Bobby is Baaaaaaaack!
ESPN has the story up now.
No shocking developments in the story, though there is a little nugget at the end that caught my attention.
Despite the team's record, Cox feels he's still got plenty to offer from the dugout.
"Everybody is used to winning around here," he said. "But I'm probably better now than I've ever been."
I would offer some evidence to the contrary:
Johnson, Kelly (Inane vendetta)
Boyer, Blaine (Appearances)
Francoeur, Jeff (Batting order).
Oh well, I guess the "he gets to retire when he wants" schtick is still legit enough to win over a couple hearts and minds.
*UPDATE*
Explain your votes. You drive-by "yes" voters must flesh out your logic.
0 recs |
75 comments
Comments
those who say yes, explain yourselves. i really wanna hear logic thats not centered around usual bullshit of “HE WON 14 STRAIGHT DIVISION TITLES! HE’S A LEGEND! yada yada yada”
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Sep 10, 2008 10:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I said ‘yes’ and honestly, I can’t give you any answer other than, he’s Bobby Cox. That’s just how it is. If Bobby wants to manage the Atlanta Braves, I’m all for it. There’s no logical explanation, no statistical evidence, that’s just how I feel about it.
Am I happy about the current state of the major league team? No, of course not. Had I been expecting a stretch like this to happen since about 2002? Sure, it’s sports in the modern era. There are ups and down. I think the Braves’ problems involve a lot of things, Bobby Cox, Frank Wren, John Schuerholz, Liberty Media, Time Warner, Ted Turner, Bud Selig, George Steinbrenner, Scott Boras, the state of money and baseball in general, and the luck of the draw with injuries and performance.
Maybe another manager could come in and do a better job, though I don’t care who you are, take John Smoltz, Tim Hudson, Tom Glavine, Peter Moylan, and Rafael Soriano off your pitching staff for large parts of the season and you’re going to have some problems too. For me though, if Bobby wants to manage, let him do it.
by cbwilk on Sep 10, 2008 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Feel the same way
It was the perfect storm for us to do terrible this year. We had a staff of old guys for the rotation and we were plugging in a guy who hadn’t pitched in 2 and a half years. Then the injuries came which showed how our depth wasn’t deep enough for the mounting disabled list that grew by the minute. I think that everything that could go wrong did and it wouldn’t matter who was the manager we were not gonna be in any race under the circumstances and I feel that BC shouldn’t leave the team under this state after he has spent so many years putting them as targuably the best franchise for well over a decade.
by H0SS on Sep 10, 2008 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree, up to a point
Bobby is certainly not to be blamed for the rash of injuries, but I think his issues run much deeper than just that.
Just to expound on one major issue is his misuse of the bullpen. I don’t care who is or isn’t on the roster, there is absolutely no excuse to run the same guys out there over and over again. Boyer is the most glaring case of this. Here is a guy who has already had arm surgery, hasn’t had a lot of innings anyway, and is probably not the best option for the bullpen anyway since he isn’t that good. Bobby, however, runs him into the game over and over again for no reason and with no sense of the situation. Mop-up duty and close and late situation both had Boyer being run out there.
This, along with the senseless ping-ponging of Kelly Johnson up and down the lineup; not to mention the random benchings in favor of Prado. It is senseless.
No manager probably could have won with the team and injuries we had this year, but still, Bobby is no longer a young man, and he makes odd decisions. Not that we need to fire him, but a promotion to special assistant to the GM would be nice. He still does have some sense of talent, but his managerial skills are iffy at times.
by mburris1 on Sep 11, 2008 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will say, I can’t defend Bobby in any way for his use of Boyer. He’s ruining that kid’s career and hurting the Braves in a lot of games. He’ll probably get non tendered after the season. The same thing happened with Royce Ring; he was great as a situational lefty but got overused to the point that he didn’t even rejoin the team in September and might also get nontendered.
by cbwilk on Sep 11, 2008 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Take all the good points, whydon'tcha?
