Talking Chop: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

Is Holliday A Possibility?


Scanning the newsire, it seems Holliday was originally interested in Tex-like money.  However, that's all fine and good when the three teams competing for your services are the three largest cash cows in the MLB.  Holliday, though, I don't think has that luxury.

Apparently the Yankees are not all that interested.  Neither are the Red Sox.  Both have plenty of outfielders and pressing needs elsewhere.  By some accounts the Cardinals are offering a deal somewhere in the neighborhood of 16m per year for five years.  This seems at least to be in the "ball park" of what the Braves can afford, especially if we deal Lowe for a sack of baseballs (do we really need a starter in return?). 

If the only team out there really bidding on Matt Holliday is going to be St. Louis, and Holliday already seems to have spurned some of their advances, could the Braves get in on the bidding?  The only reason this seems conceivable is because the Yankees, Red Sox and Angels aren't going to be driving the price way over anyone's head.  Essentially, the Braves would compete against the next tier down for a guy who could, potentially, be the offense we need.

0 recs  |  Comment 139 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Let’s trade Lowe for some prospects or a cheap bat like Rivera and then get Holliday

The Spanish Kid

by Kobe:The Legend on Dec 15, 2009 2:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

That would be a deal for two corner outfielders. We only need one.

I’d be fine trading Lowe for prospects. Getting his salary off the books would do wonders for payroll flexibility.

by kalesi on Dec 15, 2009 2:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Trading Lowe for Rivera...

…even if possible, and then signing Holliday leaves us with six OF if you count Heyward and Schafer, and no 1B.

by cavebird on Dec 15, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rivera isnt cheap

Also, dont trade javier vazquez.

by esadb on Dec 15, 2009 4:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, kinda

i just look it up and for some reason i thought he made twice as much as he does

Also, dont trade javier vazquez.

by esadb on Dec 15, 2009 4:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We are not signing Holliday. He is going to sign for either 7 years $119M. or 6 years $112M. Wren is not going to want to wrap $17 or $18M a year in 1 guy.

by jack dein on Dec 15, 2009 3:22 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

just like

we weren’t signing Lowe?

if we trade Lowe, it WONT be for Rivera. it will be for a B+ prospect IF WE’RE LUCKY.

then, we have the $ to sign Holliday.

by apoxonbothyourhouses on Dec 15, 2009 3:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, If we aren’t going to sign Holliday or Bay and we’ll get a B+ prospect for Lowe, I say get Marlon Byrd and then get Russell Branyan if you want some power

The Spanish Kid

by Kobe:The Legend on Dec 15, 2009 3:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ouch.

Marlon Byrd and Russell Branyan would be brutal signings. Both are coming off career seasons and will cost far more than they would produce.

by cavebird on Dec 15, 2009 4:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No Byrd. The dude only hit SIX of his 20 home runs away from Arlington. No Byrd.

"Sometimes I wonder what'd it be like to be outside and not hear the birds chirping...I think it'd be kind of nice."

by alligatorimpersonator on Dec 15, 2009 11:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Over three years his OPS at home was 150 points higher than his OPS on the road. Bryd will not be good outside of Arlington.

I wrote a novel, it's about baseball, you should buy it: https://www.createspace.com/3407939
www.dropoutproductions.com

by cbwilk on Dec 16, 2009 12:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Explain to me why he’s a “one year” guy?

In my view, the Braves have a future right fielder in Heyward. They have a centerfielder in McLouth. I’m not thrilled with sticking Schafer or Diaz as a full-time starter in left. As I see it, the Braves need to find a guy that can man left for a couple of years.

by kalesi on Dec 15, 2009 4:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think maybe you read it wrong?

“per year in one guy”, not “one year guy”…

Also, dont trade javier vazquez.

by esadb on Dec 15, 2009 4:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t knock the Diaz.

Somebody around here is more anal than the mom on 7th heaven. Freakin' A. lol
(self-appointed President of Yunel's Cartel~~~)

by Chief Noc-A-Homa on Dec 15, 2009 8:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

um

Schafer will do fine once his wrist heals and when he is in the Majors he will shift McLouth to LF. He has better range and a better arm

by drumzalicious on Dec 15, 2009 9:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bobby Cox said in an interview that they had no interest in getting into either the Holliday or Bay sweepstakes. They would look elsewhere for a corner OF.

by Fischerking on Dec 15, 2009 3:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Come on, do you think they are going to come out and say if they were? I mean after last years debacle with Furcal, I the FO is going to be a bit more tight lipped lol.

"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me." Hunter S. Thompson

by mad_dog_maddux on Dec 16, 2009 9:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Spending that much money on Holliday would be about as bad as spending it on Lowe last year. Holliday just isn’t good enough a player for the Braves and their payroll to invest that much money in him. For the same money, they could re-sign Adam Laroche and sign an inexpensive outfielder such as Marlon Byrd. There really isn’t a need to spend a ton of money on the outfield anyway since the Braves already have McLouth and Diaz signed with Schafer and Heyward close to being major league ready.

by redwards95 on Dec 15, 2009 3:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Has Schafer given you an indication he’s going to be a starting outfielder in the bigs? Guy lead the league in strikeouts over a few months and was hurt much of last season.

by kalesi on Dec 15, 2009 4:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not this year, but I can see Logan in the OF in 2011.

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 15, 2009 4:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

he broke his wrist int he second week of the season and ur gonna hold it against him that he struggled… really?

Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?

by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST

by Swo12bv on Dec 15, 2009 5:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Jordan Schafer is a whiter version of Mike Cameron… hits for a lower avg, good OBP, decent power and good speed… and couple that with stupendous defense in CF and there ya go…

Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?

by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST

by Swo12bv on Dec 15, 2009 5:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Now you're just trying to get me to like him...

….and I also note that both players have had drug suspensions. ;)

by cavebird on Dec 15, 2009 9:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Make that...

…think more highly of him. As a Brave, I hope he does well, just am not as optimistic as others.

by cavebird on Dec 15, 2009 9:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He was playing with a broken wrist!

Do people not pay attention at all or are they just that dumb?

by bbxxj on Dec 15, 2009 6:14 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

I get that he probably had some wrist troubles, but there’s no way the FO or Bobby would let him play two months of his rookie season with a broken wrist.

by homerun on Dec 15, 2009 6:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bobby came out and said the was playing with a broken ‘hand’ he called it for a long time and that he didn’t know about it. I’ll find the quote when I get back to my computer.

by bbxxj on Dec 15, 2009 6:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong.

