Talking Chop: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Check out our NFL Scoreboard: scores, schedule and blogs Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

The Braves are Dealing from Strength for Javier Vazquez

If the widely-rumored trade between the Chicago White Sox and the Atlanta Braves is as reported, then the Braves and General Manager Frank Wren have pulled off a coup! This is a solidly one-sided trade in the Braves favor. Reportedly going to Atlanta is the reliable Javier Vazquez, a guy who has made at least 32 starts and thrown 198 innings each of the last nine years (see my earlier post as to why this is a critical need for Atlanta). The Braves also receive lefty reliever Boone Logan. He's a young, mainly unheard of guy, who is a power LOOGY (90-92 mph) who was rushed to the majors in 2005 after not having pitched above A-ball.

The three to four players the Braves are rumored to have given up are all expendable in my book. All these are guys have terrific upside, but have either not shown it in the majors or are a couple of years away from making the majors. The highest rated guy we reportedly traded is catcher Tyler Flowers (T-Flow, as the tat reads on his bicep). He had the scouting world buzzing this fall after putting on a power display by leading the Arizona Fall League in homeruns and a ridiculous .973 slugging percentage. He certainly looks like he has a bright future, but he hasn't played a single game above class-A and he plays a position that is solidly occupied in the majors by All-Star Brian McCann. Verdict; Tyler Flowers (as I've said all off-season) is perfect trade bait and 100% expendable.

The other players rumored to be in the deal include, but are not limited to starting pitcher Jo-Jo Reyes (who may not actually be in the deal anymore, but is nonetheless completely expendable), starting pitcher Charlie Morton (talented, but expendable), shortstop Brent Lillibridge (completely expendable), rookie-ball third baseman Jon Gilmore (a bright young prospect, but years away from the majors and completely expendable), and Santos Rodriguez (a young lefty who isn't even out of rookie ball yet). Every one of these guys is 100% expendable.

We just traded three or four non-factors in our organization for a middle-to-top of the rotation work-horse starter who should find the National League a more friendly place to pitch that the New Comisky. Oh, and we got a great young LOOGY to boot. We filled one of our biggest off-season needs -- an experienced starting pitcher -- and we didn't give up shit. I know there will be many who are sad to see T-Flow go, and while I would love to still have him, remember that he would likely be a non-factor for the Braves this year (as would Lillibridge, Reyes, Gilmore, or Rodriguez), while Vazquez and Logan are huge additions.

This is a total WIN for the Braves. Add to that the fact that Vazquez is signed for the next two years at a very affordable $11.5 million per. and this deal looks even better. Vazquez is the kind of pitcher that fits perfectly with the way Bobby Cox manages his staff. He can go deep into games, but Cox will protect him enough to not let him get overused or overexposed.

I LOVE this trade... well done, Frank Wren.

0 recs | Comment 79 comments | Digg!

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Meh

Vazquez is just the guy we don’t need. He is about as inconsitent as you can get. Would have rather given up talent and gotten Peavy or tried to sign Burnett. C’mon, this is another move by the cheapo Braves front office. Trying to get the fans excited with a so so player.

by Jerret Anderson on Dec 2, 2008 9:44 PM EST   0 recs

And his career record is a very weak 127-129.

by Jerret Anderson on Dec 2, 2008 9:47 PM EST   0 recs

Dude

Dont you know that Career W/L record is absolutely meaningless? You lose alot of credibility with that post.

braves#1

by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 10:33 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Dude

This guy has never been a top of the rotation guy and I just don’t get stoked on getting a player who has lived off the hype of what he was supposed to be.

2004 14-10 4.91
2005 11-15 4.42
2006 11-12 4.84
2007 15-8 3.74
2008 12-16 4.67

3 of his last 5 seasons have been losing seasons. And he played on a good team in 2008. Frank Wren has been a god awful GM so far. We didn’t get shit for Texiera.

by Jerret Anderson on Dec 2, 2008 11:55 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

he actually played for good teams all of those years (1, 2, 3 (90 wins), 4 (his best year, lawl), 1). imagine that

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 11:57 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

WHO THE HELL CARES ABOUT W/L RECORDS???????

They dont mean a damn thing. And those 4 somethin ERA could be 3 something in the NL.