I will say that no manager could overcome this many injuries and take this team to the playoffs. When your starter goes 3 innings and gives up 5 or 6 runs, you’re more often than not, gonna lose that game. But its the games that the Braves coulda won that tell on Bobby, and thats where these items like Boyer, Francouer, and Kelly come into play. Early in the season it was obvious that Kelly shouldn’t be hitting leadoff, and how long did it take to make that change? 2 months? Then, Yunel shouldn’t hit leadoff and Blanco should. 2 more months before that change. Corky Miller, who started over Sammons Sunday btw. Bennetts trip to the DL was a blessing, otherwise he’d have 200 innings by now. Francoeur’s consecutive games streak going well into this season. Norton becoming the left fielder for a time. This team isn’t a bunch of veterans who just need to be cheered, its young guys who need to be taught how to play the game, and be held accountable. Does everyone remember what people (Smoltz included) said about Leo Mazzone after he left? He was great with the veterans, but this team is heading in a different direction, and Leo wasn’t good at developing pitchers, he was good at repairing veterans. I feel this has become the case with Bobby. These guys don’t play good fundamental baseball, and that all comes back to the manager. Anyone who has seen them attempt a bunt can agree. This is a team going in a new direction, and they need a new leader to guide them that way.
by 10-4 on Sep 11, 2008 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The fact that Brandon Jones cant get down a bunt, or that Jo-Jo Reyes cant consistently throw strikes is not because Cox isnt good at handling young players. people comment all the time about the braves way of teaching baseball throughout their minor leagues, and their comments are about how they play the game the right way. That is a direct reflection of Bobby.
Yes he over used Boyer, and Ohman. Maybe Kelly should have been moved out of the leadoff spot (although last year he had a great OBP out of the leadoff spot and that is probably a better indicator than 2 months of this season would be.) And yes he may have stuck with Frenchy for too long.
But at some point all those one run losses and close games have to put on the shoulders of the players and not just the manager. Maybe just maybe it is Kelly’s fault that he is so damn streaky, and when he is going bad you cant fault Bobby for taking him out of the lineup. And with an outfield that included Blanco with no power, and Kotsay with no power, You cant blame Cox for sticking with Frenchy who would have been this teams best chance at production from the outfield.
by gopherbroke on Sep 11, 2008 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes it feels like Bobby has a double standard. Sticks with Frenchy, but ping pong platoons Kelly even though he’s had a better track record. It’s the falling in love with a player thing that people talk about. Sometimes he’s too loyal to the wrong people, and not loyal enough to others.
Just bad bullpen management too. Like Acosta for 2.1 inning saves that he inevitable blows and completely forgetting about players like Stockman and Devine.
I agree with you that a lot of the one run losses are the players fault for the complete inability to hit in those situations. The problem is that Bobby has cost us more close games than a manager should.
Bobby’s a great, great motivator, but he’s not a good strategist.
by VictorW on Sep 11, 2008 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We have a winner
Couldn’t have said it better.
by Sparhawk on Sep 11, 2008 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow
alot more yes answers than expected. I like Bobby and believe he should never be fired but the front office should try to at least give him a nugch(dont know how to spell it) so that Bobby knows its time to step down at the end of his contract. I respect what Bobby has done for the Braves when he was GM and manager but last year and this year he has been a very bad manager. His bullpen management is flat out maddening. Our dang bullpen is flat out worn out by the All Star break and for some reason never played Devine last year and then never played Stockman much this year when he was up.
braves#1
by rockybull on Sep 10, 2008 10:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sweet Fancy Pujols...
nudge, nudge, nudge. Find a place for him, but not in the dugout! Competition in the NL requires better management than we’ve seen from BC the last two years.
by BBFAN46 on Sep 11, 2008 7:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No problem. I got a degree in English. I have to try not to fix every little misspelling or gramatical inconsistency.
by cbwilk on Sep 11, 2008 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
grammatical
absolutely could not resist…….
by secondbass on Sep 11, 2008 5:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And right there is why I resist, because I’m as bad as anybody. Nice one.
by cbwilk on Sep 11, 2008 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah....me, too
I re-read and re-read that little post just to be sure!
by secondbass on Sep 11, 2008 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As I was writing it, I was thinking, ‘I guarantee there’s something wrong here.’
by cbwilk on Sep 11, 2008 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well.....
