Midseason Trade?
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
Trade
If we trade anyone it should be Tex because he is gonna be useless to us after this year because there is no way in hell he’s gonna resign with us so we might as well get some prospects back like maybe some pitching.
by jjcollins on May 17, 2008 7:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If He Walks...
He’ll go to a team with an unprotected first round pick, because those are the most likely to splurge on a big free agent. That pick would then be ours, along with an additional “sandwich” pick between the first and second rounds, I believe. When you consider the sandwich pick we got for Mahay’s free agent contract with the Royals, that’s three top-40 or so picks to restock our farm system. If those replace the three lower level prospects we sent to the Rangers in the trade, we essentially traded two top prospects for a couple months of quality lefty relief during a playoff run and 1.5 seasons of Tex in his prime. That, I believe, is a fair deal. We may have overpaid by a prospect, but we had no leverage and a fanbase that is proving why the deal was necessary with their lack of patience this season. Besides, what would we get for half a season of Tex if everyone knows we’d only shop him because we have no chance of resigning him? He’s also struggling pretty badly so far this year…
Please check out my blog at http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/ , now redesigned and recommited!
by ejruiz on May 18, 2008 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Max Ramirez for Bob Wickman
I realize we had an excess of catchers which seemingly made Max expendable, but even then I didn’t like the trade. As of today, ol’ Max’s line looks like this:
.382 (52 hits in 136 ABs) 8HR, 27 RBI, .456 OBP, .662 LG, 1.117 OPS
My reaction is to say, man, could we ever stand to have him back at least as trade bait, which is really what we used him for before anyway. I guess we got our player’s worth for the moment in Wickman, but boy, did that stink in the long run! And yes, we have McCann for a while, and he’s great and all, but what other catching prospects do we have? Sammons is servicable, I guess. Isn’t there a Japanese catcher around the system somewhere?
by secondbass on May 17, 2008 7:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Third Base
Also a glaring void in the system. Here’s hoping Gilmore takes the reins….
by secondbass on May 17, 2008 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Max.
He sure can hit, but can he play defense? He was moved behind the plate by the Braves and he’s been able to hit there in the minors, but reports are his defense won’t hold up for the position in the majors. He’ll likely end up at 1B or, even more likely from what I’ve heard, DH.
I didn’t mind the Wicky trade at the time and, honestly, I still don’t. We used Max as we were gonna use him (tradebait) and it worked out as well as it could have in the short term. It has to make you somewhat suspicious that he would continue to rake for the Indians, yet they too dealt him for a rental (Lofton) without much fanfare. I’m guessing it’ll be another year or two before he’s a regular in the majors and we’ll see what he really is then. For every Max Ramirez, there’s always an Andy Marte, so I’m not torn up about it.
Please check out my blog at http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/ , now redesigned and recommited!
by ejruiz on May 18, 2008 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe we can fleece the Yankees for one of their young pitching prospects for MIKE HAMPTON OR CHUCK JAMES!!!
by bigjoe on May 17, 2008 10:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I Like It.
I’m sure that once Cashman is out or the Yanks make a run at the Wild Card, Hank will force him to make a move. If we can get one of their young pitchers at a reasonable cost (most likely as the third team in a bigger trade) I’d be fine with that. I know you’re probably kinding, but both Hampton and Chucky could pass through waivers unclaimed right now. I’m still hoping they convert James to relief, cause that’s his last chance to be effective.
Please check out my blog at http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/ , now redesigned and recommited!
by ejruiz on May 18, 2008 1:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we keep playing .500 baseball
The Tex trade talks will begin to heat up.
by Jay212033 on May 17, 2008 10:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
For What?
You think we do better in the trade market than the two draft picks (firt round and sandwich) that we get if he walks as a Type A free agent? If we shop him, people will know it’s because we acknowledge our inability to keep him, costing us leverage. He’ll be a pure rental for a couple of months, intent on testing free agency in the offseason, hurting his value further. If we’re still hovering around .500, I’m gonna go ahead and assume he’s still having a sub-par season… you get what I’m getting at. Trading Tex is a bigger pipe dream than resigning him.
Please check out my blog at http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/ , now redesigned and recommited!
by ejruiz on May 18, 2008 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're probably right, but...
I think Wren will listen to offers; as he should.
by BBFAN46 on May 20, 2008 7:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Thoughts (Yeah, I Know: Who Cares?).
Blanton is a solid innings-eater, he’s only 27 and will still be under team control for a couple years. By every one of those metrics, he’s exactly what we need; but there’s a catch… with the A’s, there’s always a catch. They understand leverage to perfection and their position in this trade market. Their guy may well be the best out there and they’re going to want to get a package that reflects that. I’m talking about at least two top prospects (a position player and a pitcher) just to get the talks started. You have to consider that they don’t HAVE to trade Blanton because he’s relatively cheap, they’re a reasonably competative team and they’re only going to get better soon. So think Schafer/Gorkys and Hanson/Rohrbough or something along those lines, just to get the ball rolling. In other words: Blanton is just what we need, but the cost won’t match his value.