Also its not Wrens fault he didn’t get alot for Tex. What is he gonna do hold up a GM at gunpoint and MAKE the GM give him real good players? As far as im concerned he got the BEST deal available. Its much better than gettin 2 draft picks that MAY or may not pan out. At least he did get a major league First baseman and a solid young reliever.

braves#1

by rockybull on Dec 3, 2008 12:02 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

since when did Mareck (who isn’t even considered a prospect) become solid.

by sting51684 on Dec 3, 2008 12:06 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?n=Stephen%20Marek&pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=447821

Since these numbers right here thats when. This is done at AA and look at his winter league no runs allowed damn good. And also he will get a chance to win a spot in the bullpen for the braves in spring training. Since when are these numbers that he put up NOT solid?

braves#1

by rockybull on Dec 3, 2008 12:28 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

This may be the ammunittion the braves need

to convince peavy or burnett to come to atlanta. They had very obvious concerns that the braves may not be a contender. I think that this definitely helps this out.

by colerocks on Dec 2, 2008 9:48 PM EST   0 recs

the main issue is this. vazquez isnt THE GUY THAT PUSHES US TO A DIVISION TITLE. we have a lot more work to do. if we don’t get a power hitter, another starter, members of the bullpen that aren’t total headcases, we’re gonna be solidly stuck in 4th place for awhile. why pull the trigger on this NOW when you could give up a little more to get someone who is ROUNDLY better and under control for longer (thus, more of a chance to improve)?

how much of a dickhead is frank wren gonna feel like when he walks away from vegas with javier vazquez and a handful of buffet vouchers when every name free agent signs elsewhere?

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 9:49 PM EST   0 recs

I don’t think anyone thinks this is the cherry on the top of our off-season sunday, but it’s a good solid vanilla base. < / analogy>

by gondeee on Dec 2, 2008 9:52 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

a little more to get Peavy?

REALLY? If you say adding Escobar, Rorhbough or Locke, Reyes or Morton and INCLUDE the no trade clause is a little more then sure it would be a little more then. hahahha

braves#1

by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 10:35 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

you’re missing the point. the talent level is consistent. the PLAYERS may be different, but the TALENT is similar.

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 11:02 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

how is the talent level similar?

The Padres were rumored to want Escobar, Flowers, Reyes/Morton, Rorhbough or Locke and then the Braves give in to Peavys no trade clause.

Escobar is by far better than Lillibridge. Flowers in the Padres deal. and then Gilmore while he is good he is a long way away. But Reyes/Morton and Rorhbough/Locke is more valuable than Gilmore. And then you add in the no trade clause. I just dont get how it is similar talent in the Peavy deal.

braves#1

by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 11:16 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Wait, you’re saying the talent level of the proposed Peavy deal is similar to the one supposedly given for Vazquez? If that’s what you’re saying, you’re flat-out wrong.

Headliner: Escobar vs. Flowers
A stud ML shortstop under team control until the sun burns out vs. an all-bat catcher who will most likely be moved from the position, lessening his value significantly.
Secondary: Rohrbough vs. Lilli
Rohrbough is a potential #2, but pitching prospects are hard to predict. Lillibridge is a tiny wafer of a man who might as well be batting with a roll of wrapping paper, but with good-great fielding skills at SS. We already have a great SS at the ML level, so Lilli’s blocked. He’s more expendable than Rohrbough. Talent, we’ll give Lilli the edge on this one, but not enough to make up for Escobar vs. Flowers.
Next: Morton vs. Gilmore
Morton by a mile. Not even close.

You can flip Morton and Rohrbough around and have the same basic premise.

I’ll take the Vazquez deal any day of the week.

by drdonkeypunch on Dec 2, 2008 11:16 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

there was never any indication that rohrbough was in the deal. and it was morton/reyes, not necessarily morton.

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 11:32 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

i dont wanna overstep my bounds, but im not convinced tflow isnt an avg catcher.. to call him an all bat C may be overstating it… a lot of pitchers have said they love throwing to him because he is such a big catcher and he calls a pretty good game

"We win today, that's two in a row... if we win tomorrow, that's called a winning streak. It has happened before..."

by Swo12bv on Dec 3, 2008 12:14 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Ergh!

