed. For them to hit at a .350 clip with no power would be very unlike them. As for Francoeur, his year and a half plus of suck has earned a good bit of trepidation when it comes to any success he has at the plate, particularly over as short a span as just a week.
3. You just killed your own point. If the advanced scouting reports and tons of film show that he’s a shitty hitter on any kind of non-mistake pitch, you’re probably going to pitch to him like he’s a shitty hitter and hope you don’t make any mistakes. Since when does the scoreboard give credit for balls that almost go out of the park? If Owings is lucky it didn’t go out, I guess Francoeur is just lucky every front row homer he’s ever hit did.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 18, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How did I kill my own point? Even bad players can get in hot streaks and when that happens, you obviously have to pay much more attention to them. And I don’t care how little power someone is hitting for, if they’re hitting .350 over a span and even their outs have been hard hit then that’s impressive.

by was385 on Jun 18, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is such an ignorant statement

its like Francoeur asking where OBP was on the scoreboard. If a pitcher is getting tons of line drives off him and they’re just getting hit right to guys, I’m not going to be happy with his performance. Luck plays a big part in this game, and you can’t ask for anything more than a batter to hit a ball well, pretty much anything beyond that is just about where it’s hit and where the defense is positioned.

by was385 on Jun 18, 2009 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well if he is "unlucky" in every at bat

then he shouldnt be in the majors. A ML hitter should be able to put the ball through a hole in the defense.

by esadb on Jun 19, 2009 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

HELLO? THIS!

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not saying he's unlucky in every at bat

Read what I’m saying and then comment. Normally over the past few seasons he hasn’t been unlucky, he’s just been terrible. He’s had stretches where all he has had are strikeouts, weak groundouts, or pop ups. But lately, he’s been hitting the ball hard a number of times for hits and even some of his outs have been hard hit balls.

by was385 on Jun 19, 2009 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I swear, do you guys really not understand what is being said here? They’re saying that FYF has been hot OVER THE LAST WEEK, and has been driving the ball hard in this series, which is why Dusty choose to IBB him in THIS GAME.

by Lennox on Jun 19, 2009 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you

finally someone who can read a simple statement and actually understand what it means

by was385 on Jun 19, 2009 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's a measured statistic for luck...

It’s called BABIP…and Francoeur is exactly as “unlucky” as he was last year and a whopping 9% less lucky than he is on his career. Unfortunately, luck can only carry you so far if you’re not a fundamentally good baseball player.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're arguing with yourself here bud

Because what you’re arguing against most certainly isn’t something I’ve said. I’m not saying he’s been unlucky the whole season, I’m saying that all you can ask for is a hard hit ball and sometimes they’re right at people. Normally Francoeur hits weak balls that are lucky to be hits, but lately, he’s been hitting the ball well and had several hard hit balls that he was unlucky to hit right at people.

by was385 on Jun 19, 2009 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I concur

I think that FYF may be making more contact lately, but he certainly isn’t making more runs or production. He has 0 HRs in his past 48 ABs (over 13 games), he has 5 RBI in the same time-span, 12 hits (5 of which came in 2 games), his batting average is still hovering right around his season norm of .250 during this exact time frame.

To his credit, he has only struck out 6 times during this stretch while walking (IBB not included) 3 times.

baseball-reference.com does not allow me to (or at least, I don’t know how to filter it) find a LD% or a BABIP for the past two weeks.

But, his numbers have not increased or really decreased at all over the past two weeks. He is still getting on base at his season clip, he is hitting his season’s average, he has a 2:1 K:B ratio with lots of runners left on base and little production. Still horrible for a C-OF.

"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT

by justincredubil02 on Jun 19, 2009 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

one more thing

his OBP is actually lower over the past 2 weeks than his season norm.

"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT

by justincredubil02 on Jun 19, 2009 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

See thats the problem. Hitting a ball out of the park isnt the only thing that scores runs. hitting it to the corner of the park isnt the only thing that scores runs. in fact i could care less if all he hit for the rest of the year were line drives that fell right in front of the outfielders. He is at least making contact and moving runners over. Bringing them in.

Just give the guy his credit

by drumzalicious on Jun 18, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

For Christ's sake...

He’s got 5 RBIs and 3 runs in the last 14 games. Are you actually happy with that from a corner OF who brings average defense aside from a good arm?

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 18, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just give up man, there’s some people on here who are going to blindly have faith in FYF despite what the numbers say.