I went back to that last one and put the commas between ‘me’ and ‘too’ because it’s technically correct, but notice I left off end punctuation.
Sheesh!
by secondbass on Sep 11, 2008 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Personally, I do my best to pretend to be smart by having a built in spellchecker in my browser.
by VictorW on Sep 11, 2008 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted yes because he does a solid job of handling everything. There are no fights that break out, there are no players who act up or unprofessional like most other teams, most players are performing to their expectations, and I rarely disagree with his handling of the bullpen or bench. Not to mention that players love him and want to play for him (could be a key part of persuading a free agent); and I honestly feel that no other manager would have performed significantly better.
I’m not saying Bobby wrangled out the most wins than another manager, but I think the club performed to a realistic level given the injuries and underperformances – which I don’t think are all his fault. Bottom line, I think it’s completely unnecessary to fire Bobby. The fan backlash would be ridiculous and it wouldn’t help the club significantly – if at all. The players would be unhappy, it could potentially decrease attendance, and firing someone usually creates unwanted attention in the media.
Also, I hate to pull out the none of us are in the clubhouse card, but it’s certainly true. I mean, how do we really know what kind of job he’s doing? Based on putting Boyer in the game instead of Acosta? The lineup? There are more to a manager than we see, and it’s something that the players and upper management sees. And by their account, he’s doing an outstanding job so you have to believe them.
by beeniez on Sep 11, 2008 12:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Every single player in that braves dugout talks about how great it is to play for Bobby. Yeah he has over used Boyer, but early on in the year Boyer and Ohman was really all he had out in the pen.
Consider this, If Cox leaves this year, those of you who want Smoltz back can forget it, and who the hell knows what Chipper will do. He has said publicly in the past that he may just retire when Cox does.
by gopherbroke on Sep 11, 2008 9:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
but right now, we’ve got like 10 arms in the pen. and he still uses boyer & ohman
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Sep 11, 2008 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont disagree with that, but Boyer is getting much more time off now (Only 3 appearances in Sept.) And Ohman has had this kind of workload in the past. That is where he differs from Boyer. Ohman threw 10 more innings in 06 than he has currently.
by gopherbroke on Sep 11, 2008 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To be fair...
Those names include Jorge Julio, Vladimir Nunez, and Julian Tavarez; Garbage. If we actually want to win games then Ohman and Boyer are two of our better options.
I voted yes simply because I don’t think changing the manager from Bobby would have/will net us any more wins; I think its a personnel issue, with underperformance and injuries.
by soup du jour on Sep 11, 2008 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
why should we wanna win games? this is pretty much already set in stone as our worst year in 18 years, so why not go for broke and just tank the rest of the season to get in better position to get mr strasberg?
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Sep 11, 2008 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because I’d rather see improvement from the team via wins than getting a few spots in the draft.
by soup du jour on Sep 11, 2008 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So bobby should be fired because we were losing games earlier, but now he should be fired because he is trying to win games…
by gopherbroke on Sep 11, 2008 10:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How bout a poll: Should Frank Wren stay as GM?
Then everyone should be voting no.
by jjcollins on Sep 11, 2008 10:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Really?