Unfortunately Timed Emergency Outage Planned

Start Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2008; 10:30PM (EST)
End Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008; 12:30AM (EST)

Our tech team sends along note that our web provider will be undergoing some form of emergency maintenance tonight for the time listed above. Neither Frank Wren nor Javier Vazquez were consulted.

by gondeee on Dec 2, 2008 9:50 PM EST   0 recs

Flowers is the flavor of the week

Vazquez is not a name that blows you a way, but he has been, arguably, the most consistent pitcher in baseball over the last eight years. I agree he is not a number one starter, but we need more than a number one starter. He slots in as a solid 2 or 3 with a great contract. Don’t forget, some of his stats are from his years on an awful Expos team. He will be better in the NL. I would love to keep Flowers, but gondee is absolutely right when he says we gave up expendable players. We are not going to become contenders with one move, but this is a solid piece of the puzzle.

by gutisking on Dec 2, 2008 9:52 PM EST   0 recs

um, his expos numbers are better than his other numbers…real bad analogy

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 9:59 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

The Expos are a bad team which certainly did not help his win/loss. How many more wins would a guy like Curt Schilling have if he did not spend so many years on bad Phillies teams. I’m not saying his team affected the type of pitcher he is/was, but it certainly has an affect on wins/losses. How about helping us all out next time with his splits in Montreal/DC versus his other teams rather than trying to prove how big of an asshole you can be (assuming you actually looked at the splits). I thought we were here to talk about the Braves.

by gutisking on Dec 2, 2008 11:09 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

show me any study that talks about why wins and losses matter when looking at a pitcher.

and yes, i did look at the splits. 2 ERAs under 3.5 in montreal and 1 under 4…1 under 4 total since he left. walks have been up since he left montreal. innings have gone down, but thats mainly due to management. 64-61 outside of montreal, 63-68 outside montreal. not exactly some DRASTIC SPLIT like you’re claiming it is.

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 11:37 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

I love the trade

We get a proven innings eater for a bunch of young players. I remember Bobby Cox liking JV when he was an Expo.

by themurph on Dec 2, 2008 9:58 PM EST   0 recs

Trade

This is a great trade for atlanta, people need to get a clue. Everyone would’ve complained had we gotten Peavy b/c we would’ve had to have given up Esco….they would complain if we end up signing Burnett or Sheets b/c they are injury risks…its unreal.

Vazquez is not as good as Peavy, or Burnett/Sheets when healthy. Yet as gondee said its not like we gave up something that was going to put us over the top next year anyway. T-Flow would’ve had to slot in at 1st base in the future anyway, and while Kotchman isn’t great, he’s a solid first baseman with a strong glove. Vazquez is a horse who pitches close to 200 innings a year. His career record is crap, but records don’t mean much if the pitcher has good stuff but has been on crappy teams. I think this is a win, a trade that both teams win on actually.

by jwrocks on Dec 2, 2008 10:00 PM EST   0 recs

Crappy Teams???

Yankees in 2004 (who won the division); DBacks in 2005 (who finished 2nd); White Sox in 2006 (who finished 3rd at 90-72) and AL Central Champs in 2008 with White Sox. Hardly sounds like crappy teams.

by sting51684 on Dec 2, 2008 10:54 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Hey

Your right Kotchman isn’t great, he’s not even good.

by Jerret Anderson on Dec 2, 2008 11:58 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Completely Agreed

While I would have love to have seen Flowers remain in the organization, you have to pay to play. Getting 2 major league players that will come in and contribute right away for 4 players, at least 3 of which won’t sniff the majors for 2-3 years, was a coup.
While this may be sacrilege to say, I’m glad they got Vazquez and not Peavy. While Peavy is probably the better overall pitcher. He doesn’t pitch deep into games. Has a slight injury history. Would tie up more money and years. And lastly, would have cost a helluva lot more than this package.
I think we just have to assume that Frank and the boys know a bit more about the team than us. He got one of the SP’s he said he would get, and still has money to spend on LF(dunn) and the other SP(my hope would be sheets or randy). I think getting Vazquez, a proven innings eater allows the Braves to take a gamble on a Sheets or even Randy.

by NorCalAtlFan on Dec 2, 2008 10:14 PM EST   0 recs

I hope we don’t get Dunn. That guy is the second coming of A. Jones. Lots of power, low average, strikes out a lot and he doesn’t have good D either.

by Jerret Anderson on Dec 2, 2008 11:59 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

1) andruw jones never had a lot of power
2) adam dunn walks a lot more than andruw jones
3) andruw jones played good defense
4) adam dunn hasn’t fallen off a cliff with a boulder tied to his leg like andruw jones

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:06 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

I just wish we could have given them a little more and also gotten Dye.

by MatM on Dec 2, 2008 10:24 PM EST   0 recs

I don't understand

Flowers might be expendable, but doesn’t anyone think else think that an awesome prospect coming off such a great campaign might be worth a little more than a guy with a career losing record (127-129) and a mediocre era of 4.25 (especially if it is Morton in the trade, who has shown some good stuff and maybe getting closer to putting it all together)?