If they’re happy with his .333/.368/.389 over a 19 PA span, awesome. If they want to ignore the fact that he’s taken 1 walk and hit 1 XBH during that time, awesome. If they choose to completely ignore the entirety of the 2008 season along with the 242 PAs this season that came before the last 5 games where he put up a .244/.278/.338, awesome. Let them live in their fantasy world.

The main reason we’re doing as poorly as we are this season is because we continue to shovel outs into a furnace by the dozens with this guy.

by Smoltz's Beard on Jun 19, 2009 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you're going to bash us, at least read the comments first

I mean seriously man. You’re saying that we have blind faith in the guy but that is just plain not true. We’re just saying that if you’re going to bash a player when he’s not doing well, then you should also give him some credit when he’s hitting the ball well… and he is lately. No one is saying that this nullifies his horrible performance over the last two seasons, no one is saying that we shouldn’t be looking for a replacement, no one is saying any of that but you and MichaelProcton.

by was385 on Jun 19, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I read the whole argument, unfortunately. You’re asking us to give FYF credit for hitting enough singles in the past few games that finally results in a OBP over .300 during that time, when he’s been atrocious for like 250 games prior to it.

I will give him credit when he starts getting on base and hitting for power for a prolonged period of time…things that your typical corner OF does. I’m not going to get excited for him hitting a bunch of singles as a result of a .375 BABIP

He’s not hitting the ball well, and that’s where your logic fails.

by Smoltz's Beard on Jun 19, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you.

was, have you ever heard of this concept called deviation from norms? When Chipper goes into a 10, 20, or even 40 AB slump, people don’t say, “He sucks.” They say, “What’s wrong?” By the same token, when Francoeur goes into a 10, 20, or even 40 AB hot streak, they don’t say, “Put him in the All-Star game,” they say, “Hmm…is he hitting in such a fashion that he can sustain that streak?”

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re telling me what I’m saying (and it’s not what I’m saying) and then arguing the point that I haven’t made. I’m not saying put him in the all-star game, I’m saying he’s been a tough out lately, just like when Chipper was in his funk I was saying, he’s in a slump. Do I expect either to continue for a long time? No, not really, but I do hope that Francoeur’s does.

by was385 on Jun 19, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Youre problem is

youre taking things literally.

by esadb on Jun 19, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no, not really

I know he doesn’t literally think I’m advocating Francoeur for the all-star team, but it’s a big leap from oh he’s hitting the ball well to he’s a good player, which is what I’ve been told that I think.

by was385 on Jun 19, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well sorry

but some of the points you posted made it sound sort of like thats what you were saying.

by esadb on Jun 19, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't tell you what you were saying at all.

I used the generic term “people.” Now, if your overly sensitive little head got to worryin’ about that, I’m sorry.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is why I hate stat geeks

because you completely ignore what you actually see and just go off of stats (if you’re even watching the game). He has been hitting the ball well lately. These haven’t been lucky flares that just fell in the right spot or ground balls that find a hole, he’s been hitting solid line drives lately and even a lot of his outs have been hard hit. So yes, his approach lately has been much better at the plate (which is blatantly obvious to anyone who has been watching the past week). I’m giving credit to a guy who has been hitting the ball well lately, just like I’d be doing if any other player was hitting well. Again, I’m not saying this will continue and certainly not saying it forgives his terrible performance over the last year and a half, but I will give him credit for hitting well.

by was385 on Jun 19, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

indeed

all i would like for him to change now is his first pitch swinging because although he has been hitting the ball hard he still needs to wait for some better pitches.

by drumzalicious on Jun 19, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like how you’re getting upset at Procton when you think he’s putting words in your mouth, which I don’t really think he has been, and then turn right around and do the same to me be insinuating that I havn’t been watching the games and I’m simply going by the numbers. Real mature.

I’ve been watching the games, and I’m not seeing these “solid lines drives” and “hard hit” outs (neither of these have anything to do with his overall approach, btw). I’m seeing the same old FYF getting a little lucky when facing 2 IP of Aaron Harang, and a myriad of other back end starters and sub-par relievers. Maybe you’re a little easier to impress than I am, and if that’s the case then that’s the case.

That’s the problem with your subjective analysis, and why it’s pointless to try and argue with someone like you…so I’m going to stop wasting my time.

by Smoltz's Beard on Jun 19, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just a lefty-lefty matchup thing...