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 15, 2009 6:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Um, they basically did.

by ATLforlife on Dec 15, 2009 6:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t consider myself dumb. I watched the games. He was overmatched against MLB pitching from the first week. I think the kid is talented, but hes got a hole on the inner half of the plate and he simply could not catch up to fastballs thrown right by him.

Should I give the kid a break? Probably. But this is the Major Leagues. I’m not concerned about a wrist. The guy is either going to contribute or he isn’t. Last year he didn’t. If you are Atlanta you simply can’t assume, like we did last year, that Shafer is A) going to be 100% health, and B) can hit major league pitching. So far he’s proven neither.

by kalesi on Dec 15, 2009 6:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

u mean he couldnt catch up to fastballs bc he had a major hand issue that hampered his bat speed… try again there bud.

Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?

by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST

by Swo12bv on Dec 15, 2009 7:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So what, we let everyone who might have talent but is injured cost us runs and wins?

You can SAY he had a major hand issue. The fact remains. Did he hit pitching? No, he struckout at an astronomical rate. If the kid shows up at spring training and proves otherwise then more power to him.

by kalesi on Dec 15, 2009 7:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He hit MLB pitching pretty well for the first two weeks, and then his injury happened.

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 15, 2009 9:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't say it - COX DID

Per DOB:

Here’s what Cox said when asked whether he’s confident that Jordan Schafer can come back and be the player they expected:

“Well, we played him with a broken hand. We didn’t really know it at the time, but it bothered him the entire time. As far as I know, he’s going to be fit and ready to go, and still one heck of a prospect.”

by bbxxj on Dec 15, 2009 9:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So I guess we are goig to go with stupid instead of misinformed. Try swinging a bat with a broken wrist. He had surgury, Cox and Wren both said it was effecting him, his numbers went from amazing to crap in an instant… and you still claim it was Schafer the player that sucked so bad? Seriously.

by bbxxj on Dec 15, 2009 7:23 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

they cant be considered amazing when its less than a weeks time.

i think we need to agre 09 never happened for Schafer

Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?

by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST

by Swo12bv on Dec 15, 2009 7:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What amazing numbers? In the minors? Francouer beat up Atlanta high schools too and then busted in the bigs.

Look, I’m not knocking Shafer. But I’d like to see the guy hit big league pitching before you hand him left field and say “here ya go.”

I’m not beating up on the guy. I think hes a great talent with a lot of potential. What I’m not prepared to say is that the Braves should forego trying to upgrade their outfield because Shafer might live up to billing.

by kalesi on Dec 15, 2009 7:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Has Schafer given you an indication he’s going to be a starting outfielder in the bigs? Guy lead the league in strikeouts over a few months and was hurt much of last season

this is quite a substantial knock on the guy and suggests u think he has no talent… considering u based it on two months of time Schafer spent in the majors, the entirety of which he had a broken hand/wrist (which has been acknowledged by every individual related to the organization that matters). it is pretty reasonable for us to harrass the crap out of baseless comments

Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?

by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST

by Swo12bv on Dec 15, 2009 7:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think he has plenty of talent. But let’s be honest here. The guy has missed a lot of time due to a suspension and an injury. The kid has a gift for baseball. My only point is that he has missed a lot of time over the past two seasons and the time that he didn’t miss, he was overmatched.

Again, if he shows up at spring training, tears the cover off the ball and earns an outfield spot, then toss him out there. But I’m not prepared to hand him a starting outfield position just because we should forget his 2009 never happend. 2009 did happen.

by kalesi on Dec 16, 2009 11:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ok I can live with that stance. He did tear up ST and most of that first month of the regular season. We were ready to give him the job then and we should now.

by bbxxj on Dec 15, 2009 7:51 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

You make a decent point.

Of course, it does beg the question of why Schafer kept playing with it.

by cavebird on Dec 15, 2009 9:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly

I’d like to see Schafer start in AAA. I think he needs a season to get fully healthy and into a real baseball routine. IF we get a good LFer and McLouth and Heyward are penciled in CF and RF then we have the luxury to do this. However if we wind up getting a good 1Bman and all our LF options are sub-par I would not be against letting Schafer win the job (if completely healthy) out of ST. It all depends if there is a spot for him to win out there.

by bbxxj on Dec 15, 2009 9:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So we should include Diaz in a Lowe trade then?

That would sweeten the pot, no? It would seem a bit silly to let him rot as a fourth OF.

by cavebird on Dec 15, 2009 10:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Since Wren plans on giving Heyward a real shot at the RF gig right out of ST (per DOB) it seems like signing a RFer is not likely to happen so we NEED a guy who can start in RF should Heyward not win it in ST and can be a super-sub against LHP and as a PHer. Diaz is perfect for this as he can start in RF and be close to average there over the season or he can put his gigantic L/R splits to work in a backup/simi-platoon/PH role.

No, Diaz is integral to our flexibility this offseason in the OF and should and will be kept IMHO.

by bbxxj on Dec 15, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah we currently have no depth. Keeping Diaz would help that to an extent

by acie4mvp on Dec 15, 2009 11:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So, basically, we will let him rot as a fourth OF.

If there was the right guy available, I would be okay with that. But the OF options are pretty weak outside of the guys we can’t or won’t pay to get (i.e. Holliday & Bay). If Cameron were still available, I’d say sign him and a good 1B and use Diaz as you describe. As it is, I would say sign a good 1B, sign Nady or get Swisher on the cheap (or some other decent but not great OF/1B), play Diaz in left fulltime (where he defensive numbers seem to be better per fangraphs) and let Nady/Swisher/whoever be the fourth outfielder/back up 1B guy. It would give more flexibility because Diaz doesn’t play first base, and let’s face it, we are not likely to sign an OF better than Diaz at this point.

by cavebird on Dec 16, 2009 8:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t see why we can’t or won’t pay to get Holliday or Bay

by acie4mvp on Dec 16, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s not that the Braves can’t pay for Holliday or Bay (after moving Lowe), it’s just that the Braves rarely throw a bunch of years and a bunch of money at free agents, especially overpriced free agents. The Braves don’t like to be handcuffed to one player financially for six years, and I’m glad they don’t. You never know what can happen – the guy could end up getting hurt, or just not playing as well, or who knows, and then the Braves have 1/5th of their money going to one player for a long time.

"Sometimes I wonder what'd it be like to be outside and not hear the birds chirping...I think it'd be kind of nice."

by alligatorimpersonator on Dec 16, 2009 1:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

who was the last full time starting left fielder in Atlanta that wasn’t platooned?

