Bill Ballew: Braves Prospect List Q&A 2009 (Part 2)
Here is the conclusion of our Atlanta Braves prospect Q&A with Baseball America's Bill Ballew. For Part 1 click here.
Q: Kris Medlen is a personal favorite of mine, and he did have a great year in 2008, but is he a major league pitcher? Do you think he'll ultimately end up in the rotation or the bullpen? Could he possibly close in the future if he winds up in the bullpen?
A: You have good tastes, because Medlen's also one of my favorites. While he was outstanding upon moving to the rotation last year at Mississippi, I see him more as a setup guy in the big leagues. He could be a swing guy as well, a spot starter should a doubleheader or two crop up, but a guy who is used mostly in the seventh or even the eighth inning. He definitely has the ability to pitch in the big leagues, but I don't see him being in the top half of Atlanta's rotation.
Q: Will Cole Rohrbough be the 2009 left-handed version of Tommy Hanson? Does Rohrbough have as high a ceiling as Hanson?
A: I think that's a strong possibility. Rohrbough bordered on being unhittable in 2007 before an ankle injury hindered him throughout most of the 2008 slate. He underwent reconstructive surgery in September on his ankle and is doing very well. Rohrbough truly has electric stuff from the left side. He's smart and knows how to pitch to go with an outstanding repertoire. He's also a bulldog. Most pitchers would not have thrown a pitch if they had the injury Rohrbough suffered last year. He's tough and should be healthy in 2009, which could put him on the fast track in a big way.
Q: Does Jordan Schafer have what it takes to be an everyday player in the major leagues right now? Who do you think will ultimately be a more valuable center fielder, Schafer or Gorkys Hernandez?
A: Defensively, without a question Schafer could man the middle garden for the Braves right now. And if he's given a chance, say at least 150-200 at-bats at the top of the lineup, I believe he could make the necessary adjustments to be a leadoff hitter right now in the big leagues. I don't see that happening just yet, however. Gregor Blanco was somewhat of a surprise last year, and the Braves need to give Josh Anderson an extended look. Long-term, Blanco is a fourth outfielder at best, while the jury is still out on Anderson due to his lack of opportunity. Schafer went through a lot of emotional ups and downs in 2008, which is understandable, and it wasn't until the end of the season before he was back to his normal self. A stint at Triple-A would be best for him, but a mid-season promotion could be just what the doctor ordered. As far as Hernandez is concerned, he too has outstanding potential, but for some reason I get the feeling his future might be with another organization. Just a hunch. Some scouts question his true age, but nevertheless there is no question he is a solid defender who can make things happen on offense. But with Schafer on board and Anderson still maintaining some potential, I wouldn't be surprised if Hernandez is included in a trade for a player like Xavier Nady.
Q: Can Brandon Jones and Josh Anderson be everyday major league outfielders? Should the Braves take a chance on them and put them in their opening day lineup?
A: I like Anderson's potential better than Jones'. Anderson has a fire; in football, it would be classified as a non-stop motor. He is disruptive on the base paths and is an above-average defender. If given the chance, I think he would be much more than adequate as a center fielder. Jones is a solid athlete, but it seems as if all parts of his game are rarely clicking at the same time. He's not particularly fast, and his power comes and goes, particularly from a long ball standpoint. He also strikes out too much, and needs to improve his approach at the plate in order to become an adequate hitter as a starter. His defense is good enough but not exceptional in left field. I believe Jones still has some value, but my gut tells me he won't turn the corner and emerge as a starter with the Braves.
Q: What is the biggest strength of the Braves minor league system? The biggest weakness?
A: The strength is the depth of pitching from Double-A down and the development of several potent hitters, particularly in the outfield. The likes of Heyward and Freeman don't come around often, and players such as Schafer, Hernandez, Johnson, Hicks, Eric Campbell and a handful of others are pretty impressive. The biggest weakness is a lack of everyday infielders who could become long-term solutions. This excludes Freeman at first base. While Hicks is without question the highlight at the other three positions, the cupboard is relatively bare otherwise.