And you had to figure Kotch is a pretty easy guy to double up if he hits it on the ground. And it’s not like you can say it didn’t work. They got Kotchman out without moving the runners.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 18, 2009 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it didn't work

because FYF more than likely (7 out of 10 times, according to his OBP) would have gotten out, then Kotch pops up, then, Ross doesnt walk, Hanson and McLouth don’t get RBIs and the game is much closer at that point.

"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT

by justincredubil02 on Jun 18, 2009 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that’s stupid. they got kotchman out, and that’s all their is to it. If you walk chipper to get to the next guy, then he pops out, and then the next guy gets a HR, did they fail then?

nope

by RichmondBraves on Jun 18, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

“If you walk chipper to get to the next guy, then he pops out, and then the next guy gets a HR, did they fail then?”

…yeah?

by l0stnumber on Jun 18, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really because the point is to not let chipper do the damage. He is more likely to do damage to you than say Kelly Johnson.

by drumzalicious on Jun 18, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

this

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 18, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So if he gives up a 2 run (or more) homer because he walked a more perceived threat it’s not a failure? Gotcha.

Strategy lasts longer than two batters. It’s not a failure if they walk a batter and the remaining batters do no damage. Walking the batter automatically extends the inning in the absence of a DP. This creates the opportunity for the HR to occur when it did.

by l0stnumber on Jun 18, 2009 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just like Kotchman is more likely to do damage than FYF

"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT

by justincredubil02 on Jun 19, 2009 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually not...

Francoeur hits better against lefties than Kotchman, both for this year and their respective careers.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you would rather

FYF be batting than Kotch?

Lefty-righty matchups be damned, I would rather pitch to FYF than Kotch.

all you have to do to get FYF out is 3 breaking balls away. That should do the trick.

"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT

by justincredubil02 on Jun 19, 2009 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Murley's also shown to have pitched much better against lefties.

There are a lot of things there that say Kotchman isn’t the guy to pitch to. Although I will say he’s done better in avoiding DPs than I would have guessed (just 4 in 40 chances.)

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually this year FYF has been holding off on those Breaking pitches away. He still gets out on some of them but he has been better

by drumzalicious on Jun 19, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your argument is flawed

IBB-ing Chipper is not equal to IBB-ing FYF.

"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT

by justincredubil02 on Jun 19, 2009 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh my

Every comment has been a reply. My head hurts

AB: Jeff Francoeur
Pitching: Any pitcher in MLB
Runners: Escobar at 3rd, Chipper at 2nd, McCann at 1st.

Pitch 1: In play, out(s)

by mvhsbball on Jun 18, 2009 9:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

"Ohhhh Shit."-Bobby Cox, 3/28/09

by 10-4 on Jun 19, 2009 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

WTF?

why do you even have to make this comment? Who cares if people are replying to each other? It is called a conversation.

I apologize if people are trying to have a conversation on this website. In the future we will all just get along and agree with everything without having any sensible dialogue amongst ourselves.

What is the point of this post? To show your disdain for replies?

Don’t be such an ass.

"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT

by justincredubil02 on Jun 19, 2009 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Overeact much?

I can’t speak for him, but when i click on this thread and saw it had so many comments, i was surprised to see it was, to the time of his post, one very long heated debate. Long heated debates aren’t a rare occurence, i just found it funny that it happened right off the bat in a post.

"Ohhhh Shit."-Bobby Cox, 3/28/09

by 10-4 on Jun 19, 2009 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i don’t know if he said something to them, but bobby was very specific after last night’s game, saying that people were swinging at bad pitches with guys on base. that’s the first time i’ve heard bobby get specific about the reason we can’t score runs. maybe this is the beginning of something new…

"When life gives you lemons, just say 'F*ck the lemons,' and bail."

by Bravely going forward on Jun 18, 2009 10:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think Bobby has been on TC while the games have been going on reading our disapproval of the way the guys have just been hacking

by drumzalicious on Jun 18, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

god help him if he reads jeff schultz’s columns…seriously, that guy is a dick.

"When life gives you lemons, just say 'F*ck the lemons,' and bail."

by Bravely going forward on Jun 18, 2009 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jeff Schultz loves Braves mgmt about as much as John Smoltz.

"Ohhhh Shit."-Bobby Cox, 3/28/09

by 10-4 on Jun 19, 2009 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And the interesting thing is, we didn't strike out once.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 18, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i think he was referring more to the pop ups and weak ground outs it led to

"When life gives you lemons, just say 'F*ck the lemons,' and bail."

by Bravely going forward on Jun 19, 2009 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn't criticizing...just saying it was interesting.