My initial thought is BJ Surhoff, but there maybe one more recent than that.

by kalesi on Dec 16, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good question, looking back, we had BJ Surhoff, then the year or so Chipper played left, then Brian Jordan.

by wcubmac on Dec 16, 2009 2:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Was it Surhoff who killed himself running into the wall?

by acie4mvp on Dec 16, 2009 2:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

oh yeah

"Sometimes I wonder what'd it be like to be outside and not hear the birds chirping...I think it'd be kind of nice."

by alligatorimpersonator on Dec 17, 2009 10:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Was it Langrehans?

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 16, 2009 4:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Langerhans didn't last a full year....

and would anyone be opposed to signing him to a minimum deal and being the 4th OF?

by Mr. Sanchez on Dec 16, 2009 5:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would not be opposed to that. Plus D, but not much in the way of offense off the bench.

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 16, 2009 6:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

but we assume the 4th OF we'll become...

5th/AAA by mid year. And as said elsewhere, Infante can be the real 4th OF if someone goes down and we need a bench player to start for a week or two.

by Mr. Sanchez on Dec 16, 2009 6:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I get that, but I think he was saying that we can’t afford to get Bay or Holliday. Maybe I’m just reading it wrong.

by acie4mvp on Dec 16, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i doubt we’ll have the means to land holliday; however, i strongly disagree with your point that it would be like ponying up for lowe (an ageing pitcher) last year. holliday is a complete stud. flat-out. no need to post stats here for evidence — any metric you research will tell the story, including defensive.

by brndn on Dec 15, 2009 8:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And he’s only 29

by acie4mvp on Dec 15, 2009 11:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Scott Boras is a master of driving up prices of his clients and making it seem that there are other people interested in one of his clients when there isn’t anyone who has shown any interest in him. Essentially, the team that actually wants his services is outbidding themselves. Holliday signing with us might be just as possible as Bay signing with us.

by Walker Wallace on Dec 15, 2009 7:13 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

well this time he kinda has no truth

The Yankee’s kinda came out and said they have no interest in and to be honest they shouldnt. They need a true Right Fielder so that Swisher can stick to DH’ing and being a somewhat of a utility man.

by drumzalicious on Dec 15, 2009 10:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Swish isn’t a bad fielder, his range is average but I think most people see his body type and just kind of assume he is a bad fielder.

by acie4mvp on Dec 15, 2009 11:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Swisher is an AWFUL fielder. Believe me. I watched him play on a regular basis and is pretty brutal. Dropped balls, bad routes, etc….

I thought hurricane season was over........

by bravesguy311 on Dec 16, 2009 8:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Swish is terrible

he needs to be at 1B or a DH.

They honestly shouldnt waste time on Damon either. The Phils were getting all kinds of extra bases off of those two having terrible arms.

IMO they should sign Holliday to play LF and put whoever has the stronger arm between Granderson and Cabrera in RF. OR they could sign Church. He may not be a 20+HR hitter like everyone else in the lineup but he can play a very good RF and has a cannon of an arm.

They can sacrifice offense at one position to have some all around better defense. They could then flip Melky to another team seeking a CF’er. Maybe in a package to the Padres for Heath Bell? Bell could set up Mariano.

I mean a lineup of

Jeter SS
Granderson CF
Holliday LF
Tex 1B
A-Rod 3B
Posada C
Cano 2B
Swisher DH
Church RF

wouldnt be all that bad. To be honest it would be kinda crazy.

by drumzalicious on Dec 17, 2009 3:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

YES. SIGN THIS GUYYY. Tell me this lineup doesnt give u serious wood.

McLouth
Prado
Chipper
Holiday
McCann
Esco
Laroche
Diaz

MATT DIAZ IS THE F**K*NG MAN.
They made me change my signature...

by nick9314 on Dec 15, 2009 11:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

That gave me "serious wood"

…and I’m a chick!

Sign him!

by coldriver10 on Dec 15, 2009 11:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Woah. That was hot

MATT DIAZ IS THE F**K*NG MAN.
They made me change my signature...

by nick9314 on Dec 16, 2009 2:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Kinda hard to pencil in Laroche when he’s not on our roster.

Has the whole world gone crazy? Am I the only one around here who gives a s#!t about the rules?!?

by TennKen on Dec 16, 2009 6:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

NO WAY DUDE. Good thing u told me...

MATT DIAZ IS THE F**K*NG MAN.
They made me change my signature...

by nick9314 on Dec 16, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

honestly

it doesnt im still not a fan of McLouth leading off over Diaz.

by drumzalicious on Dec 17, 2009 3:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Diaz might not need to lead off against righties, given his inconsistencies, but if there’s a lefty out there there’s not a reason in the world to bat him anywhere but leadoff. I’ve been pitching a platoon of him and McLouth, because Nate’s splits are as drastic as Diaz’s, but in the opposite direction. Nate has a sub-.700 OPS against lefties, but he crushes righties to the tune of a .833 OPS, and that despite only hitting .269 off of them. If we could get a true centerfielder (which I was hoping would be Cameron, oh well), the best scenario for those two is to platoon in left/leading off. Although with Yunel’s .392 OPS against righties, you got to wonder whether he’d be more valuable staying back in an RBI-friendly spot or leading off against righties rather than Nate.

O the things we ponder in the dead of winter…

by J-Freak on Dec 18, 2009 3:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

our true centerfielder will be starting in AAA this year. Look to see him sometime late in the season

by drumzalicious on Dec 19, 2009 3:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well in order to land Holliday we will have add an extra yr at 16-17m which would be risk but something that would replace chipper production when he retires. Plus if you did have a legit cleanup hitter behind chipper he will probably perform closer to his 08’ numbers if he can stay on the field for 120+ games. That would be the immediate upside in making this move but the risk in having 17M in one player for 5-6 yrs could be a huge mistake if it doesn’t pan out do to injury or serious production in yr 5 and 6 of the contract. Though a 5 r deal with either Bay or Holliday could work with this coming off the books when Heyward/Hanson could be locked up at that point. But we will have see once we dump Lowe’s salary what he will do in making a big move with 20+M that he will have to play with in getting a LF/1B.

by Hanson-Ace on Dec 16, 2009 9:26 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

There is also the problem that...