by sting51684 on Dec 2, 2008 10:38 PM EST   0 recs

Sell High

Flowers was traded while his value was high. His trade value was probably never as high as it was this offseason. He killed the ball in the AFL. While he is a good hitter and may blossom into a very good hitter the AFL numbers are something of a fluke. If you consider (what has been said over and over again) that 1) Flowers is a little old for his stop on the ladder 2) He is NOT a MLB caliber catcher 3) He projects as an offensive catcher but nothing more then a marginal 1B or DH.-Wren was right to move him. Now if this was the best deal in which to move him, that is a different question.
I tend to think that the overall cost of the trade was minimal for the Braves and didn’t strip them of a lot of depth. It gave them a solid #2 to add to the rotation for the next couple years at a very reasonable price. Is Vazquez-by himself-a team changing addition? Probably not. However, no 1 starting pitcher can be a team changer for the Braves. They need AT LEAST two quality starting pitchers to make a run at things. (And no-Hampton and/or Glavine don’t fit that bill). WIth the shortage of good pitching you can’t count that the Braves are going to be able to go after and land two…if one…free agent pitcher. With Vazquez they get one piece of the puzzle (one that has actually been healthy for most of his career-which by itself has value) and are in a position to sign the second piece like a Ben Sheets or a AJ Burnett (although I personally prefer to go after Lowe or even Penny -if healthy. Burnett has health problems and is going to demand big bucks over multiple years. Sheets could probably be had for a one year deal…maybe a one year deal with an option and has greater upside then Burnett.)

by calbers on Dec 2, 2008 10:53 PM EST   0 recs

this deal stinks

Where is the logic in this deal?

I agree that Vasquez is valuable, his contract only has 2 years left on it and it is reasonable. But the dude is 32, there is no way the braves are resigning him after these two years are up. And even if it does temp Peavy (which would be terrible b/c it’d mean giving up the rest of the farm) or Burnett, the braves still aren’t the best team in the NL East by far. They may be a fringe wild card team, but that’s pushing it.

I also agree this is selling high on T-Flo, which is good. But when the Braves simply aren’t close to being a championship team for the next two years, why not hang on to the young guys until that run is ready to be made? Am I the only one who remembers getting killed by the phillies early in the season when the braves still had Tex and a mostly healthy rotation? and yeah Chuck Morton hasn’t put it all together yet, but all the stuff is there. I think he just needs more confidence in his stuff.

Giving up JoJo and Lillibridge is totally fine though, I like that part.

I’m fine with signing free agents to reasonable contracts, but I don’t get the need to turn a bad roster into a mediocre one, especially knowing how bright the future will probably be (assuming it’s not mortgaged)

by son.of.sourman on Dec 2, 2008 11:03 PM EST   0 recs

forgot to mention

i think t-flow has a higher ceiling than kotchman @ 1b

by son.of.sourman on Dec 2, 2008 11:04 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Don't forget

While Kotchman offensively may be serviceable, he’s a very good glove man. Teix was a rare 1B, most are either very good offensively or very good defensively. I’ll take a glove man over a defensive liability.

by cmdpsu15 on Dec 2, 2008 11:05 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

meh

i don’t think defense at 1B, as long as it’s serviceable, is such a big deal

by son.of.sourman on Dec 2, 2008 11:17 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

kotchman was a +12, which roughly translates to a whopping 1 win.

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 11:39 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

boone

check out this photo of boone: http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/boones-beard.jpg

the 80s porno bush on his face indicates strong upside.

by brndn on Dec 2, 2008 11:14 PM EST   0 recs

ok

now i’m cool with this deal

by son.of.sourman on Dec 2, 2008 11:18 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

That’s the worst “beard” I’ve ever seen. I hope Bobby makes him shave that thing off his face.

by drdonkeypunch on Dec 2, 2008 11:18 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Boone

Shaved that off during the middle of the season.

by SockinSox on Dec 2, 2008 11:38 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Trade...