…because I’d vote yes in a heartbeat. Picked up Redmond, Infante, Ohman, Josh Anderson, Greg Norton, and Jorge Campillo for Tyler Yates, Jose Asciano, Oscar Villareal, and some cash. A potential future rotation member, a great utility guy, a good lefty reliever, a good 4th OF, a very good PH, and a guy that’s been a solid arm for our rotation for what amounts to three extra bullpen arms and a few hundred thousand bucks. Sure the Kotsay/Ridgeway trades weren’t that great and we should have had another SP, but I think he’s done a fine job.
by bravesfan91 on Sep 11, 2008 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What’s everyone’s problem with Greg Norton? Since the beginning of July, he’s hit for a .296 average, a. 531 slugging percentage, a .400 on base percentage and driven in 15 runs, mainly as a pinch hitter. He’s been more productive than any player on the bench, more productive than most players the Braves have had on their bench for the last five years, and he was aquired for Nelson Payano, a journeyman lefty who’s not doing anything for Seattle’s AA team. Is everybody mad that he started for a week when other guys were hurt? Cause that’s just odd.
by cbwilk on Sep 11, 2008 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I’m all for re-signing Norton as our main pinch hitter next year. He’ll be cheap and we can focus on other worries. I think he’s done a great job when used as that. Its when Bobby trotted him out there as a starter in left field that he became exposed as bench players often do.
by 10-4 on Sep 11, 2008 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ditto
Norton’s fine in a PH role. Not so much as an everyday player.
by matches on Sep 11, 2008 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah..
….to bad Bobby will miss use him and have him start.
Thats the problem, Bobby gives him to many at bats. If he were just a PH and nothing more that would be great. But it’s not, he miss uses Norton all the friggin’ time.
by RainDelay on Sep 11, 2008 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reminds me Julio Franco last year
When we picked him up, he became the starting 1B for a while. I love these type of savvy vets as pinch hitters, but no reason to start them regularly except for the occasional off day for a starter.
by VictorW on Sep 11, 2008 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Norton has had 2 starts since Aug.1
The only time he was in there regularly was when the braves were grasping for straws in the outfield because no one was hitting.
by gopherbroke on Sep 11, 2008 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
SMALL SAMPLE SIZE ALERT!
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Sep 11, 2008 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Norton’s career is a small sample size. That’s his role. The whole point is that he can be successful over a small sample size. I have no doubt in my mind that over an extended period Norton would be a well below average major leaguer.
by cbwilk on Sep 12, 2008 2:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted yes...
…I’ve seen the managers they’ve trotted out in the past, Russ Nixon anyone? Or how about Joe Torre? There’s a lot of spoiled fans floating around that don’t know what it was like to sit through miserable year after year, the last couple of years are nothing but a blip on the radar when it comes to how bad the Braves can really be.
In that 14 year run I’ve always waited for the other foot to drop, took longer than I expected but it did fall.
by RainDelay on Sep 11, 2008 11:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough, but...
The idea that “it could always be worse” is no excuse for discounting the argument that “it could always be better.” It is just a cop out.
Of course it could be worse. Until they fire up the LHC in a couple weeks and the world ends, there will always be a worse option. That is no way to go about living life or running a baseball team.
by mburris1 on Sep 11, 2008 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
in 3 years, joe torre finished 1, 2, 2. then he was shitcanned. don’t mention him among our horrible managers
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Sep 11, 2008 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was worse than bobby..
..when it came to inane in game tactical moves.
Torre was a shitty with the Braves. Period.
by RainDelay on Sep 11, 2008 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As far as I’m concerned Bobby should stay as long as he wants. Clearly he has his weaknesses as a manager – bullpen use comes to mind. He IMO does a very good job, though, of managing people. Most problems are dealt with in private. He rarely if ever rips players in the papers. 95% of the players who play for him love him, but there’s never any question that he is in charge. We have had perhaps the most tranquil, most professionally run clubhouse in baseball for the last two decades, and he is the key reason why.
As an in-game strategist – he’s not the best. He’s been outmanuevered pretty badly several times in the postseason. But IMO he’s a big reason we were there in the first place.
by matches on Sep 11, 2008 4:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would make the argument
that the reason we were in the playoffs was superior talent.
Bobby as a manager of people is a good point, but ultimately, being a manager of a team is what drives the team to wins. Not that this team is built to win now, I think we all agree it isn’t, but Bobby has still done irreparable damage to at least one guys career in Boyer, and maybe a couple others.