…Holliday has not given any indication that he would accept $16 or $17 per year for 5 or 6 six years and has indicated that he wants more.

by cavebird on Dec 16, 2009 10:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes. But the whole point is that what Holliday thinks he deserves and wants, and what he is going to get, aren’t the same thing.

by kalesi on Dec 16, 2009 11:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You make some valid points....

here. A legit cleanup hitter behind Chipper , replacing Chipper production when he retires and what will happen when we clear Lowe’s salary from the books to acquire a LF/1B. I have suggested this elsewhere, but my answer would be Miquel Cabrera. The downside of course is that he is locked up at 19million per year for another 6 seasons I think. Maybe, the Braves can play the money game being played with us on Lowe. Sure , we will take Derek but gives us 4-5 mil per year. Detroit is so poor right now I hear they are trying to sell the T in the name Tigers to preserve some cash. So maybe, we ask for 3 mil a year and get Miquel at 16 to 17 mil for a few prospects. If you have to, include a Freeman. If not all the better. Look at Cabrera’s numbers…. and you stat guys can look at all of them. He is only 26, right handed and a legit power hitter. Man , I would love his bat behind Chipper in Bobby’s last year.

by mikie baseball on Dec 16, 2009 10:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just don’t think Holliday is worth $15MM or more per season.

I’d be sorry for the team that locks him up long term for more than that. He’s a good hitter, but I honestly don’t think he’s a draw at the stands.

by Sparhawk on Dec 16, 2009 10:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not saying Nady is close to the overall hitter Holliday is, but just HR numbers they are very comparable. The last two healthy seasons for Holliday: 25:24 HR and .535:.515 SLG and for Nady: 20:25HR and .476:.510 SLG. Obviously Holliday has slightly better power numbers and he hit for a bit better average and much more walks, but pure power wise he isn’t 80-100M and 5-6yrs better than Nady. Just saying..

by bbxxj on Dec 16, 2009 10:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Power isn’t why he is going to get 85 million for 5 years. And I don’t really see Holliday as a clean up hitter. He’s a really good 3-hitter

by acie4mvp on Dec 16, 2009 11:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, just looking back to last year, he will give us a few more home runs than Diaz, thats about it. Im not at all saying that Diaz is the hitter that Holliday is, but Diaz had a very good year last year. Holliday is not a 35 home run guy. He’s a quality number three hitter, thats it. Will Diaz hit over .300 this year, maybe not, but if you take just the numbers our left fielders put up last year, and compare them to Hollidays numbers, probably not much different. Defensively he is just as bad if not worse.

by wcubmac on Dec 16, 2009 1:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How much money do we have left?

The Spanish Kid

by Kobe:The Legend on Dec 16, 2009 9:40 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Not to self promote or anything....

but check out the 25 Man Roster: A Quick Reference. It will give you a complete answer and its up in the rec’d section.

by bbxxj on Dec 16, 2009 10:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Math Class

C – Brian McCann – $5.5MM
C – Dave Ross – $1.6MM
1B -
2B – Martin Prado – $415K
SS – Yunel Escobar – $425K
3B – Chipper Jones – $13MM
IF –
IF – Diory Hernandez – $400K
IF/OF – Omar Infante – $2.225MM
LF – Matt Diaz – $2.55MM
CF – Nate McLouth – $4.5MM
RF –
OF -

SP – Javier Vazquez – $11.5MM
SP – Jair Jurrjens – $450K
SP – Tommy Hanson – $400K
SP – Tim Hudson – $9MM
SP – Kenshin Kawakami – $6.667MM

RP –
RP – Peter Moylan – $410K+
RP – Kris Medlen – $400K
RP – Eric O’Flaherty – $400K
RP – Boone Logan – $428K+
RP – Takashi Saito – $3.2MM
RP – Billy Wagner – $6.75MM

Total – $70MM(est)

Remember last year when FW got a little trigger happy when all the pitchers were falling off the board and dished it all out to Lowe? I don’t expect them to sign Holiday but Cameron’s gone and I’m reading the Cubs are getting Byrd. We’re running out of options. If this Lowe trade takes awhile, and is for prospects, it could be down to Heyward and Dye. If it plays out and the Cards are the only real threat to get him, we could give Holiday $18M and still be $8M under last year. If we did that and called up Brandon Jones and a reliever(Reddmond, Hyde, etc.) that would leave us with 1B.

If we did get Matt Holiday, I would feel completely comfortable with a 1B platoon involving Garko/Gomes and someone else.

Possibilities (with ‘09 salaries):
Hank Blalock – $6.2MM
Ryan Garko – $446K
Jonny Gomes – $1.275MM in ’08(can’t find ‘09.. can’t be much more)
Garret Atkins – $7MM
Adam LaRoche – $7MM
Mike Jacobs – $3.275MM
Aubrey Huff – $8MM
Eric Hinske – $1.5MM
Nick Johnson – $5.5MM

Again… I don’t think this Holiday thing will happen. But if FW plays this out the way he did Lowe, it’s definitely not out of the question.

Adding Holiday to the $70MM and Jones’ and a reliever would bring us to around $90MM. To match last years, we could pay Huff, Atkins, Blalock or LaRoche. However, we would still need another bench spot. Or we could buy low on two other guys and R/L platoon.

Lefties – Eric Hinske, Nick Johnson, Mike Jacobs
Righties – Jonny Gomes, Ryan Garko,

Most of these guys can play 3B and some in the OF aswell. Don’t forget DeRosa is out there too, and i know we haven’t seen his name much but MLBTR said he might give a hometown discount.

by JKowalek on Dec 16, 2009 10:31 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

add a minimum salary reliever in that open slot...

Hyde, Kimbrel, Abreu, Chavez, Redmond, etc. Not sure if Diory Hernandez is the guy, but assume the salary would remain be it Conrad or whoever. Makes us think we actually have a good bit of money free depending on Lowe and could take on some salary. Or perhaps package a prospect or three, and make a move for an elite young bat, then off set a big front-loaded deal with a bunch of young players who are cheap now but will be much more expensive in 3-4 years.

by Mr. Sanchez on Dec 16, 2009 10:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, i said Hyde or Redmond but Kimbrel isn’t ready yet. The walks are WAY too high and i know it hasn’t really caught him yet, meaning he is getting out of the trouble, but that might change in the Big. Abreu could i guess i just haven’t seen much of him. And Conrad would be right there with Diory, too. Any group of those would have to it though as would would have to sacrifice something with getting Holiday.