I don’t understand a lot of this talk. This is a great trade. The Braves always somehow manage to trade these young prospects when their values are peaking. I don’t understand why so many people are absolutely clinging on to these prospects?? We do have a great farm league but a lot of these guys will never be Major League contributors. Vazquez is a solid pitcher who is very dependable and I don’t know about most people but I’ll be glad when we have at least one pitcher that you don’t have to worry about his constant injuries or old age. (Huddy just had bad luck with his injury) This past season wore me out wondering who they were gonna have to trot out there cause Hampton’s hamstring got tweaked, or Glavine’s elbow hurt or Smoltz’s shoulder was stiff. THANK GOD FOR DEPENDABILITY!!!

by MTSU11 on Dec 2, 2008 11:25 PM EST   0 recs

For everyone who thinks its a good trade

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/blog/big_league_stew/post/Javier-Vazquez-headed-to-Atlanta-to-frustrate-Br?urn=mlb,126374

the line of that article that sums up Javier Vazquez :

Like the D’backs, Yankees and Expos before them, the Pale Hose could never get over the inconsistency that Vazquez brought to the mound. A powerful flamethrower one minute but a mental midget the next, Vazquez could never quite put it together to realize the potential that so many have seen.

by sting51684 on Dec 2, 2008 11:38 PM EST   0 recs

Yahoo isn't exactly known for their stunning sports analysis

Notice how this guy can’t say anything tangible about Vazquez and fills it up with a bunch of cliches like inconsistency. I bet the writer doesn’t even know what pitches Vazquez throws.

by VictorW on Dec 3, 2008 11:41 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Vazquez

He’s alright, nothing special. He had an extremely bad habit of giving up runs when we scored the half inning before. Like others have stated he’s extremely inconsistent and isn’t much more than an innings eater. For every 8 IP, 13 K, 3 H, 1 ER game he gives you there will be a 5.1 IP, 8 K, 8 H, 2 BB, 6 ER game in between. The comment that really did him in with ChiSox fans is when he said during the stretch run that he didn’t care what people thought of him because at the end of his career he will be on the beach. When he’s on though, he’s great.

by SockinSox on Dec 2, 2008 11:45 PM EST   0 recs

you’re gonna love tyler flowers…i do feel sorry for you that lillibridge is the great hope to replace ramirez at short for you. he’s probably better than cabrera defensively but uh…he can’t hit for shit.

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 11:48 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

A Sox fan's perspective

Vazquez is maddeningly inconsistent. His peripherals (notably, IP and K) theoretically tell you that he’s a good pitcher—but then you look at the results, and they haven’t been good (except for 2007, when the Sox were out of the playoff hunt from day 1). He’ll likely see a slight improvement in the NL, but if the Braves acquired him to be a staff ace, they’re sorely mistaken.

He’s actually the kind of pitcher the White Sox likely will need in 2009—an innings-eater who can take some of the pressure of younger arms (Gavin Floyd, John Danks, Clayton Richard, Jeff Marquez ((Vomit)), etc.) and save the bullpen in case one or two of those younger arms needs a break. He may be inconsistent, but at the least, he has a rubber arm and can eat innings while striking out a good number of batters.

Chicago White Sox Examiner — Your what hurts?

by UribeAuction on Dec 2, 2008 11:47 PM EST   0 recs

Similar Pitchers View in Pop-up

Compare Stats

   1. Pedro Astacio (940)
   2. Jon Lieber (938)
   3. Esteban Loaiza (935)
   4. Kevin Tapani (934)
   5. Dick Ruthven (928)
   6. Woody Williams (927)
   7. Jeff Suppan (927)
   8. Todd Stottlemyre (923)
   9. Mark Gubicza (923)
  10. Mike Krukow (920)

Similar Pitchers through Age 31

Compare Stats

   1. Livan Hernandez (932)
   2. Brad Radke (927)
   3. Andy Benes (918)
   4. Scott Erickson (912)
   5. Mike Moore (902)
   6. Jaime Navarro (902)
   7. Jim Clancy (901)
   8. Mike Witt (901)
   9. Richard Dotson (896)
  10. Ismael Valdez (892)

DO YOU SEE WHAT YOU HAVE DONE?!?!?!?!?!?

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 11:48 PM EST   0 recs

see!

all servicable starters on that list. I still like the deal.

by themurph on Dec 2, 2008 11:50 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

bahahaahhahaha

do you know vazquez has had as many seasons below league average ERA as he’s had above average?

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 11:51 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

that's what "Servicable" means

You sure you went NU? This is a very minor trade but one we really needed.

by themurph on Dec 3, 2008 12:07 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

i never claimed to have gone to NU. right conference, wrong school.

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:07 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

its the NU logo. i’m a fan, not a student. looking to go there in 2 years for my MBA.

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:10 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Fan Comments from the Yahoo Baseball Blog

-this sucks being a twins fan when he pitched it was free wins

-Kenny Williams is such an overrated GM, he’ll somehow have blown this deal too

-Another trash guy for the Braves. Why give up Flowers for him when they didnt want to give him up for Peavy?

