Braves Top-5 Minor League Center Fielders
While the Braves top Minor League center fielders don't have the star power present in right field, or the pure power present in left field, they are still an interesting collection of speedsters and defensive stalwarts. While none currently seem like locks to become future stars, and maybe not even future starters, fortunately, the Braves are well set at the Major League level with Nate McLouth and the center fielder of the future, Jordan Schafer.
1. Matt Young B/T: L/R Born: 10/3/1982 Ht: 5'8" Wt: 175
Young takes the top spot after a second excellent season at Mississippi that saw him take home the award as the Southern League's Top Huslter. After hitting .289 with a .769 OPS along with 30 stolen bases for Mississippi in 2008, Young improved to a .289 average, .827 OPS and a team record 43 stolen bases. After playing most of his games in left field in 08, he shifted and played mostly in center this season. The same speed he utilizes on the basepaths enables him to cover an excellent amount of space in the outfield, and he takes good routes while making intelligent decisions. But, his arm is well below average, so that negates some of his defensive value.
A line drive hitter, Young doesn't make the mistake of trying to hit for power, and instead contents himself with spraying the ball to the gaps, collecting 23 doubles and 10 triples this season. He also makes use of his tiny frame (his listed height of 5'8" is a good bit of an exaggeration) to work a ton of walks, racking up 97 this season on the way to a .414 on base percentage.
Young was originally signed as a second baseman, so he has a bit of versatility, but he's only played 59 games there as a professional, and half of those came in 2006. He'll enter next season as a 27 year old, so he's not a typical prospect, but there's plenty of reason to think that his speed and defense, combined with his on base skills, could make him a valuable part of a Major League bench. If he's left off the Braves' 40 man roster this offseason, there's a possibility that a team looking to keep him as the 25th man on their roster and utilize him as a late inning pinch runner and defensive replacement might take a chance on him in the Rule V draft.
2. Cory Harrilchak B/T: L/L Born: 10/27/1987 Ht: 5'10" Wt: 175
Harrilchak, who turned 22 yesterday, was drafted in the 14th round this year and excelled for Danville, hitting .324 with a .842 OPS and 19 stolen bases as the team's regular hitter in the three hole. He split his time fairly equally around the outfield, playing 25 games each in center field and right field while playing 11 in left field, but, mostly due to his bat, he profiles best as a center fielder. He has excellent speed and a great knowledge of how to play the outfiled, along with a fairly strong, accurate arm.
Harrilchak has a slight frame, so he's unlikely to develop much power, but he's already smart enough to make use of his skills as a line drive hitter, spraying out 10 doubles and 5 triples in his 60 games, and he was able to effectively add speed to his game, getting caught stealing only twice in his 21 attempts. He also showed a knack for getting on base, with a .401 on base percentage, another indicator that, while he may have hit third for Danville, he profiles better as a leadoff or number two hitter in the future.
While he was a bit old at 21 for Danville, like Riann Spanjer-Furstenburg, Harrilchack had an outstanding professional debut, showing plenty of promise that he'll develop into a fine prospect. With his age and his dominance of the Appy League, there's a possibility that he could start 2010 at Myrtle Beach, but an assignment to Rome seems more likely. While he's unlikely to be considered a top flight prospect, at least until he has a breakout season at a more age appropriate level, Harrilchak has the tools to work himself into Atlanta's Major League plans in the future.
3. Kyle Rose B/T: R/R Born: 5/24/1989 Ht: 6'0" Wt: 165
Rose was drafted in the 8th round of the season's draft and, like Harrilchak, he was slightly old for his league, playing for the Orlando Braves in the GCL as a 20 year old. But, unlike Harrilchak, he didn't exactly dominate, though he still fared well, hitting .293 with a .750 OPS along with 27 stolen bases. The speed was the biggest asset to his offensive game, as he led his league, stealing those bases in just 48 games, and, more impressively, in just 63 times of reaching first base, meaning that he stole a base 43% of the time he reached first. For comparison, this year's Major League stolen base leader, Jacoby Ellsbury, stole 35% of the times he reached first. Those are tremendously impressive numbers, especially when you factor in a .397 on base percentage.
While he excelled at the speed game, Rose showed almost no power, slugging just .354 on the season. His incredibly slight frame suggests he isn't likely to gain much power, but if he can continue to get on base at a great clip and steal bases at an oustanding rate, he'll turn into a great prospect. He made 4 errors in center field this season, which raises some concern about his defense, but without the context of those errors, it's possible to write them off as the by product of his first professional season.
While Rose may have been slightly old for the GCL, he won't turn 21 until late May of next year, so if he is able to start out at Rome he'll be in step with the ages that typify better prospects. If he's able to augment his speed with a bit more slugging, he'll likely emerge as a top flight leadoff hitting prospect. Even if he's unable to, his immense speed will make him a valuable player.