I think they are planning on handling the Gearrin/Kimbrel thing with bringing one up after this year since Saito getting only a one yr deal. The other would be brought up after 2 yrs since Wagner has that option. Unless they both excel this year then Wags won’t get it. I’d like to see potentially us having the 8th and 9th locked up though with those two hitting stride.

by JKowalek on Dec 16, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think this is exactly what Wren ...

is facing. So now, put Miguel in there at 17mil and fill first base(Salary 19mil- 2mil Detroit pickup). Put Heyward and Shafer in at .4 apeice.Conrad as the other infielder, and whatever we have left over for the other slot…. The lineup in 2010….

Mclouth
Diaz
Chipper
Cabrera
McCann
Heyward
Escobar
Prado

We have a shot to win in 2010…even on a down year from Chipper. In 2011, if Chipper retires, the 3 slot is Heyward, 4 is Cabrera and 5 McCann…. still formidable…. So Frank… get to work and forget these fringe alternates.

by mikie baseball on Dec 16, 2009 2:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Care to explain exactly how we’re getting Cabrera?

by acie4mvp on Dec 16, 2009 2:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure...

I will give it a try. Tigers have money problems….They have traded Grandeson … they are looking to future. Dombrowski is a smart man.Say we give up Freeman, in a pinch. Maybe 1 of our top 20 pitching prospects(maybe 5 cause we will still have 15!!!!). Maybe our catching prospect(afterall, we have one of the best there). That’s Wrens job….. its the end result that matters. I dont want the medicrity being offered on this board…. Swisher, Rivera, Nady et all. Do you? think bigger. Cabrera, Heyward and Mc Cann fill the 3 , 4 and 5 slots nicely if this is Chippers last year …..Dont be a Lemmling

by mikie baseball on Dec 16, 2009 3:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Swisher is infinitely better than Nady and Rivera

by acie4mvp on Dec 16, 2009 3:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

disagree...

he’s been more consistent than both. But if all 3 are healthy and playing their best, all 3 put up some impressive numbers and the extra cost of Swisher isn’t “worth it”.

by Mr. Sanchez on Dec 17, 2009 10:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you want to bring up Schafer for the bench? and for the trade your just throwing out names….. actually positions. Look it’d be nice but JJ or Tommy would have to go with Freeman. and then some other guys. And you can’t just go and give up 5 of your top 20 pitchers and think it’s ok… it’s top 20 for a reason…. 1-5 is much better than 15-20

by JKowalek on Dec 16, 2009 7:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cabrera may not be feasible, but the point remains. The Braves need a bat. That bat needs to play first or left and needs to be a guy that can hit in the middle of the order.

I’d love to see a trade made. The Braves have some very attractice assets. I, personally, think we should be able to talk about any player not named Heyward.

by kalesi on Dec 17, 2009 10:56 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

IF we free up Lowe’s salary we can get Holliday and then get a 1B like Troy Glause who shouldn’t cost much and a cheap bench bat and we have enough money to do it but we have to free Lowe’s salary for prospects

The Spanish Kid

by Kobe:The Legend on Dec 16, 2009 12:50 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Here is my question....

Is Holliday as good as Cabrera?

by mikie baseball on Dec 16, 2009 3:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

depends

are we talking about playing 1/2 their games in Coors?

if not, then he’s nowhere near Cabrera.

by apoxonbothyourhouses on Dec 17, 2009 1:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

even then

if Cabrera was in Coors it would be downright ridiculous

by drumzalicious on Dec 19, 2009 3:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Think about it.....

In 5 years….. Cabrera will be as old as Bay is now. I would rather go laRoche and one of the mediocore guys we are speaking of here. maybe if Chipper still has it …we win. My alternative of Miguel makes it a real possibility, regardless of whether Chipper is done or not …. and for more than 2010.

by mikie baseball on Dec 16, 2009 3:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That's nice...

…but Cabrera costs money and players. We have no idea what the price is to Detroit, and I doubt they send money back unless it is a nice haul they get. I don’t see that happening.

On the other hand, LaRoche or Delgado or even Glaus and a mediocre OF who just keeps Heyward’s spot warm (if Heyward doesn’t take it in ST) and then moves to 4th OF is probably the best we can hope for right now—-there just isn’t the talent out there that isn’t overpriced.

by cavebird on Dec 16, 2009 5:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Of course he costs money .....

and players.Dombrowski has long been a close to vest wheeler dealer. I have little doubt he has spoken to a few teams on Miguel.They are up to there eyesballs in salary and have needs for young cheap talent. I dont want to lose Freeman, but I suspect he and a few of our pitching prospects might work. As an add on, even if we get back 2 mil per year over the next 6 from Detroit we could front load a portion and maybe even have enough to sign LaRoche.My only concern with Miggy is attitude. While it is more likely we do the Laroche mediocre thing, I would not take this option off the table. Again, Cabrera is a long term solution to a declining Chipper.Heyward might struggle a bit jis first year. In a sense the option you speak of has to have everything go right.

by mikie baseball on Dec 17, 2009 3:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And the option you speak of...

…is pure speculation. You don’t even know if Cabrera is available. Even assuming we could get $12 million back if we send a nice package of Freeman and pitching prospects, I don’t know if that would be good value. We would essentially be giving up a ton of young talent to pay a very good player market value. I don’t like the idea of giving Holliday tons of money, but doing that would make more sense than paying Cabrera tons of money and giving up good prospects, too. I am not sure why we would need to sign LaRoche if we get Cabrera; that doesn’t really make much sense. I am not sure what you mean by Cabrera being a long term solution to a declining Chipper—Cabrera certainly can’t play third any more.

by cavebird on Dec 17, 2009 4:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Isnt most of this speculation?

I wouldnt be suprised if the Red Sox were involved if we are not. As I said, Dombrowski has a history, if not a masters degree, in changing organizations. He engineered the Marlins first divesture of an overpaid team. He was there for the Expos in developement of the talent they had in an earlier period. He took a horrible Detroit team and built it to a contender. They may be in a major transformation period. They have something like a 130 mil payroll. I think the only blemish he has had trading in us Jurrjens. He plays it tight to the vest. I think Wren might have learned something about not speaking until its done. Speculation, but based on the men involved the team needs and even the money. And while we lose prospects, we can gain some of them back when we lose Lowe. Acquiring Cabrera at 18mil for 6 years is not the kind of contracts we are used to but he is not exorbant in terms of cost.

by mikie baseball on Dec 17, 2009 7:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I still don't see how...