-Great job atlanta, way to get Vazquez 8 yrs too late

-Yes the Twins will miss him and so will the rest of the al central.

-I hope those names are wrong! How do you give up Flowers (Even with a young All-Star catcher already) for a past his prime innings eater?! Maybe Lillibridge and Reyes..

-glad we got rid of vasquez. he is way overpaid, and i like how kenny is getting rid of the big contract guys that aren’t worth a crap. that being said i dont think the sox are going cheap, i would say they are just making room for a couple more moves. hopefully at second base or center field.

-Haha stupid stupid!! So sorry Braves! And we took Mike Hampton from you for this!

-I am a little confused why Atlanta did this, especially if Flowers is the prospect they say he is. Nice job Kenny.

-I liked the old $120 million Braves a lot better than the more recent $80 million Braves!

-I’ve been a CWS fan for forty years, and while I absolutely love Kenny WIlliams, I cannot figure out why any other GM would want to deal with him. He’s made a career out of rooking teams out of solid prospects for used-up garbage, or picking up players who are "need-change-of-scenery/reclamation-projects" (Contreras, Quentin, Jenks).
He must be the slickest, smoothest-talking jive-a** GM in recent history to pull off some of these trades (anybody remember him dealing Mike Sirotka to the Jays for David Wells, without informing the Jays that Sirotka had a bum shoulder that ended his career?).
I’m sure the Braves will look back on this trade in two or three years and say "What the hell were we thinking?"

-Really it is a decent move for both teams if you throw out the salaries. If it prevents Atlanta from making another move, however, then it is a bad decision for Atlanta. And Boone Logan is awful. I know he is a lefty, but he is really bad.

-Dear Atlanta,
That sound you just heard is a collective sigh of relief from the South Side of Chicago…and Berlin, WI. Enjoy your Javi Juice, serve warm, then cold….very cold.
Sincerely,
Chicago White Sox

Still feel the same about the trade knowing we are the laughing stock of the league right now?

by sting51684 on Dec 2, 2008 11:50 PM EST   0 recs

i feel so great right now. really. imagine what i’d be doing if there was alcohol in the house.

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 11:51 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

agreed

this is not a good day.

by son.of.sourman on Dec 3, 2008 12:06 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

its only a good day for me because i’m watching sakuraba. and if kenny williams is sakuraba, frank wren is royler gracie…getting his fucking arm ripped off

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:08 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

does this deal preface wren giving Dunn an Albert Belle like contract (circa 1999)?

by sting51684 on Dec 3, 2008 12:10 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

subtract a year. and make sure he doesnt have a degenerative hip condition.

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:11 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

he was actually signed by wren on Dec 1 1998. Almost 10 years to the day…

by sting51684 on Dec 3, 2008 12:13 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

10 years ago, he crippled the orioles ago. today…WHO KNOWS!?

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:15 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Who cares what other fans think of the deal?

braves#1

by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 11:57 PM EST   0 recs

Hey big joe?

i read all of your coments about dont get this guy dont get this one, who should we get?

by Brandonba on Dec 3, 2008 12:27 AM EST   0 recs

that jake peavy fellow would have been nice. i heard he won a cy young award, even. take a flyer on all the “injured former superstars”. if you don’t get burnett now, with hudson out…we’re fucked, because we have a staff where 2 #3s are the 1-2. which uh, isn’t a recipe for success.

if you want me to forever leave this blog though, sign jon garland. i won’t even make a goodbye post. i’d just get the fuck out of dodge.

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:31 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

It’s been so fucking busy at my office lately, but this post made my day. +1

I guess I should be one to talk.
There's nights that I can't even walk.
There's days I couldn't give a fuck.
And in between is where I'm stuck.

by Smoltz's Beard on Dec 3, 2008 2:55 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

No you wouldn’t. You’re like a victim of spousal abuse, you say you’ll try to get away, but you always come back. Nobody else would drive a million miles to Atlanta to see a batting lineup marquee’d by Omar Infante and Mike Hampton. If that’s not a sucker for punishment, Jon Garland is a slap on the wrist.

No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.

by royhobbs on Dec 3, 2008 3:12 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Seriously…how can you say no to this face?

I guess I should be one to talk.
There's nights that I can't even walk.
There's days I couldn't give a fuck.
And in between is where I'm stuck.

by Smoltz's Beard on Dec 3, 2008 3:20 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

he looks like a registered sex offender

Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.

by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 3:43 PM EST to parent up   0 recs