Braves to Acquire Javier Vazquez
Well it looks like it isn't a rumor at this point as the most recent update on MLB Trade Rumors that Vasquez is on his way to Atlanta for a physical. The talks right now say we will send Lillibridge and JoJo Reyes (I still liked him) and maybe one more player in the deal.
There are several aspects to this whole deal that interest me personally. One is the Braves get their man. This is yet another perpetually rumored player the Braves have interest in that we finally end up with, though a while after we are supposedly interested in. Second, Frank Wren seems to have inherited John Schuerholtz's ability to pull of the big trade that no one knew was even being talked about. Bravo.
So anyways, here is a main page offering for you guys to weigh in at.
0 recs |
144 comments
Comments
Flowers is being rumored as the third player in the deal. We would also get Boone Logan who if you want a good scare look at his numbers.
by jack dein on Dec 2, 2008 6:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
if flowers is true, then perhaps dye is involved.
by brndn on Dec 2, 2008 6:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's what Rosenthal's saying...
The White Sox will receive as many three players in return and also could part with left-handed reliever Boone Logan. Infielder Brent Lillibridge is expected to be in the deal along with a young starting pitcher and possibly Class A catcher Tyler Flowers. Left-hander Jo-Jo Reyes was among the pitchers under discussion, but is not in the trade, sources said.
Do Not Want! Please don’t let the Flowers part be true!!!!
by sddbaker on Dec 2, 2008 6:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Logan?
If Boone is in the deal it makes me wonder if the offer to Ohman is off the table. I just don’t see Bobby carrying three lefties in the pen. Just me speculating.
by scstrato on Dec 2, 2008 6:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
yeah, because logan is so much better than ohman. um, what?
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 6:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
C'mon Joe
That’s not what I meant. Logan is obviously a lot cheaper than Ohman and with Gonzo, Soriano, Morlan and others I can’t see where the big Oh would be anything more than a Loogy. Logan is better suited for that role (cost wise).
Just for the record, I would rather have Ohman than Gonzo – but this is just a personal preference.
by scstrato on Dec 2, 2008 6:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
how do we even know logan will even 1) be on the team, and 2) be in the majors? he could be a head case that the white sox wanted to dump for all i know
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 6:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Couldn’t agree more, which is why I said I was speculating.
by scstrato on Dec 2, 2008 7:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe flowers will break his leg coming off the plane and another player will have to be subbed in
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 6:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying anything new
Don’t put Flowers in this deal. I’m okay with trading him, but only to get someone awesome.
by someguy917 on Dec 2, 2008 6:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Why Flowers
Really? After we wouldn’t include him for Peavy? Anyone know how long Vasquez is under control? Pretty hefty price for an innings-eating #3 starter. I really hope this is some kind of double trade.
“I would rather have Ohman than Gonzo – but this is just a personal preference.”
That’s just nuts. I want to lock-up Gonzo long term.
by TradeAndruw on Dec 2, 2008 6:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
09 & 10 for i think 11.5 each year
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 6:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Didn’t say my preference for Ohman over Gonzo was justified, but on the other end what has Gonzo done to justify a long term contract?
by scstrato on Dec 2, 2008 7:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s cause they wanted Flowers AND Yunel for Peavy.
Vazquez is good. With an improved defense behind him and a switch to the NL, he should be a good #2 or maybe weak ace.
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 8:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
he’ll be a weak 2/good 3 … That’s how Wren is probably seeing it too. You kinda forget about J.J. in all this, but I could see where Wren might think that J.J. is no. 2 material.
"You never know what I'm going to do..."
- Michael Vick (Palm Beach Post 11/6/2005)
by jamesrael on Dec 2, 2008 8:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Check Vazquez's peripherals
With an improved defense behind him and a league switch, FIP and tRA say can be a 3.5 to 3.7 ERA guy. Jurrjen’s awesomeness doesn’t change the fact that Vazquez can be a strong 2 or weak ace.
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 8:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I dont know what he will be but i think he can be a Very good number 3 starter or a solid number 2 starter. Either way its a win win deal. Nothin of great value given up. I dont know if Reyes is in the deal or not but if he is then i am still fine with it. I am one of the FEW Braves fans that actually still like him but hey Vazquez is NOT a scrub pitcher. He is worth Flowers, Reyes/?, and Lilli.
braves#1
by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 8:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Jo Jo too
I just wish he could find the plate
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 8:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s strange how I always seem to agree with you.
Only you’re way better with stats than I am.
by get swoll yunel on Dec 2, 2008 11:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Flowers
is a Catcher that is PROJECTED NOT to stick at catcher and move to first in the majors. He was 22 years old at High A and he dominated AFL. Big deal. Its better than trading Freeman who is 18 years old and DOMINATED Low A. People Flowers is NOT gonna get us a stud by himself and even with Reyes and Lilli in the deal he still is not gonna get us a stud. I like Flowers he could be a real good first baseman but i like Freeman more.
braves#1
by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 6:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
"03/06/07: Signed three-year, $34,5 million extension w/limited NTC."