4. LV Ware B/T: R/R Born: 3/18/1987 Ht: 5'10" Wt: 185
Ware struggled mightily for Rome in April, hittting just .130 with a .423 OPS in just 51 plate appearances before he was sent to Extended Spring Training. But, a huge part of that poor showing was tied up in the five man outfield rotation that Rome was utilizing at the outset of the season, leading to irregular playing time for Ware, . He rebounded easily though once Danville's season began, hitting .293 with a .740 OPS and a league leading 24 stolen bases as the team's leadoff hitter.
Those numbers were an improvement over the .272 average, .727 OPS and 13 stolen bases that he put up for Danville in 2008, which is important, because even though he was forced to repeat the level, he showed a marked improvement. Like all the other center field prospects, Ware doesn't have much power, hitting no home runs this season, but he makes up for that lack with a strong line drive swing and an excess of speed. Above all, Ware's greatest asset is his mental game, as he has established himself as a smart, polished player who gladly takes on a role as a team leader. He combines that mental edge with his speed to make himself a plus defender, capable of covering a large amount of ground in center field, with a slightly above average arm. He also takes this edge to the plate, as he is a smart hitter, willing to hit behind runners and bunt when advantageous.
Ware is likely to return to Rome to start 2010 and since he'll turn 23 just prior to the start of the season he's too old to be considered a top tier prospect. But, he is a solid, polished player who seems likely to be able to build on his success one level at a time. At worst, he's likely to develop into a 4th outfielder capable of providing great defense off the bench and a ton of speed, but his work ethic and baseball accumen suggest better is in store.
T5. Calvin Culver B/T: R/R Born: 10/7/1988 Ht: 6'2" Wt: 220
Culver began 2009 in Extended Spring Training, before joining Rome at the beginning of April. He started out hot, hitting .295 with a .774 OPS in his first 44 at bats, but faded as the season went on, finishing with just a .225 average and a .607 OPS in a part time role.
He's big for a center fielder, but he's able to use his strong body to make himself a more than capable defender, spending the majority of his games in the middle of the outfield, while playing 16 in right field and 11 and left field. At this point, Culver has shown little aptitude for hitting in the Minor League, compiling a .236 average and .634 OPS in 579 career plate appearances. But, he'll enter next season as a 21 year old, so there's time for him to improve, but with the wealth of young outfielders coming up from Danville and Orlando, there might not be enough at bats available for him.
T5. Cole Miles B/T: S/R Born: 3/24/1987 Ht: 5'8" Wt: 165
Like most of the players on this list, Miles has little to no power, but tons of speed. And, like Matt Young, his listed height is a friendly lie. After putting up a poor showing with Rome in 2008, hitting just .239 with a pathetic .585 OPS to go with 28 stolen bases, he managed to improve dramatically with his promotion to Myrtle Beach this season, hitting .266 with a .679 OPS, though his stolen bases dropped to 16. While thos numbers still aren't overly impressive, he came on strong in the second half, following up a .259 average and .634 OPS in the first half with a .272 average and .716 OPS in the second half while collecting 13 of his 17 extra base hits for the season and 10 of his stolen bases.
This marked improvement was a welcome sight for Miles after his poor showing for the previous year and a half, and looks like a good indication that he's begun to make the adjustments necessary to develop into a Major League prospect. Another change that has aided him is the shift from the infield to the outfield. Originally drafted as a shortstop, MIles had seen most of his playing time at second base prior to 09, playing just 13 games as an outfielder. But 2009 saw him make the full time switch, as he played just 19 games in the infield, compared to 64 in center field, 21 in left field, and even 8 games in right field. While he never seemed to grasp playing the infield, compiling just a .957 fielding percentage there for his career, he's shown apptitude for the outfield, making use of his speed. While he still has great lengths to go in learning the best routes and actions to take in the outfield, and his well below average arm will always be a bit of a liability, he certainly profiles better in the future as an outfielder.
Miles will likely return to Myrtle Beach in 2010 as a 23 year old, looking to build on his strong second half. He'll need to work on hitting the ball with more authority, as he's never hit more than 9 doubles in a season, and he'll need to walk more to utilize his speed, which he needs to utilize more, but his overall situation isn't as dire as all that sounds. There are positives to his game, and if he can continue to show an ability to adjust and adapt, he might become a Matt Young like prospect in a few years.
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We are lucky to get such great prospect coverage on this site!
"Hey Fat Kid...the monster is right behind you! RUNNNN!!" -The Host
Juan Flores
Will more than likely start the season in either Danville or Rome. He played very well in the DSL after being signed in June.