Please check out my blog at http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/ , now redesigned and recommited!
by ejruiz on May 18, 2008 12:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i would hope that Hanson isn’t dealable right now
he is as good as there is in the minors, and still underrated.
Check out my Smoltz Tribute site
http://www.smoltz3000.com
by cgilmo78 on May 18, 2008 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ditto...
Knowing their position of strength, I’m not sure Oakland would be easy to deal with. And, I’m not sure we have much that really interests them at this point (Gorkys maybe), but I would certainly hang on to Hanson for a while and see how he matures. Right now he is a cheap option.
by BBFAN46 on May 20, 2008 7:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
There is no guarantee that we get a first round pick. The Orioles will probably have one of the top 14 or 15 worst records in the game and theres will be protected. Im not sayin he will sign with the Orioles but if he does we dont get a first round pick. I think the Mariners are struggling right now also and if they stink for the year then they will have a protected pick and with Sexsons contract gone at the end of the year they may want to sign Tex. I doubt the Yankees keep struggling like they are BUT if for some reason they do stink this year then there pick is protected also. (I figure the Yankees will make the playoffs or at least get close to maken the playoffs but I am just sayin). So I mean there is no guarantee that we get a first round pick for Tex. But I do agree with you Ejruiz that I doubt we get much for him UNLESS the Yankees panic and offer more than they should out of desperation, that could be a possibility. But I would rather keep Tex TRY for the playoffs and then in the offseason see what happens.
braves#1
by rockybull on May 18, 2008 1:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's True.
But you can check the bolded part of my reply to braves077 below to see why trading him would still not be better. The O’s are still a while longer away and they’d be silly to spend big bucks on a free agent 1B when what they really need is starting pitching and they’ll be plenty of that available this offseason; they’ll be involved, but they won’t win. The M’s could be players, but I don’t think he’s a West Coast guy and they might be apprehensive about spending that kind of money on another free agent 1B; besides, they’ve got to play Clement somewhere and, after extending Johjima, 1B would be the logical position. The Yanks are the only threat to sign him with a protected pick, in my opinion, but they’ll get better as they get healthier; they’ll also make a trade or two (even if they have to fire Cashman now and have Hank negotiate them) to help themselves get back into contention.
Please check out my blog at http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/ , now redesigned and recommited!
by ejruiz on May 18, 2008 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If...If we fallen out
of the playoff chase and we were faced with the decision of trading Tex than i would probably deal him. I wouldn’t trade with the Yankees because i don’t like their prospects and their entire organization. Unless they give up a big amount.
The O’s are another team that probably would be interested in Tex but i don’t know trading wise b/c they’ll be out of it too. Unless we could get the Bedard guys in the trade.
This is the most logical team to trade with is the Angels. Yes, Kotchman is hitting good but adding an all around hitter and a gold glove player is a way better upgrade then Kotchman. These are the guys also mentioned in the Miguel Caberera trade talks expect for Morales i think. So this is who i would ask for that i know they have:
Nick Adenhart - projected to be an Ace or a #2. He’s in AAA and dominating.
Ervin Santana – he’s finally pitching great. Once Kelvim Escobar comes off the DL he might be sent down. I’ve always liked this guy.
Reggie Willits – He’s a talented OF that is blocked. i know that our best prospects are OF. If Kotsay would move to 1st then Willits play CF. If kotay stays in CF then Willits plays or platoons in Left.
I don’t know their other top prospects but you would have to ask for atleast another top one b/c your only truely getting one prospect in Adenahart.
Kendry Morales – he’s not a prospect but he could play 1st base for us.
These are just names that comes off the top of my head…
What do you guys think of this and do you know their top prospects?
by braves077 on May 18, 2008 7:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You Could Get...
Maybe two of those guys and I doubt it. We’re talking about half a season of a guy who is definitely going to test the FA market and will have multiple big market suiters. Besides, aren’t they in first place already and likely to remain there? He’s more of an East Coast guy and that’s where the really big money is; the Angels have also said that they wouldn’t give anyone more money per year than Vlad, so he’s going to be out of their price range. When you’re thinking of a potential package for Tex, don’t think of what we gave up, think of what the Twins got for Santana and cut it in half (at least) because Tex is less valuable, a guarantee to test the market and would only be a half season rental in the worst case scenario.
Please check out my blog at http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/ , now redesigned and recommited!
by ejruiz on May 18, 2008 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tex Thoughts
At the beginning of the year, I was all for re-signing Tex, even if it costs a lot. Sometimes you gotta get good players, no matter what the cost, to create some excitement around the team and start winning. I still believe that, but maybe not so much for Tex anymore. After his year so far, I’m about ready to let him go. I know he’s a slow starter, but, come on, it’s mid-May now, and he’s still not hitting! For a guy that is looking to get $200 million, he better learn to get hot a little sooner.
I was comparing Chipper’s stats to Lance Berkman’s stats the other day, and even though Chipper has a higher average, Chipper’s got a whole lot less runs scored. I can only think that it’s the failure of the guys hitting behind Chipper to hit him in. It makes me think about where the Braves would be if Tex was getting a few more hits.