…paying Cabrera that much is worth so much more than paying Holliday that much and keeping the prospects. Cabrera is certainly better than Holliday, but Cabrera probably isn’t better than Holliday + Freeman + pitching prospects. And if we offered Holliday Cabrera’s remaining contract, we could hold the press conference tomorrow.

by cavebird on Dec 17, 2009 8:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He is 26 years old. Meaning that he is approaching his prime. Holliday is essentially in his prime and is putting up similar numbers. In the end Cabrera will have a better hitting career than Holliday. Also lets not forget that Holliday started his career in Coors Field where every year he has hit a lot more of his HR’s at home than on the road except 2008. I dont doubt that he has HR power i just dont expect him to hit more than 25-30 where as Cabrera coming from the AL and a tougher league would most likely give us 35-40 HR’s if not more.

With that said as much as i love Freeman the guy has yet to show any sort of power. He hits doubles for days and as of now just looks like a Casey Kotchman. Sure he could develop it but we never know. Thats why he is a “Prospect” and trading him for a proven commodity is a gamble. If he turns out to be a great player then so be it. Im pretty sure we will be contending through the end of Cabrera’s contract.

Also the problem with signing an outfielder long term is that it creates a logjam in our outfield. We have both Heyward and Schafer who are going to be in the majors soon. We already have McLouth under contract. Sure we could trade McLouth but at the same time I believe the team would rather go the cheaper route of keeping McLouth and leaving that Left Field spot open for another up and coming outfielder whether it be Cody Johnson or Adam Milligan.

I understand your reasoning however I believe getting Cabrera and hitting him between Chip and Mac would be dynamite.

by drumzalicious on Dec 19, 2009 4:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In 5 years

Cabrerea will likely weigh about as much as William “Refridgerator” Perry.

by Blue or CONKZILLA on Dec 20, 2009 9:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

id love it if we got a big name OF holliday or bay ect

but id also love the combo of jason heyward and freddy freeman in the future. it would resemble a prince+braun duo

by carolinabrave89 on Dec 16, 2009 5:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Conradulations.... It's your lucky day

i think your going to see both. at the start of next season, barring injury, you’ll have your duo and i think you will also have the big name OF that they get this year whose got a couple years left on his contract. I think Matty D will be moved to the bench or traded.

by JKowalek on Dec 16, 2009 7:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not interested in Holliday.

Not only is he too pricey, but he also hasn’t proven he can hit outside of Denver. I know he did well in St. Louis, but every player has hot streaks.

by GouldisGold on Dec 16, 2009 11:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

He had a rough April, but from May 1 until he was traded up put up an 299/.400/.480 line. Then he went to St. Louis and killed the ball for more than 2 months.

So, yeah, I guess you could say that he had a 5 month long hot streak

by Lennox on Dec 17, 2009 2:55 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Um

IF and only IF we can clear all of Lowe’s salary I feel as though it should be for a player with a bigger impact like Miguel Cabrera/Adrian Gonzalez.

The only way i would be ok with A-Gonz is if we could lock him up for the next 5-6 years.

The reason why I say that is because in a trade for both we would have to trade Freeman.

by drumzalicious on Dec 17, 2009 3:58 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Gonzalez will likely create a bidding war all his own. The Padres can sit back and let teams throw offers at them all day long. Interesting to see what new management does over there. Think the Padres are sorry they didn’t take the Brave’s offer for Peavey last season? I would be.

Correct though, the Braves would have to first move Lowe. The way I see it, if we are going to pay Lowe 15 million to be a #4 starter, why not pay Matt Holliday just a bit more to man left field for 5 years?

You can certainly scrutinize a guys numbers. The reality is he’s the best outfielder out there right now and, by some providence, the big market clubs aren’t interested. The Braves need one bat to make this club a playoff contender. That bat either needs to play first base or left field.

by kalesi on Dec 17, 2009 10:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The problem for the Braves is that the player we "need" isn't available...

…at the right price. Cabrera costs to much in salary and what we would have to trade. If we could get A Gonz, that’s great, but the cost will be steep and the Red Sox probably can outbid us. (Personally, I would not need to insist on signing him long-term; if we can get two years of great production at low cost, we’ll figure what to do at 1B in 2012 later.)

If we “need” a “big bat” that leaves guys who probably won’t be traded and Holliday and Bay. Bay’s a weak fielder and wants more money than he will be worth. Holliday wants more money than we can afford. Holliday would be more than a little bit more than Lowe and more years than five.

Fortunately, I don’t think we need a “big bat” to contend. The team we had at the end of last season was a contender and if we can get LaRoche back or another decent 1B option (Delgado, Glaus, etc.) and a two-month starter/fourth outfielder after Heyward is up guy, we should be better than the end of last season if just because FUGA is no longer being trotted out there every night.

The Braves just aren’t the Yankees or Red Sox, we can’t overpay for what we need now and not worry about it because it will cripple us later on.

by cavebird on Dec 17, 2009 1:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well said. Doesn’t seem that tough to wrap your head around.

"SIGN PUJOLS OR FIRE WREN" ~ Swo12bv

by Smoltz's Beard on Dec 17, 2009 2:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope you are correct....

that we don’t need a big bat, I am not as confident. We are all talking like last year was a fluke for Chipper, rather than the continuation of a trend. If that is the case and Chipper has a good year you are more than likely correct that LaRoche and a fill in are enough to contend. If not, can we rely on a first year player to carry us to the pennant? What happens next year if Chipper retires? No we arent the Red Sox or Yanks with respect to payroll, but there is a that chance we do not have Chippers 13mil cost next year, or KK’s 7mil or Javy’s 11 mil next year. Maybe Detriot, for instance, pays 2 mill a year of Cabrera salary 5 mil in 2010 and 3mil in 2011 and 1 mil in each of the back 4 years. That frees us to pay Laroche 9 mil a yr for 3 years at something like a 7 mil, 9mil, 11mil clip.

by mikie baseball on Dec 17, 2009 4:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Why would we have Cabrera and LaRoche?

The rules generally only allow one first baseman, and Cabrera is far too slow now to play third. Remember that we finished sixth in the NL in runs scored last year despite playing FUGA all year and Kotchman for more than half the year and Chipper having a crappy season. We really were close last year. This year if we got LaRoche and someone better for left field (and yes, even the crapshoot that is Heyward in his rookie seaon would have to be better than FUGA—-beating FUGA is not much of a challenge, lol), we would be better than we were going into last season. Of course, with Halladay on board, the Phillies will be better going into 2010 than they were going into 2009 as well. It will be tough, but it sure seems silly to trade a nice package of prospects for a guy who we have to pay market value to. If Chipper retires after this year, we can always go after a big free agent next year, the class is supposed to be pretty good and we’ll have a lot more money. Hell, if Detroit has a bad year, maybe we can trade for Cabrera then.

by cavebird on Dec 17, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Okay...