I read this as he’s only under control for next year “2007, 2008, 2009”. That does not make me happy.
by TradeAndruw on Dec 2, 2008 7:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
From COTs
He’s signed for the next two at 11.5 per.
by scstrato on Dec 2, 2008 7:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
that makes it more acceptable
I can actually live with this, though Flowers still seems excessive. It’s a crappy market this year.
by TradeAndruw on Dec 2, 2008 7:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I take that back
After reviewing the stats, you can get 200 innings with a 4.00 ERA from a lot of pitchers without giving up the prospects. A mixture of Hampton and Glavine, for instance. Or the Bg Unit, who I can’t believe is not getting more interest.
by TradeAndruw on Dec 2, 2008 7:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1 for Randy Johnson
Everyone’s ready to give 4 years to Burnett, but not 1 to Randy Johnson?
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 8:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Free agents Ben Sheets and Randy Johnson don’t seem to be on the radar due to concerns over their reliability.
last one out, close the door and turn out the lights.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 8:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Say, yondaime4.....
Where ya been? Good to see you back…..
by secondbass on Dec 2, 2008 7:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Here and there really, but I had some family issues and work is the crazy right now, so I kind of took a break from….well everything really. But I’ll be floating around a little here and there
by yondaime4 on Dec 2, 2008 8:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe...
that this is a good deal so far. We’ll have to see who the other young starter is and the third prospect but I like Vazquez. He is a master innings-eater which is always needed. I like Flowers, and most will disagree, but if we can include him to get Dye, I’d do it. We all know we want and need a power hitting outfielder and Dye fits the bill. Let’s get this done and put our focus back on Burnett!!!
by MTSU11 on Dec 2, 2008 7:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The reports don't mention Dye
As much as I like Flowers (absolutely one of my favorite Braves prospects), I could see the logic in trading him with others as long as the return was Vasquez AND Dye……but that’s not the report. I can’t understand trading Flowers and others for Vasquez and some lefty releiver. Didn’t Wren just refuse to include Flowers for Peavey, yet now he seems willing to unload him for, in my mind at least, less? Doesn’t make sense.
Of course at this point, it’s all speculation. Here’s hoping Flowers isn’t included unless Dye is as well, but again – that’s not the rumor.
by secondbass on Dec 2, 2008 7:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Let’s not overreact, because the names are all speculation by Rosenthal and Gammons.
We weren’t going to get him for our scraps (Reyes, Lillibridge), but I think trading Flowers for him is a little overkill. I’d rather use Flowers in a package for someone better than Vaz (Greinke, Peavy). Is it just me, or is it backwards that Wren wouldn’t upgrade the package for Peavy with Flowers, yet he’s willing to ship him off in a deal for Vazquez?
by soup du jour on Dec 2, 2008 7:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
"I’d rather use Flowers in a package for someone better than Vaz"
And now I must say, and I quote, “….great minds think alike.”
by secondbass on Dec 2, 2008 7:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Because the Padres wanted Yunel and Flowers.
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 8:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
1. It’s pure speculation that it’s Tyler Flowers at the moment. Rosenthal says possibly Flowers.
2. The Braves know their prospects better than anyone. Rarely do they trade one off and regret it.
3. We have no idea if the Padres wanted Flowers or if we refused to trade him. The only prospect we know 100% for a fact that wouldn’t be traded was Tommy Hanson.
4. You have to give up talent to get talent. Lillibridge and Reyes wasn’t going to get a solid #3 pitcher.
5. I think Vazquez will benefit moving to a more relaxed atmosphere in the NL.
Solid move. It’s a fair price in my opinion. Neither side got fleeced. Calm down people, it was Tyler Flowers and not one of our blue chippers.
by beeniez on Dec 2, 2008 7:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I still think
Flowers could have pulled in more, but I guess if we get that lefty too, we would be in pretty good shape.
by someguy917 on Dec 2, 2008 7:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We’re also assuming that the Braves are on the hook for his entire salary. Which would be kind of rare to trade a player making that much money and not receive any cash considerations back.
by beeniez on Dec 2, 2008 7:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
adam wainwright says hi
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 8:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
of course Meyer was never good but you get what im sayin. Every good player that we traded i can say a bad player that was in the deal.
braves#1
by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 8:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Vazquez will be a lot more valuable than $11.5 million the next two years. He certainly improves our ability to contend next year.