I’m still not 100% sure that we shouldn’t try to re-sign Tex, because he can be a very good hitter, and he showed that last year. But, there may not be a better time to trade him to a contender than after the All-Star break, when Tex will be hot and some 3rd-place team will be desperate to make a run (sounds familiar…). Maybe we could get Joba Chamberlain from the Yankees??
The only other issue is who would replace Tex?
by skipcaray on May 18, 2008 1:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No Joba.
You couldn’t get Joba from the Yanks for anything in the world, let alone a half season rental of a player they could just as easily sign in the offseason. You’re right, though, Tex isn’t worth $200M; no firstbaseman is. I hope we offer him something reasonable, but let him walk if he sticks to what I believe are ridiculous demands.
Chipper’s runs are down because Tex has been off and Francouer has taken up too many 5-hole AB. If McCann had been hitting clean-up after Chipper all year, he’d be right up there with Berkman in runs scored.
Please check out my blog at http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/ , now redesigned and recommited!
by ejruiz on May 18, 2008 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts
I know i’ll probably get hammered for this but I’d like to see us acquire Anthony Reyes. IMO Duncan and LaRussa have sorely mishandled this kid (ie, Danny Haren) by trying to force him to pitch to contact. Four or five starts in the Braves minor leagues and he’ll be good as new (OK, so that might be wishful thinking). I really like this kid though and I think he’s got just as much upside as Blanton (maybe more) and he will be a hellva lot cheaper. Not to mention how nicely he’ll fit in right behind Huddy and Zy Ear for the next several years.
by scstrato on May 19, 2008 6:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Man, if we can get him for someone the caliber of Chuck James…I’d do that in a heartbeat. Reyes is ELECTRIC.
by bigjoe on May 19, 2008 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve always been high on Reyes myself. But you’re right, Duncan and the Cards have screwed the kid up – he’s getting lit up in AAA right now. But that can be fixed, he just needs his confidence back – and the Cards have shown they have none in him – thus he isn’t performing to his best.
If we could steal him away from the Cards, I think he would fit fine in the rotation.
by RainDelay on May 19, 2008 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could go for that, too...
but I think the Cards may set the price a little too high for us. I would love to give them James and a mid-minors infielder.
by BBFAN46 on May 20, 2008 7:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reyes Is Fine...
But don’ t they want a top prospect in return? Maybe they’ll change their tune as time goes on, but they seem to overvalue him at this point. By the way, for anyone that believes that Chuck James has any trade value: let it go. That’s like when people thought Thorman had value last year after he fell of the map.
Please check out my blog at http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/ , now redesigned and recommited!
by ejruiz on May 20, 2008 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They do ...
want a top prospect plus a mid-level guy, BUT that’s still cheaper than Blanton would cost. Let’s talk theoretical for a second … let’s, just for giggles, say that Jones, Lillibridge, Hanson and Locke are guys we would be willing to move (remember, it’s theoretical).
Blanton is an established big league innings eater so I would wager he would cost at least 3 maybe all 4 prospects. It is possible Reyes would only cost us a Lillibridge and a Locke. Granted that’s a lot to pay for someone who may/may not reach their potential but if Reyes DOES reach his potential, and considering Lillibridge is blocked, I think it would be a steal. Heck I might even offer up Lillibridge and James just to see if Moz will bite.
Then again, there is a reason I am not a Major League GM! :-)
by scstrato on May 20, 2008 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Armchair GM
Just to chime in on Reyes and Blanton, I’m wondering if it would be better to trade 3 or 4 prospects for a proven guy, rather than trade 2 guys for an unproven guy. I’m also wondering about the statement it would make by getting a big-time guy rather than someone who might work, but might be another Chuckie. I am starting to get anxious for a big pick-up in the rotation like we did at first base last year with Tex.
Of course, even if Blanton costs 3-4 prospects, can we pay that? I’m thinking we can. Pretty much all of our positions are set for the next 3-4 years, with the exception of first, and maybe third depending on how long Chipper’s going to keep playing. We have young guys playing in LF, RF, C, SS, and 2B, and we have Shaffer and Blanco to inherit the outfield. The only hole is at first if we don’t re-sign Tex, and we don’t have a strong heir apparent in the system (at least I don’t think so). All this to say that even if we give up a lot for Blanton, we’re not going to need a lot of prospects for the next few years, and by then, we’ll have new prospects to replace those that we traded, plus a great arm in the rotation.
by skipcaray on May 20, 2008 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t argue with that, clearly Blanton is a superior pitcher to Reyes (at this point). My only point was Reyes is cheaper with similar upside (but much higher risk) and saves us prospects to fill other holes.
by scstrato on May 20, 2008 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on 1B
There really isn’t anyone in the system that I feel is an “up-and-comer”...same for 3B. Pretty much every other position you can look at and say we have someone promising on the way. Makes me wonder if corner infield is going to be addressed in the draft, or if maybe one of the promising prospects is going to be switching positions soon.
by VegasAces on May 20, 2008 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 