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sadly i couldnt see this game

lately i’ve been working from 4:45am til 9 at night so there hasnt been much time for me to check up on the Braves, great to see Tommy leading us into a win

by bravesfan1047 on Jun 18, 2009 11:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

4:45am to 9pm?

Jesus christ, i would be dead after 3 days if i had that schedule

AB: Jeff Francoeur
Pitching: Any pitcher in MLB
Runners: Escobar at 3rd, Chipper at 2nd, McCann at 1st.

Pitch 1: In play, out(s)

by mvhsbball on Jun 18, 2009 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Frenchy isn’t hitting all that bad as of late. Don’t get me wrong, the guy is still a total waste of talent (i’ve decided to call him that from now on along with MR. 6-4-3. Calling a guy i’ve never met a fuck head or asshole is dumb. he’s probably a real good guy off the field).

But ya, my new target is officially Kelly Johnson. KJ kills more rally’s than FYF does, has a lower average and cant field for shit. Isn’t it funny the 1st time in 5 games KJ is benched, we win 7-0? Prado should be our 2nd basemen in the Boston series

AB: Jeff Francoeur
Pitching: Any pitcher in MLB
Runners: Escobar at 3rd, Chipper at 2nd, McCann at 1st.

Pitch 1: In play, out(s)

by mvhsbball on Jun 18, 2009 11:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Kelly has been a solid 2B this year.

by esadb on Jun 18, 2009 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

AB: Jeff Francoeur
Pitching: Any pitcher in MLB
Runners: Escobar at 3rd, Chipper at 2nd, McCann at 1st.

Pitch 1: In play, out(s)

by mvhsbball on Jun 19, 2009 2:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I meant solid defensively.

Which he has been. Not great, but greatly improved from last year.

by esadb on Jun 19, 2009 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

according to the D Metrics

he has been one of the best in the league

"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT

by justincredubil02 on Jun 19, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just like...

the last two times Francoeur hasn’t started, we’ve won and scored an average of 6 runs?

Remember, kids...don't ever let facts get in the way of your argument.

by MichaelProcton on Jun 19, 2009 12:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

awesome analysis

by Smoltz's Beard on Jun 19, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Him pitching out of jams is much more impressive to me than getting everyone out. Its more important for young pitchers to learn how to pitch in the bigs than to have the pure nasty big league stuff.

Obviously Tommy has nasty big league stuff, so when he combines that with his apparent knack for getting out of jams he will be our ace.

by bbxxj on Jun 19, 2009 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

The only thing keeping him from being a major league ace is himself at this point. I know boog for one has said it a lot during his starts, but he has stuff that most major league pitchers can only dream of having and as he gets more experience, he’ll realize that. But it is a nice time to see that when the pressure is on and he is in a jam, he trusts himself more than in a normal situation. He just needs to take that mentality and use it all the time.

by was385 on Jun 19, 2009 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+2

agreed. and to think he’s getting out of a majority of his jams WITHOUT striking out hitters. Just wait until he becomes a smarter pitcher and knows what pitch he should throw in what count. i cant wait

AB: Jeff Francoeur
Pitching: Any pitcher in MLB
Runners: Escobar at 3rd, Chipper at 2nd, McCann at 1st.

Pitch 1: In play, out(s)

by mvhsbball on Jun 19, 2009 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

it is rather exciting.

"Actually, Justin was right."
by bigjoe on May 15, 2009 9:04 AM PDT

by justincredubil02 on Jun 19, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Atlanta Braves.
Start posting about the Braves »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dalemurphy_small
Late October/Early November Rosterbation
Dsc01731_small
A 2009 Season, Up Close and Personal

Recent FanPosts

527368058_l_small
Brian McCann Pictures
527368058_l_small
Chipper Jones Pictures
527368058_l_small
Mike Gonzalez Pictures
527368058_l_small
Jair Jurrjens Pictures
527368058_l_small
Tim Hudson Pictures
Small
Best part about the '09 WS...
527368058_l_small
Martin Prado Pictures
Images_small
Good Old Baseball Question
527368058_l_small
Yunel Escobar Pictures
Small
chipper needs a change....

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Gondeee_small gondeee

Authors

My_hair_is_a_bird-257x300_small yondaime4

Dsc01731_small royhobbs

Dalemurphy_small cbwilk