He’s hard to peg preformance-wise because his peripherals are usually great (very good tRA and FIP), but he consistently has posted bad ERAs the last five years (save 2007) largely because he’s played in front of bad defenses. I like him to be around a true talent of 3.80-4.00 ERA and he’s good for 200 IP. That’s 20 runs above average or ~4 wins above replacement. Using ~$5 million per win, he’s worth $20 million – making him a significant revenue stream for us at $11.5 million a year.
His age is a bit of a concern, but I’d much rather pay him $23 million for age 32 and 33 seasons than pay $50 million for Burnett’s age 32-35 seasons. The best thing about him is his price. We’re only on the hook for two seasons and only at $23 million total. That gives us financial flexibility in two offseasons when we’ll have a lot of free agent decisions to make (Francoeur, Kotchman, Johnson, Hudson) and still gets us a good starter. Vazquez is underrated because of his ERA, but he strikes out 8 per nine, walks only 2.5 per 9, and has an equal GB/FB. And he pitches 200 innings like it’s his job.
Flowers is a premium prospect because of the combo of a great bat and the chance he’ll stick at catcher. If he sticks at catcher he’ll be a bad defensive catcher who will struggle to catch 125 games consistently. If he moves to first he’ll be a sub-par defensive first baseman who’s value will take a gigantic hit (something like 2-2.5 wins of value just from moving). In other words, I’d cash him in now because in another year we’ll have a much better idea of what position he’ll play in the major leagues. That’s not a good thing for his value most likely.
Lillibridge and Reyes are being undervalued here. Reyes could easily be #4 starter for the next 3 years. At $400K per that’s incredible value. Lillibridge also has a lot of value for the glove. The only way he doesn’t play in the majors in some role is if his injury induced struggles last year are his true talent. I doubt that.
by 17843 on Dec 2, 2008 7:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Great post, man
You are another guy here that I really enjoy reading.
by get swoll yunel on Dec 2, 2008 11:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wren didn’t want to include Flowers because they were already giving up so much for Peavy. If he’s the centerpiece of a trade for an established starter like Vazquez, it makes much more sense. I hate to give up Flowers, but we’ve already got McCann at the major league level, so Flowers’ basic role within the organization was tradebait, and that’s what’s happening. Lilli and Reyes wouldn’t be enough to net anyone of quality, so you have to throw in someone else to make it work. I think both sides improve with this trade. Without Vazquez, here’s what the Braves rotation looks like for next year…
1. ? Burnett (big maybe)
2. Jair
3. Campillo
4. Morton
5. ??
That’s probably one of the worst rotations in the league, especially if Burnett wasn’t in it. I love Jair, but he’s a #3. Campillo will regress, who knows about Morton. Vazquez in a #2 in the NL, and will most likely pitch very well at a low pay rate.
by drdonkeypunch on Dec 2, 2008 7:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jurrjens was a #2 last season
His peripherals agree. If you jack his HR rate up to league average though, he’s still a 3.9 ERA guy.
Campillo’s peripherals pegged him as around a 3.7 ERA guy last season. I think he can maintain a 3.7 to 4 ERA. He stuff isn’t electric, but his changeup is devastating and his control is wonderful.
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 8:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Vazquez is not as bad as people on here are making him out to be. He is an above average major league pitcher. You gotta give up somethin to get somethin.
braves#1
by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 7:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think any of us are selling Vazquez short. The question is more about the price paid to acquire him. Unfortunately all we have to go on is a bunch of speculative media reports, none of which say the same thing. I’ll wait until the official notice (if it’s real) to make my judgment, but there’s no harm in speculating about the parties involved (cost or performance wise).
by scstrato on Dec 2, 2008 7:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Give up?
Jo-Jo: Can’t take constructive criticism; 5th starter/triple A starter at best right now; has potential, but so do Morton/Hanson/Campillo/Bennett/Carlyle/James (hey, it could happen).
Lilly: Plays well in the filed … liability in the lineup. Might as well have two pitchers and/or Porky Miller hitting.
Flowers: He’ll be something. But his absence doesn’t affect our club’s success next year and w/ BMac at the ML level, we’re set for a bit. He was trade bate all along.
"You never know what I'm going to do..."
- Michael Vick (Palm Beach Post 11/6/2005)
by jamesrael on Dec 2, 2008 8:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I am in disbelief how people are sayin dont trade Flowers because of Catching depth in the damn minors. We have other Catchers in the minors, yeah none as good as Flowers but unless McCann gets hurt then Flowers wont see no time at Catcher. And plus MANY scouts dont think he will stick at catcher anyway. His trade value is through the roof right now. And im SURE that Wren looked around and offered Flowers to alot of teams to see what he could get. Im sure this is the best and this is a damn good offer. Oh yeah and its ABSURD to think that Flowers is the best catching prospect in the game. One person earlier on here or on one thread said Flowers is prolly the best Cathing prospect even better than Wieters. Ok you MIGHT want to put down the kool-aid.
braves#1
by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 8:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
+INIFINITI
Amen brutha! Preach it!