I do not accept the premise that he is too slow to play 3rd base. True Miquel has put on some poundage, but he is still a kid at 26, and therefore if properly motivated could easily become a third sacker, as he has decent hands and always has. In addition he could be the leftielder until we bring up Heyward, and slowly bring him into the mix if he has troubles at the plate to start. He would instantly make Chipper a better hitter and see more fastballs, as he is a feared 4 hole hitter.He is righthanded (thank god).The offensive numbers for the team were highly inconsistent despite the acceptable level of runs scored over the course of a season. We would go 6 or 7 games and score a total of 10 runs and then breakout with a bunch in a few to make the total acceptable. Cabrera would take that out, as he is very consistent. Your point that the Phils improved with Halladay only supports the need for a major improvement offensively, not to keep pace, but to gain on a team that finished well ahead of us last year. The addition of Laroche and Cabrera makes us vastly improved offensively, which is what we need. The loss of Freeman is a price no doubt, but a price which might be required to secure one of the best young righthanded power hitters this side of the kid in St Louis.As far as market value, yep, sometimes you have to pay it. Relative to a Bay or Holliday, if we could secure him at 18mil per I would take it, as the cost of a Holliday is not that much cheaper., and has yet to put the numbers outside of Coors that Cabrera has.So if it sounds silly to you it does not to me. We have 20 the top 25 prospect who are pitchers. For my money Freeman and a couple of young arms are a fair price to acquire a solid team that could actually win next year.Remember next year, even if Chipper has a strong season and stays on, we have the cost of Javy coming off and KK… so there is 18 mil there. I want to win next year, as I am sure you do… Swisher, Nady et al aint the answer in any season.

by mikie baseball on Dec 17, 2009 7:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cabrera at least would be better...

…at third then in left field. If we did trade for Cabrera, I think we could get a left fielder who could hit close to or as well as LaRoche and be okay offensively and much better defensively. Hell, if we got Cabrera, just let Heyward do it; with Cabrera on board, we wouldn’t need production out of Heyward right away and he could develop at the major league level without the pressure. And Heyward’s defense is ready and good in right, which would let Diaz go back to left where he is better. I really don’t think Cabrera is worth the prospects and salary, but he is an absolutely massive bat—-I don’t disagree with that. If we add him, we don’t need to add the offense of LaRoche and throw the positional thing out of whack.

by cavebird on Dec 17, 2009 8:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The reason ....

to sign Laroche has many aspects to it. One we have gotten rid of Freeman, so that would need to be filled. Again, I am not convinced that Cabrera, could not play 3rd on a spot basis to spell Chipper, or in case of injury. He has quite a few the past few years. If I am correct and he can play 3rd, it would be a fit if Chipper were to retire at seasons end. In the scenerio that for some reason Heyward does not produce this year, Miquel still would fit as the outfielder with Mclouth and Diaz, with Chipper and adam at the corners. So he provides dept and fits in my salary scenerio.In the best case we Matty D to the 4th outfielder or against Leftys when Laroche sits. So his versatility would dictate several scenerios.I will repeat, my main concern with Cabrera is about his perceived attitude. People just do not realize that he is only 26 years old. Again, this is a Bobby’s last year(and maybe Chippers) i want to send them off with a championship and still be good next year.Right now, I cant think of another playerthat could put us in that position that might be available and the work on the trade done so under the radar. Maybe Braun….

by mikie baseball on Dec 17, 2009 9:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Braun is not available.

Period. Not even for Heyward. He is gold and teams do not give that up. As for Cabrera, he could play third in a pinch (badly) but he is not an outfielder. Your thought that he could play LF at his size and speed is honestly laughable. He is a great bat. At 1B, if we could somehow fit the contract and the prospects, makes sense. With LaRoche, it makes no sense. If we get him, we add a cheap OF like Nady to do the fourth OF/Heyward warmer position. Cabrera in the OF is like Willingham, you just don’t do it if you don’t want to cringe on every flyball hit to left.

by cavebird on Dec 17, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Chipper

Hard to consider it a trend when he is coming off 3 straight +.420 wOBA seasons. Lets wait to see how he comes out the gate this season before we start putting him out to pasture.

"SIGN PUJOLS OR FIRE WREN" ~ Swo12bv

by Smoltz's Beard on Dec 17, 2009 5:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No you are absolutely correct...

Chipper is not on the decline. No trend at all. He really isnt 38 years old . The last two months he was on fire as I recall…. balls flying all over the place. Maybe we should resign him for another 5 years.Its pretty funny that we cant see a 26 year old move to a natural position , but think a 38 year old who batted , what 265 with 18 or so homers and 70 rbis should not yet be put out to pasture. One is a realistic expectation , the other needs divine intervention. What do I know….

by mikie baseball on Dec 17, 2009 7:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If that was your attempt at humor you failed miserably. But hey, at least you supported your opinion with some solid factual analysis! Why would we want to take into account date from previous seasons when we can blindly go by how a player produced most recently?

"SIGN PUJOLS OR FIRE WREN" ~ Swo12bv

by Smoltz's Beard on Dec 17, 2009 8:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

…we want to take into account date data from previous seasons…

Fixed.

"SIGN PUJOLS OR FIRE WREN" ~ Swo12bv

by Smoltz's Beard on Dec 17, 2009 8:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

eh

he came out the gate good this year and fell off somewhere in july.

by drumzalicious on Dec 19, 2009 4:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My thing is, can we expect Diaz and Prado to hit like they did? Diaz hit .400 against lefties, and like 250 against righties. I would be shocked if Diaz ended up the season anything but a platoon player. I like him, and think that he is a great hitter against lefties, but Im not convinced he can play every day. Prado stepped in and hit like 450 his first month, and fell off quite a bit at the end. Laroche played the best 3 months of his career in a contact year. Im not sure if we wouldn’t be the worst hitting team in the division next year if we don’t bring someone in.

by wcubmac on Dec 17, 2009 5:27 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Good points...

I like Diaz and Prado big time, but they cannot be counted on to carry us as they did for a couple of months. They might, but surely they have no real track record of that ability.I disagree a bit on Adam, as I actually think he is a solid 280 type hitter , just needs to have better first halfs. We are a bit better than the Mets offensively right now as presently constructed, but no match for the Phils.

by mikie baseball on Dec 17, 2009 8:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So you take into account the track record of Diaz and Prado, two clearly inferior hitters, but complete dismiss #10’s? Cool.

