Tex? good or bad
i'm an Angels fan. we traded for your guy Tex and i was wondering if you guys as Braves fans liked him? do you guys think he was worth the trade that you guys made to get him? if i was the GM for the Angels i wouldn't go further then 7/140 on him. i think the NYY, Redsox, and Orioles are going to go higher. i don't think he's worth the money. my simple logic is that he didn't help you guys get better when he came to the Braves, and he didn't help the Angels get any better when he came to us. i think he's all about stats and thats it. what do u guys think?
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
I'm With You.
He’ll get bashed by some, but they have nothing to back their claims up.
Here we go again: http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/
We traded alot to get him, and it didn’t work out for us in the long run, but that was in no way Tex’s fault. He’s a Gold Glove 1B, switch-hitter, hits for average and power. The only other free agent out there that I might consider over him is Sabbathia. Tex is worth whatever he ends up getting paid. Whichever of the big market teams end up not getting him, will regret it. If I had been the Mets I would have declined Delgado’s option and tried to get him.
Tex’s only problem is that he’s always weak at the plate in April and May. He’s absolutely money from August on though, which is exactly what you want in a player. Ask the Yankees fans how much they wish A-Rod could hit in the clutch instead of just throwing up sick numbers in April, then disappearing from September on.
No he is not!
I like Tex and he was very good for us but he is NOT worth $25M a year no way. The guy did not wake up with his bat until Mid May. His glove is as good as anybodies at first and better than most. Gold Glove First baseman and a GREAT Second half player. Personally i dont think he is worth $20M a year. He is a very good player but to me a $20M a year players shows up with the BAT for the WHOLE season not 4 and a half months out of 6 months. You wanna get paid $20M a year you better bring that bat for the whole season.
braves#1
I’d rather spend the money on CC, although you do need offense. I just don’t think Tex can be THE primary offensive threat on a team, especially if you lose Guerrero. Don’t you have an up and coming 1B?
Tex is the perfect addition to the Angels. Not only is he an absolute stud, but he brings OBP and power to a lineup that is bereft of both. Resigning him should be priority number one for the Angels.
Right.
For the Angels its such a perfect fit that I would pull out all the stops to get this guy. CC would be nice, but giving a pitcher 6-7 years is very risky…and Tex has been very durable throughout his entire career.
by soup du jour on Nov 9, 2008 12:00 AM EST up reply actions
offense
i feel if the young players we have don’t live up to hype then we can make a trade at the deadline like we did with the Braves. there’s always going to be some good bats up for sale to help out. pitchers are harder to trade for because their value is soo high regardless at the deadline or offseason.
Angels
yeah we have alot of corner IF talent waiting there chance. i would rather keep Tex only if its 20M or less a season. Kendry Morales is next in line if we don’t sign Tex or get anyone else to replace Tex. i would rather sign CC also because you can never have enough good arms. especially dominant #1.
Angels2
right now going into ’09 were in the weakest Div in the AL, mabye all MLB. so if Tex is offered 25/yr. then i say walk away and take a risk with younger guys. were good enough to survive the 1st half of the season without Tex. make some evaluations in June/July.
Here’s DOB’s article knocking Tex for not being clutch that got panned by firejoemorgan.
http://www.firejoemorgan.com/2008/07/new-criterion-for-being-good-at.html
mark teixeira has a career OPS of 918. mike schmidt’s is 907.
Following the Braves...one long hard drink at a time.
different eras
Tex’s career OPS+ is 134. Schmidt’s is 147. And Schmidt was a gold glove 3B, not a 1B. There is no comparison between the two.
Teixeria is awesome
Great bat, greater glove, hits for power, hits for average. And is most certainly worth a great deal of money. Problem is, despite how much money the Angels have to spend, you’re right, others will be likely willing to spend more.
Personally, I loved what he did for the Braves in 1 1/2 seasons, but I’m not quite so sure if I liked the guy himself. Statistically, it has no impact on the game, but I just think the guy didn’t have any heart. He played with no emotion, didn’t look like he was ever having any fun, and was more or less kind of like a machine. Took his cuts, played his defense, ate his gatorade bars in exactly the same half-innings, lather, rinse, repeat. It doesn’t make him any worse of a player, but as fans, makes him harder to be liked for who he is and not just his statistical output.
Also, collectively, everyone seems to have the impression that he’ll play for anyone, as long as their the winning bidder, regardless of if there’s glory to be had there or not. There’s something to be said about that when so many fans and sports analysts seem to get the same impression without him ever really saying it.
No wonder nobody likes you, Tuttle... everything's a (Pujols) damn debate.

by 



