"He's getting better, but he's not there yet ..."
by FrankyWren on Dec 2, 2008 8:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jo Jo Reyes??
Is Reyes in the deal or not? Over at minorleagueball.com they are saying it is not Reyes and could be Morton involved in the deal.
by atl14yearsschaffer on Dec 2, 2008 8:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
DOB confirmed it
It’s Jo Jo
"He's getting better, but he's not there yet ..."
by FrankyWren on Dec 2, 2008 8:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i hope theres a dunkin donuts in chicago for poor jojo
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 8:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jo Jo, Lillibridge, Flowers and a mystery prospect. If its anyone significant this trade sucks. Its already borderline after Flowers was included
by SayHeyWerd on Dec 2, 2008 8:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It won't be.
Wren isn’t dumb. I have faith. Everyone cross ya fingas.
"He's getting better, but he's not there yet ..."
by FrankyWren on Dec 2, 2008 8:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Indifferent
I saw the trade earlier today and I was like, “great”, in a sarcastic way. Getting Vasquez several years later when we had an interest in him years ago reminds me of getting Hampton several years later, after we had interest in him. We all know how that worked out. I tend to agree with blogger, “tradeandruw”, that there are other 4.00 era workhorse pitchers that we can get without trading away prospects. Does anyone think Vasquez can win 12-15 games with our team next year? If we get him as our only signing, we are in for a long year. Even if we get Burnett, who I am not really a fan of (reminds me of Carl Pavano), we are still going to be in trouble becuase we have no #2 starting pitcher (No, not Vasquez). Hopefully our GM has something else up his sleeve. IMO, we need to keep every good pitching prospect we have and develop them. Signing or trading for other team’s pitchers is iffy. But, being as how this is not a dynasty Braves team anymore, where we have Glaving, Avery, and Millwood in our system, I suppose we’ll have to over pay old pitchers like Derek Lowe and broken ones like A.J. Burnett. Oh, and if Tyler Flowers is in the deal for Vasquez, that is a mistake.
by EricT. on Dec 2, 2008 8:35 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I absolutely do
Vasquez has been very solid (10+ wins) for the past 7-8 years while pitching in hitter-friendly parks in the AL. So do I think he can rattle off a few more wins in the NL? Yes. Do I think he’ll pitch 200+ innings? Yes. Do I think J.J. can fill the no. 2 starter spot? Yes. That means Wren needs to sign Peavy or Burnett and …BOOM! I’d say he’s done what he said he would.
"He's getting better, but he's not there yet ..."
by FrankyWren on Dec 2, 2008 8:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
wins are a horrible metric to determine a pitcher’s worth, please try again.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 8:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
WHOA
Wait a tic. The fact that he has done reasonably well in the AL over a 7-8 year period means nothing? Or the fact that he will pitch 200 innings for us? Or the fact that he strikes out a lot of players? Or the fact that he has pitched in primarily hitter-friendly parks? All that means nothing? Wow … why don’t you educate me.
"He's getting better, but he's not there yet ..."
by FrankyWren on Dec 2, 2008 8:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no, the fact that you said HE HAS 10+ WINS THE PAST FEW YEARS!!! ZOMG! wins are a horrible metric to determine a pitcher’s worth.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 8:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sheesh
I said 10+ wins over the past 7-8 years … not the past few years. And that was one factor among many that I cited. Sorry for the confusion.
"He's getting better, but he's not there yet ..."
by FrankyWren on Dec 2, 2008 9:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Check Vazquez's peripherals
With a league change and improved defense behind him, you’ll be surprised at when he can do. 200 K’s to 60 some walks is VERY good.
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 8:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bowman
said that JoJo is NOT in the deal. So not sure. But look at this right here, this is interesting.
“He posted a 3.00 ERA and allowed opponents a .250 batting average in 39 appearances before the All-Star break.”
That is talkin about Logan. He is 23 or 24 now so maybe he will be better than than many thought. I know he finished bad but maybe it was fatigue.
braves#1
by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 8:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Braves provided a list of five players from which the White Sox could choose four.
Chicago is believed to have the most interest in shortstop Brent Lillibridge and Minor League catcher Tyler Flowers
The Braves will also provide two more unidentified prospects. But contrary to earlier reports, Jo-Jo Reyes won’t be included in the deal.