Ultimately his job isn’t to be everybody’s buddy, it is to handle the roster in a way that is good for the organization.
by mburris1 on Sep 11, 2008 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Irreperable damage may be a little over dramatic. Dont just assume because he has been over used this year that his career is over. That is just unfounded.
by gopherbroke on Sep 11, 2008 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, he is definitely a non-tender candidate
Also, he already had one arm surgery. If his overuse does any damage that causes him to need another surgery, he’d be a reclamation project at best, assuming he got any offers in the first place.
Overdramatic, maybe. Plausible, yes.
by mburris1 on Sep 11, 2008 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Definitely plausible yes, I agree. But one could argue that it is also plausible that all the work he had this year will make his arm stronger, and he will be better equiped to handle a full season load next year.
But that being said, he has the 3rd worst ERA in the NL currently for releivers, and that is because of overuse. So for this season I agree that Bobby hurt the pen by overusing Boyer. Ohman as well showed signs of tiring, but has pitched fairly well recently.
But if Bobby would have been able to use Soriano, and Moylan, all season then Boyer wouldnt have been overused. When you have to choose between your 3rd option who is tired, or 6th-7th options the choice isnt an easy one. The fact that the Starting Rotation has been unable to provide consistent innings all year because of injury (Smoltz, Glavine, Hampton) or because of ineffectiveness (Glavine, Jo-Jo, Charlie, etc.) Also forced Cox’s hand. Someone has to go out there and pitch. And everyone else sucks.
by gopherbroke on Sep 11, 2008 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
superior talent
Don’t you think that’s kind of a fait accompli? Most teams who win have superior talent – even teams with superior talent can self-destruct for internal reasons that may not be readily apparent to fans. (See the Mets earlier this year.) For 12-13 years we had superior talent and didn’t blow up. For a few years after that (‘04-’05), we arguably didn’t have superior talent and still did pretty well.
If we’re going to blame Bobby when things go bad, we also have to give him some of the credit when things go well.
by matches on Sep 12, 2008 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does IMO mean ‘in my opinion’? This is why I hate text messaging.
by cbwilk on Sep 12, 2008 2:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good arguments, but...
it doesn’t matter who the manager is — until we get at least two dependable starters we will continue to do battle with the Nats for the lower rungs of the NL East ladder.
by BBFAN46 on Sep 17, 2008 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DOESNT IT FEEL GREAT TO BLAME SOMEONE
I do have to agree that Bobby may be a fault for a lot of brave’s losses over the years, and is starting to remind me of JoePa (legendary Penn state coach in case anyone is uneducated). But you do have to give him his respect and the time he has earned as a braves manager. But I would like to ask anyone’s thought on our wonderful ex-GM John Schuerholz, and current GM Frank Wren. I feel a MLB manager can only do so much with what he has available. And ownership (turner and however many more we have had) has always kept the braves pretty low on payroll, I know. But there has been several moves especially in the last few seasons that really shot the braves in the foot before the season began. Smoltzie said it best when you look at the roster of old farts that we were actually were going to try to make a run at the playoffs with. And you look at some of the teams we had in the 90’s when we were running the national league, other than pitching I never really thought we were that good in comparison to other leading teams talent. So dibs have to go somewhere and I think that is Bobby Cox.
by dabraves on Sep 11, 2008 9:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Enough already.
..I think you’re pouring it on now so’s to really just be a royal ass and a pain in our collective backsides.
by RainDelay on Sep 12, 2008 4:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Out of curiosity
Every time I re-check this thread, there is at least one reasoning of Bobby’s faults pointed at Jeff Francoeur. What my curiosity is, is how much of Francoeur being used when he should be benched is on Cox, and how much of it is on management? Francoeur’s (probably prematurely), like it or not, one of the faces of the franchise, and I’m curious to hypothesize that there is a good bit of his constant starting time in relation to this fact.