"SIGN PUJOLS OR FIRE WREN" ~ Swo12bv

by Smoltz's Beard on Dec 17, 2009 8:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I really have little...

interest in an arguement with you. My point about Diaz and Prado was that they do not yet have a track record to prove they can consistently do what they did last year. With respect to Chipper, I would like nothing more than to be wrong about what is obvious to any even casual baseball fan. You gave me this same statistical bs earlier this year when I brought up the Braves needing a big bat and suggesting Gonzalez. You said something to the effect of Chipper could easily hit 8 homers his next 58 PAs or something to the effect. I pointed out it was not likely as he seemed hurt and was aging. Fact is , I do not believe he hit 8 homers the rest of the year. I like your loyality to Chipper and can assure you i am as big a fan. I will never dismiss Chipper, but my eyes do not see a 420 oba, but a player whos skills have diminished . Hope I am wrong.

by mikie baseball on Dec 17, 2009 9:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hope this will change your mind about Chip...

He won the batting title the year before and he OPS’d over .1000 in each of the 3 years before the ’09 season.

Chipper wasn’t even that bad in ‘09. He was doing great like usual, he just had a rough and especially unlucky last two months. Even with the bad last two months, he still had an OBP of .388. And, I bet you wouldn’t be so down on Chipper if he had 100 RBI’s, which he most likely would have attained since he OPS’d over .1000 with RISP. It’s not his fault guys weren’t on in front of him.

Chip will bounce back next year.

"Sometimes I wonder what'd it be like to be outside and not hear the birds chirping...I think it'd be kind of nice."

by alligatorimpersonator on Dec 17, 2009 10:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Chipper led the team in OBP…it doesn’t get much better than that – in your career worst year you are still one of the best in baseball at getting on base.

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 18, 2009 12:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Chip will be back next year....

Take a look at my XMas wish post for the Braves next year. You know, the truth is, if there was a player to do it, or a reason for doing (His relationship with Bobby Cox), then Chipper will return to form.in a big way next near. On the other hand, he hit somewhere in the 230’s from mid June on, and very little production as his OPS plunged from the mid 900’s I think to the low 800’s.Okay, that is about as staty as I can get.The other thing is a tough one to statisically prove. He will hit 39 next season. Pre the steriod era, very, very few great ones picked it up at that point… Mantle, Mays, Aaron all started thier decents in mid to late 30’s. I am nearly 60 years old, and the kid in me wants him to do just that…. have a great year! Have a nice holiday season and thanks for your reply

by mikie baseball on Dec 19, 2009 1:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Your arrogance and condescending attitude do nothing but compound your ignorant and stubborn view. If you’re that quickly to turn on a player, while ignoring a vast amount of statistical information, than you’ve got a lot to learn. You’re not even able to come to the table with actual facts, instead fueling your argument with pure speculation.

Enjoy living in your box, come talk to me when you’re willing to speak with an open mind.

"SIGN PUJOLS OR FIRE WREN" ~ Swo12bv

by Smoltz's Beard on Dec 18, 2009 10:15 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Face!

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 18, 2009 12:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not inferior at all

They are both career 300 + hitters.

by FitzFan on Dec 21, 2009 4:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Smolt’s Beard, the floor is yours…

"My team of nine guys who hit like Albert Pujols and never ever bunt just beat your team with one Shane Victorino 472 to 3."

by justincredubil02 on Dec 21, 2009 12:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would say at the moment...

…the Mets are probably as good or better than us offensively if everyone is healthy (which, of course, is a massive if). That really doesn’t matter as their current rotation is Santana and horse shit, so we are a far better team. The Phillies are going to be tough to catch, they are one of the two best teams in the majors and just added Halladay, although at the cost of Lee; that is still a bit of an upgrade. We are going to have to have guys like Prado and Diaz come through to beat them; they are just too good to beat otherwise.

by cavebird on Dec 17, 2009 9:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Boras as usual is saying that there is a mystery team pursuing Holliday trying to jack up the price tag on Holliday. If I were the Cards, I would call his bluff and tell Boras to f… off because they need the extra money to go to Pujols when he becomes a free agent. That is the guy that you want to build a team around. No offense to Matt.
For us, I hope Wren doesn’t fall for Boras’s tricks, either. We need a bat, but not at the cost of getting a guy that’ll screw up our budget for next year.

by Walker Wallace on Dec 18, 2009 1:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Atlanta Braves.
Start posting about the Braves »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

12475953_small
2010 NL East Fan Projections: RPs
Heywardaaa_small
Like College Basketball? Join March Madness at Talking Chop!
12475953_small
2010 NL East Fan Projections: OFs
Buckner_small
Prospect Smackdown: Davis vs. Freeman vs. Morrison
12475953_small
2010 NL East Fan Projections: Catchers

Recent FanPosts

Small
I know it's "only spring training," but is it time to be concerned about McLouth?
Raymug2_small
Smoltz isn't similar to Eckerlsey. He's better. Much better.
Zoidberg-why_small
WTF happened to the Braves on 30 in 30?
Small
When should Heyward play -- Analysis
Heywardaaa_small
Predicting the Braves' 2010 Lineup: #2 Hitter
Crowder_channing_small
I need your help
Small
A Closer Look at the Newest Offensive Impact Players
Stairs_small
Becoming a Braves Fan
Small
leadoff hitters

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Detroit Tigers' Gerald Laird, left, is greeted by teammates Ryan Strieby, center, and Miguel Cabrera who were on base for his third-inning grand slam off New York Yankees pitcher Joba Chamberlain during a spring training baseball game in Lakeland, Fla., Wednesday, March 10, 2010.  (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Detroit Tigers, Sights Set On Success

Davey Johnson, center, a senior adviser for the Washington Nationals,  is shown in the dugout during a spring training baseball game against the New York Mets, Saturday, March 6, 2010, in Viera, Fla. (AP Photo/Rob Carr) +3 updates

Spring Training News and Notes, 3/19: Catching Up With Everyone

Milwaukee Brewers third baseman Mat Gamel can't field a bunt by Chicago Cubs' Kosuke Fukudome, of Japan, during the first inning of a baseball game in Chicago, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2009.(AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh)

Brewers Third Baseman Mat Gamel Diagnosed With 'Slightly' Torn Lat

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Gondeee_small gondeee

Authors

My_hair_is_a_bird-257x300_small yondaime4

Dsc01731_small royhobbs

Tc_small cbwilk