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 8:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’m not excited about Logan but I think that Vazquez will be a good addition. This trade gives me the impression that Wren is getting him more to be a number 2 starter and he is not the ace that he is looking for. I think the winter meetings will provide us with another starter.
by jack dein on Dec 2, 2008 8:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jo Jo
Jo Jo is 100 percent not in the deal..
by Whodunnit?4040 on Dec 2, 2008 8:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully it's not Morton
"He's getting better, but he's not there yet ..."
by FrankyWren on Dec 2, 2008 8:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Boone Logan's pitches.
Judging from the release point, looks like a sidearming LOOGY.
93.2 MPH fastball with above average movement. That’s a plus fastball from a lefty. For comparison, Gonzalez’s fastball averages 92.8 and has about 2 inches less horizontal movement and similar vertical movement.
82 MPH slider that has about 9 inches of horizontal movement relative to his fastball. Good pitch. Should eat lefties alive.
85 MPH changeup. Movement on it is pretty decent relative to the fastball. A solid pitch.
This guy has lefties at a .750 OPS but righties at a .950 OPS. Kinda surprised at the righty split because his fastball is very good and his changeup is solid. Guess he can’t locate his pitches properly, but his walk rate last year wasn’t awful. Being homerun happy killed him though. At worst, he is a good LOOGY. His pitches themselves are very good though so he has potential.
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 8:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
MAN
You go to the bar for three fucking hours and the first trade goes down. Thanks to Matt for being Johnny on the spot with a front page post.
On first blush…. I LOVE this trade!
by gondeee on Dec 2, 2008 8:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
On The Fence.
I’ll wait to see what the exact package is before I state my feelings on the trade, but I will say that I like Vazquez and think that moving from the White Sox (AL hitter’s park) to the Braves (NL neutral/pitcher’s park) bodes well for a guy that’s at worst an innings-eater and at best a solid #2 (4.40 ERA, 1.25 WHIP, 8.56 K/9 and 3.58 K/BB in 627.2 IP over the last three seasons). He’d get much better than the 2/$25M he has coming his way if he were an FA this offseason and he fits the bill of bridging the gap to the next wave.
Here we go again: http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/
by ejruiz on Dec 2, 2008 8:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t fully understand the inclusion of Logan. I know he’s a throw-in, but another LOOGY was the throw-in? It seems like every trade we pull off we ask for a LOOGY. I still like the deal though. I think a deal centered around Flowers was appropriate for Vazquez’s caliber.
by beeniez on Dec 2, 2008 8:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ring, Ridgway, Ohman
More reason to teach your kids to pitch left handed!
Oh, and the Braves picked up O’Flaherty.
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 9:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And what’s-his-face in the Teixeira deal.
by beeniez on Dec 2, 2008 9:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes! Gah, that was driving me crazy. Ron Mahay.
by beeniez on Dec 2, 2008 9:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Haha I can’t believe I forgot him. That’s FIVE lefties in the last two seasons. Wow!
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 9:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What about Ledezma, who we traded for Ring… and McBride who we traded for Ledezma
by DMac142005 on Dec 2, 2008 10:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The 4 players are Flowers, Lillibridge, third baseman Jon Gilmore, and pitcher Santos Rodriguez.
on mlbtr.
by SayHeyWerd on Dec 2, 2008 9:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Gilmore? wow i cant believe that. Not lookin NEAR as good as it looked before wow just wow.
braves#1
by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 9:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But no Morton or Reyes, so it kind of evens back out – kinda.
by beeniez on Dec 2, 2008 9:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah i was hoping maybe Gorkys would be added and then Dye added to the Braves. that would have been EPIC!!!
by SayHeyWerd on Dec 2, 2008 9:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
how does that even out? flowers and gilmore are BETTER than reyes and morton
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 9:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Flowers is better, yes…..that I agree with. But not Gilmore…..he’s a Low A 3rd baseman who couldn’t handle Rome at the beginning of the season and got sent back down to Danville. Yes, he had a good season there, but he’s a long ways away from Atlanta; too much can happen between now and his arrival in the big leagues.
Like it or not, both Morton and Reyes have major league experience and still have some degree of upside, however small it may be.
As I said somewhere below, this kind of puts Flowers as the centerpiece of the trade, not just a throw-in. It makes more sense this way in my opinion, if the rumors end up true, and it makes it look more like Flowers for Vasquez, which seems fair.
by secondbass on Dec 2, 2008 9:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Morton’s stuff is electric. I really like him, but he’s such a headcase.