Also even though Hector Garcia didn’t have a good debut in the DSL he still projects very well in CF. He has track speed, plays great defense and has a great arm. His bat is still developing as he was very young this past season at 16 but will get better as he matures, he’s projected to have some pop down the line.
by Jay212033 on Oct 28, 2009 11:13 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
As always I LOVE these lists
I like the depth here as I like speedy line drive hitting CFers. If you can get power from RF/1B/C/LF like we may be (Heyward, Freeman, McCann, Johnson/Milligan) it doesn’t matter really how much power you get from CF as long as they get on base run the bases as the big bats drive them in.
Yes. I became a lot higher on this list as I wrote it up. Sure, none of these guys have any pop, but they all have speed and are great defenders, so any of them that pan out are going to be great complimentary players.
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
Great write-ups by the way. I love following the prospects but I have very little time to do much else than read what other people write and I live too far north to go to many of our minor league games. I try to catch the AAA team in Indy a few times but I always have some confict the random Tuesday-Thursday they travel up here.
will matt young be our 4th OF at the start of the 2010 season?
President of Marteeeny's Weeenies: The Official Fan Club for Martin Prado.
WE WANT PRADO AT 2B IN 2010!
by Scott Coleman on Oct 28, 2009 12:30 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Church is acceptable in CF at least as a backup. He isn’t outstanding out there but he wouldn’t be awful.
yeah i get you, it just sounded like he was implying you 4th OFer had to be a CFer..i think jones could handle CF for a few games when called upon
We need an OF
With the ability to play CF though. McLouth miss several games this season and we need a backup capable of playing CF and Brandon isn’t that guy.
by Jay212033 on Oct 28, 2009 1:02 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
depends...
you need more than 1 guy capable of playing CF, and if that is a starting RF or LF, so be it. If neither RF or LF can, then your 4th OF probably should be able to fill in at CF.
I’d love to see it, but I kind of doubt it. I really think he’s getting taken in the Rule V draft.
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
Fail
It’s Rule 5, not Rule V.
If Albert played in the AFL, they’d have to rename it the AZ/NM Fall League, based on where his homers landed.
I thought it was the fifth sequel to Rule.
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
Ah’m not ah smart mayn.
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
I would really like to see him as our 25th man.
The way we have things set up on the bench for next year
UTL: Infiante
BUC: Ross
4OF: Diaz (maybe not if we don’t sign/promote two OFers)
INF: Hernandez?
Flex: Young would fit here as he could pinch run, draw a walk, backup all OF positions and in a pinch play some 2B.
i really think the braves should think about keeping sammons on the roster…that would free up ross for some more valuable PH ABs, but im not sure that would be worth losing another bench player or BP arm..
and i dont really like hernandez on the roster, i think we need a veteran prescense to at least backup esco…we already got alot of young guys
The free agent SS class fails to excite. We could get fantastic defense out of a guy like Adam Everett, if he’d actually accept a backup role, but he doesn’t exactly put a hurtin on ya with the bat. The ageless wonder Vizquel also could give you great defense, but he doesn’t hit for a lick anymore. Bobby Crosby maybe? I don’t know, I’m just spitballing here.
Vizquel would be great though, since he’d be the second backup infielder. You use Infante to spell guys and if Chipper needs to sit for a bit and Vizquel when you just need some late inning defense. I’d love to add him.
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
Also...
Diaz-RH
Infante-RH
Ross-RH
so Young’s left handed bat would be nice. Someone who can hit from the left side will certainly be on the bench.
Young
I think the analysis of Young is far too positive.
Here is a 26-year old who just sniffed AAA for the first time this year and performed poorly there (in limited ABs).
I also think the write-up misleads when it praises his CF ability. The available stats say otherwise, suggesting he’d be an above-average LF but CF is a stretch.
If Albert played in the AFL, they’d have to rename it the AZ/NM Fall League, based on where his homers landed.
Saying a guy can be a backup outfielder and pinch runner is too positive?
And I barely trust the defensive stats for the Major Leaguers, so I put no stock in the ones out there for the Minor Leaguers.
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
Saying a guy can be a backup outfielder and pinch runner is too positive?
Well, that’s not all you say. You list him as the Top CF prospect. You praise his “excellent” 2008 season, when he OPS’d in the 700s as a 25 year old LF in his third run at AA. You talk about his “excellent” range, but the stats say otherwise. The overall impression that I got from your write-up was that you went heavy on the positives and very light on the negatives.
I respect the amount of time you spend watching the Braves farmhands, and I think it makes for interesting posts. However, I do think that these write-ups do a disservice when they focus so heavily on the positives. It’s only human to want the guys that you see to succeed, especially the good guys among them. But in order to elevate your posts from the level of basic fandom to useful analysis, I think you should try to be more balanced.
