Fun little ditty we can all do
well, then again... I don't know how much FUN it'll be but I have an interesting thing we can do.
The Braves will finish around 4 or 5 games out of first place in the NL EAST. What I propose is that however many games out the Braves are at the end of the season we pick the games that REALLY stick out that we should've won. So 5 games out means we come up with 5 specific games that us Braves fans knew would come back to haunt us.
For example, I would certainly include that one game against the Marlins where Hudson had a shutout into the 9th and things took a turn for the worse. Another one would be the same exact situation.. except when it happened in Minnesota. So start mentioning "memorable" games from this season to see which ones make the cut so we can wallow in self-pity.
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
refuse the pity, but i'll list some games
- vs. florida in april, can't pin it all on wickman when bobby could've pulled huddy at the first sign of trouble
- vs. arizona in arizona, when escobar made the "nobody's watching" steal and tied the game to go into extra innings, before chad paronto blew it
- vs. colorado where tulowitzki converted the unassited triple play, yet the braves managed to stick around for extra innings before holliday walked off on them
- vs. cincinnati that went like 14 innings - normally i'm not this mean but come on - it was cincinnati.
by royhobbs on Sep 28, 2007 7:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yes
by RehabReject on Sep 28, 2007 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fun But Maddening Post
Also, I posted about it at the time and Salty did the same exact thing with one out and a man on third in a game in Atlanta. This has happened a few times.
Also, this may be blasphemy - and it was a long shot anyway - but I'm a little tired of hearing about how much of a big game pitcher Smoltz is. Maybe he was at some time, but not lately... The reason I say this is because there have been many times when we've said, "Let's get through (fill in the blank of a crappy starter we have deep in the rotation) and then we have Hudson and Smoltz" and then one or both lose. I know it's baseball and that it's hard to win at will, and technically Smoltz had a decent year, but I don't remember many times when we desperately needed one and he brought it home.
On a positive, it was fun to play hard these past couple weeks. It looks like we got our sea-legs a bit too late but I admit that the teams in front of us are a little better. i think next year is going to be great. I really do.
by finchy on Sep 28, 2007 4:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
not blasphemy, just wrong...
You give me a game that has to be won, and my list of choices for starting pitchers includes a healthy John Smoltz, then he's in there. I would bet a number of major league managers would agree.
by sddbaker on Sep 28, 2007 5:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
check that
by sddbaker on Sep 28, 2007 5:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe You're Right
by finchy on Sep 29, 2007 12:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yikes
Pretty great.
by finchy on Sep 29, 2007 12:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
in a must-win situation...
i understand, i really do, i felt the same way on thursday, watching smoltz completely melt down in the 1st inning, sending irate text messages to my friends that "he should've let chipper field it" or "just give up the single," but let's face the facts here - smoltz was definitely on that night, indicative by the way he dominated guys after the 4-0 defecit, except for one hanging slider to burrell. he just happened to be cranked to 11 to start the game, before settling down - most good pitchers require some time to settle down before being awesome.
smoltz's 15 postseason wins are reasoning for his "big-game pitcher" status, because we've all seen the best of the best lose in the playoffs. i think greg maddux and roger clemens (albeit a prick) are two of the greatest pitchers out there - but we've all seen them lose in the playoffs, several times, no less.
look at smoltzie's 15th post season win, against the astros in 2005. i don't know how many of you remember, the luxury the braves had by clinching early to the point where the weary smoltz could actually rest prior to the post season, and was even still questionable, but when the braves dropped the opener to the astros, smoltz did what he had to do. he outdueled roger clemens, and held the astros in check as they won, something like 7-2. afterwards, there were lots of reports how he could hardly move the right side of his body, he was in so much pain. even if they made it out of houston, the likelihood of smoltz going again was slim, but there wasn't a person that didn't believe that a 40% smoltz still wouldn't attempt to take that mound in a game 5.
smoltz is still the man for the big game, it's just unfortunate his teammates can't rise to that level when he's on it. he can lay down challenges, or ultimatums for his teammates, but until they can rise with him, one man can't defeat a team on fire that just wanted it more.
by royhobbs on Sep 29, 2007 11:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
losses
By the way, here's a little fun thing that will make all of our heads swim.
TEAM PYTHAG W/L ACTUAL W/L
PHILLIES: 88-74 89-73
METS: 87-75 87-75
BRAVES: 89-73 84-78
18-25 in one run games, a miserable 4-11 in interleague games. Thats what happens when the WORST team you play interleague is the Twins.
by bigjoe on Oct 1, 2007 11:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
re: Losses
Then again, the Braves were doomed when JS didn't get another arm. Granted, the market was thin and the price was probably too high, but it's something that should have been addressed way before the deadline. I don't have the exact numbers in front of me, but the 5th spot in the rotation was deplorable. If I remember correctly, the worst in MLB!! Redman, Carlyle, Cormier, whoever. They were all crap.
by NorCalAtlFan on Oct 2, 2007 8:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 