As for Gilmore: .390 BABIP
by VictorW on Dec 2, 2008 9:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he’s also 20. you mean to tell me wren chose campbell over him? what a maroon
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 9:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
HOLD THE FUCKING PHONE
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 9:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I want Ohman in the bullpen
But with the inclusion of Logan in the Vazquez trade, does that mean he will likely be let go? I certainly hope not, but it wouldn’t make much sense to keep Ohman too UNLESS Logan either has minor league options left OR if Bobby wants TWO left handed relievers in his bullpen next year (not included Gonzo as he is the closer, I think).
by ChipperTeixeira89 on Dec 2, 2008 9:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think we need a lefty that can go a whole inning that’s not the closer and a LOOGY. Whether that’s Gonzo with someone else as the closer or Ohman with Gonzo as the closer. I think our bullpen is getting a little overcrowded right now.
by beeniez on Dec 2, 2008 9:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think the following four are locks to be in the ’09 bullpen (barring injury/trades):
Acosta
Logan
Soriano
Gonzo
Then we have the following that could be in the bullpen (if healthy returning from injury or resigned):
Ohman
Moylan
Medlen
Smoltz
Am I missing anyone of SIGNIFICANCE?
by ChipperTeixeira89 on Dec 2, 2008 9:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no you arent, but why is Boone a lock, chek out his ERA for the past couple 365 day periods
by SayHeyWerd on Dec 2, 2008 9:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
True. but hear me out first
Logan started off really well last year (first two months of the season I think had a sub 2 era), but then struggled mightily afterwards. Not only that, but he is the best left handed reliever the Braves have now that is signed and not named Gonzo. Ohman would definitely be a better option, but it’s not even a safe bet that he will even resign (just look at how quick Hampton left). Now I’m not saying I would prefer Logan over Ohman, but I do think Logan could do a very solid job getting the guys he is expected to get out (left handed batter, particularly Howard, Utley and Delgado).
by ChipperTeixeira89 on Dec 2, 2008 9:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeye i agree Boone is a nice aquisition, he can be really good for us.
by SayHeyWerd on Dec 2, 2008 9:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you’re drunk.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 11:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think I like this...
We’ll have to see how this all pans out, but Vasquez is a really solid pitcher with a good contract. He should be able to help stabilize the rotation immediately. Overall, he’s a much safer bet to have a pair of 200 inning, 4.00 or better ERA seasons than Burnett or Sheets. A solid defense, neutral park, and easier league should make this guy look a lot better than he did in Chicago.
If Flowers is in the deal, I’ll be a little disappointed, but I would still call it a good move on our part. Flowers was old for his level and there are questions about his ability to stick as a catcher. 22 year old first basemen that mash in high-A aren’t exactly rare, and I have a feeling that first base is Tyler’s future home. I wish him the best of luck going forward if he is indeed a part of this trade.
I’m very low on Lillibridge at this point – as he’s moved through the minors, his numbers have gotten progressively worse. Not a promising sign. The upside here as of now is probably a slick fielding utility man.
Jon Gilmore isn’t a guy I know a ton about. Had a good campaign in Danville this year, but I would consider him a very low risk throw-in on our part. He’s probably only looking at about a 10% chance to make it as a big leaguer.
Santos Rodriguez seems similar to Gilmore, but he was 20 and pitching in the Appalachian League – he’s got a lot of ground to make up if he ever wants to see a major league job.
by BraveBronco0121 on Dec 2, 2008 9:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
If that report is true
I think you pretty much summed it up. I like Flowers, but Gilmore and Rodriguez are at best fringe prospects. We thought Thorman would be a monster too. Still, I wanted to see what he could do. It makes more sense in the AL, where he can sub at C, 1B and DH and get significant at bats. He would get few with us, and Freddie Freeman appears to be a better prospect.
by Mekons5 on Dec 2, 2008 9:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, now, see....this changes things
It kind of makes Flowers the centerpiece of the trade. I guess you could argue that Lillibridge is, but I see it as being Flowers. So when you add in two minor leaguers not above Low A, add Lillibridge, and we get back Vasquez and Logan…..I could warm up to this a little easier. Still hate to lose Flowers, but this scenario I could handle.
by secondbass on Dec 2, 2008 9:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
same.
im glad that nobody real important was added, although I did like Gilmore.
by SayHeyWerd on Dec 2, 2008 9:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah....
I liked Gilmore as well, but oh well……
by secondbass on Dec 2, 2008 9:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Vazquez is more a #3 pitcher
So unless he pitches better than in previous seasons, Jurrjens will likely be the #2 starter which means the Braves still need to add that ace pitcher everyone wants (Burnett or Peavy are my preference).
by ChipperTeixeira89 on Dec 2, 2008 9:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Burnett or Peavy are more likely to end up in Atlanta
No one like the thought that they have to pitch four times a week.
by Mekons5 on Dec 2, 2008 9:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
this has officially gone to shit. fuck you frank wren
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 9:35 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
relax, we’re losing Flowers and thats pretty much it.
by SayHeyWerd on Dec 2, 2008 9:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly, it’s basically a Flowers for Vazquez trade.
by beeniez on Dec 2, 2008 9:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah and they get the upside of Lillibridge, Gilmore and Rodriguez, and we get the upside of Boone. Whatever.
by SayHeyWerd on Dec 2, 2008 9:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i wonder if you’ll be saying that when vazquez is allowing back to back jacks to utley and howard this august.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 2, 2008 11:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
C'mon man
You are way too pessimistic sometimes. We don’t even know the final outcome of this deal, let alone if Wren made some huge fuck-up (that will take a couple years). Based on what we currently know (Vasquez has great peripherals and health, Lillibridge and Reyes look like 4A players, Flowers can rake but has no future position on this team and is at peak trade value, Gilmore is intriguing and little else, etc.) this deal looks solid.
