Forget closer
Bobby has got to get out of this set-up / closer mode. Why would you pull Hudson after seven when he has only thrown 84 pitches and is getting groundouts? You can chalk this one up to Bobby and I'm afraid he is not going to change.
Wickman hasn't been the same since the trip to the DL. Why doesn't Bobby use him as a set-up if he is going to stay with this method? What a shame for Bobby to screw up a great performance by Hudson. Would Bobby have let Smoltz pitch a complete game in that situation? Now a days; I say no. And inmy opinion this is stupid.
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
i feel ya, but..
and this is just a judgment call i guess, but i have to disagree with your statement that wickman hasn't been the same since his DL trip. since coming off the DL he has actually looked like the same old wick (albeit we haven't seen him as much): an unorthodox starter who throws strikes and makes people put the ball in play -- as opposed to the typical hard-throwing strikeout guy -- which will sometimes lead to bad results in a close game; and unfortunately tonight was a game that we really needed.
having said all of that, i do think the braves have to wonder whether or not soriano would be a better fit as a closer -- but i don't think that's a new question, i think it's probably been on everyone's minds much of the year.
by brndn on Jun 14, 2007 11:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
heartbreaker
and BTW, Soriano is definitely of closer calibre, but BC would never risk hurting Wick's confidence by replacing Wick with Soriano. its way more important to BC to know that his players know that he has confidence in them than to put the right guy in at the right time. (can you sense the sarcasm?)
by wuky on Jun 14, 2007 11:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wickman.
10 IP, 7 H, 1 ER, 1 BB, 5 K, 5 SVs
Not sure what Wickman you are talking about, but the one who's been pitching in the closer role for the Braves has gone back to his 9th inning dominance.
by Smoltzs Beard on Jun 15, 2007 1:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Numbers
Brndn thanks, I didn't see the agreement with Hudson and maybe didn't have anymore. I guess that's the real difference in the way pitchers are today versus in the 70's. 84 pitches was considered low for a starting pitcher, but then again the ball speed has increased on an average.
Thanks again.
by bravos on Jun 15, 2007 7:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bobby Cox, lost us a game we could'nt afford.
by los angeles braves fan on Jun 15, 2007 11:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Brutal Loss Everyone
As for Wickman... Hell, remember what it was like last year without him? Absolutely nauseating. You get a closer sometime you win and a few times shit like last night happens. Happens to Rivera, everyone. One concern though... I know 'Smoltzs Beard' posted Wick's numbers. Very good. But I feel like 1) He doesn't look confident 2) He's throwing more balls and getting behind more 3) He's aiming his pitches, trying to place them. Anybody else see that or am I wrong? Also, Wickman is a put-it-in-play guy. That's fine, but if you're that kind of pitcher and you're getting behind in counts, you're screwed.
by finchy on Jun 15, 2007 3:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Interesting.
As far as his tendancy to aim, I think most guys that pitch to contact do the same thing as far as nibbling the corners, etc. I have, however, noticed him falling behind hitters...which as you said can become disasterous.
by Smoltzs Beard on Jun 15, 2007 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hear you
by finchy on Jun 15, 2007 6:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 












