Derek Lowe: Atlanta Braves 2009 Player Preview
This player preview was written by Timm Davis, who can be found at his blog, Rain Delay, and also posts here as... wait for it... Rain Delay.
Going into the winter, I was one of the few voices (at the time) that was lobbying for the Braves to sign Derek Lowe over AJ Burnett. Thankfully Burnett chose the bright lights of New York, instead of the muggy summers in the south. I will also state for the record that I have man crushes on guy's that can throw that sinker and get ground ball after ground ball.
Like Crash Davis says: "Relax, all right? Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic."
After apparently having "no interest" in Lowe at the beginning of the off season, the Braves front office wizened up and went after him (maybe it had something do to with the Padres trying to be greedy, and Burnett going to the big apple). He's come in to a 4 year, $60 million contract and is to be the ace of the staff. There's an argument that he's not what people term as a 'true ace', like say a Jake Peavy, Johan Santana or Carlos Zambrano. What matters is that he's the ace of this staff, a staff that was missing its two aces by the end of last season. So while he's not your prototypical "Ace" as some would lead you to believe, he's still a TOR pitcher and that's what we want.
So now you're thinking, how much of a difference is Lowe and Burnett, in reference to their 2008 performance. Well, lets take a look shall we?
| IP | tRA | ERA+ | K/9 | BB/9 | K/BB | HR/9 | GB% | FIP | |
| AJ Burnett | 221.2 | 3.62 | 106 | 9.39 | 3.50 | 2.69 | 0.77 | 48.5 | 3.45 |
| Derek Lowe | 211.0 | 3.36 | 137 | 6.27 | 1.92 | 3.27 | 0.60 | 60.3 | 3.26 |
At first blush they look fairly similar, but look again. Check out the disparity in GB%, Lowe has him beat by about 12%. For Lowe he was off his career average, which is a robust 64.4 GB%, he's (by product of the sinker) less homer prone, which seemed to be a problem with the Braves pitching staff last year.
One thing is for sure, he's going to make our infielders work hard. I have all the confidence in the defense behind him. Escobar, the second best defensive shortstop in baseball, Casey Kotchman who's a picking machine, Kelly Johnson who will hopefully improve on the league average defense he provides (though some people will swear on a stack of bibles that he's the second coming of Rafael Ramirez) and Chipper over at third, who for the most part has improved his defense at third after being sent to the outfield and then returned to the hot corner (he was 10th in the Majors in +/- with a +9 according to John Dewans metric).
Now there is a age factor to consider, as by the time his contract ends Lowe will be 40. It's really nothing to worry about though -- maybe if he was a power pitcher -- but he's not and should be able to survive off his sinker for some time. In 2008 he posted the highest ERA+ he's seen in the last 6 years with a 131.
Even though I think ERA is pretty worthless, I might as well point out that he hasn't posted an ERA over 4.00 since 2004, and I see no indication that this trend will change. His career GB/FB sits at 3.32, even though he posted a career low 2.63 last season -- likely just a blip on the radar. We shouldn't worry about any sort of decline, though some of the main stream pundits think that his removal from Dodger stadium might hurt him in the long run.
As the ace of the staff, and part of the Braves new rebuilt pitching philosophy, he's going to be depended on to go out an chew up a ton of innings (something Braves starters didn't do in 2008). Since 2002 when he went from being a closer to a starter, he's dipped under 200 innings pitched only twice. He had 182.3 in 2004, and just missed the 200 mark in 2007 with 199.1.
The 2009 Atlanta Braves are hoping to pencil him in for 200+ innings, an ERA+ in the 130's and a TON of ground balls. He's the anchor of the staff who's going to set the tone, eat a lot of innings (giving an over used bullpen in 2008 some rest) and take some pressure of the young guys like Jair Jurrjens.
Thanks to Timm for a great preview of our pitching ace.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great write up and break down on Lowe vs Burnett argument. I still think this was a great signing in which it fits the Braves motto of Quality Pitching + Great Defense equals Wins formula. I am kinda glad how this worked out this off season with the miss outs on Peavy/Burnett and getting Lowe/KK/Vaz + keeping the key prospects instead. He will be the Ace in 09’ but he will be a solid #2 next year with Huddy being the Ace in 10’ and possibly a #3 in ‘11 with Hanson fully ready to dominate by than. So Lowe will be a bit overpayed as a #2/#3 starter at the back end of his contract though he will give you innings and shouldn’t decline in performance since he depends on a hard sinker ball and not a power pitcher. Overall this was a great signing and allow the braves to compete over the next few years with adding the talent from the farm system
I was very pleased to get Lowe...
since I had seen him as the #2 pitcher on the market after Sabathia. Burnett is too much of an injury risk for me to be comfortable with him, Dempster had no real track record of success in the rotation, and Sheets is now unlikely to pitch for most of 2009.
Have you seen Lowe’s PITCH F/x data? It’s no wonder he gets a crazy amount of grounders – his sinker has 9+ inches of horizontal movement to go along with the sinking action. If Braves fans like Hudson’s sinker, they will adore Lowe’s.
I was for Burnett...
…but I am not the least bit objected to Lowe. Sure, Burnett could get shelved with arm troubles, while Lowe puts up another respectable productive season, but I was willing to take the gamble on Burnett.
Lowe came at a good time too; I think with Burnett going to New York, and Smoltz going to Boston, Lowe is a metaphor for what he’s pretty much done his whole career – quietly anchor and bring some stability to a pitching rotation. While many were voicing their opinions about Burnett’s greed and Smoltz’s comments, once the smoke cleared, people stopped and looked at the remains of the Braves pitching situation, and thought, “hey, this isn’t really bad. We might actually have something, here.”
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
Yeah but how many wins did he have?!
1. Throw strikes
2. Get Groundballs
3. ????
4. Profit!
"OBP is not a production number, and should not be used as something he achieved."
Thanks!
I had fun doing this one, and I’ve got one more to write and it’s going to be even more fun.
I wouldn’t be too sure about that.
I'm not not licking toads...
by Smoltz's Beard on Mar 3, 2009 10:07 AM EST up reply actions
Hey Smoltz's Beard- you wouldnt want Carlos Zambrano on our staff? If not you are nuts!
Proof that when posting while high or intoxicated can lead to some really funny posts
by bravesrbaseball on Mar 3, 2009 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
Never said I wouldn’t want him on the staff. He’s been a fine #3 starter the last couple of seasons, but the fact that the general baseball public thinks of him as an ace is misguided.
I'm not not licking toads...
by Smoltz's Beard on Mar 3, 2009 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
understood
I'm not not licking toads...
by Smoltz's Beard on Mar 3, 2009 5:32 PM EST up reply actions
he’s obviously the ace… he strikes people out and gets really excited and then when he the team messes up he throws his glove, hat, the gatorade cooler, a baby
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST

by 



