Many thanks to Bill Ballew for taking the extra time to answer these questions. I hope you thoroughly enjoyed his answers, I especially enjoyed what he had to say about Medlen and Rohrbough, and his insider info on Gorkys.
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I feel the same way as Bill here about Anderson, but it took this interview and Bill’s words on Anderson for me to figure out why I liked him over Blanco and want to see him given a chance in CF and at the top of the order. I know that makes me in the minority here and I don’t have stats to back up my feelings, its just a gut instinct(combined with the fact I’d like to see Schafer get some time at AAA before being thrown in the big time).
-1000 for being a dick.
I’m with you on Anderson. I think it’d be fun to have a guy like him at the top of the order again.
www.dropoutproductions.com
Where were ya’ll when I was being gang raped by everyone on this board for throwing Anderson’s name out there. I believe my statement of the possibilities of Infante snagging some ABs against lefties in CF caught the originally drift, but Anderson turned into the whole Corey Patterson and Adam Dunn fiasco…
...catsports...
by bwellnjonesco on Jan 31, 2009 9:31 PM EST up reply actions
Well you choosing Patterson over Dunn was ridiculous…
I never saw that, I’ve always been for Anderson. I think both he and Blanco are great guys and good players, but Anderson’s speed is an asset that I don’t think Blanco’s better on base skills can compete with. Speed creates havoc and it’s a huge asset to have a guy like that at the top of the order.
www.dropoutproductions.com
If you could just combine Anderson’s skills with Blanco’s, you could have a really good centerfielder/catalyst leadoff hitter.
I like Anderson’s speed and energy as well but Ballew is in the minority opinion on Anderson being a starter. Anderson’s on-base ability is the problem. If he can’t post a .340 OBP, he has no value as a starter and at 26 he is nearly a finished product. Anderson is definitely worth a look but he has a big step to take to not be a liability as an everyday player in the leadoff spot. It would be nice to find another CF option who hit lefties well to platoon in CF and the leadoff spot with either of the Gregosh Blanderson duo.
"Fools rush in where fools have been before"
by jeg on Feb 1, 2009 1:12 AM EST up reply actions
Sure I’m not rooting against him, and I’d love for him to be our lead off hitter, but I only see Anderson as a placeholder for Schafer, and not being able to hold down the position on a long term basis.
He had a K% of 24% last year, as well as a poor .24 BB/K ratio. Granted, this was in 136 AB, and he performed better in AAA last year, but it worries me that he won’t be able to adjust to major league pitching. His BABIP is also enormous. While this could be helped by his LHness + his speed, you have to wonder if it will come back to earth. And with a OBP of .340 in the majors last year, any coming back to earth would mean him definitely becoming below average.
His basestealing is definitely a plus and somewhat makes up for his lack of power, but I wonder about the coaching staff’s motivation to use it. Maybe they’ll give him the green light, but I’m skeptical. I think he might have a chance to win the job out of ST, and yeah, he might be a better option than Greg White to be the full time CF at the beginning of the year (while leaving Blanco/Jones to be the 4th and 5th outfielders), I really don’t see him as a long term solution. Perhaps it would be nice to let him build value and try and trade him (if we’re not in contention, that is) when Schafer is ready for the big leagues.
by soup du jour on Jan 31, 2009 10:34 PM EST up reply actions
I figured out during a discussion about a week and a half ago that Anderson stole a base roughly 20% of the time he got on last year with Atlanta, which is pretty much what he’s done throughout his career, so I’d say they definitely gave him the green light.
I think you’re right, he’s not a long term answer in center, that’s obviously Jordan Schafer. But, if things go like they have and we still don’t have a power hitting left fielder, it’d be nice to let Anderson play beside a Diaz/Blanco platoon until Schafer is ready. You’d have to assume that Schafer could equal the power output of the platoon and add speed and defense to boot. The Braves haven’t had speed or consistency at the top of the order and it’d be nice to see if Anderson could provide that.
www.dropoutproductions.com
Thats been around for awhile.