And I totally dig your commentary for the most part. You remind me of a slightly more jaded Braves fan than myself.
And I like Vasquez obviously (for stat reasons already mentioned), but what else should we do at this point considering our options? The FA options fucking suck… and trades involve giving up propspects… Vasquez seems like a solid gamble.
by get swoll yunel on Dec 3, 2008 12:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
best case scenario? healthy braves mike hampton with more strikeouts and 30 more innings.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well no shit!
I would’ve loved Hampton myself at 2 mil plus incentives… that was a no-brainer…
But what really happened with thatreally? Did he just decline an offer we made to “be closer to his family” or did we just not make an offer?
But yeah, I agree, Hampton on an inconsequential contract would’ve been a smart move.
Fuck brining Glavine back.
by get swoll yunel on Dec 3, 2008 12:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
oh no, i’m talking about vazquez. thats what we’re most likely going to get out of him. league average garbage. wren was most likely counting on hampton coming back, and when he didn’t, he freaked the fuck out and overpaid for vazquez. i wonder if we don’t sign dunn, if he’ll trade 3 more prospects to williams for dye.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I think Vasquez will be better than league average, but who fucking knows at this point?… the dude has proven many many times that he can underperform his peripherals…. the advantage Vasquez clearly has is his incredible durability.
But the prospective talent we’re (possibly) going to give up doesn’t really bother me at all… Flowers is kind of a bummer, but I just don’t see the guy fittiing on a our roster any time sooner… maybe he becomes a money DH? Obviously you’re way higher on Gilmore than I am, but the Braves very obviously want to be ‘competitive" next season and they were making a move one way or another… this one doesn’t seem to mortgage the future while also picking up a solid piece in my view.
I am also completely onboard the Dunn bandwagon and have been for awhile… I do not understand our FO’s complete lack of interest in that guy.
by get swoll yunel on Dec 3, 2008 12:32 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
considering this is the man that signed albert belle TEN YEARS AGO TO THE DAY (2 days ago)…he’s probably horrified at the prospect of signing someone that knows how to hit a home run.
but mark my words. if we march into spring with an OF of blanco-anderson-francoeur, i don’t care who’s in our rotation…we’re winning 74 games. TOPS.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The horror the horror....
God forbid that is our outfield for ’09…
I’m not usually a big RA RA free agent guy because that isn’t typically the best way to build a ballclub (unless you’re the ‘97 Marlins), but if there is a year to spend for the Braves, it is this one. We’ve got the money, we’ve got the holes, and we’ve got the protected draft pick, so now all that remains is the decision making.
Dunn is such an infinitely better option than Dye to me that’s ridiculous. The guy offers better production, age, injury history, and value (when you consider the prospects given up for Dye) that it isn’t even close. Fuck that he hits LH. Are we still so bummed ou by the McGriff/Klesko back to back that we can’t have two lefties bat in the 4-5 again?
by get swoll yunel on Dec 3, 2008 12:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
last i checked, mcgriff & klesko won us a ring.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly you remember the failures of ’96 & ’97 playoffs (particularly Graeme Lloyd OWNING our middle of the order in the ’96 Series) and the eventual decision to trade McGriff and aqcuire the Big Cat to provide some RH balance to our line-up.
I didn’t say it was the right decision to make, but they definitely felt it was necessary (and apparently still do to some extent).
by get swoll yunel on Dec 3, 2008 12:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i don’t blame either of those series on the offense. 96 was just horrible management with the pitching (you should not blow a 2-0 lead going home with the starters we had. period), and 97 was the infamous eric gregg game. i remember an 11 year old small joe sitting in my aunt’s basement in new york screaming and crying at the TV as pitches a foot off the plate were called strikes by that fat dead fuck eric gregg.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jesus man
apparently me and you are not only the same age, but we also had similar traumatic experiences when we were children.
Game 4 of the ‘96 series I still believe we were robbed on. Jermaine Dye should’ve caught that foul ball and that 3 run inning should’ve never happened. If we go 3-1 into game 5, Smoltzie would’ve sealed the deal….