Maybe you don’t want my feedback, but there it is anyway. (I also think you do yourself an incredible disservice by neglecting advanced fielding metrics, but that’s an old saw we don’t need to revisit.)
If Albert played in the AFL, they’d have to rename it the AZ/NM Fall League, based on where his homers landed.
Well, my personal list had Kyle Rose first, Cory Harrilchak second, and Young third. I was working with the consensus of the bloggers here that put Young first.
I hardly think the 13 games Young played for Mississippi in 06 and 33 for them in 07 should really be counted as “runs” at the level. If you don’t like the use of “excellent”, that’s fair, but for a guy with literally no pop, I think he had a great year, and he was the team MVP. Your repeated questioning of his range really isn’t swaying me, because I think he’s a great outfielder who covers a ton of ground. If somebody’s stats say otherwise, that’s fine, they can talk about that in their review.
The negatives are present; he’s too old, he doesn’t have any pop, and he’s inexperienced. The negatives are there for every guy, spelled out clearly. Why wouldn’t I want to highlight the positives? This is a Braves fan site and for a number of people things like this are their first extended look at some of these guys. Is is bad to say, “hey, these guys aren’t outstanding prospects, but they don’t suck either”? I don’t think so. There will always be somebody around to point out the negatives (case in point), and I have no problem doing so for guys I don’t think much of (look at Culver’s writeup again), but I think there’s nothing wrong with being positive.
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
The problem with being positive (as opposed to realistic) is that it diminishes the credibility of the claims.
If Albert played in the AFL, they’d have to rename it the AZ/NM Fall League, based on where his homers landed.
Again, not sure how I wasn’t being realistic. I didn’t set any of them up as surefire major leaguers, or even very worthwhile prospects. Hell, I said Young could be a defensive replacement and pinch runner; that’s not exactly unrealistic.
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
FWIW
The games I watched this summer Matt Young looked more than capable of covering CF. He took good routes and caught some balls I didn’t think he had any chance at. His bat may not be where the organization would like it to be and his arm strength is the greatest in the world but I don’t think range is an issue in his case.
where are you getting your stats? His OPS in AA this year was .827 and that was after a pretty slow start to the season. Just for reference the league OPS for the SL is like .720 which he bested last year as well. I honestly don’t think he should have started the season at AA again, but he did and he did extremely well there. No, Matt Young will never be more than a role player at the major league level, but yes right now I think he is our best CF prospect simply because of the guys that are left, 3 played horrible this season and the other two played in rookie ball, and I generally don’t rate people incredibly high until they have some full season experience under their belt, so Matt Young gets it by default in my book.
The problem I have run into with these top 5 lists is that since our depth is so poor in a lot of cases you are really stretching the term prospect in a lot of cases and trying to determine what becomes more important, likely impact vs likely potential.
where are you getting your stats?
Per B-Ref, Young had a 769 OPS in MS in 2008.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=young-001mat
If Albert played in the AFL, they’d have to rename it the AZ/NM Fall League, based on where his homers landed.
You're both right
He posted a .769 mark in 08, Yakker.
But yondaime is right, he put up .827 this year.
Looks like a sign of progress to me…
Cory Harrilchak
I got no real basis for this opinion, other than a general sense it is so, but mark me down as making the call:
This kid is going to be much better than expected as he moves up.
I think he will be at the Beach sometime next summer and then starting the 2011 season with Mississppi.
For a poor draft...
we certainly have a lot of guys from this year’s selections making our top 5 lists. I’m not sure if that says more about our draft, or current lack of quality prospects.
Or the fact that it wasn’t really poor.
"At least he didn’t nail the bitchy fat girl from Hell's Kitchen."
www.dropoutproductions.com
that was kind of my point...
for something that was so widely claimed a weak draft, it sure seems to have turned out well. Either that, or the Braves system is absolute crap.
i think the knock on the draft was very little upside… and i think these lists reflect that… most of the guys we got have a high chance of reaching their ceiling, but their ceiling is a serviceable ML player… there doesnt; appear to be a single stud player in the class..so it makes sense for these guys to be popping up on our lists, bc they were mostly college guys who are well polished
at least that was my 2 cents.
Heyward,Hanson,and Shaffer r ready now!! Why do you think they havent signed the "right handed bat"?
by fatazfoot on Jan 7, 2009 8:59 PM EST
a lot of the guys who are doing well are old for the league they finished the season up in so I’m going to reserve judgement on this draft class until next offseason. I don’t think it’s quite as awful as fans/scouts/prospect junkies made it out to be but I’d say it’s lacking big time in impact potential
by McCann's the Man on Oct 28, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions

by 