But your sig made me chuckle. Somehow haven’t heard that one, very nice +1
SWAGGA LIKE BJONES, SWAGGA LIKE BJONES
JOE-BO FOR THE BENCH IN 09
I’ve called him Greg for years. I’m really looking forward to seeing him in Spring Training, since I haven’t seen him since he made his debut.
www.dropoutproductions.com
During spring, I plan on busting out TC nicknames left and right.
That won’t get me very far, will it?
SWAGGA LIKE BJONES, SWAGGA LIKE BJONES
JOE-BO FOR THE BENCH IN 09
You never know man, the guys appreciate creativity. I think Norton would like “The Rake”. Though I’d suggest if you explain “FYF” to Francoeur you use the nice version.
www.dropoutproductions.com
Great Stuff -Question on Rohrbough
gondee, congrats on a really good read.
I got chills reading the comments on Rohrbough, but I’m a little confused. I thought he missed the early part of ‘08 with a “sore elbow” and that was what hindered him. Maybe I’m out of the loop, but I never heard about ankle reconstruction. Anyone else?
I think he may have had the arm problem at the beginning of the year and that it was caused by changing his delivery because of the ankle injury. He did have the reconstruction surgery back in September and supposedly is doing great. And he just became a dad for the first time!
www.dropoutproductions.com
thanks… I did not know that! Good for him, on the surgery and of course the baby. It’s all good!
by MikeinAtlanta on Jan 31, 2009 9:31 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t like the Nady for Gorkys trade he’s projecting. At this point, I feel like BJones/Diaz platoon or other combination can put up stats just as good as Nady would put up for one year.
He only says “someone like Nady.” I don’t think it was a “prediction”. I think the point is, Braves aren’t likely to hold on to two natural CF’s longterm, and if Schafer can do the job in CF, Gorky’s is probably trade bait somewhere along the line.
I’m not in favor of giving him up for one year of anybody, though.
by MikeinAtlanta on Jan 31, 2009 9:16 PM EST up reply actions
I like what I hear about Rohrbough, and Medlen. I like Anderson too, but when you throw him with Schafer, Jones, and Diaz, it looks like we have a lot of guys who are serious platoon hitters. Even if we don’t land a good OF bat, I think we could eek by on platooning until something better comes along or someone steps it up.
Nice write up.
Hopefully we can keep a productive and healthy infield for years to comes. Chipper, Escobar, Johnson and McCann should be viable for several seasons yet. Resigning Chipper will be our biggest hurdle. Johnson’s defense may also come into play at some point. However, we can always put him in left in favor of Prado. Kotchman may also need to be replaced if he doesn’t produce this season, and If he does, I’d imagine he would become trade bait in the not to distant future.
Hopefully our pitching and outfield depth will allow us to snag a few young infield prospects in the future.
/incoherent babbling off.
Rohrbough
It sound like Rohrbough is going to be a solid #2 with a Smoltzies like approach to pitching….Man I can Imagine the top off the rotation with Hanson/Rohrbough/JJ could be the next Maddux/Glavine/Smoltz 1-2-3 pitching domination for the next decade….Things looking good for the future Rotation
Hanson
Rohrbough
JJ
Locke
we still need to sign a FA… becuase we got the steal trade for a prospect from the Tiger (jurrjens, smoltz)… we got the developed prospect (glavine, rohrborough/hanson)… we need to sign a emergin star P that is a Boras client..
lets hear some names guys… lets go down the same road exactly.
"We win today, that's two in a row... if we win tomorrow, that's called a winning streak. It has happened before..."
Technically...
Jurrjens could be the Boras client and we could take the Tigers to the cleaners again.
fair enough… but we signed a Boras client in Maddux… so we need to do the same again?
"We win today, that's two in a row... if we win tomorrow, that's called a winning streak. It has happened before..."
Well here's my thinking
This time around we could sign any emerging pitcher because we already have the Boras part down pat.
fair enough… but i was really looking for a carbon copy of the previous big three
…..this is slowly slipping into a meaningless discussion
"We win today, that's two in a row... if we win tomorrow, that's called a winning streak. It has happened before..."
Well...
Best I can guess is Micah Owings. He went to Tech… but I’m not sure there’s a Maddux among the Boras clients.

by 



