And fucking Eric Gregg and his strike zone… I remember when that dude died, I felt completely vindicated for some reaosn… which is evil to some extent I guess, but I’ll never forget that game.
At least we couldn’t really remember the ’91 series… Fuck you Lonnie Smith anyways!
by get swoll yunel on Dec 3, 2008 1:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i live 90 minutes from philly and would go to the vet all the time, where gregg bartended…even as a teenager, i refused to go into the bar out of principle because i was afraid i’d go ballistic on him.
i generally take sports too seriously, but yeah. thankfully my football teams are doing much better than THIS franchise. naturally, i didn’t drive 700 miles to see either of them this year.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 1:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fucking Northwestern has the same record as UGA!
I am pissed haha.
And we seem to be in similar situations rooting for the Falcons and Ravens… way overachieving teams (mine more than yours) with great rookie QBs.
If you ever come down here for a game, dude, you should let us know on here, cause I’d be down to meet up with some folks…. I need to take advantage of that all you can eat all you can drink package at some point.
by get swoll yunel on Dec 3, 2008 1:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
…and 97 was the infamous eric gregg game. i remember an 11 year old small joe sitting in my aunt’s basement in new york screaming and crying at the TV as pitches a foot off the plate were called strikes by that fat dead fuck eric gregg.
aside from eric gregg being dead, and you being 11, how different is all this from the current big joe?
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.
by royhobbs on Dec 3, 2008 8:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Eric Gregg is dead? Man, my day just got better.
by cbwilk on Dec 3, 2008 8:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i’m an alcoholic now. and when the game is going bad now, i turn it off and do something better with my time than hope and pray for a comeback that i know isnt going to come.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 3:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Belle contract wasn't even that bad either
I mean the dude absolutely mashed from 91-99 (might’ve juiced) and probably would’ve been worth what he was making if not for degenerative osteoarthritis.
If we’re not going to blame JS for the Hampton trade, then you can’t really fault Wren for the Belle contract.
by get swoll yunel on Dec 3, 2008 12:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i more fault baltimore’s doctors for somehow failing to notice the DEGENERATIVE HIP CONDITION.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The score will be 8-2 and Vasquez will log the win.
by someguy917 on Dec 3, 2008 1:30 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe after we unload his contract onto the phillies for a bag of balls
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 3:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not as good as it was when it was Flowers and Lilli. It sucks that Gilmore is in it but still not a bad deal. We keep Morton and Reyes and could still ship one off if we had to to get another player. The deal is fine.
braves#1
by rockybull on Dec 2, 2008 9:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Umm....not quite....
While we do vazquez and boone, I would much rather pay this price to get javier and dye.
Flowers, even without staying at catcher, is still a rather good offensive prospect, one whom I would much rather give up for a greinke or peavy. While lillibridge is basically a giveaway since we really have no need for him, I am kinda leery of giving up gilmore and rodriguez, as they both seemed to show flashes of star potential. While I am not mad hat we are getting vazquez, my biggest point is that i think we could have got a pitcher who will provide similar production at a cheaper price if we were not dealing with Kenny Williams. I think that this deal is definately worth expanding to Dye if the potential is there to get him.
by bravesbeast1985 on Dec 2, 2008 9:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think the issue is that Flowers is not sufficient to do the Peavy deal
Let’s face it, Flowers is the main man in this deal. The other guys we’re giving up are either struggling with high level competition – Lillibridge – or playing in Rookie-League ball – Gilmore and Rodriguez. That package would not get us Peavy unless Towers loses his mind and decides to get 10 cents on the dollar for his best trading chit.
I like Flowers, but as I’ve said above, he’s old for his level and is unlikely to catch at the ML level. 22 year old mashers aren’t exactly rare in High-A, and very few of them end up as major league starters.
The question is this – would you rather give up Flowers and spare change for Vasquez, or Flowers + KJ/Yunel and spare change for Peavy? I’d much rather make the deal that Wren made.
by BraveBronco0121 on Dec 3, 2008 8:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
still holding out for a sirotka-caliber injury that we catch that renders the deal null and void.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 12:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
This is decent.
Not great, not bad. As long as he is 2 or 3 in the rotation and we pick up some one else, we aren’t loosing anything. This deal means we don’t need to go after Ohman hard, which puts more money towards Dunn, Burnett, or Smoltz. We also didn’t sacrifice anything that major (one awesome prospect and a couple of dime a dozen guys). We traded 4 guys who have proved nothing for a guy we desperately need and some major caliber talent. Also, it is important to note that no one rumored to be in the Jake Peavy trade was moved.
by someguy917 on Dec 3, 2008 1:38 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
logan is nowhere near as good as ohman. like, NOWHERE NEAR AS GOOD.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
by bigjoe on Dec 3, 2008 3:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