Sure there are times when it’s clear that Bobby’s sticking with someone, like when he trots out Macay McBride to “get some work,” because there’s no way the organizational management group gives two turds about him. But with Francoeur, whose tied into Delta, local TV commercials, Chic-Fil-A, I’m wondering if management feels that it’s a bad move to have him not play and be on television. After all, logic is one thing, but baseball is still a money-making endeavor for the owners and management, and many don’t seem to realize that fans care more about winning over all else. When he was demoted, it was management’s call; I would imagine sticking with him would be similar.. .
Or maybe Bobby’s in love with his laser rocket arm, or his boyish Southern good looks. Who knows, but a part of me doesn’t want to believe that Bobby wouldn’t have benched him sooner if it were 100% his call.
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
by royhobbs on Sep 12, 2008 8:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Last night was a good example.
Francouer comes up with the bases loaded twice, and once with 2 men on, and goes 0-3. Bobby pinch hits Infante for Anderson, and Blanco for B Jones, and FYF stays in the game. I know the Blanco thing worked, but still. Whaaat? To me its a dead giveaway, but i do agree that the Braves screwed themselves by marketing him so much. And that may have something to do with it.
I remember when Jeff’s games streak was still alive, Bobby would give quotes about it with things like: “Well Jeff comes to play every day.” What young player doesn’t? We never got the quote :“Well, Kelly loves being platooned.”
by 10-4 on Sep 12, 2008 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have a friend who is two generations older than I, and has been following baseball very closely his entire life. As you might imagine, during that time, he has gained some experience in how the game works both on and off the field. One of his favorite sayings when it comes to roster moves is “it’s a business decision first, then a baseball one.”
I believe that’s exactly what we’re dealing with here, as royhobbs stated.
by VegasAces on Sep 12, 2008 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frenchy won’t turn things around sitting on the bench. He’s not starting every single game anymore, which is a good thing, but reducing him to a once or twice a week role won’t get it done. Like many, i wish they’d left him at AA a bit longer so he’d have time to actually fix things, but what’s done is done.
by matches on Sep 12, 2008 11:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
WHY?
Why would any Braves fan want Bobby Cox back? This team is not going to win unless it picks up a dominating pitcher and gets some power in the outfield. It won’t be happening. Someone has to shake this team up and let the brass know that picking up a 40 year old pitcher is not going to bring a championship.
Secondly, what coach goes to the playoffs 14 straight seasons or whatever it was, and only wins one damn world series. Bobby Cox is one of the most overrated coaches out there.
It’s time to get someone new in there. I cannot even watch this team anymore. It makes me sick.
thelandryhat.com New Coach, Same America's Team
by thelandryhat on Sep 14, 2008 11:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's an insult!
…To the baby. At least the baby’s a baby. He has an excuse. But really, is there anything more tired than “He only won one WS in 14 tries”? I mean, wouldn’t we all give our left (or right) testicle for a division title and a shot at a WS title right about now?
by buzzdeadwax on Sep 15, 2008 12:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Come on, you only need one. They have prosthetics now anyway. I’d totally give up left for some World Series action.
by cbwilk on Sep 16, 2008 6:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you got rid of your left one for a World Series run, what would become of the right one? Would it still be the “right one” or would it become the “center one” or would it just simply be “one?”
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
by royhobbs on Sep 16, 2008 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It depends on the person, I think
One person could give up the left, then the right would just move on over to the left side. Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future.
by buzzdeadwax on Sep 16, 2008 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve wondered that about my ovaries, too. Well, ovary as the case is….
Ah, shoot, now I’ve ruined my joke about giving up my testicles…
by Lizziebeth on Sep 16, 2008 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I were gondeee...
…I’d be a raging, psychotic alcoholic
…this is where I’d say “thread’s closed.”
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
by royhobbs on Sep 16, 2008 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sheesh!!
I thought you had more balls than tha….whoaaaaa, wait a minute…
:)
(it’s all just biology, right?)
by Lizziebeth on Sep 16, 2008 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Being an older guy...
NO, mine is a little more precious than that!
by BBFAN46 on Sep 17, 2008 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















